Astronomical Unit to Nanometer Converter

Convert astronomical units to nanometers with our free online length converter.

Quick Answer

1 Astronomical Unit = 1.496000e+20 nanometers

Formula: Astronomical Unit × conversion factor = Nanometer

Use the calculator below for instant, accurate conversions.

Our Accuracy Guarantee

All conversion formulas on UnitsConverter.io have been verified against NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) guidelines and international SI standards. Our calculations are accurate to 10 decimal places for standard conversions and use arbitrary precision arithmetic for astronomical units.

Last verified: December 2025Reviewed by: Sam Mathew, Software Engineer

Astronomical Unit to Nanometer Calculator

How to Use the Astronomical Unit to Nanometer Calculator:

  1. Enter the value you want to convert in the 'From' field (Astronomical Unit).
  2. The converted value in Nanometer will appear automatically in the 'To' field.
  3. Use the dropdown menus to select different units within the Length category.
  4. Click the swap button (⇌) to reverse the conversion direction.
Share:

How to Convert Astronomical Unit to Nanometer: Step-by-Step Guide

Converting Astronomical Unit to Nanometer involves multiplying the value by a specific conversion factor, as shown in the formula below.

Formula:

1 Astronomical Unit = 1.4960e+20 nanometers

Example Calculation:

Convert 10 astronomical units: 10 × 1.4960e+20 = 1.4960e+21 nanometers

Disclaimer: For Reference Only

These conversion results are provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees regarding the precision of these results, especially for conversions involving extremely large or small numbers which may be subject to the inherent limitations of standard computer floating-point arithmetic.

Not for professional use. Results should be verified before use in any critical application. View our Terms of Service for more information.

What is a Astronomical Unit and a Nanometer?

1 astronomical unit (AU) = 149,597,870,700 meters (EXACT)

The astronomical unit is a unit of length in astronomy and planetary science, representing the mean distance from Earth to the Sun. Since 2012, the AU has been a defined constant—exactly 149,597,870,700 m—rather than a measured quantity.

Why Not Just Use Kilometers?

Scale problem: Solar System distances in kilometers become unwieldy:

  • Earth to Sun: 149,597,871 km (hard to grasp)
  • Jupiter to Sun: 778,500,000 km (increasingly meaningless)
  • Neptune to Sun: 4,500,000,000 km (just a big number)

AU makes it intuitive:

  • Earth: 1.00 AU (baseline)
  • Jupiter: 5.20 AU (5× farther than Earth)
  • Neptune: 30.1 AU (30× Earth's distance)

The human brain handles ratios better than absolute numbers. "Neptune is 30 times farther from the Sun than Earth" is far more comprehensible than "Neptune is 4.5 billion kilometers from the Sun."

Light Travel Time

The AU has a natural time component:

1 AU = 8 minutes 19 seconds at the speed of light

  • Light from the Sun takes 8m 19s to reach Earth
  • If the Sun suddenly vanished, we wouldn't know for 8+ minutes
  • Solar flares and coronal mass ejections take this long to arrive
  • Real-time communication with spacecraft: Earth-Mars = 4-24 minutes one-way delay (depending on orbital positions)

AU vs. Light-Year vs. Parsec

Three different distance scales for different contexts:

| Unit | Meters | Use Case | |----------|-----------|--------------| | Astronomical Unit (AU) | 1.496 × 10¹¹ m | Solar System (planets, asteroids, comets) | | Light-year (ly) | 9.461 × 10¹⁵ m (63,241 AU) | Interstellar distances (nearest stars) | | Parsec (pc) | 3.086 × 10¹⁶ m (206,265 AU) | Galactic/extragalactic distances (parallax-based) |

Why each exists:

  • AU: Human-scale for our cosmic neighborhood
  • Light-year: Intuitive (distance light travels in a year)
  • Parsec: Technical (distance at which 1 AU subtends 1 arcsecond)

A nanometer (symbol: nm) is a unit of length in the International System of Units (SI) equal to one billionth (10⁻⁹) of a meter:

1 nm = 0.000000001 m = 1 × 10⁻⁹ m

Why Is the Nanometer Scale Special?

The nanometer occupies a unique position between the atomic world and the microscopic world visible under optical microscopes:

1. Atomic to Molecular Scale:

  • Individual atoms: 0.1-0.3 nm diameter (hydrogen to larger elements)
  • Small molecules: 0.3-2 nm (water, glucose, amino acids)
  • Large biomolecules: 2-100 nm (proteins, DNA, ribosomes)

2. Quantum Effects Dominate:

  • At nanometer scales, quantum mechanical effects become significant
  • Electrons exhibit wave-particle duality
  • Quantum tunneling allows particles to pass through barriers
  • Energy levels become quantized (discrete rather than continuous)
  • Materials exhibit size-dependent properties (quantum dots change color with size)

3. Surface Area to Volume Ratio:

  • Nanoparticles have enormous surface area relative to volume
  • This makes them extremely reactive and useful for catalysis
  • Example: Gold is chemically inert in bulk but highly reactive as 5nm nanoparticles

4. Optical Properties Change:

  • Materials interact differently with light at nanometer scales
  • Nanostructures can manipulate light in ways impossible with bulk materials
  • Metamaterials with negative refractive index
  • Plasmonic effects in metal nanoparticles

The Nanometer in Context

Too Small to See with Optical Microscopes:

  • Optical microscopes use visible light (wavelengths 400-700nm)
  • Diffraction limit: Cannot resolve features smaller than ~200nm (half the wavelength)
  • Viewing nanometer-scale structures requires:
    • Electron microscopes (transmission or scanning, resolution to 0.1nm)
    • Scanning probe microscopes (STM, AFM, can "feel" individual atoms)
    • X-ray crystallography (infers structure from diffraction patterns)

Larger Than Individual Atoms:

  • Atoms: 0.1-0.3nm diameter
  • Nanometer scale: 1-100nm (roughly 3-300 atoms wide)
  • This is the realm of molecules, nanoparticles, viruses, and proteins

Note: The Astronomical Unit is part of the imperial/US customary system, primarily used in the US, UK, and Canada for everyday measurements. The Nanometer belongs to the metric (SI) system.

History of the Astronomical Unit and Nanometer

Ancient Underestimates (300 BCE - 1500 CE)

Aristarchus of Samos (3rd century BCE): The first known attempt to measure the Earth-Sun distance. Using lunar phases and geometry, Aristarchus estimated the Sun was 18-20 times farther than the Moon. His method was sound, but observational limitations led to severe underestimation.

