Fathom to Point (Typography) Converter
Convert fathoms to points with our free online length converter.
Quick Answer
1 Fathom = 5183.996734 points
Formula: Fathom × conversion factor = Point (Typography)
Use the calculator below for instant, accurate conversions.
Our Accuracy Guarantee
All conversion formulas on UnitsConverter.io have been verified against NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) guidelines and international SI standards. Our calculations are accurate to 10 decimal places for standard conversions and use arbitrary precision arithmetic for astronomical units.
Fathom to Point (Typography) Calculator
How to Use the Fathom to Point (Typography) Calculator:
- Enter the value you want to convert in the 'From' field (Fathom).
- The converted value in Point (Typography) will appear automatically in the 'To' field.
- Use the dropdown menus to select different units within the Length category.
- Click the swap button (⇌) to reverse the conversion direction.
How to Convert Fathom to Point (Typography): Step-by-Step Guide
Converting Fathom to Point (Typography) involves multiplying the value by a specific conversion factor, as shown in the formula below.
Formula:
1 Fathom = 5183.997 pointsExample Calculation:
Convert 10 fathoms: 10 × 5183.997 = 5.1840e+4 points
Disclaimer: For Reference Only
These conversion results are provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees regarding the precision of these results, especially for conversions involving extremely large or small numbers which may be subject to the inherent limitations of standard computer floating-point arithmetic.
Not for professional use. Results should be verified before use in any critical application. View our Terms of Service for more information.
Need to convert to other length units?
View all Length conversions →What is a Fathom and a Point (Typography)?
The Six-Foot Maritime Standard
The fathom is defined as exactly 6 feet in the imperial and U.S. customary measurement systems.
Precise equivalents:
- 6 feet (by definition)
- 2 yards (6 ft ÷ 3 ft/yd)
- 72 inches (6 ft × 12 in/ft)
- 1.8288 meters (exactly, using 1 ft = 0.3048 m)
- 182.88 centimeters
Historical basis: The arm span of an average man with arms fully outstretched, measured from fingertip to fingertip.
Arm Span Origins
Old English "fæthm":
- Primary meaning: To embrace, encircle with outstretched arms
- Secondary meaning: The distance between fingertips when arms are extended
Practical measurement: Sailors hauling in sounding lines (weighted ropes for measuring depth) would pull hand-over-hand, with each arm span representing one fathom. This created a natural counting method:
- Drop weighted line overboard
- Haul in, counting arm spans
- Number of arm spans = depth in fathoms
Standardization necessity: Since arm spans varied (5.5-6.5 feet typically), maritime commerce required a fixed standard. The British settled on exactly 6 feet, matching the standardized foot of 12 inches.
Nautical Charts and Depth Contours
Fathom lines: Nautical charts show depth contours (lines connecting points of equal depth) traditionally measured in fathoms.
Common contour intervals:
- 1, 2, 3, 5, 10 fathoms: Shallow coastal waters
- 20, 50, 100 fathoms: Coastal navigation
- 500, 1,000 fathoms: Deep ocean
Chart notation: Depths written as plain numbers on charts (e.g., "45") indicate 45 fathoms unless otherwise specified. Modern charts often include a note: "Depths in fathoms" or "Depths in meters."
Anchor Cable and Chain
Shackle: One "shackle" of anchor chain traditionally equals 15 fathoms (90 feet / 27.43 m) in the Royal Navy and many navies worldwide.
Anchoring depth rule: Ships typically anchor with a scope (ratio of chain length to water depth) of 5:1 to 7:1 for safety.
Example:
- Water depth: 10 fathoms (60 feet)
- Required chain: 50-70 fathoms (300-420 feet)
- That's 3.3 to 4.7 shackles
The Desktop Publishing Point
The modern typographic point is defined as exactly 1/72 of an international inch. This creates the mathematically convenient relationship:
- 1 point (pt) = 1/72 inch = 0.013888... inches
- 1 point = 0.352777... millimeters
- 72 points = 1 inch (exactly)
- 1 inch = 25.4 mm (by international definition)
This definition, known as the PostScript point or DTP point (Desktop Publishing point), was established by Adobe Systems in the 1980s and has become the universal standard for all modern typography.
The Em Square and Font Height
When we say "12 pt font," we're technically measuring the em square—the metal block that held the physical letter in traditional typesetting. This em square includes:
- Ascenders: Parts of letters extending above the baseline (like the top of 'h' or 'b')
- Descenders: Parts extending below the baseline (like the tail of 'g' or 'y')
- Built-in spacing: Extra vertical space above and below letters
This means 12 pt text doesn't have letters exactly 1/6 inch tall—the actual visible letter height (called x-height) is typically 60-70% of the point size, with the rest being built-in spacing. This spacing prevents lines of text from touching each other.
