Kilometer to Point (Typography) Converter

Convert kilometers to points with our free online length converter.

Quick Answer

1 Kilometer = 2834643.883689 points

Formula: Kilometer × conversion factor = Point (Typography)

Use the calculator below for instant, accurate conversions.

Our Accuracy Guarantee

All conversion formulas on UnitsConverter.io have been verified against NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) guidelines and international SI standards. Our calculations are accurate to 10 decimal places for standard conversions and use arbitrary precision arithmetic for astronomical units.

Last verified: December 2025Reviewed by: Sam Mathew, Software Engineer

Kilometer to Point (Typography) Calculator

How to Use the Kilometer to Point (Typography) Calculator:

  1. Enter the value you want to convert in the 'From' field (Kilometer).
  2. The converted value in Point (Typography) will appear automatically in the 'To' field.
  3. Use the dropdown menus to select different units within the Length category.
  4. Click the swap button (⇌) to reverse the conversion direction.
Share:

How to Convert Kilometer to Point (Typography): Step-by-Step Guide

Converting Kilometer to Point (Typography) involves multiplying the value by a specific conversion factor, as shown in the formula below.

Formula:

1 Kilometer = 2.8346e+6 points

Example Calculation:

Convert 10 kilometers: 10 × 2.8346e+6 = 2.8346e+7 points

Disclaimer: For Reference Only

These conversion results are provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees regarding the precision of these results, especially for conversions involving extremely large or small numbers which may be subject to the inherent limitations of standard computer floating-point arithmetic.

Not for professional use. Results should be verified before use in any critical application. View our Terms of Service for more information.

What is a Kilometer and a Point (Typography)?

The kilometer is a unit of length in the International System of Units (SI), the modern form of the metric system. One kilometer equals exactly 1,000 meters by definition, making it a straightforward decimal multiple of the base SI length unit.

The kilometer is denoted by the symbol km (lowercase 'k', lowercase 'm'). The spelling varies by region: "kilometre" in British English and Commonwealth countries, "kilometer" in American English, though both refer to the same measurement.

The kilometer represents the standard distance unit for:

  • Road distances and highway signage worldwide (except USA, Myanmar, Liberia)
  • Geographic features: city separation, coastline length, river length
  • Transportation: vehicle range, fuel efficiency (km/L or L/100km)
  • Athletics: running and cycling race distances (5K, 10K, marathon)
  • Aviation: visibility distances, some altitude references in certain countries

The metric system's decimal structure makes kilometer conversions simple:

  • 1 kilometer = 1,000 meters (exactly)
  • 1 kilometer = 100,000 centimeters
  • 1 kilometer = 1,000,000 millimeters
  • 1 meter = 0.001 kilometers
  • 1 centimeter = 0.00001 kilometers

The Desktop Publishing Point

The modern typographic point is defined as exactly 1/72 of an international inch. This creates the mathematically convenient relationship:

  • 1 point (pt) = 1/72 inch = 0.013888... inches
  • 1 point = 0.352777... millimeters
  • 72 points = 1 inch (exactly)
  • 1 inch = 25.4 mm (by international definition)

This definition, known as the PostScript point or DTP point (Desktop Publishing point), was established by Adobe Systems in the 1980s and has become the universal standard for all modern typography.

The Em Square and Font Height

When we say "12 pt font," we're technically measuring the em square—the metal block that held the physical letter in traditional typesetting. This em square includes:

  • Ascenders: Parts of letters extending above the baseline (like the top of 'h' or 'b')
  • Descenders: Parts extending below the baseline (like the tail of 'g' or 'y')
  • Built-in spacing: Extra vertical space above and below letters

This means 12 pt text doesn't have letters exactly 1/6 inch tall—the actual visible letter height (called x-height) is typically 60-70% of the point size, with the rest being built-in spacing. This spacing prevents lines of text from touching each other.

Points vs. Picas

Typography traditionally pairs the point with the pica:

  • 1 pica = 12 points = 1/6 inch
  • 6 picas = 1 inch
  • 1 pica ≈ 4.233 mm

Professional designers often measure larger typographic elements in picas. For example, a column width might be "20 picas" (3.33 inches) rather than "240 points." The pica provides a more manageable unit for page layout dimensions while maintaining exact mathematical relationships.

Historical Point Systems (Pre-Digital)

Before the DTP point standardization, multiple incompatible point systems existed:

Didot Point (Continental Europe):

  • 1 Didot point ≈ 0.3759 mm
  • Based on the French pied du roi (royal foot)
  • Approximately 67.55 Didot points per inch
  • Still occasionally referenced in European historical printing contexts

American/British Pica Point:

  • 1 pica point ≈ 0.351459 mm
  • 72.27 points per inch (not exactly 72!)
  • Derived from metal type casting standards
  • Also called the "Anglo-American point"

Fournier Point (Early French):

  • Pierre Simon Fournier's original 1737 system
  • Approximately 0.348 mm
  • 72.989 points per French royal inch
  • Largely replaced by Didot system by 1800

The digital revolution eliminated these variations. Today, when anyone uses "point" in typography, they mean the 1/72-inch DTP point unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Note: The Kilometer is part of the metric (SI) system, primarily used globally in science and trade. The Point (Typography) belongs to the imperial/US customary system.

History of the Kilometer and Point (Typography)

The kilometer emerged during one of history's most ambitious standardization efforts—the creation of the metric system during the French Revolution.

Metric System Origins (1790s): In 1791, the French Academy of Sciences proposed a universal measurement system based on natural constants rather than arbitrary royal decrees. They defined the meter as one ten-millionth of the distance from the North Pole to the equator along the Paris meridian. For longer distances, they created the kilometer (from Greek khilioi = thousand, plus metron = measure).

Decimal Simplicity: Unlike traditional systems with complex conversions (5,280 feet per mile, 1,760 yards per mile), the metric system used consistent decimal relationships. This made the kilometer instantly comprehensible: 1 km = 1,000 m, with no fractional arithmetic required.