Actual ratio: Sun is ~400× farther than the Moon, not 20×.

Ptolemy's geocentric model (2nd century CE): Ptolemy's Almagest placed the Sun relatively close—around 1,200 Earth radii (~7.6 million km), about 5% of the true distance. This underestimation persisted for 1,400 years during the geocentric era.

Copernican Revolution (1543-1600s)

Nicolaus Copernicus (1543): De revolutionibus orbium coelestium established the heliocentric model. While Copernicus correctly ordered the planets, his distance estimates were still too small—placing the Sun about 20 million km away (13% of the actual distance).

Johannes Kepler (1609-1619): Kepler's laws of planetary motion (published in Astronomia Nova and Harmonices Mundi) enabled calculation of relative planetary distances. If Earth's orbit is 1 AU, then:

  • Venus: 0.72 AU
  • Mars: 1.52 AU
  • Jupiter: 5.20 AU

Problem: Kepler knew the proportions, but not the absolute scale. What was the AU in meters or kilometers?

The Transit of Venus Method (1761-1769)

Edmond Halley's proposal (1716): Halley realized that observing Venus crossing the Sun's face (a "transit") from different Earth locations would create a parallax effect, enabling triangulation of the Earth-Sun distance.

1761 Transit of Venus: International expeditions to Siberia, South Africa, India, and the South Pacific. Observations were complicated by:

  • The "black drop effect" (Venus appearing to stick to the Sun's edge)
  • Cloudy weather disrupting measurements
  • Imprecise timekeeping

1769 Transit of Venus: More extensive global coordination:

  • Captain James Cook: Observed from Tahiti (Point Venus)
  • Charles Mason & Jeremiah Dixon: Observed from the Cape of Good Hope
  • Russian expeditions: Observed from Siberia

Result: Combined data yielded an Earth-Sun distance of approximately 153 million km, within 2% of the modern value (150M km). This was the first accurate measurement of the AU.

Why transits work: Observers at different latitudes see Venus cross the Sun along slightly different paths. The timing difference creates a parallax angle:

tan(parallax) = (Earth baseline) / (Earth-Sun distance)

With a known Earth baseline (distance between observation sites) and measured parallax, the AU could be calculated.

19th Century Refinement (1800-1900)

1874 and 1882 Transits of Venus: Equipped with photography and telegraph time-synchronization, astronomers improved AU measurements to ~149.5 million km.

Asteroid parallax (1898-1900): The asteroid 433 Eros passes closer to Earth than Venus, providing better parallax measurements. During Eros's 1900-1901 opposition, global observatories measured its position, refining the AU to 149.53 million km (±0.03%).

Term standardization: The phrase "astronomical unit" became standard in the late 19th century, replacing earlier terms like "solar distance" or "Earth's mean distance."

20th Century Precision (1961-2012)

Radar ranging to Venus (1961): The Goldstone Observatory and Jodrell Bank transmitted radar signals to Venus and measured the round-trip time. Since radio waves travel at the speed of light (c), the distance calculation was straightforward:

Distance = (c × round-trip time) / 2

Result: The AU was refined to 149,597,870 km (±1 km precision).

Radar ranging to Mars (1965-1976): Mariner and Viking spacecraft provided radar measurements, cross-verifying the Venus-based AU.

Viking landers (1976): Precise radio tracking of the Viking landers on Mars enabled AU measurements to sub-kilometer precision.

Jet Propulsion Laboratory ephemerides: JPL's Development Ephemeris (DE) models incorporated radar, spacecraft tracking, and lunar laser ranging. By 2000, the AU was known to meter-level precision.

IAU 2012 Redefinition

The problem: The AU was previously defined as "the radius of an unperturbed circular Newtonian orbit about the Sun of a particle having infinitesimal mass, moving with a mean motion of 0.01720209895 radians per day (the Gaussian gravitational constant)."

This definition was:

  1. Circular (tied to a theoretical model, not measurable)
  2. Dependent on the solar mass (which itself was measured in AU-based units)
  3. Subject to revision as measurements improved

The solution (IAU Resolution B2, 2012): The International Astronomical Union redefined the AU as a fixed constant:

1 AU = 149,597,870,700 meters (EXACT)

Why this matters:

  • Consistency: The AU no longer changes with better measurements of solar mass
  • Spacecraft navigation: JPL's navigation software uses this exact constant
  • Parallels SI units: Like the meter (defined via the speed of light), the AU is now a defined standard, not a derived quantity

Fun fact: The chosen value (149,597,870,700 m) was the best measurement available in 2012, now frozen as the definition.

Cultural and Scientific Impact

The AU represents humanity's growing comprehension of cosmic scale:

  • Ancient world: Sun thought to be ~10 million km away
  • Kepler era: Relative distances known, absolute scale uncertain
  • 1769: First accurate measurement (153M km, 2% error)
  • 1961: Radar precision (±1 km)
  • 2012: Defined as exact constant (no error—it IS the standard)

This progression mirrors the scientific method: hypothesis → observation → refinement → standardization.

of the Nanometer and Nanotechnology

Early Foundations: Unknowingly Working at the Nanoscale (Pre-1900)

Ancient Nanomaterials (400 BCE - 1600 CE):

  • Roman Lycurgus Cup (4th century CE): Contains gold-silver nanoparticles (~70nm) that make glass appear red in transmitted light, green in reflected light
  • Medieval stained glass windows: Colloidal gold and other metal nanoparticles create vibrant colors
  • Ancient artisans unknowingly created nanomaterials through empirical recipes

Michael Faraday's Colloidal Gold (1857):

  • British scientist Michael Faraday systematically studied colloidal gold suspensions
  • Discovered that gold nanoparticles (5-100nm) exhibit ruby-red color, unlike bulk gold's yellow
  • First scientific recognition that material properties change at nanometer scale
  • Published "Experimental Relations of Gold (and Other Metals) to Light"
  • Laid foundation for nanoscience, though the term wouldn't exist for over a century

Theoretical Foundations (1900-1959)

Quantum Mechanics (1900-1930):

  • Max Planck (1900): Quantum theory—energy is quantized
  • Albert Einstein (1905): Photons (light quanta) and photoelectric effect
  • Niels Bohr (1913): Atomic model with discrete electron orbits
  • Erwin Schrödinger (1926): Wave equation describing electron behavior
  • These developments revealed that matter behaves fundamentally differently at atomic/molecular scales

Electron Microscopy (1931):

  • Ernst Ruska and Max Knoll invented the transmission electron microscope (TEM)
  • First images of structures below optical resolution (sub-100nm)
  • Enabled visualization of viruses, cell organelles, and eventually nanoparticles