Points vs. Picas
Typography traditionally pairs the point with the pica:
- 1 pica = 12 points = 1/6 inch
- 6 picas = 1 inch
- 1 pica ≈ 4.233 mm
Professional designers often measure larger typographic elements in picas. For example, a column width might be "20 picas" (3.33 inches) rather than "240 points." The pica provides a more manageable unit for page layout dimensions while maintaining exact mathematical relationships.
Historical Point Systems (Pre-Digital)
Before the DTP point standardization, multiple incompatible point systems existed:
Didot Point (Continental Europe):
- 1 Didot point ≈ 0.3759 mm
- Based on the French pied du roi (royal foot)
- Approximately 67.55 Didot points per inch
- Still occasionally referenced in European historical printing contexts
American/British Pica Point:
- 1 pica point ≈ 0.351459 mm
- 72.27 points per inch (not exactly 72!)
- Derived from metal type casting standards
- Also called the "Anglo-American point"
Fournier Point (Early French):
- Pierre Simon Fournier's original 1737 system
- Approximately 0.348 mm
- 72.989 points per French royal inch
- Largely replaced by Didot system by 1800
The digital revolution eliminated these variations. Today, when anyone uses "point" in typography, they mean the 1/72-inch DTP point unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Note: The Fathom is part of the imperial/US customary system, primarily used in the US, UK, and Canada for everyday measurements. The Point (Typography) belongs to the imperial/US customary system.
History of the Fathom and Point (Typography)
Ancient Maritime Practices (Pre-9th Century)
Mediterranean and Northern European sailors: Ancient mariners measured rope and depth using body-based units:
- Cubit: Elbow to fingertip (~18 inches)
- Pace: Two steps (~5 feet)
- Arm span: Outstretched arms (~6 feet)
Sounding lead: A heavy weight (lead sinker) attached to a marked line, dropped overboard to measure depth. Sailors counted arm spans as they hauled the line back aboard.
Old English Documentation (9th-11th Centuries)
Earliest references: Anglo-Saxon texts use "fæthm" for measuring rope lengths and describing distances.
Beowulf (8th-11th century): The epic poem mentions "fæthmas" in describing ocean depths and ship measurements.
Viking influence: Old Norse "faðmr" (similar arm-span measurement) influenced English usage through Viking contact and trade.
Medieval Standardization (13th-15th Centuries)
Edward I (1272-1307): English law under Edward I began standardizing measurements, including the fathom at 6 feet.
Admiralty regulations: The emerging Royal Navy needed consistent rope, sail, and depth measurements for shipbuilding and navigation.
Rope making: British rope makers sold cordage by the fathom, with standard lengths for anchor cables (120 fathoms = 1 cable length in some contexts).
Age of Exploration (15th-17th Centuries)
Navigation charts: Early nautical charts (portolan charts) began incorporating depth soundings in fathoms.
Captain James Cook (1768-1779): Cook's Pacific voyages produced meticulous charts with fathom-based depth measurements. His charts became templates for British Admiralty standards.
Example - HMS Endeavour soundings: Cook's logs record depths like "15 fathoms, sandy bottom" or "No bottom at 100 fathoms" (indicating depths exceeding 600 feet).
British Admiralty Charts (19th Century)
Hydrographic Office (founded 1795): The British Admiralty Hydrographic Office systematized global nautical chart production, standardizing fathoms for depth.
Matthew Fontaine Maury (1806-1873): American oceanographer Maury collaborated with the British to create standardized depth charts using fathoms, mapping ocean currents and depths.
Cable-laying expeditions: Transatlantic telegraph cable projects (1850s-1860s) required precise fathom-based depth surveys. HMS Agamemnon and USS Niagara charted the Atlantic floor in fathoms before laying the 1858 cable.
U.S. Navy Adoption (19th-20th Centuries)
Inherited British standards: The U.S. Navy adopted British maritime practices, including fathom-based charts and anchor cable measurements.
U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey: Founded in 1807 (originally "Survey of the Coast"), it produced nautical charts in fathoms for American waters.
World War II: Submarine warfare and amphibious operations relied heavily on fathom-based depth charts. USS submarines operated in waters charted in fathoms.
Metrication Movement (20th Century-Present)
International Hydrographic Organization (IHO, founded 1921): Recommended global adoption of metric system for nautical charts.