Global Adoption: The metric system spread rapidly throughout Europe in the early 1800s. Napoleon's conquests carried metric measurements across the continent. By the mid-19th century, most European nations had officially adopted kilometers for distance measurement.

International Treaty (1875): The Metre Convention, signed by 17 nations, established the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) and made the metric system the international scientific standard. Kilometers became the globally recognized unit for geographic and travel distances.

Road Sign Conversion: Through the 20th century, country after country converted road signage from miles to kilometers:

  • Germany: 1920s (early adopter)
  • Japan: 1924
  • France: Kilometers used since metric system creation (1795)
  • Australia: 1974 (major conversion effort)
  • Canada: 1977 (gradual conversion)
  • United Kingdom: Still uses miles despite metric adoption elsewhere
  • Ireland: 2005 (one of the last European conversions)

Modern Definition (1983): The meter was redefined based on the speed of light: the distance light travels in vacuum during 1/299,792,458 of a second. This made the kilometer precisely 299,792,458/299,792,458,000 of the distance light travels in one second, tying it to a fundamental physical constant rather than a physical artifact.

Global Standard: Today, approximately 195 of 198 countries use kilometers as their primary road distance measurement. Only the United States, Myanmar, and Liberia officially use miles, though Myanmar is gradually transitioning to metric. The kilometer has become effectively universal for international travel, trade, and communication.

Early Typography: The Cicero and Finger-Width (1400s-1700s)

Early European printing used inconsistent measurements based on:

  • The cicero: A unit based on the line width of a specific typeface (Cicero type), varying by region
  • Local inches and feet: Each region had different inch definitions
  • Finger widths and eyeball estimates: Printers adjusted type spacing by hand

This inconsistency made it nearly impossible to share typeface designs or maintain consistency across print shops.

Pierre Simon Fournier: The First Point System (1737)

French typefounder Pierre Simon Fournier le Jeune published "Table des proportions" (1737), introducing the first systematic point system:

  • Based the point on the French royal inch (pouce du roi)
  • Divided the inch into 72 points (a number divisible by many factors: 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12)
  • Created 20 standardized font sizes
  • Named sizes after musical terms (e.g., "Petit-Canon," "Gros-Parangon")

Fournier's system brought mathematical precision to typography for the first time, allowing typefounders to create consistent, proportional type families.

François-Ambroise Didot: The Didot Point (1783)

François-Ambroise Didot, another French typefounder, refined Fournier's system by basing measurements on the pied du roi (royal foot):

  • 1 Didot point = 1/72 of 1/12 of the pied du roi ≈ 0.3759 mm
  • Larger than Fournier's point (about 7% bigger)
  • Created the cicero as 12 Didot points
  • Established type size naming still used today (e.g., corps 8, corps 12)

The Didot system became the standard across Continental Europe and remains influential in French and German typography traditions. Some European printing specifications still reference "Didot" even today when discussing historical typography.

American and British Variations (1800s)

The 19th century saw typography spread across the English-speaking world, but without international standards:

American Point System (established c. 1886):

  • Created by the United States Type Founders Association
  • Based on the pica: 1 pica = 0.166 inches
  • Therefore: 1 point = 0.166/12 ≈ 0.013837 inches
  • Result: approximately 72.27 points per inch

British Imperial Point:

  • Similar to American system but based on British imperial inch
  • Also approximately 72.27 points per inch
  • Created incompatibilities when Britain and US used different inch definitions before 1959

This proliferation of standards created international printing chaos. A "12 point" font in France was noticeably different from "12 point" in Britain or America.

Adobe PostScript: The Digital Revolution (1982-1985)

The desktop publishing revolution began when Adobe Systems developed PostScript, a page description language for laser printers:

John Warnock and Charles Geschke (Adobe founders) faced a choice: adopt historical point systems with fractional relationships to inches, or create a new, mathematically clean standard.

They chose simplicity: 1 point = exactly 1/72 inch

This decision meant:

  • Easy calculation: multiply by 72 to convert inches to points
  • Clean pixel mapping on early displays (72 DPI screens made 1 point = 1 pixel)
  • No fractional arithmetic in computer calculations
  • Complete break from historical confusion

Apple LaserWriter and Macintosh (1985)

Apple Computer licensed Adobe PostScript for the Macintosh computer and LaserWriter printer (launched January 1985):

  • First affordable desktop publishing system
  • 72 DPI screen resolution matched PostScript's 72 points/inch
  • Onscreen "What You See Is What You Get" (WYSIWYG): Text appeared on screen at the exact size it would print
  • Revolutionary for designers: no more calculating conversions

The LaserWriter cost $7,000 (expensive but far cheaper than typesetting equipment costing $50,000+), making professional typography accessible to small businesses and independent designers.

Industry Standardization (1985-1995)

The DTP point rapidly became universal:

1987: Adobe releases Adobe Illustrator and Photoshop (1990), both using PostScript points 1987: PageMaker (Aldus, later Adobe) becomes industry-standard layout software 1990s: Microsoft adopts 72 points/inch in Word, PowerPoint, Publisher 1996: CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) defines the pt unit as 1/72 inch for web typography 2000s: All professional design software (InDesign, Quark, CorelDRAW) standardizes on DTP point

By 2000, the historical Didot and pica points had effectively vanished from active use. The DTP point achieved something remarkable: complete global standardization of a measurement unit in just 15 years.

Modern Digital Era (2000-Present)

Today's typography operates in a world of complete point standardization:

  • Print design: All software uses 72 pt/inch
  • Web design: CSS pt units defined as 1/72 inch (though px and em are more common online)
  • Mobile apps: iOS, Android use point-based typography systems
  • E-readers: Kindle, Apple Books use point-based font sizing
  • Office software: Word, Google Docs, Apple Pages all use identical point measurements

The point has become so universal that most designers under 40 have never encountered historical point systems. The DTP point is simply "the point."