The Birth of Nanotechnology Concept (1959-1980)

Richard Feynman's Vision (1959):

  • Famous lecture "There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom" at Caltech
  • Envisioned manipulating individual atoms to build materials and machines
  • Predicted writing entire Encyclopedia Britannica on head of a pin
  • Proposed molecular-scale machinery and atom-by-atom fabrication
  • Didn't use term "nanotechnology" but inspired the field

Norio Taniguchi Coins "Nanotechnology" (1974):

  • Japanese scientist Norio Taniguchi first used term "nanotechnology"
  • Referred to precision machining and material processing with tolerances below 1 micrometer
  • Initially described top-down manufacturing (machining, lithography)
  • Later expanded to bottom-up assembly (molecular self-assembly)

The Nanotechnology Revolution (1981-Present)

Scanning Tunneling Microscope - STM (1981):

  • Gerd Binnig and Heinrich Rohrer (IBM Zurich) invented STM
  • First instrument to "see" and manipulate individual atoms
  • Uses quantum tunneling effect to scan surfaces with atomic resolution
  • Won Nobel Prize in Physics (1986)
  • 1989: IBM scientists arranged 35 xenon atoms to spell "IBM" (first atomic-scale manipulation)

Atomic Force Microscope - AFM (1986):

  • Gerd Binnig, Calvin Quate, and Christoph Gerber invented AFM
  • Can image and manipulate atoms on insulators (not just conductors like STM)
  • "Feels" surface topography with nanometer-scale probe
  • Revolutionized nanoscale characterization across materials science, biology, chemistry

Fullerenes and Carbon Nanotubes (1985-1991):

  • Harold Kroto, Robert Curl, Richard Smalley discovered buckminsterfullerene (C₆₀, 1985)
    • Soccer-ball-shaped carbon molecule, ~0.7nm diameter
    • Nobel Prize in Chemistry (1996)
  • Sumio Iijima discovered carbon nanotubes (1991)
    • Cylindrical carbon structures, 1-100nm diameter, micrometers long
    • Exceptional strength, electrical conductivity, thermal properties
    • Sparked explosion of nanomaterials research

Semiconductor Nanometer Process Nodes (1990s-Present):

Moore's Law and the Nanometer Era:

  • Gordon Moore (1965): Predicted transistor count per chip would double every ~2 years
  • Drove relentless miniaturization of semiconductor features

Process Node Timeline:

  • 130 nm (2001): Intel Pentium 4, first widespread "nanometer node"
  • 90 nm (2004): AMD Athlon 64, Intel Pentium 4 Prescott
  • 65 nm (2006): Intel Core 2 Duo, beginning of multi-core era
  • 45 nm (2007): Intel Core 2 Duo (Penryn), high-k metal gates introduced
  • 32 nm (2010): Intel Core i3/i5/i7 (Westmere)
  • 22 nm (2012): Intel Ivy Bridge, first 3D FinFET transistors (non-planar)
  • 14 nm (2014): Intel Broadwell, Apple A8
  • 10 nm (2017): Intel Cannon Lake (limited), Samsung/TSMC volume production
  • 7 nm (2019): AMD Ryzen 3000, Apple A12, extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography
  • 5 nm (2020): Apple M1, AMD Ryzen 5000 (TSMC), advanced EUV
  • 3 nm (2022): Apple M2 Pro/Max (late 2022), Apple A17 (2023)
  • 2 nm (Development): Expected mid-2020s, pushing physical limits

Note: Modern "process nodes" (7nm, 5nm, 3nm) are marketing terms more than actual physical dimensions. A "5nm" chip doesn't necessarily have 5nm transistors; the smallest features may be 20-30nm. The naming reflects relative density improvements.

Contemporary Nanotechnology (2000-Present)

Nanomedicine:

  • Nanoparticle drug delivery: Liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles target tumors
  • mRNA vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna COVID-19 vaccines): Use lipid nanoparticles (~100nm) to deliver mRNA
  • Gold nanoparticles for cancer therapy, diagnostics
  • Quantum dots for biological imaging

Nanomaterials:

  • Graphene (2004 isolation by Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov): Single-atom-thick carbon sheet, extraordinary properties
  • Quantum dots: Semiconductor nanocrystals (2-10nm) that emit specific colors based on size
  • Aerogels: Ultra-low-density nanoporous materials

Consumer Applications:

  • Sunscreen: Titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles (transparent, UV-blocking)
  • Anti-reflective coatings: Nanoporous silica on eyeglasses, displays
  • Stain-resistant fabrics: Nanoparticle coatings
  • Catalytic converters: Platinum nanoparticles

Common Uses and Applications: astronomical units vs nanometers

Explore the typical applications for both Astronomical Unit (imperial/US) and Nanometer (metric) to understand their common contexts.

Common Uses for astronomical units

1. Planetary Science and Orbital Mechanics

The AU is the natural unit for describing planetary orbits using Kepler's laws.

Kepler's Third Law:

P² = a³

Where:

  • P = orbital period (Earth years)
  • a = semi-major axis (AU)

Example: Mars

  • Semi-major axis: 1.524 AU
  • Predicted period: √(1.524³) = √(3.540) = 1.881 Earth years
  • Actual period: 1.881 years (687 days) ✓

Why AU simplifies this: In SI units, Kepler's Third Law requires the gravitational constant G and solar mass M☉:

P² = (4π² / GM☉) × a³

Using AU and years, the constants vanish!

2. Asteroid and Comet Tracking

Orbital elements use AU:

  • Semi-major axis (a): Average orbital distance (AU)
  • Perihelion distance (q): Closest approach to Sun (AU)
  • Aphelion distance (Q): Farthest point from Sun (AU)

Example: Halley's Comet

  • Semi-major axis: 17.8 AU
  • Perihelion: 0.586 AU (inside Venus's orbit)
  • Aphelion: 35.1 AU (beyond Neptune)
  • Orbital period: 75-76 years

Near-Earth Object (NEO) classification:

  • Atens: Semi-major axis <1.0 AU, perihelion >0.983 AU
  • Apollos: Semi-major axis >1.0 AU, perihelion <1.017 AU
  • Amors: Semi-major axis >1.0 AU, perihelion 1.017-1.3 AU

3. Exoplanet Characterization

When astronomers discover exoplanets, they report orbital distances in AU for comparison with our Solar System.