Gradual transition:
- 1970s-1980s: Most nations began publishing new charts in meters
- UK Admiralty: Converted most charts to meters by the 1990s
- U.S. NOAA: Many American charts still use fathoms, particularly for coastal waters
Mixed usage today: Modern electronic chart systems (ECDIS) allow display in either fathoms or meters, accommodating mariners accustomed to either system.
Early Typography: The Cicero and Finger-Width (1400s-1700s)
Early European printing used inconsistent measurements based on:
- The cicero: A unit based on the line width of a specific typeface (Cicero type), varying by region
- Local inches and feet: Each region had different inch definitions
- Finger widths and eyeball estimates: Printers adjusted type spacing by hand
This inconsistency made it nearly impossible to share typeface designs or maintain consistency across print shops.
Pierre Simon Fournier: The First Point System (1737)
French typefounder Pierre Simon Fournier le Jeune published "Table des proportions" (1737), introducing the first systematic point system:
- Based the point on the French royal inch (pouce du roi)
- Divided the inch into 72 points (a number divisible by many factors: 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12)
- Created 20 standardized font sizes
- Named sizes after musical terms (e.g., "Petit-Canon," "Gros-Parangon")
Fournier's system brought mathematical precision to typography for the first time, allowing typefounders to create consistent, proportional type families.
François-Ambroise Didot: The Didot Point (1783)
François-Ambroise Didot, another French typefounder, refined Fournier's system by basing measurements on the pied du roi (royal foot):
- 1 Didot point = 1/72 of 1/12 of the pied du roi ≈ 0.3759 mm
- Larger than Fournier's point (about 7% bigger)
- Created the cicero as 12 Didot points
- Established type size naming still used today (e.g., corps 8, corps 12)
The Didot system became the standard across Continental Europe and remains influential in French and German typography traditions. Some European printing specifications still reference "Didot" even today when discussing historical typography.
American and British Variations (1800s)
The 19th century saw typography spread across the English-speaking world, but without international standards:
American Point System (established c. 1886):
- Created by the United States Type Founders Association
- Based on the pica: 1 pica = 0.166 inches
- Therefore: 1 point = 0.166/12 ≈ 0.013837 inches
- Result: approximately 72.27 points per inch
British Imperial Point:
- Similar to American system but based on British imperial inch
- Also approximately 72.27 points per inch
- Created incompatibilities when Britain and US used different inch definitions before 1959
This proliferation of standards created international printing chaos. A "12 point" font in France was noticeably different from "12 point" in Britain or America.
Adobe PostScript: The Digital Revolution (1982-1985)
The desktop publishing revolution began when Adobe Systems developed PostScript, a page description language for laser printers:
John Warnock and Charles Geschke (Adobe founders) faced a choice: adopt historical point systems with fractional relationships to inches, or create a new, mathematically clean standard.
They chose simplicity: 1 point = exactly 1/72 inch
This decision meant:
- Easy calculation: multiply by 72 to convert inches to points
- Clean pixel mapping on early displays (72 DPI screens made 1 point = 1 pixel)
- No fractional arithmetic in computer calculations
- Complete break from historical confusion
Apple LaserWriter and Macintosh (1985)
Apple Computer licensed Adobe PostScript for the Macintosh computer and LaserWriter printer (launched January 1985):
- First affordable desktop publishing system
- 72 DPI screen resolution matched PostScript's 72 points/inch
- Onscreen "What You See Is What You Get" (WYSIWYG): Text appeared on screen at the exact size it would print
- Revolutionary for designers: no more calculating conversions
The LaserWriter cost $7,000 (expensive but far cheaper than typesetting equipment costing $50,000+), making professional typography accessible to small businesses and independent designers.
Industry Standardization (1985-1995)
The DTP point rapidly became universal:
1987: Adobe releases Adobe Illustrator and Photoshop (1990), both using PostScript points
1987: PageMaker (Aldus, later Adobe) becomes industry-standard layout software
1990s: Microsoft adopts 72 points/inch in Word, PowerPoint, Publisher
1996: CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) defines the pt unit as 1/72 inch for web typography
2000s: All professional design software (InDesign, Quark, CorelDRAW) standardizes on DTP point
By 2000, the historical Didot and pica points had effectively vanished from active use. The DTP point achieved something remarkable: complete global standardization of a measurement unit in just 15 years.