Common Uses and Applications: kilometers vs points

Explore the typical applications for both Kilometer (metric) and Point (Typography) (imperial/US) to understand their common contexts.

Common Uses for kilometers

International Road Travel and GPS

GPS navigation systems worldwide default to kilometers in metric countries. Drivers receive instructions like "In 2 kilometers, turn left" or "Your destination is 45 kilometers away." Trip computers display "distance to empty" in kilometers, helping drivers plan fuel stops.

Road atlases and mapping applications show distance scales in kilometers. Drivers estimate travel time using kilometers: "It's 300 km, so at 100 km/h average, that's 3 hours of driving" becomes intuitive mental math.

Highway interchanges number by kilometer markers in many countries. "Exit 245" means the exit is 245 km from the highway's starting point, making distance calculation simple: the gap between Exit 245 and Exit 310 is 65 km.

Public Transportation and Urban Transit

Metro, train, and bus systems describe route lengths and network extent in kilometers:

Urban Rail Systems:

  • Tokyo Metro: 304 km of track, 179 stations
  • London Underground: 402 km of track
  • New York City Subway: 380 km of track
  • Paris Métro: 226 km of track

High-Speed Rail:

  • China high-speed network: 40,000+ km (world's largest)
  • Europe high-speed: 11,000+ km network
  • Japan Shinkansen: 3,000+ km
  • Trains operate at 250-350 km/h

Commuters describe their journey: "I take the train 35 km to work" or "The metro line is 25 km end to end."

Logistics and Freight

Shipping companies calculate costs, routes, and delivery times in kilometers:

Trucking:

  • Per-kilometer rates: €0.50-2.00 per km depending on cargo
  • Driver limits: 500-900 km daily maximum (varying by regulations)
  • Route optimization: Software minimizes total kilometers driven

Delivery Services:

  • Local delivery: 0-50 km radius
  • Regional delivery: 50-200 km
  • National delivery: 200-1,000+ km

Supply Chain: "Warehouse is 150 km from port" or "Distribution center serves 200 km radius" inform logistics planning and inventory positioning.

Scientific and Environmental Research

Scientific studies report distances in kilometers:

Climate Science:

  • Ice shelf extent: "Antarctic ice shelf extends 500 km from coast"
  • Glacier retreat: "Glacier receded 5 km over past decade"
  • Ocean currents: "Gulf Stream flows 10,000 km across Atlantic"

Geology:

  • Fault lines: "San Andreas Fault extends 1,200 km through California"
  • Volcanic reach: "Ash cloud spread 500 km from eruption"

Ecology:

  • Animal migration: "Caribou migrate 5,000 km annually"
  • Bird migration: "Arctic terns migrate 70,000 km round trip"

Sports and Recreation

Beyond running, many sports use kilometer measurements:

Hiking:

  • Day hike: 5-20 km round trip
  • Multi-day trek: 10-30 km per day
  • Long-distance trails: Appalachian Trail 3,500 km, Pacific Crest Trail 4,300 km

Swimming:

  • Open water races: 5 km, 10 km, 25 km
  • English Channel: 34 km minimum straight-line distance (actual swim 40-50 km due to currents)

Skiing:

  • Cross-country ski race: 10 km, 30 km, 50 km distances
  • Ski resort terrain: "Resort has 150 km of marked runs"

Sailing:

  • Yacht races: Sydney to Hobart 1,170 km, Volvo Ocean Race circumnavigates 72,000+ km

Agriculture and Land Management

Farms and land parcels measure in hectares, with distances in kilometers:

Farm Infrastructure:

  • Irrigation canal: 10-50 km length serving agricultural region
  • Fence line: "Property has 15 km of fencing"
  • Farm roads: "30 km of internal roads"

Rural Distances:

  • "Town is 25 km away"
  • "Nearest hospital 60 km"
  • "Property borders 2 km of river frontage"

Real Estate and Property

Property descriptions include kilometer proximity to amenities:

Location Descriptions:

  • "5 km to city center"
  • "2 km to nearest school"
  • "15 km to international airport"
  • "Within 1 km of public transport"

Commute Distance: Property values often correlate with kilometer distance from employment centers. "Within 10 km of downtown" commands premium pricing compared to "40 km from city center."

Emergency Services

Police, fire, and ambulance services track response distances and coverage areas in kilometers:

Response Zones:

  • Ambulance coverage: Aim for < 8 km from any location
  • Fire station spacing: 3-5 km apart in urban areas
  • Police patrol areas: Officers cover 10-30 km² sectors

Response Times: "Average response time 8 minutes for locations within 5 km of station" guides emergency service planning.

Telecommunications and Utilities

Infrastructure planners measure network reach and service areas in kilometers:

Power Distribution:

  • High-voltage transmission: Hundreds to thousands of km
  • Distribution lines: 5-20 km from substation to customers
  • Rural electrification: "Extended power 50 km to remote village"

Water Supply:

  • Aqueduct: "200 km pipeline from reservoir to city"
  • Distribution network: "City has 2,000 km of water mains"

Internet Infrastructure:

  • "Fiber backbone runs 5,000 km across country"
  • "Last-mile connections within 3 km of exchange"

When to Use points

1. Document Typography and Word Processing

Body Text Standards:

  • 10-12 pt: Standard body text for business documents, reports, letters
  • 11 pt: Often considered optimal for printed books (balance of readability and page economy)
  • 12 pt: Default in Microsoft Word, Google Docs; universally acceptable for any document
  • 14 pt: Large print books for readers with visual impairments

Heading Hierarchies: Professional documents typically use 3-5 heading levels with systematic point size progression:

  • H1 (Title): 18-24 pt, bold
  • H2 (Major sections): 16-18 pt, bold
  • H3 (Subsections): 14-16 pt, bold
  • H4 (Minor subsections): 12-14 pt, bold or italic
  • Body text: 10-12 pt, regular

This creates clear visual hierarchy while maintaining readability.