Kepler-452b ("Earth's cousin"):

  • Star: G-type (Sun-like)
  • Distance from star: 1.05 AU
  • Orbital period: 385 days
  • Size: 1.6× Earth diameter
  • In habitable zone (liquid water possible)

TRAPPIST-1 system:

  • Star: Ultra-cool red dwarf (9% Sun's mass)
  • 7 planets: 0.011 to 0.063 AU (all closer than Mercury!)
  • 3 in habitable zone (TRAPPIST-1e, f, g)
  • Why so close? Red dwarf is dim, HZ is much nearer

Proxima Centauri b:

  • Distance from star: 0.0485 AU (7.3 million km)
  • Orbital period: 11.2 days
  • In habitable zone (red dwarf is faint)
  • Nearest potentially habitable exoplanet (4.24 light-years)

4. Mission Planning and Spacecraft Navigation

Delta-v budgets: Spacecraft missions calculate fuel requirements based on AU distances.

Hohmann transfer orbit (Earth to Mars):

  • Earth orbit: 1.00 AU (circular approximation)
  • Mars orbit: 1.52 AU
  • Transfer orbit semi-major axis: (1.00 + 1.52) / 2 = 1.26 AU
  • Travel time: Half the transfer orbit period ≈ 259 days (8.5 months)

Launch windows: Earth and Mars align favorably every 26 months (synodic period). Missing a window means waiting 2+ years.

Example: Perseverance rover

  • Launch: July 30, 2020
  • Landing: February 18, 2021
  • Distance traveled: ~480 million km (depends on orbital path, not straight-line)

5. Solar Wind and Space Weather

Heliosphere: The Sun's influence extends well beyond planetary orbits, measured in AU.

Termination shock: ~90 AU

  • Solar wind slows below sound speed
  • Voyager 1 crossed: 94 AU (2004)

Heliopause: ~120 AU

  • Boundary where solar wind meets interstellar medium
  • Voyager 1 crossed: 121 AU (2012)

Bow shock: ~150 AU

  • Where interstellar medium piles up against heliosphere

Oort Cloud: 2,000-100,000 AU

  • Spherical shell of icy comets surrounding Solar System
  • Gravitationally bound to the Sun, but barely

6. Educational and Outreach

The AU provides an intuitive scale for teaching Solar System structure.

Scale models: If Earth = 1 cm diameter:

  • Sun: 109 cm (1.09 m) diameter
  • Earth-Sun distance: 117 m (1 AU scale)
  • Jupiter: 11 cm diameter, 608 m from Sun
  • Neptune: 4 cm diameter, 3.5 km from Sun!

The "Voyage" scale model (Washington, D.C.):

  • 1:10 billion scale
  • Sun (Smithsonian): 1.39 m diameter sphere
  • Earth: 1.3 cm (grain of rice), 15 m away
  • Pluto: 0.2 cm, 590 m away

7. Historical Astronomy

Pre-AU era challenges: Before the AU was accurately measured, astronomers knew relative planetary positions but not absolute distances.

Example: Kepler knew...

  • Venus is 0.72× Earth's distance
  • Mars is 1.52× Earth's distance
  • Jupiter is 5.20× Earth's distance

...but NOT the actual Earth-Sun distance!

The AU filled this gap, providing the absolute scale.

When to Use nanometers

of the Nanometer in Modern Contexts

1. Technology and Electronics

Semiconductors:

  • Process node naming (3nm, 5nm, 7nm chips)
  • Transistor gate lengths, interconnect widths
  • Thin film thicknesses (oxides, metals, dielectrics)

Displays:

  • QLED quantum dots (2-10 nm) for color purity
  • OLED organic layers (~100 nm thick)
  • Anti-reflective coatings (100-150 nm)

Data Storage:

  • Hard drive head-to-platter spacing (~3-5 nm flying height)
  • Magnetic domain sizes (~10-50 nm)
  • Flash memory cell feature sizes (~15-30 nm)

2. Optics and Photonics

Wavelength Specifications:

  • Laser wavelengths (UV: 193 nm, 248 nm, 355 nm; visible: 405 nm, 532 nm, 650 nm)
  • Optical filter bandwidths (specify transmission/reflection in nm ranges)
  • Spectroscopy (absorption/emission peaks reported in nanometers)

Thin Film Optics:

  • Anti-reflective coatings (multiple layers, each 50-150 nm)
  • Dichroic mirrors and filters (nanometer-scale multilayers)
  • Photonic crystals (periodic structures, 100-500 nm)

3. Materials Science and Nanotechnology

Nanoparticle Synthesis:

  • Specifying target particle size (gold nanoparticles: 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 nm)
  • Quantum dots (size determines optical properties)
  • Ceramic nanoparticles for catalysis, coatings

Thin Films and Coatings:

  • Physical vapor deposition (PVD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD)
  • Layer thicknesses: 1-1,000 nm
  • Atomic layer deposition (ALD): atomic-scale control (~0.1 nm/cycle)

Surface Characterization:

  • Atomic force microscopy (AFM) measures roughness in nanometers
  • Ellipsometry measures film thickness (0.1-1,000 nm range)
  • Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images nanoscale features

4. Biology and Medicine

Molecular Dimensions:

  • Protein sizes (5-50 nm typical)
  • Virus dimensions (20-400 nm)
  • Cell membrane thickness (~7-10 nm lipid bilayer)

Nanomedicine:

  • Nanoparticle drug carriers (50-200 nm optimal for cellular uptake)
  • mRNA vaccine lipid nanoparticles (~100 nm)
  • Diagnostic nanoparticles (gold, quantum dots, magnetic)

Microscopy:

  • Electron microscopy resolution (TEM: 0.1-1 nm, SEM: 1-10 nm)
  • Super-resolution optical microscopy (breaks diffraction limit, ~20-50 nm resolution)

5. Environmental Science

Air Quality:

  • Ultrafine particles: < 100 nm diameter (penetrate deep into lungs)
  • PM 2.5: Particulate matter < 2,500 nm (2.5 μm) diameter
  • Nanoparticle pollutants from combustion, industrial processes

Water Filtration:

  • Nanofiltration membranes: pore sizes 1-10 nm (remove ions, small molecules)
  • Graphene oxide membranes: sub-nanometer channels for desalination

6. Metrology and Precision Measurement

Surface Roughness:

  • Optical surfaces: Roughness < 1 nm RMS (root mean square) for high quality
  • Semiconductor wafers: < 0.1 nm RMS for epitaxial growth

Film Thickness:

  • Quality control in manufacturing (coatings, semiconductors)
  • Techniques: Ellipsometry, X-ray reflectivity, profilometry

7. Research and Development

Nanoscience Research:

  • Synthesizing new nanomaterials with specific dimensions
  • Characterizing structure-property relationships
  • Exploring quantum effects at nanoscale

Academic Publications:

  • Specifying material dimensions (nanoparticle size, film thickness, feature size)
  • Nanometer is standard unit in materials science, nanotechnology, condensed matter physics

Additional Unit Information

About Astronomical Unit (AU)

1. Why use Astronomical Units instead of kilometers or miles?

Convenience and intuition.