Modern Digital Era (2000-Present)
Today's typography operates in a world of complete point standardization:
- Print design: All software uses 72 pt/inch
- Web design: CSS
ptunits defined as 1/72 inch (thoughpxandemare more common online) - Mobile apps: iOS, Android use point-based typography systems
- E-readers: Kindle, Apple Books use point-based font sizing
- Office software: Word, Google Docs, Apple Pages all use identical point measurements
The point has become so universal that most designers under 40 have never encountered historical point systems. The DTP point is simply "the point."
Common Uses and Applications: fathoms vs points
Explore the typical applications for both Fathom (imperial/US) and Point (Typography) (imperial/US) to understand their common contexts.
Common Uses for fathoms
1. Nautical Charts and Hydrography
Depth soundings: Nautical charts mark depths in fathoms, particularly on U.S. and older British charts.
Contour lines: Lines connecting equal depths (e.g., the 10-fathom line) help mariners avoid shallow areas.
Chart abbreviations:
- fms: Fathoms
- fm: Fathom
- No bottom at 100 fms: Depth exceeds 100 fathoms (600 feet)
2. Anchoring and Mooring
Anchor scope: Mariners calculate how much anchor chain to deploy based on water depth in fathoms.
Rule of thumb: Deploy 5-7 times the water depth in calm conditions, 7-10 times in storms.
Example:
- Depth: 8 fathoms
- Calm weather scope (5:1): 40 fathoms of chain
- Storm scope (10:1): 80 fathoms of chain
3. Commercial Fishing
Net depth: Fishermen describe trawl net depths in fathoms.
Example: "Running trawl at 50 fathoms" (300 feet deep)
Fishing line: Deep-sea fishing lines measured in fathoms to target specific depths.
4. Recreational Boating and Diving
Depth sounders: Many recreational boat depth finders display fathoms (though meters and feet are increasingly common).
Dive planning: Divers reference depth in fathoms on nautical charts when planning dive sites.
5. Submarine Operations
Periscope depth: Submarines traditionally use fathoms for depth control.
Example: "Dive to 20 fathoms" (120 feet)
Historical note: WWII submarine logs recorded depths in fathoms; modern submarines use meters.
6. Maritime Literature and Tradition
Nautical expressions:
- "To fathom something" = to understand its depth (metaphorically)
- "Unfathomable" = too deep to measure or comprehend
Sailing instructions: Traditional pilot books use fathoms for approach depths and anchorage recommendations.
When to Use points
1. Document Typography and Word Processing
Body Text Standards:
- 10-12 pt: Standard body text for business documents, reports, letters
- 11 pt: Often considered optimal for printed books (balance of readability and page economy)
- 12 pt: Default in Microsoft Word, Google Docs; universally acceptable for any document
- 14 pt: Large print books for readers with visual impairments
Heading Hierarchies: Professional documents typically use 3-5 heading levels with systematic point size progression:
- H1 (Title): 18-24 pt, bold
- H2 (Major sections): 16-18 pt, bold
- H3 (Subsections): 14-16 pt, bold
- H4 (Minor subsections): 12-14 pt, bold or italic
- Body text: 10-12 pt, regular
This creates clear visual hierarchy while maintaining readability.
2. Professional Graphic Design and Layout
Adobe Creative Suite Standards:
- InDesign: All text boxes, frames, and measurements in points
- Illustrator: Artboard rulers can display points; all typography in points
- Photoshop: Type tool uses points by default
Print Design Specifications:
- Business cards: Names typically 14-18 pt, contact info 8-10 pt
- Brochures: Headlines 24-36 pt, body text 9-11 pt
- Posters: Titles 48-144+ pt depending on viewing distance
- Magazine layouts: Body 9-10 pt (smaller for dense content), headlines 18-48 pt
Grid Systems: Many designers use point-based grids: 12 pt baseline grids ensure consistent vertical rhythm across pages.
3. Web Typography (CSS)
CSS supports points, though pixels and ems are more common for responsive design:
body {
font-size: 12pt; /* Equivalent to 16px at 96 DPI */
}
h1 {
font-size: 24pt; /* Prints at exactly 1/3 inch tall */
}
@media print {
body { font-size: 11pt; } /* Optimize for printed output */
}
Print Stylesheets: Points are ideal for @media print CSS rules since they translate directly to physical printed size.
Fixed Layouts: PDF generators and print-to-web applications often use point-based layouts for predictable output.
4. Font Design and Development
Em Square Definition:
- Font designers work within an em square measured in points
- Traditionally 1000 or 2048 units per em square (OpenType fonts)
- Defines the bounding box for all characters
Typeface Specifications:
- X-height: Ratio of lowercase 'x' height to full em square (typically 0.5-0.6)
- Cap height: Uppercase letter height (typically 0.65-0.75 of em square)
- Ascenders/descenders: Extensions above/below baseline
All these proportions maintain their relationships regardless of point size, so a typeface designed with good proportions at 12 pt will remain readable at 8 pt or 72 pt.