2. Professional Graphic Design and Layout

Adobe Creative Suite Standards:

  • InDesign: All text boxes, frames, and measurements in points
  • Illustrator: Artboard rulers can display points; all typography in points
  • Photoshop: Type tool uses points by default

Print Design Specifications:

  • Business cards: Names typically 14-18 pt, contact info 8-10 pt
  • Brochures: Headlines 24-36 pt, body text 9-11 pt
  • Posters: Titles 48-144+ pt depending on viewing distance
  • Magazine layouts: Body 9-10 pt (smaller for dense content), headlines 18-48 pt

Grid Systems: Many designers use point-based grids: 12 pt baseline grids ensure consistent vertical rhythm across pages.

3. Web Typography (CSS)

CSS supports points, though pixels and ems are more common for responsive design:

body {
  font-size: 12pt; /* Equivalent to 16px at 96 DPI */
}

h1 {
  font-size: 24pt; /* Prints at exactly 1/3 inch tall */
}

@media print {
  body { font-size: 11pt; } /* Optimize for printed output */
}

Print Stylesheets: Points are ideal for @media print CSS rules since they translate directly to physical printed size.

Fixed Layouts: PDF generators and print-to-web applications often use point-based layouts for predictable output.

4. Font Design and Development

Em Square Definition:

  • Font designers work within an em square measured in points
  • Traditionally 1000 or 2048 units per em square (OpenType fonts)
  • Defines the bounding box for all characters

Typeface Specifications:

  • X-height: Ratio of lowercase 'x' height to full em square (typically 0.5-0.6)
  • Cap height: Uppercase letter height (typically 0.65-0.75 of em square)
  • Ascenders/descenders: Extensions above/below baseline

All these proportions maintain their relationships regardless of point size, so a typeface designed with good proportions at 12 pt will remain readable at 8 pt or 72 pt.

5. Publishing and Book Design

Book Industry Standards:

  • Fiction novels: 10-12 pt body text, typically Garamond, Baskerville, or Caslon
  • Textbooks: 10-11 pt body, 8-9 pt captions/sidebars
  • Children's books: 14-18 pt for early readers, larger for picture books
  • Academic journals: 10-11 pt Times New Roman or similar serif fonts

Line Spacing (Leading): Traditionally measured in points: 10 pt text with 12 pt leading (written "10/12" and pronounced "ten on twelve") means 10 pt font with 2 pts of extra space between lines.

6. Screen Display and User Interface Design

Operating System Defaults:

  • Windows: 96 DPI screen resolution → 12 pt = 16 pixels
  • macOS (historical): 72 DPI → 12 pt = 12 pixels (now uses points independently of DPI)
  • Retina/HiDPI displays: Points now represent logical pixels rather than physical pixels

Mobile App Guidelines:

  • iOS: Uses point as device-independent unit; 1 pt = 1 logical pixel (2-3 physical pixels on Retina)
  • Android: Uses density-independent pixels (dp), roughly equivalent to points

Accessibility Standards:

  • WCAG 2.1: Recommends minimum 14 pt (18.67 px at 96 DPI) for body text
  • Large print: 18 pt or larger considered "large print" for accessibility

7. Technical Drawing and CAD (Limited Use)

While engineering drawings typically use millimeters or inches, annotation text in CAD software (AutoCAD, SolidWorks) is specified in points:

  • Drawing notes: 10-12 pt
  • Dimension labels: 8-10 pt
  • Title blocks: 14-24 pt

This ensures text remains readable when drawings are printed or exported to PDF.

Additional Unit Information

About Kilometer (km)

How many meters are in a kilometer?

There are exactly 1,000 meters in 1 kilometer. This relationship is definitional—the prefix "kilo-" means 1,000 in the metric system.

Converting kilometers to meters: Multiply by 1,000

  • 1 km = 1,000 m
  • 2.5 km = 2,500 m
  • 0.5 km = 500 m
  • 10 km = 10,000 m

Converting meters to kilometers: Divide by 1,000

  • 1,500 m = 1.5 km
  • 5,000 m = 5 km
  • 500 m = 0.5 km
  • 42,195 m = 42.195 km (marathon distance)

The metric system's decimal structure makes these conversions simple—just move the decimal point three places.

How many kilometers are in a mile?

One mile equals exactly 1.609344 kilometers. This conversion factor was established through the 1959 international yard and pound agreement, which defined the yard (and thus the mile) in terms of meters.

Quick conversions:

  • 1 mile = 1.609 km
  • 5 miles = 8.047 km
  • 10 miles = 16.093 km
  • 26.2 miles (marathon) = 42.195 km

Reverse conversion: 1 kilometer = 0.621371 miles

  • 1 km ≈ 0.62 miles (about 5/8 of a mile)
  • 5 km = 3.107 miles
  • 10 km = 6.214 miles
  • 100 km = 62.137 miles

Mental approximation: For rough estimates, remember "5 miles ≈ 8 km" or "8 km ≈ 5 miles." This Fibonacci-pair approximation gives about 1% accuracy and is easy to remember. More roughly, "1 mile ≈ 1.6 km" works for casual conversion.

What does 'kilo' mean in kilometer?

The prefix "kilo-" means one thousand (1,000). It derives from the Greek word khilioi, meaning thousand.

In the metric system, "kilo-" consistently indicates multiplication by 1,000:

  • 1 kilometer (km) = 1,000 meters
  • 1 kilogram (kg) = 1,000 grams
  • 1 kiloliter (kL) = 1,000 liters
  • 1 kilobyte (kB) = 1,000 bytes (in decimal notation)
  • 1 kilowatt (kW) = 1,000 watts

This consistent prefix system makes the metric system easy to learn. Once you know "kilo = 1,000," you can understand any kilo- measurement immediately.