Solar System distances in kilometers are unwieldy:

  • Jupiter: 778,500,000 km from the Sun
  • Neptune: 4,500,000,000 km

In AU:

  • Jupiter: 5.20 AU
  • Neptune: 30.1 AU

Human brains handle ratios better than large numbers. "Neptune is 30× farther from the Sun than Earth" is far more intuitive than "Neptune is 4.5 billion kilometers away."

Scientific advantage: Kepler's Third Law simplifies to P² = a³ when using AU and years, eliminating gravitational constants.

2. How many kilometers/miles is 1 AU?

Exactly 149,597,870.700 kilometers (since 2012 IAU definition).

Rounded values:

  • Metric: ~150 million km (1.496 × 10⁸ km)
  • Imperial: ~93 million miles (9.296 × 10⁷ mi)

Why "exactly"? As of 2012, the AU is a defined constant (like the speed of light), not a measured quantity. The meter is defined via the speed of light, and the AU is defined in meters, making it exact.

3. How long does it take light to travel 1 AU?

499.0 seconds = 8 minutes 19 seconds.

This is the "light travel time" from the Sun to Earth. When you see the Sun in the sky, you're seeing it as it was 8 minutes 19 seconds ago.

Implications:

  • Solar flares take 8m 19s to reach Earth
  • If the Sun vanished, we wouldn't know for 8+ minutes
  • Real-time communication with Mars: 4-24 minute one-way delay

Formula:

Time = distance / speed of light
Time = 149,597,870,700 m / 299,792,458 m/s = 499.0 seconds

4. What is the difference between AU, light-year, and parsec?

Three distance units for different scales:

| Unit | Definition | Meters | Use Case | |----------|---------------|-----------|--------------| | AU | Earth-Sun distance | 1.496 × 10¹¹ m | Solar System (planets, asteroids) | | Light-year | Distance light travels in 1 year | 9.461 × 10¹⁵ m | Interstellar (nearest stars) | | Parsec | Distance where 1 AU subtends 1 arcsec | 3.086 × 10¹⁶ m | Galactic/extragalactic |

Conversions:

  • 1 light-year = 63,241 AU
  • 1 parsec = 206,265 AU = 3.26 light-years

Why each exists:

  • AU: Intuitive for our cosmic neighborhood
  • Light-year: Public-friendly (distance light travels in a year)
  • Parsec: Technical (based on parallax measurements)

5. Why was the AU redefined in 2012?

To eliminate circular dependencies and fix the AU as a constant.

Old definition (pre-2012): The AU was tied to the Gaussian gravitational constant and solar mass, creating circular logic:

  • Solar mass measured in kg using AU-based planetary orbits
  • AU defined using solar mass
  • Improved measurements of one changed the other

New definition (IAU 2012): 1 AU = 149,597,870,700 meters (EXACT)

Benefits:

  1. Consistency: The AU never changes, even with better solar mass measurements
  2. Spacecraft navigation: JPL navigation software uses this exact constant
  3. Parallels SI system: Like the meter (defined via speed of light), AU is now a defined standard

Fun fact: The chosen value was the best 2012 measurement, now frozen as the definition.

6. How far has Voyager 1 traveled in AU?

164 AU as of 2024 (24.5 billion km from the Sun).

Journey milestones:

  • 1977: Launch from Earth (1 AU)
  • 1979: Jupiter flyby (5.2 AU)
  • 1980: Saturn flyby (9.5 AU)
  • 2004: Crossed termination shock (94 AU) — solar wind slowed
  • 2012: Entered interstellar space (121 AU) — crossed heliopause
  • 2024: 164 AU and counting

Speed: 3.6 AU/year (17 km/s relative to the Sun)

Perspective:

  • Voyager 1 has traveled 164× the Earth-Sun distance
  • It's traveled only 0.0026 light-years (0.26% of a light-year)
  • At this speed, it would take 75,000 years to reach Proxima Centauri (4.24 light-years)

7. What is the habitable zone in AU for our Solar System?

Approximately 0.95 to 1.37 AU for a Sun-like star.

Inner edge (0.95 AU): Too close → runaway greenhouse effect (like Venus at 0.72 AU)

  • Water vapor traps heat
  • Surface water evaporates
  • Planet becomes uninhabitable

Outer edge (1.37 AU): Too far → frozen surface (Mars at 1.52 AU is marginal)

  • Insufficient sunlight to maintain liquid water
  • CO₂ freezes, reducing greenhouse warming

Earth (1.00 AU): Perfect!

  • Liquid water oceans
  • Temperate climate (greenhouse effect keeps average ~15°C)

Mars (1.52 AU): Marginal

  • Thin atmosphere (lost over billions of years)
  • Surface water frozen, but subsurface ice exists
  • Past liquid water evidence (ancient river valleys)

Note: Habitable zone width depends on star type:

  • Red dwarfs (dim): HZ is 0.05-0.15 AU
  • Sun-like stars: HZ is 0.95-1.37 AU
  • Blue giants: HZ is 10+ AU (but these stars don't live long enough for life to evolve)

8. How accurate is the AU measurement?

Perfectly accurate since 2012—it's a defined constant.

Pre-2012: The AU was measured using radar ranging, spacecraft tracking, and orbital mechanics. By 2000, precision reached sub-meter levels.

Post-2012: The IAU defined the AU as exactly 149,597,870,700 meters. This isn't a "measurement" anymore—it's the standard, like the meter is defined via the speed of light.

What this means:

  • The AU has zero uncertainty (it's exact by definition)
  • Measurements of planetary distances are now in meters, not AU
  • The AU is a conversion factor (like 12 inches = 1 foot, exact)

9. Can you see 1 AU with the naked eye?

Yes! You're seeing across 1 AU whenever you look at the Sun.