5. Publishing and Book Design
Book Industry Standards:
- Fiction novels: 10-12 pt body text, typically Garamond, Baskerville, or Caslon
- Textbooks: 10-11 pt body, 8-9 pt captions/sidebars
- Children's books: 14-18 pt for early readers, larger for picture books
- Academic journals: 10-11 pt Times New Roman or similar serif fonts
Line Spacing (Leading): Traditionally measured in points: 10 pt text with 12 pt leading (written "10/12" and pronounced "ten on twelve") means 10 pt font with 2 pts of extra space between lines.
6. Screen Display and User Interface Design
Operating System Defaults:
- Windows: 96 DPI screen resolution → 12 pt = 16 pixels
- macOS (historical): 72 DPI → 12 pt = 12 pixels (now uses points independently of DPI)
- Retina/HiDPI displays: Points now represent logical pixels rather than physical pixels
Mobile App Guidelines:
- iOS: Uses point as device-independent unit; 1 pt = 1 logical pixel (2-3 physical pixels on Retina)
- Android: Uses density-independent pixels (dp), roughly equivalent to points
Accessibility Standards:
- WCAG 2.1: Recommends minimum 14 pt (18.67 px at 96 DPI) for body text
- Large print: 18 pt or larger considered "large print" for accessibility
7. Technical Drawing and CAD (Limited Use)
While engineering drawings typically use millimeters or inches, annotation text in CAD software (AutoCAD, SolidWorks) is specified in points:
- Drawing notes: 10-12 pt
- Dimension labels: 8-10 pt
- Title blocks: 14-24 pt
This ensures text remains readable when drawings are printed or exported to PDF.
Additional Unit Information
About Fathom (fath)
How many feet are in a fathom?
Exactly 6 feet = 1 fathom.
This is the defining relationship. The fathom was standardized to 6 feet during medieval English measurement standardization.
How many meters are in a fathom?
1 fathom = 1.8288 meters (exactly).
This conversion uses the international foot definition: 1 foot = 0.3048 meters (exactly).
Calculation: 6 feet × 0.3048 m/ft = 1.8288 m
Is the fathom an SI unit?
No, the fathom is not an SI unit.
It belongs to the imperial and U.S. customary systems. The SI unit of length is the meter.
International usage: The International Hydrographic Organization recommends meters for nautical charts, but fathoms remain legal and common in U.S. and some British waters.
Is the fathom still commonly used today?
Yes, in specific maritime contexts, especially in the United States.
Still common:
- U.S. NOAA nautical charts (many coastal charts)
- Recreational boating in the U.S.
- Commercial fishing fleets
- Maritime tradition and literature
Declining usage:
- International shipping (uses meters)
- Most modern navies (switched to meters)
- New chart production (increasingly metric)
Result: Fathoms persist in American waters and traditional maritime communities but are gradually being replaced by meters in international contexts.
Where does the word "fathom" come from?
From Old English "fæthm" (outstretched arms, embrace).
Etymology:
- Proto-Germanic: *faþmaz (embrace, armful)
- Old English: fæthm (span of outstretched arms)
- Middle English: fadme, fathme
- Modern English: fathom
Original meaning: The distance between fingertips when a person extends both arms horizontally—roughly 6 feet for an average man.
Verb form: "To fathom" originally meant "to measure depth with outstretched arms," later metaphorically "to comprehend deeply" (exploring the depths of understanding).
Why are anchor chains measured in shackles, not fathoms?
Both are used, but shackles are standard for large vessels.
Shackle definition: 1 shackle = 15 fathoms = 90 feet = 27.43 meters
Reason: Anchor chains are physically connected with shackle links every 15 fathoms. These physical shackles allow disconnection for maintenance and provide visual/tactile markers when deploying chain.
Usage:
- Small vessels: Anchor chain length in fathoms
- Large vessels and navies: Anchor chain length in shackles
Example: "Deploy 5 shackles" = 75 fathoms = 450 feet of chain
How deep is "full fathom five"?
5 fathoms = 30 feet = 9.144 meters.
Shakespeare's The Tempest: Ariel's song describes a drowned man lying at the bottom, 5 fathoms below the surface.