Other common metric prefixes:

  • Mega- (M) = 1,000,000 (million)
  • Kilo- (k) = 1,000 (thousand)
  • Hecto- (h) = 100 (hundred)
  • Deca- (da) = 10 (ten)
  • Deci- (d) = 0.1 (tenth)
  • Centi- (c) = 0.01 (hundredth)
  • Milli- (m) = 0.001 (thousandth)

Is a kilometer longer or shorter than a mile?

A kilometer is shorter than a mile. One mile equals approximately 1.61 kilometers, making a mile about 61% longer than a kilometer.

Comparison:

  • 1 mile = 1.609344 km
  • 1 km = 0.621371 miles

Practical comparison:

  • 5K race = 3.11 miles (shorter than 5 miles)
  • 10K race = 6.21 miles (shorter than 10 miles)
  • 100 km = 62.1 miles (significantly shorter than 100 miles)

Mental shortcut: Think "kilometers are smaller, so you need more of them." To cover the same distance:

  • 100 miles requires 161 kilometers
  • 100 kilometers equals only 62 miles

This difference matters when traveling internationally. A road sign showing "Paris 100 km" means about 62 miles—much closer than "100 miles" would be. Speed limits work the same way: "100 km/h" equals about 62 mph, considerably slower than "100 mph."

Why does most of the world use kilometers instead of miles?

Approximately 195 of 198 countries use kilometers because the metric system is simpler, more logical, and internationally standardized. Only the United States, Myanmar, and Liberia officially use miles, with Myanmar gradually transitioning to metric.

Decimal Simplicity: The metric system uses consistent base-10 relationships:

  • 1 km = 1,000 m (easy conversion)
  • Compare to: 1 mile = 1,760 yards = 5,280 feet (complex conversion)

Children in metric countries learn one simple rule: move the decimal point. American children must memorize: 12 inches per foot, 3 feet per yard, 1,760 yards per mile.

International Trade: The Metre Convention (1875) established metric as the international scientific and commercial standard. Countries adopting metric gained advantages in international trade, scientific collaboration, and technical documentation.

Post-Colonial Transitions: Former British colonies gradually converted from imperial to metric:

  • Australia: 1970s
  • Canada: 1970s-1980s (though some imperial usage persists)
  • India: 1950s-1960s
  • South Africa: 1970s

Only the United Kingdom retained miles for road signage despite otherwise adopting metric.

US Resistance: America resisted conversion due to:

  • Massive infrastructure costs (replacing millions of road signs)
  • Public opposition (polls show Americans prefer familiar units)
  • No perceived benefit justifying disruption and expense
  • "Metric Conversion Act" of 1975 made metric voluntary, not mandatory

Scientific Reality: Even the US uses metric in science, medicine, and military. The paradox: US scientists publish in metric while consumers shop in imperial.

How do you convert speed from mph to km/h?

To convert miles per hour (mph) to kilometers per hour (km/h), multiply by 1.609344. This gives exact results.

Formula: km/h = mph × 1.609344

Common speed conversions:

  • 30 mph = 48.3 km/h (urban speed limit)
  • 55 mph = 88.5 km/h (rural highway)
  • 60 mph = 96.6 km/h (≈100 km/h common highway limit)
  • 70 mph = 112.7 km/h
  • 75 mph = 120.7 km/h
  • 80 mph = 128.7 km/h

Reverse conversion (km/h to mph): Divide by 1.609344, or multiply by 0.621371

  • 50 km/h = 31.1 mph (urban limit in metric countries)
  • 90 km/h = 55.9 mph (rural road)
  • 100 km/h = 62.1 mph (common highway limit)
  • 110 km/h = 68.3 mph
  • 120 km/h = 74.6 mph
  • 130 km/h = 80.8 mph (German autobahn advisory speed)

Mental approximation: Multiply mph by 1.6 for quick estimates:

  • 60 mph × 1.6 ≈ 96 km/h (actual: 96.6, very close)
  • 70 mph × 1.6 ≈ 112 km/h (actual: 112.7, very close)

Or divide km/h by 1.6 for reverse estimate:

  • 100 km/h ÷ 1.6 ≈ 62.5 mph (actual: 62.1, close enough)

Why it matters: Tourists driving in foreign countries must convert speed limits mentally to avoid speeding tickets. Rental cars may show speedometers in only one unit, requiring constant mental conversion.

What's the difference between km and km²?

Kilometers (km) measure linear distance in one dimension—how far apart two points are, or how long something stretches.

Square kilometers (km²) measure area in two dimensions—how much surface space something covers.

Linear distance (km):

  • Road distance: "Paris is 100 km from here"
  • Running race: "10 km race"
  • River length: "Danube River is 2,850 km long"
  • Border: "3,000 km border with neighboring country"

Area (km²):

  • City size: "Paris covers 105 km²"
  • Country size: "France has an area of 640,000 km²"
  • Lake surface: "Lake Geneva covers 580 km²"
  • Forest: "National park protects 1,200 km² of wilderness"

The math:

  • Multiplying two distances creates area: 10 km × 5 km = 50 km²
  • 1 km² = 1,000,000 m² = 100 hectares
  • A square with 1 km sides has area of 1 km²
  • A square with 10 km sides has area of 100 km² (not 10 km!)

Common confusion: "The city is 50 km" is incomplete—50 km in which direction? Better: "The city center is 50 km away" (linear distance) or "The city covers 200 km²" (area).

How far is a 5K race in miles?

A 5K race is 3.107 miles. The "K" in "5K" stands for kilometers, so 5K means 5 kilometers.