What you're seeing:

  • The Sun's surface is 1 AU away
  • Sunlight takes 8 minutes 19 seconds to reach your eyes
  • You're seeing the Sun as it was 8+ minutes ago

Other 1 AU experiences:

  • Solar eclipses: Moon passes between Earth and Sun (~1 AU alignment)
  • Sunlight warmth: Solar energy intensity at 1 AU is 1,361 W/m² (solar constant)
  • Seasonal changes: Earth's 1 AU orbit, tilted 23.5°, creates seasons

10. How do astronomers measure AU distances?

Historically: Parallax, transits, and radar ranging. Now: The AU is a defined constant (not measured).

Historical methods:

1. Transits of Venus (1769): Observing Venus cross the Sun's face from different Earth locations enabled triangulation:

  • Parallax angle measured
  • Earth-Sun distance calculated: ~153 million km (2% error)

2. Radar ranging (1961+): Transmit radar to Venus/Mars, measure round-trip time:

Distance = (speed of light × round-trip time) / 2

Accuracy: Sub-kilometer precision

3. Spacecraft tracking (1976+): Viking landers on Mars, Voyager flybys, etc., provided precise radio ranging data.

Modern (2012+): The AU is defined as exactly 149,597,870,700 meters. Planetary distances are now measured in meters using spacecraft telemetry, and converted to AU using this exact constant.

11. Why don't we use AU for measuring distances to stars?

Because AU numbers become unwieldy for interstellar distances.

Example: Proxima Centauri (nearest star)

  • Distance: 268,000 AU
  • In light-years: 4.24 ly (much cleaner!)

It's like measuring New York to Tokyo in millimeters:

  • 11 trillion millimeters (accurate but awkward)
  • 11,000 kilometers (appropriate scale)

Astronomers do use AU for...

  • Stellar parallax calculations (1 AU baseline enables distance measurements)
  • Comparing exoplanet orbits to our Solar System

But for stellar distances:

  • Light-years: Public-friendly, intuitive
  • Parsecs: Professional astronomy (1 pc = 206,265 AU)

12. What is beyond 100 AU?

The edge of the Solar System and the beginning of interstellar space.

50-100 AU: Kuiper Belt

  • Icy objects, dwarf planets (Pluto at 39.5 AU)
  • Short-period comets originate here

90 AU: Termination Shock

  • Solar wind slows below sound speed

120 AU: Heliopause

  • Boundary where solar wind meets interstellar medium
  • Voyager 1 crossed in 2012 (121 AU)

2,000-100,000 AU: Oort Cloud

  • Spherical shell of icy comets
  • Gravitationally bound to the Sun
  • Long-period comets originate here

125,000 AU (~2 light-years): Sun's gravitational dominance ends

  • Beyond this, nearby stars' gravity is comparable
  • Practical edge of the Solar System

Perspective: Even at 100 AU, you're still deep within the Sun's influence. Interstellar space (between stars) begins around 100,000 AU.

About Nanometer (nm)

1. How small is a nanometer?

A nanometer is extraordinarily small—one billionth of a meter (0.000000001 m). To grasp this scale: A human hair is about 80,000-100,000 nm wide, so you could fit 80,000-100,000 nanometers across a single hair. A sheet of paper is ~100,000 nm thick. The DNA double helix is 2 nm wide. A typical protein molecule is 5-50 nm. A single gold atom is ~0.3 nm diameter, so 1 nanometer spans approximately 3-4 atoms. If a nanometer were enlarged to 1 centimeter, a meter would stretch 10,000 kilometers—farther than the distance from New York to Tokyo. At this scale, quantum mechanical effects dominate: electrons behave as waves, particles can tunnel through barriers, and material properties become size-dependent.

2. How many nanometers are in a micrometer?

There are exactly 1,000 nanometers in 1 micrometer (μm). The relationship: 1 μm = 1,000 nm, or 1 nm = 0.001 μm. This factor of 1,000 comes from the metric prefix system: micro (μ) = 10⁻⁶ and nano (n) = 10⁻⁹, so 10⁻⁶ ÷ 10⁻⁹ = 10³ = 1,000. Examples: A typical bacterium (E. coli) is 2 μm long = 2,000 nm. A red blood cell is 7-8 μm diameter = 7,000-8,000 nm. A virus is 20-400 nm = 0.02-0.4 μm. Human hair is 80 μm = 80,000 nm. The nanometer-to-micrometer boundary (~100-1,000 nm) roughly separates the realm of individual molecules and nanoparticles (nm) from the realm of cells and microorganisms (μm).

3. Why are nanometers important in technology?

Nanometers are the scale at which quantum mechanical effects emerge, enabling revolutionary technologies. At 1-100 nm, materials exhibit size-dependent properties impossible to achieve in bulk: gold nanoparticles turn red; semiconductor quantum dots emit precise colors based on size; carbon nanotubes become stronger than steel. Semiconductor chips have shrunk to 3-5nm process nodes, packing billions of transistors into fingernail-sized dies—enabling smartphones, AI, cloud computing. Nanometer precision allows atomic layer deposition (building materials atom-by-atom), molecular diagnostics (detecting single protein molecules), targeted drug delivery (100nm nanoparticles accumulate in tumors), and metamaterials (nanoscale structures that bend light impossibly). The nanometer sits at the sweet spot: large enough to fabricate with advanced tools (electron beam lithography, STM manipulation), small enough to exploit quantum effects and interact with individual molecules—making it the frontier of 21st-century technology.

4. What's the difference between a nanometer and an angstrom?

A nanometer (nm) equals 10 angstroms (Å). The angstrom (1 Å = 0.1 nm = 10⁻¹⁰ meters) was historically used in atomic physics, chemistry, and crystallography because atomic diameters and chemical bond lengths conveniently fall in the 1-5 Å range (hydrogen atom: ~1 Å, carbon-carbon bond: 1.54 Å). However, the angstrom is not an SI unit, and modern scientific practice favors nanometers and picometers. Example: The diameter of a DNA double helix is 2 nm = 20 Å. The spacing between DNA base pairs is 0.34 nm = 3.4 Å. A silicon atom is 0.21 nm = 2.1 Å diameter. While older papers and crystallography software often report structures in angstroms, nanometers are now standard in nanotechnology, materials science, and most contemporary research. If you see Å, just divide by 10 to convert to nanometers.

5. Can you see something that's 1 nanometer?

No, you cannot see 1 nanometer with any optical microscope, and barely even with your eyes' theoretical maximum resolution. Human eyes can resolve ~50-100 micrometers (50,000-100,000 nm) at best. Optical microscopes are limited by the diffraction limit—approximately half the wavelength of light used. Visible light ranges 400-700 nm, so the best optical resolution is ~200-300 nm (using UV light and oil immersion). To "see" 1 nm structures, you need: Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM): Uses electron beams (wavelength ~0.01 nm at high voltage), achieving 0.1-1 nm resolution—can image individual atoms. Scanning Tunneling Microscope (STM) or Atomic Force Microscope (AFM): "Feel" surfaces by scanning a sharp tip (1-atom-wide apex) across the sample, mapping topography with sub-nanometer precision. So yes, we can "see" nanometer and sub-nanometer features, but not with light—we use electrons or physical probes.