Context: 30 feet is deep enough that:
- Surface light barely reaches the body
- Free diving without equipment is challenging
- The body would be difficult to recover without specialized equipment
This depth creates the eerie, unreachable quality of Ariel's description.
Can I convert my depth sounder from fathoms to meters?
Yes, most modern depth sounders (fishfinders, chartplotters) allow unit selection.
Typical options:
- Feet
- Fathoms
- Meters
How to change (general steps):
- Access settings menu
- Find "Units" or "Depth Units"
- Select preferred unit (fathoms, feet, or meters)
- Save settings
Check manual: Specific instructions vary by manufacturer (Garmin, Lowrance, Raymarine, Furuno, etc.).
What's the difference between fathoms and cable lengths?
Both are nautical length units, but they measure different things:
Fathom:
- 6 feet / 1.8288 meters
- Primarily for depth measurement
Cable length:
- UK: 608 feet = 185.3 meters (1/10 nautical mile)
- US (historical): 720 feet = 219.5 meters (120 fathoms)
- Primarily for horizontal distance (anchor cable, ship-to-ship spacing)
Confusion: The term "cable" sometimes referred to 100 or 120 fathoms of anchor cable, but the standardized "cable length" unit differs from this.
Do submarines still use fathoms?
Historically yes, but modern submarines use meters.
World War II era: U.S. and British submarines recorded depths in fathoms (e.g., "Dive to 50 fathoms").
Modern practice:
- U.S. Navy: Switched to feet and meters for submarine operations
- International: Nearly all modern navies use meters
Reason for change: International standardization, digital instrumentation, and NATO interoperability drove metrication.
About Point (Typography) (pt)
How many points are in an inch?
Exactly 72 points (pt) = 1 inch (in) in the modern DTP point system used by all contemporary software. This creates simple conversions:
- 36 pt = 0.5 inches (half inch)
- 18 pt = 0.25 inches (quarter inch)
- 144 pt = 2 inches
Historically, European Didot points (≈67.55 per inch) and American pica points (≈72.27 per inch) used slightly different ratios, but these are obsolete in modern typography.
What is the difference between a point and a pixel?
Points are physical length units (1/72 inch), used for print and when physical size matters. Pixels are device-dependent digital display units whose physical size varies by screen resolution:
- On 96 DPI screens (Windows/web standard): 1 pt = 1.333 pixels
- On 72 DPI screens (old Mac standard): 1 pt = 1 pixel
- On Retina/HiDPI displays: 1 pt = 2-4 physical pixels (but still 1.333 "logical" pixels)
Use points for print design where physical dimensions matter. Use pixels or ems for responsive web design where consistency across devices matters more than absolute size.
What does 12 pt font mean?
12 pt font means the font's em square (the invisible bounding box containing the letters plus spacing) is 12 points (1/6 inch or 4.23 mm) tall. This includes:
- Ascenders: Parts above the baseline (tops of 'h', 'b', 'd')
- Descenders: Parts below the baseline (tails of 'g', 'y', 'p')
- Built-in spacing: Extra vertical room above and below
The actual visible letter height (called x-height for lowercase or cap height for capitals) is typically 60-70% of the point size. So 12 pt text has capital letters around 8-9 points (0.11-0.125 inches) tall, with the remaining space used for descenders and line spacing.
Why are there exactly 72 points in an inch?
Adobe Systems chose 72 because it's highly divisible: 72 = 2³ × 3² = 8 × 9, with factors including 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36. This makes common fractions simple:
- 1/2 inch = 36 pt
- 1/3 inch = 24 pt
- 1/4 inch = 18 pt
- 1/6 inch = 12 pt (standard body text)
- 1/8 inch = 9 pt
Additionally, early Macintosh screens used 72 DPI (dots per inch), making 1 point = 1 pixel—perfect for WYSIWYG ("what you see is what you get") design. Text appeared onscreen at its exact printed size.
Historically, Pierre Simon Fournier's 1737 system also used 72 points/inch for the same mathematical convenience, though his "inch" was the French royal inch, slightly different from today's international inch.
What's the difference between points and picas?
Points and picas are related typographic units:
- 1 pica = 12 points
- 6 picas = 72 points = 1 inch
- 1 pica = 1/6 inch ≈ 4.233 mm
Points are used for font sizes and small measurements (12 pt text, 2 pt line thickness). Picas are used for larger layout dimensions (column widths, page margins, grid spacing).
Example: A newspaper column might be "12 picas wide" (2 inches / 144 points) with "9 pt body text" and "1 pica margins" (12 points / 1/6 inch).
Both units are part of the same measurement system and convert simply (multiply or divide by 12), making calculations easy while providing appropriately-scaled units for different design elements.