Exact conversion: 5 km × 0.621371 miles/km = 3.10686 miles ≈ 3.11 miles

For practical purposes: 5K ≈ 3.1 miles (slightly over 3 miles)

Common running distances:

  • 5K: 5 km = 3.11 miles (popular beginner race distance)
  • 10K: 10 km = 6.21 miles (popular intermediate distance)
  • 15K: 15 km = 9.32 miles
  • Half-marathon: 21.0975 km = 13.11 miles (exactly half of marathon)
  • Marathon: 42.195 km = 26.219 miles
  • 50K: 50 km = 31.07 miles (ultramarathon)
  • 100K: 100 km = 62.14 miles (ultramarathon)

Why "K" notation? Running races worldwide use kilometer distances even in countries that otherwise use miles (like the US). This creates universal race standards—a 5K is the same distance whether run in New York, Paris, or Tokyo. The "K" abbreviation became standard running terminology.

Pace conversion: A runner completing 5K in 25 minutes averages:

  • 5:00 per kilometer (25 minutes ÷ 5 km)
  • 8:03 per mile (25 minutes ÷ 3.107 miles)

How do you calculate distance on a map with a kilometer scale?

Map scales show how many kilometers in the real world correspond to a unit distance on the map. Common map scales for road maps use kilometers.

Common scale notations:

  • 1:100,000 means 1 cm on map = 100,000 cm (1 km) in reality
  • 1:250,000 means 1 cm on map = 250,000 cm (2.5 km) in reality
  • 1:50,000 means 1 cm on map = 50,000 cm (0.5 km or 500 m) in reality

Using the graphic scale: Most maps include a graphic scale bar showing distances directly:

|——————|
0      50     100 km

Measuring distance:

  1. Use a ruler or string to measure the map distance
  2. Compare to the scale bar or use the ratio
  3. Calculate actual distance

Example: On a 1:100,000 scale map:

  • Measure 5 cm between two cities
  • 5 cm × 1 km/cm = 5 km actual distance

For curved routes (roads, rivers): Lay a string along the curved path, then measure the string length against the scale.

Digital maps: Online mapping tools calculate distances automatically, displaying both kilometers and miles. Google Maps, for instance, shows "15 km" or "9.3 mi" depending on regional settings.

What's the origin of the marathon distance 42.195 kilometers?

The marathon distance of 42.195 kilometers (26 miles, 385 yards) has a fascinating history combining ancient legend with modern royal preference.

Ancient Legend: The marathon commemorates the run of Greek soldier Pheidippides, who allegedly ran from the Battle of Marathon to Athens (about 40 km) to announce victory over Persia in 490 BCE, then died from exhaustion. This legend inspired the modern marathon race.

Original Olympic Distance (1896-1908): Early Olympic marathons varied in distance, roughly 40 km but not standardized. Different Olympic marathons measured 40 km (1896 Athens), 40.26 km (1900 Paris), 41.86 km (1904 St. Louis), 40 km (1906 Athens).

1908 London Olympics—The Defining Race: The modern distance was set for the 1908 London Olympics. The race began at Windsor Castle and finished at the Olympic Stadium. Originally planned as 26 miles, an extra 385 yards was added so the race would finish directly in front of the royal box where Queen Alexandra sat.

Total distance: 26 miles + 385 yards = 26.219 miles = 42.195 kilometers

Standardization (1921): The International Amateur Athletic Federation (IAAF) officially adopted 42.195 km as the standard marathon distance in 1921, codifying the 1908 London course distance for all future marathons.

Modern Usage: Every certified marathon worldwide measures exactly 42.195 kilometers (or 26 miles 385 yards). Famous marathons—Boston, New York City, London, Berlin, Tokyo—all use this precise distance. Race courses must be certified to ensure accuracy, typically measured using calibrated bicycle wheels.

Half-Marathon: Exactly half of 42.195 km = 21.0975 km (13.1 miles), also standardized for half-marathon races worldwide.

About Point (Typography) (pt)

How many points are in an inch?

Exactly 72 points (pt) = 1 inch (in) in the modern DTP point system used by all contemporary software. This creates simple conversions:

  • 36 pt = 0.5 inches (half inch)
  • 18 pt = 0.25 inches (quarter inch)
  • 144 pt = 2 inches

Historically, European Didot points (≈67.55 per inch) and American pica points (≈72.27 per inch) used slightly different ratios, but these are obsolete in modern typography.

What is the difference between a point and a pixel?

Points are physical length units (1/72 inch), used for print and when physical size matters. Pixels are device-dependent digital display units whose physical size varies by screen resolution:

  • On 96 DPI screens (Windows/web standard): 1 pt = 1.333 pixels
  • On 72 DPI screens (old Mac standard): 1 pt = 1 pixel
  • On Retina/HiDPI displays: 1 pt = 2-4 physical pixels (but still 1.333 "logical" pixels)

Use points for print design where physical dimensions matter. Use pixels or ems for responsive web design where consistency across devices matters more than absolute size.

What does 12 pt font mean?

12 pt font means the font's em square (the invisible bounding box containing the letters plus spacing) is 12 points (1/6 inch or 4.23 mm) tall. This includes:

  • Ascenders: Parts above the baseline (tops of 'h', 'b', 'd')
  • Descenders: Parts below the baseline (tails of 'g', 'y', 'p')
  • Built-in spacing: Extra vertical room above and below

The actual visible letter height (called x-height for lowercase or cap height for capitals) is typically 60-70% of the point size. So 12 pt text has capital letters around 8-9 points (0.11-0.125 inches) tall, with the remaining space used for descenders and line spacing.

Why are there exactly 72 points in an inch?

Adobe Systems chose 72 because it's highly divisible: 72 = 2³ × 3² = 8 × 9, with factors including 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36. This makes common fractions simple:

  • 1/2 inch = 36 pt
  • 1/3 inch = 24 pt
  • 1/4 inch = 18 pt
  • 1/6 inch = 12 pt (standard body text)
  • 1/8 inch = 9 pt

Additionally, early Macintosh screens used 72 DPI (dots per inch), making 1 point = 1 pixel—perfect for WYSIWYG ("what you see is what you get") design. Text appeared onscreen at its exact printed size.