6. Why are modern chips called "3nm" or "5nm" when features aren't actually that small?

Modern process node names (3nm, 5nm, 7nm) are marketing terms reflecting relative density improvements, not actual physical dimensions. Historically, process nodes indicated the smallest feature size (e.g., Intel's 130nm process in 2001 had ~130nm gate lengths). But as scaling slowed and 3D transistor designs (FinFETs) emerged, the relationship broke down. Today: A "5nm" chip from TSMC might have gate lengths ~20-30nm, metal pitch ~30-40nm, and the tightest pitch structures ~24-28nm. The "5nm" refers roughly to an equivalent density compared to hypothetical scaling trends. A "3nm" chip is denser than "5nm," but actual dimensions are larger than 3nm. Why keep the naming? Industry convention, marketing (smaller number sounds more advanced), and rough correlation with transistor density. Different manufacturers' "5nm" may differ significantly. Bottom line: Process nodes indicate generation and relative performance/density, not literal nanometer measurements.

7. What's the smallest thing ever manipulated by humans?

Humans have manipulated individual atoms (~0.1-0.3 nm), the smallest stable units of matter. 1989: IBM scientists used a Scanning Tunneling Microscope (STM) to arrange 35 xenon atoms to spell "IBM" on a nickel surface—the first atomic-scale manipulation. 1990s-present: Researchers built molecular structures atom-by-atom: molecular gears, switches, quantum corrals (rings of atoms to confine electrons). 2012: Physicists stored 1 bit of data in a single holmium atom (~0.25 nm diameter) using magnetic orientation. Subatomic particles: Particle accelerators (LHC) manipulate protons (~0.0016 nm diameter) and study quarks (~10⁻³ to 10⁻⁴ nm, though quarks can't be isolated). Quantum engineering: Controlling individual electron spins, photon states, and qubits for quantum computing. So while atoms (~0.1-0.3 nm) are the smallest stable structures we manipulate routinely, we probe and control phenomena down to 10⁻⁵ nm scales in particle physics.

8. How does nanotechnology differ from regular technology?

Nanotechnology operates at 1-100 nm scale where quantum mechanical effects become significant and surface-area-to-volume ratios are enormous, enabling properties impossible in bulk materials. Differences: Scale: Nanotech manipulates individual molecules, atoms, or nanostructures; regular tech uses bulk materials. Quantum effects: At nanoscale, quantum tunneling, quantized energy levels, and wave-particle duality dominate; bulk materials follow classical physics. Size-dependent properties: Gold nanoparticles (5-50 nm) are red/purple and reactive; bulk gold is yellow and inert. Quantum dots (2-10 nm) emit precise colors tuned by size—impossible with bulk semiconductors. Surface area: Nanoparticles have immense surface area relative to volume, making them superb catalysts, drug carriers, and sensors. Bottom-up assembly: Nanotech often uses molecular self-assembly or atom-by-atom fabrication; traditional manufacturing is top-down (machining, cutting). Applications: Nanotech enables mRNA vaccines (lipid nanoparticles), 3nm computer chips, targeted cancer therapy, and quantum computing—revolutionary advances impossible with conventional approaches.

9. Is nanotechnology safe?

Nanotechnology safety is highly material-specific—some nanomaterials are safe, others pose risks. Concerns: 1) Toxicity: Some nanoparticles (carbon nanotubes, certain metal oxides) can damage cells, cause inflammation, or penetrate biological barriers (blood-brain barrier). Silver nanoparticles, widely used in antimicrobial products, can harm aquatic life. 2) Environmental persistence: Nanoparticles may accumulate in ecosystems with unknown long-term effects. 3) Inhalation: Ultrafine airborne nanoparticles (~10-100 nm) penetrate deep into lungs, potentially causing respiratory issues. Safety measures: Extensive testing: New nanomaterials undergo toxicology studies before commercial use. Regulation: FDA, EPA, EU regulate nanomaterials in drugs, food, cosmetics, and industrial applications. Encapsulation: Many nanoparticles (e.g., in sunscreen, food) are embedded in matrices, preventing release. Established safety: Some nanomaterials are demonstrably safe (titanium dioxide and zinc oxide in sunscreen used for decades; lipid nanoparticles in mRNA vaccines tested extensively). Conclusion: Nanotech isn't universally safe or dangerous—each material requires careful evaluation.

10. How do semiconductor fabs create nanometer-scale features?

Modern semiconductor fabrication uses photolithography with extreme precision and multi-step patterning. Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Lithography: Uses 13.5 nm wavelength light (generated by tin plasma) to pattern features. Wavelength is much smaller than older 193 nm UV lithography, enabling finer patterns. Process: 1) Coat silicon wafer with photoresist (~50-100 nm layer). 2) Project circuit pattern onto resist using EUV light through precision optics. 3) Exposed resist dissolves, leaving pattern. 4) Etch exposed silicon, deposit materials, etc. 5) Repeat hundreds of times (modern chips: 20-25+ mask layers). Multi-patterning: Single exposure can't achieve tightest pitches, so features are created through multiple aligned exposures (self-aligned double patterning, etc.). Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD): Deposits ultra-thin films (~0.1-1 nm precision) for gates, insulators. FinFET 3D transistors: Vertical silicon fins (~5-7 nm wide) provide better gate control at nanoscale. Extreme precision: Alignment accuracy: ~1-2 nm. Temperature control: ±0.01°C. Cleanrooms: <1 particle/cubic meter. Took decades of R&D and billions in equipment development to achieve 3-5nm nodes.

11. What's the limit of miniaturization in computer chips?

Miniaturization faces several fundamental limits expected to halt around 1-2 nm nodes (late 2020s-early 2030s): 1) Atomic scale: Silicon atoms are ~0.21 nm diameter. At 1-2 nm features, structures are just 5-10 atoms wide—difficult to control dopant placement and variability. 2) Quantum tunneling: Electrons can "tunnel" through barriers < 1-2 nm thick, causing leakage current and preventing transistors from turning off. 3) Heat dissipation: Power density in chips approaches limits of cooling technology. Shrinking further increases current density and heat. 4) Manufacturing precision: Atomic-level variations affect device performance. Placing individual dopant atoms precisely is extremely difficult. Beyond silicon: Future options include: New materials (carbon nanotubes, graphene, 2D materials). 3D stacking (vertical integration). New transistor architectures (gate-all-around FETs, tunnel FETs). Beyond CMOS (quantum computing, photonic computing, neuromorphic chips). Moore's Law (doubling transistor count every 2 years) is already slowing. The 1 nm node may be the practical limit for silicon, necessitating entirely new computing paradigms.