How do I convert points to millimeters?
Formula: millimeters = points × 0.352777... (exact value: 25.4 / 72)
Simplified: millimeters ≈ points × 0.353 (accurate within 0.01%)
Quick conversions:
- 10 pt = 3.53 mm
- 12 pt = 4.23 mm
- 14 pt = 4.94 mm
- 18 pt = 6.35 mm
- 24 pt = 8.47 mm
- 72 pt = 25.4 mm (exactly 1 inch)
Reverse conversion (millimeters to points): points = millimeters × 2.834645... ≈ millimeters × 2.835
Example: A European specification requires "4 mm text." You need: 4 mm × 2.835 ≈ 11.34 pt (round to 11 pt or 11.5 pt).
Is 12 pt the same size in Word and Photoshop?
Yes, exactly. All modern software—Microsoft Word, Adobe Photoshop, InDesign, Illustrator, Google Docs, Apple Pages—uses the same DTP point definition (1/72 inch). 12 pt text will measure exactly 1/6 inch (4.23 mm) when printed from any of these applications.
However, onscreen appearance may differ slightly due to:
- Font rendering differences: Windows ClearType vs. Mac font smoothing displays the same physical size slightly differently
- Screen zoom levels: If Word is zoomed to 150%, text appears larger on screen but still prints at correct physical size
- Different default fonts: Word's default Calibri looks different from Photoshop's default Arial, even at the same point size
But when measured with a ruler on printed output, 12 pt is always exactly 1/6 inch across all applications.
Why doesn't my 12 pt text look 12 points tall on screen?
Your screen zoom level affects apparent size, but the text will still print at correct physical dimensions:
- 100% zoom: 12 pt text appears at approximately true physical size (depending on monitor size and resolution)
- 200% zoom: 12 pt text appears twice as large on screen but still prints at 1/6 inch (4.23 mm)
- 50% zoom: Text appears half-size on screen but prints correctly
Most word processors and design software show the current zoom level in the bottom toolbar. Page view at 100% zoom usually displays content close to actual print size, though this depends on your monitor's physical dimensions and resolution.
To verify true size, print a test page and measure with a ruler: 12 pt text should measure exactly 0.167 inches or 4.23 mm from the top of the tallest letter to the bottom of descenders.
What's the best point size for body text?
10-12 pt is the standard range for printed body text, with specific recommendations depending on context:
Printed Documents:
- 10 pt: Acceptable minimum; used for dense content (textbooks, references)
- 11 pt: Comfortable reading size for most book typography
- 12 pt: Default in Microsoft Word; universally acceptable for any document
Digital/Screen Display:
- 12-16 pt (or 16-21 pixels at 96 DPI): More comfortable for extended screen reading due to backlit display eye strain
- 14-18 pt: Recommended for accessibility and readers with vision impairments
Factors affecting choice:
- Font design: Fonts with larger x-height (like Verdana) are readable at smaller sizes than fonts with small x-height (like Garamond)
- Line length: Longer lines benefit from larger text (12+ pt)
- Reader age: Older audiences benefit from 12-14 pt minimum
- Reading distance: Presentations and signage require much larger text (18+ pt)
When in doubt, 12 pt is the safe, professional standard for nearly all applications.
Can I use points for web design?
Yes, but it's discouraged for screen-only designs. Here's why:
Points in CSS:
CSS supports the pt unit (1/72 inch), but it's primarily useful for print stylesheets:
@media print {
body { font-size: 11pt; } /* Predictable printed size */
h1 { font-size: 18pt; }
}
Why not for screen:
- Not responsive: Points are absolute units, don't scale with user preferences or viewport size
- Accessibility issues: Users who increase browser font size won't affect point-sized text
- Device variations: Different pixel densities make points appear inconsistent across devices
Better alternatives for screen:
- Relative units (
em,rem): Scale with user preferences - Pixels (
px): Precise control with media queries - Viewport units (
vw,vh): Scale with screen size
Best practice: Use pixels or rems for screen, points for print stylesheets.
What is leading and how does it relate to points?
Leading (pronounced "led-ing") is the vertical space between lines of text, measured in points from baseline to baseline. The term comes from traditional typesetting, where thin strips of lead metal were inserted between lines of type.