Historically, Pierre Simon Fournier's 1737 system also used 72 points/inch for the same mathematical convenience, though his "inch" was the French royal inch, slightly different from today's international inch.

What's the difference between points and picas?

Points and picas are related typographic units:

  • 1 pica = 12 points
  • 6 picas = 72 points = 1 inch
  • 1 pica = 1/6 inch ≈ 4.233 mm

Points are used for font sizes and small measurements (12 pt text, 2 pt line thickness). Picas are used for larger layout dimensions (column widths, page margins, grid spacing).

Example: A newspaper column might be "12 picas wide" (2 inches / 144 points) with "9 pt body text" and "1 pica margins" (12 points / 1/6 inch).

Both units are part of the same measurement system and convert simply (multiply or divide by 12), making calculations easy while providing appropriately-scaled units for different design elements.

How do I convert points to millimeters?

Formula: millimeters = points × 0.352777... (exact value: 25.4 / 72)

Simplified: millimeters ≈ points × 0.353 (accurate within 0.01%)

Quick conversions:

  • 10 pt = 3.53 mm
  • 12 pt = 4.23 mm
  • 14 pt = 4.94 mm
  • 18 pt = 6.35 mm
  • 24 pt = 8.47 mm
  • 72 pt = 25.4 mm (exactly 1 inch)

Reverse conversion (millimeters to points): points = millimeters × 2.834645... ≈ millimeters × 2.835

Example: A European specification requires "4 mm text." You need: 4 mm × 2.835 ≈ 11.34 pt (round to 11 pt or 11.5 pt).

Is 12 pt the same size in Word and Photoshop?

Yes, exactly. All modern software—Microsoft Word, Adobe Photoshop, InDesign, Illustrator, Google Docs, Apple Pages—uses the same DTP point definition (1/72 inch). 12 pt text will measure exactly 1/6 inch (4.23 mm) when printed from any of these applications.

However, onscreen appearance may differ slightly due to:

  • Font rendering differences: Windows ClearType vs. Mac font smoothing displays the same physical size slightly differently
  • Screen zoom levels: If Word is zoomed to 150%, text appears larger on screen but still prints at correct physical size
  • Different default fonts: Word's default Calibri looks different from Photoshop's default Arial, even at the same point size

But when measured with a ruler on printed output, 12 pt is always exactly 1/6 inch across all applications.

Why doesn't my 12 pt text look 12 points tall on screen?

Your screen zoom level affects apparent size, but the text will still print at correct physical dimensions:

  • 100% zoom: 12 pt text appears at approximately true physical size (depending on monitor size and resolution)
  • 200% zoom: 12 pt text appears twice as large on screen but still prints at 1/6 inch (4.23 mm)
  • 50% zoom: Text appears half-size on screen but prints correctly

Most word processors and design software show the current zoom level in the bottom toolbar. Page view at 100% zoom usually displays content close to actual print size, though this depends on your monitor's physical dimensions and resolution.

To verify true size, print a test page and measure with a ruler: 12 pt text should measure exactly 0.167 inches or 4.23 mm from the top of the tallest letter to the bottom of descenders.

What's the best point size for body text?

10-12 pt is the standard range for printed body text, with specific recommendations depending on context:

Printed Documents:

  • 10 pt: Acceptable minimum; used for dense content (textbooks, references)
  • 11 pt: Comfortable reading size for most book typography
  • 12 pt: Default in Microsoft Word; universally acceptable for any document

Digital/Screen Display:

  • 12-16 pt (or 16-21 pixels at 96 DPI): More comfortable for extended screen reading due to backlit display eye strain
  • 14-18 pt: Recommended for accessibility and readers with vision impairments

Factors affecting choice:

  • Font design: Fonts with larger x-height (like Verdana) are readable at smaller sizes than fonts with small x-height (like Garamond)
  • Line length: Longer lines benefit from larger text (12+ pt)
  • Reader age: Older audiences benefit from 12-14 pt minimum
  • Reading distance: Presentations and signage require much larger text (18+ pt)

When in doubt, 12 pt is the safe, professional standard for nearly all applications.

Can I use points for web design?

Yes, but it's discouraged for screen-only designs. Here's why:

Points in CSS: CSS supports the pt unit (1/72 inch), but it's primarily useful for print stylesheets:

@media print {
  body { font-size: 11pt; } /* Predictable printed size */
  h1 { font-size: 18pt; }
}

Why not for screen:

  • Not responsive: Points are absolute units, don't scale with user preferences or viewport size
  • Accessibility issues: Users who increase browser font size won't affect point-sized text
  • Device variations: Different pixel densities make points appear inconsistent across devices

Better alternatives for screen:

  • Relative units (em, rem): Scale with user preferences
  • Pixels (px): Precise control with media queries
  • Viewport units (vw, vh): Scale with screen size

Best practice: Use pixels or rems for screen, points for print stylesheets.

What is leading and how does it relate to points?

Leading (pronounced "led-ing") is the vertical space between lines of text, measured in points from baseline to baseline. The term comes from traditional typesetting, where thin strips of lead metal were inserted between lines of type.

Standard leading conventions:

  • Solid leading: Leading = font size (10 pt text with 10 pt leading = "10/10")
    • Lines touch; rarely used except for display type
  • Normal leading: Leading = 120% of font size (10 pt text with 12 pt leading = "10/12")
    • Default in most word processors
    • Comfortable reading with adequate space
  • Loose leading: Leading = 140-160% of font size (10 pt text with 14-16 pt leading = "10/14" or "10/16")
    • Airy, easy to read
    • Used for accessibility, children's books

Example: 12 pt text with 14.4 pt leading means:

  • Font size: 12 points (1/6 inch)
  • Space from baseline to baseline: 14.4 points (0.2 inches)
  • Extra space between lines: 2.4 points (0.033 inches)

Too-tight leading makes text hard to read (lines blur together). Too-loose leading creates disconnected "rivers" of white space.