12. Can nanotechnology create molecular machines?

Yes! Molecular machines—nanometer-scale structures that perform mechanical work—exist naturally and are being engineered artificially. Natural molecular machines: Ribosomes (~20 nm): Synthesize proteins, translating mRNA into amino acid chains (Nobel Prize 2009 for structure determination). ATP synthase (~10 nm): Rotary motor in mitochondria, spins at ~100 Hz to produce ATP (cellular energy currency). Kinesin motors (~10 nm): "Walk" along microtubules, transporting cargo within cells. DNA polymerase: Copies DNA, moving along strands, proof-reading, and assembling nucleotides. Synthetic molecular machines (Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2016): Molecular motors: Light-driven rotors, chemically-driven linear motors (synthesized by Fraser Stoddart, Jean-Pierre Sauvage, Ben Feringa). DNA origami machines: Programmable nanoscale structures that fold, unfold, or grasp objects. Potential applications: Nanoscale drug delivery, molecular computing, self-assembling materials, targeted cell repair. Challenges: Operating in biological environments, controlling motion precisely, scaling up production. Molecular machines are early-stage but represent frontier of nanotechnology.


Conversion Table: Astronomical Unit to Nanometer

Astronomical Unit (AU)Nanometer (nm)
0.574,800,000,000,000,000,000
1149,600,000,000,000,000,000
1.5224,400,000,000,000,000,000
2299,200,000,000,000,000,000
5748,000,000,000,000,000,000
101,496,000,000,000,000,000,000
253,740,000,000,000,000,000,000
507,480,000,000,000,000,000,000
10014,960,000,000,000,000,000,000
25037,399,999,999,999,998,000,000
50074,799,999,999,999,996,000,000
1,000149,599,999,999,999,990,000,000

People Also Ask

How do I convert Astronomical Unit to Nanometer?

To convert Astronomical Unit to Nanometer, enter the value in Astronomical Unit in the calculator above. The conversion will happen automatically. Use our free online converter for instant and accurate results. You can also visit our length converter page to convert between other units in this category.

Learn more →

What is the conversion factor from Astronomical Unit to Nanometer?

The conversion factor depends on the specific relationship between Astronomical Unit and Nanometer. You can find the exact conversion formula and factor on this page. Our calculator handles all calculations automatically. See the conversion table above for common values.

Can I convert Nanometer back to Astronomical Unit?

Yes! You can easily convert Nanometer back to Astronomical Unit by using the swap button (⇌) in the calculator above, or by visiting our Nanometer to Astronomical Unit converter page. You can also explore other length conversions on our category page.

Learn more →

What are common uses for Astronomical Unit and Nanometer?

Astronomical Unit and Nanometer are both standard units used in length measurements. They are commonly used in various applications including engineering, construction, cooking, and scientific research. Browse our length converter for more conversion options.

For more length conversion questions, visit our FAQ page or explore our conversion guides.

All Length Conversions

Meter to KilometerMeter to HectometerMeter to DecimeterMeter to CentimeterMeter to MillimeterMeter to InchMeter to FootMeter to YardMeter to MileMeter to Nautical MileMeter to MicrometerMeter to NanometerMeter to Light YearMeter to Astronomical UnitMeter to ParsecMeter to AngstromMeter to Point (Typography)Meter to Mil/ThouMeter to FathomMeter to FurlongMeter to Link (Gunter's)Meter to PaceMeter to SpanMeter to DigitMeter to Cable LengthMeter to EllMeter to FingerMeter to Roman MileMeter to StadionMeter to Chi (Chinese)Meter to Shaku (Japanese)Meter to Li (Chinese)Meter to ToiseMeter to BoltMeter to RopeMeter to SmootMeter to SajeneMeter to KenMeter to WaMeter to VaraMeter to AlnMeter to Cubit (Royal/Egyptian)Meter to VerstaMeter to ArpentMeter to Ri (Japanese)Meter to KlafterMeter to YojanaMeter to SkeinKilometer to MeterKilometer to HectometerKilometer to DecimeterKilometer to CentimeterKilometer to MillimeterKilometer to InchKilometer to FootKilometer to YardKilometer to MileKilometer to Nautical MileKilometer to MicrometerKilometer to NanometerKilometer to Light YearKilometer to Astronomical UnitKilometer to ParsecKilometer to AngstromKilometer to Point (Typography)Kilometer to Mil/ThouKilometer to FathomKilometer to FurlongKilometer to Link (Gunter's)Kilometer to PaceKilometer to SpanKilometer to DigitKilometer to Cable LengthKilometer to EllKilometer to FingerKilometer to Roman MileKilometer to StadionKilometer to Chi (Chinese)Kilometer to Shaku (Japanese)Kilometer to Li (Chinese)Kilometer to ToiseKilometer to BoltKilometer to RopeKilometer to SmootKilometer to SajeneKilometer to KenKilometer to WaKilometer to VaraKilometer to AlnKilometer to Cubit (Royal/Egyptian)Kilometer to VerstaKilometer to ArpentKilometer to Ri (Japanese)Kilometer to KlafterKilometer to YojanaKilometer to SkeinHectometer to MeterHectometer to KilometerHectometer to DecimeterHectometer to CentimeterHectometer to MillimeterHectometer to InchHectometer to FootHectometer to YardHectometer to MileHectometer to Nautical MileHectometer to MicrometerHectometer to NanometerHectometer to Light YearHectometer to Astronomical UnitHectometer to ParsecHectometer to AngstromHectometer to Point (Typography)Hectometer to Mil/ThouHectometer to FathomHectometer to FurlongHectometer to Link (Gunter's)Hectometer to PaceHectometer to SpanHectometer to Digit

Verified Against Authority Standards

All conversion formulas have been verified against international standards and authoritative sources to ensure maximum accuracy and reliability.

NIST Guide for the Use of SI

National Institute of Standards and TechnologyOfficial US standards for length measurements

SI Brochure

Bureau International des Poids et MesuresInternational System of Units official documentation

Last verified: December 3, 2025