Standard leading conventions:
- Solid leading: Leading = font size (10 pt text with 10 pt leading = "10/10")
- Lines touch; rarely used except for display type
- Normal leading: Leading = 120% of font size (10 pt text with 12 pt leading = "10/12")
- Default in most word processors
- Comfortable reading with adequate space
- Loose leading: Leading = 140-160% of font size (10 pt text with 14-16 pt leading = "10/14" or "10/16")
- Airy, easy to read
- Used for accessibility, children's books
Example: 12 pt text with 14.4 pt leading means:
- Font size: 12 points (1/6 inch)
- Space from baseline to baseline: 14.4 points (0.2 inches)
- Extra space between lines: 2.4 points (0.033 inches)
Too-tight leading makes text hard to read (lines blur together). Too-loose leading creates disconnected "rivers" of white space.
Do fonts actually differ in "12 pt" size?
Yes and no. All 12 pt fonts have the same em square (the bounding box), but they can look very different sizes due to:
X-height variation:
- High x-height fonts (Verdana, Arial): Lowercase letters occupy 50-60% of em square → appear larger
- Low x-height fonts (Garamond, Bodoni): Lowercase letters occupy 40-50% of em square → appear smaller
Example:
- 12 pt Verdana: Lowercase 'x' is about 6-7 points tall (very readable)
- 12 pt Garamond: Lowercase 'x' is about 5-6 points tall (more elegant but smaller)
Both fonts have the same 12 pt em square, but Verdana allocates more of that space to letter height and less to descenders/ascenders, making it appear larger.
Practical implication: When switching fonts in a document, you may need to adjust point size to maintain similar apparent size. Replacing 12 pt Garamond with 12 pt Verdana might look too large; 11 pt Verdana may better match the original appearance.
This is why typographers often specify fonts and sizes together: "11 pt Garamond" and "10 pt Verdana" can provide similar readability despite different nominal sizes.
Conversion Table: Fathom to Point (Typography)
| Fathom (fath) | Point (Typography) (pt) |
|---|---|
| 0.5 | 2,591.998 |
| 1 | 5,183.997 |
| 1.5 | 7,775.995 |
| 2 | 10,367.994 |
| 5 | 25,919.984 |
| 10 | 51,839.967 |
| 25 | 129,599.918 |
| 50 | 259,199.837 |
| 100 | 518,399.673 |
| 250 | 1,295,999.184 |
| 500 | 2,591,998.367 |
| 1,000 | 5,183,996.735 |
People Also Ask
How do I convert Fathom to Point (Typography)?
To convert Fathom to Point (Typography), enter the value in Fathom in the calculator above. The conversion will happen automatically. Use our free online converter for instant and accurate results. You can also visit our length converter page to convert between other units in this category.
Learn more →What is the conversion factor from Fathom to Point (Typography)?
The conversion factor depends on the specific relationship between Fathom and Point (Typography). You can find the exact conversion formula and factor on this page. Our calculator handles all calculations automatically. See the conversion table above for common values.
Can I convert Point (Typography) back to Fathom?
Yes! You can easily convert Point (Typography) back to Fathom by using the swap button (⇌) in the calculator above, or by visiting our Point (Typography) to Fathom converter page. You can also explore other length conversions on our category page.
Learn more →What are common uses for Fathom and Point (Typography)?
Fathom and Point (Typography) are both standard units used in length measurements. They are commonly used in various applications including engineering, construction, cooking, and scientific research. Browse our length converter for more conversion options.
For more length conversion questions, visit our FAQ page or explore our conversion guides.
Helpful Conversion Guides
Learn more about unit conversion with our comprehensive guides:
📚 How to Convert Units
Step-by-step guide to unit conversion with practical examples.
🔢 Conversion Formulas
Essential formulas for length and other conversions.
⚖️ Metric vs Imperial
Understand the differences between measurement systems.
⚠️ Common Mistakes
Learn about frequent errors and how to avoid them.
All Length Conversions
Other Length Units and Conversions
Explore other length units and their conversion options:
- Meter (m) • Fathom to Meter
- Kilometer (km) • Fathom to Kilometer
- Hectometer (hm) • Fathom to Hectometer
- Decimeter (dm) • Fathom to Decimeter
- Centimeter (cm) • Fathom to Centimeter
- Millimeter (mm) • Fathom to Millimeter
- Inch (in) • Fathom to Inch
- Foot (ft) • Fathom to Foot
- Yard (yd) • Fathom to Yard
- Mile (mi) • Fathom to Mile
Verified Against Authority Standards
All conversion formulas have been verified against international standards and authoritative sources to ensure maximum accuracy and reliability.
National Institute of Standards and Technology — Official US standards for length measurements
Bureau International des Poids et Mesures — International System of Units official documentation
Last verified: December 3, 2025