Do fonts actually differ in "12 pt" size?

Yes and no. All 12 pt fonts have the same em square (the bounding box), but they can look very different sizes due to:

X-height variation:

  • High x-height fonts (Verdana, Arial): Lowercase letters occupy 50-60% of em square → appear larger
  • Low x-height fonts (Garamond, Bodoni): Lowercase letters occupy 40-50% of em square → appear smaller

Example:

  • 12 pt Verdana: Lowercase 'x' is about 6-7 points tall (very readable)
  • 12 pt Garamond: Lowercase 'x' is about 5-6 points tall (more elegant but smaller)

Both fonts have the same 12 pt em square, but Verdana allocates more of that space to letter height and less to descenders/ascenders, making it appear larger.

Practical implication: When switching fonts in a document, you may need to adjust point size to maintain similar apparent size. Replacing 12 pt Garamond with 12 pt Verdana might look too large; 11 pt Verdana may better match the original appearance.

This is why typographers often specify fonts and sizes together: "11 pt Garamond" and "10 pt Verdana" can provide similar readability despite different nominal sizes.

Conversion Table: Kilometer to Point (Typography)

Kilometer (km)Point (Typography) (pt)
0.51,417,321.942
12,834,643.884
1.54,251,965.826
25,669,287.767
514,173,219.418
1028,346,438.837
2570,866,097.092
50141,732,194.184
100283,464,388.369
250708,660,970.922
5001,417,321,941.844
1,0002,834,643,883.689

People Also Ask

How do I convert Kilometer to Point (Typography)?

To convert Kilometer to Point (Typography), enter the value in Kilometer in the calculator above. The conversion will happen automatically. Use our free online converter for instant and accurate results. You can also visit our length converter page to convert between other units in this category.

Learn more →

What is the conversion factor from Kilometer to Point (Typography)?

The conversion factor depends on the specific relationship between Kilometer and Point (Typography). You can find the exact conversion formula and factor on this page. Our calculator handles all calculations automatically. See the conversion table above for common values.

Can I convert Point (Typography) back to Kilometer?

Yes! You can easily convert Point (Typography) back to Kilometer by using the swap button (⇌) in the calculator above, or by visiting our Point (Typography) to Kilometer converter page. You can also explore other length conversions on our category page.

Learn more →

What are common uses for Kilometer and Point (Typography)?

Kilometer and Point (Typography) are both standard units used in length measurements. They are commonly used in various applications including engineering, construction, cooking, and scientific research. Browse our length converter for more conversion options.

For more length conversion questions, visit our FAQ page or explore our conversion guides.

All Length Conversions

Meter to KilometerMeter to HectometerMeter to DecimeterMeter to CentimeterMeter to MillimeterMeter to InchMeter to FootMeter to YardMeter to MileMeter to Nautical MileMeter to MicrometerMeter to NanometerMeter to Light YearMeter to Astronomical UnitMeter to ParsecMeter to AngstromMeter to Point (Typography)Meter to Mil/ThouMeter to FathomMeter to FurlongMeter to Link (Gunter's)Meter to PaceMeter to SpanMeter to DigitMeter to Cable LengthMeter to EllMeter to FingerMeter to Roman MileMeter to StadionMeter to Chi (Chinese)Meter to Shaku (Japanese)Meter to Li (Chinese)Meter to ToiseMeter to BoltMeter to RopeMeter to SmootMeter to SajeneMeter to KenMeter to WaMeter to VaraMeter to AlnMeter to Cubit (Royal/Egyptian)Meter to VerstaMeter to ArpentMeter to Ri (Japanese)Meter to KlafterMeter to YojanaMeter to SkeinKilometer to MeterKilometer to HectometerKilometer to DecimeterKilometer to CentimeterKilometer to MillimeterKilometer to InchKilometer to FootKilometer to YardKilometer to MileKilometer to Nautical MileKilometer to MicrometerKilometer to NanometerKilometer to Light YearKilometer to Astronomical UnitKilometer to ParsecKilometer to AngstromKilometer to Mil/ThouKilometer to FathomKilometer to FurlongKilometer to Link (Gunter's)Kilometer to PaceKilometer to SpanKilometer to DigitKilometer to Cable LengthKilometer to EllKilometer to FingerKilometer to Roman MileKilometer to StadionKilometer to Chi (Chinese)Kilometer to Shaku (Japanese)Kilometer to Li (Chinese)Kilometer to ToiseKilometer to BoltKilometer to RopeKilometer to SmootKilometer to SajeneKilometer to KenKilometer to WaKilometer to VaraKilometer to AlnKilometer to Cubit (Royal/Egyptian)Kilometer to VerstaKilometer to ArpentKilometer to Ri (Japanese)Kilometer to KlafterKilometer to YojanaKilometer to SkeinHectometer to MeterHectometer to KilometerHectometer to DecimeterHectometer to CentimeterHectometer to MillimeterHectometer to InchHectometer to FootHectometer to YardHectometer to MileHectometer to Nautical MileHectometer to MicrometerHectometer to NanometerHectometer to Light YearHectometer to Astronomical UnitHectometer to ParsecHectometer to AngstromHectometer to Point (Typography)Hectometer to Mil/ThouHectometer to FathomHectometer to FurlongHectometer to Link (Gunter's)Hectometer to PaceHectometer to SpanHectometer to DigitHectometer to Cable Length

Verified Against Authority Standards

All conversion formulas have been verified against international standards and authoritative sources to ensure maximum accuracy and reliability.

NIST Guide for the Use of SI

National Institute of Standards and TechnologyOfficial US standards for length measurements

SI Brochure

Bureau International des Poids et MesuresInternational System of Units official documentation

Last verified: December 3, 2025