Point (Typography) to Furlong Converter

Convert points to furlongs with our free online length converter.

Quick Answer

1 Point (Typography) = 0.00000175 furlongs

Formula: Point (Typography) × conversion factor = Furlong

Use the calculator below for instant, accurate conversions.

Our Accuracy Guarantee

All conversion formulas on UnitsConverter.io have been verified against NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) guidelines and international SI standards. Our calculations are accurate to 10 decimal places for standard conversions and use arbitrary precision arithmetic for astronomical units.

Last verified: February 2026Reviewed by: Sam Mathew, Software Engineer

Point (Typography) to Furlong Calculator

How to Use the Point (Typography) to Furlong Calculator:

  1. Enter the value you want to convert in the 'From' field (Point (Typography)).
  2. The converted value in Furlong will appear automatically in the 'To' field.
  3. Use the dropdown menus to select different units within the Length category.
  4. Click the swap button (⇌) to reverse the conversion direction.
Share:

How to Convert Point (Typography) to Furlong: Step-by-Step Guide

Converting Point (Typography) to Furlong involves multiplying the value by a specific conversion factor, as shown in the formula below.

Formula:

1 Point (Typography) = 1.7536e-6 furlongs

Example Calculation:

Convert 10 points: 10 × 1.7536e-6 = 1.7536e-5 furlongs

Disclaimer: For Reference Only

These conversion results are provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees regarding the precision of these results, especially for conversions involving extremely large or small numbers which may be subject to the inherent limitations of standard computer floating-point arithmetic.

Not for professional use. Results should be verified before use in any critical application. View our Terms of Service for more information.

What is a Point (Typography) and a Furlong?

The Desktop Publishing Point

The modern typographic point is defined as exactly 1/72 of an international inch. This creates the mathematically convenient relationship:

  • 1 point (pt) = 1/72 inch = 0.013888... inches
  • 1 point = 0.352777... millimeters
  • 72 points = 1 inch (exactly)
  • 1 inch = 25.4 mm (by international definition)

This definition, known as the PostScript point or DTP point (Desktop Publishing point), was established by Adobe Systems in the 1980s and has become the universal standard for all modern typography.

The Em Square and Font Height

When we say "12 pt font," we're technically measuring the em square—the metal block that held the physical letter in traditional typesetting. This em square includes:

  • Ascenders: Parts of letters extending above the baseline (like the top of 'h' or 'b')
  • Descenders: Parts extending below the baseline (like the tail of 'g' or 'y')
  • Built-in spacing: Extra vertical space above and below letters

This means 12 pt text doesn't have letters exactly 1/6 inch tall—the actual visible letter height (called x-height) is typically 60-70% of the point size, with the rest being built-in spacing. This spacing prevents lines of text from touching each other.

Points vs. Picas

Typography traditionally pairs the point with the pica:

  • 1 pica = 12 points = 1/6 inch
  • 6 picas = 1 inch
  • 1 pica ≈ 4.233 mm

Professional designers often measure larger typographic elements in picas. For example, a column width might be "20 picas" (3.33 inches) rather than "240 points." The pica provides a more manageable unit for page layout dimensions while maintaining exact mathematical relationships.

Historical Point Systems (Pre-Digital)

Before the DTP point standardization, multiple incompatible point systems existed:

Didot Point (Continental Europe):

  • 1 Didot point ≈ 0.3759 mm
  • Based on the French pied du roi (royal foot)
  • Approximately 67.55 Didot points per inch
  • Still occasionally referenced in European historical printing contexts

American/British Pica Point:

  • 1 pica point ≈ 0.351459 mm
  • 72.27 points per inch (not exactly 72!)
  • Derived from metal type casting standards
  • Also called the "Anglo-American point"

Fournier Point (Early French):

  • Pierre Simon Fournier's original 1737 system
  • Approximately 0.348 mm
  • 72.989 points per French royal inch
  • Largely replaced by Didot system by 1800

The digital revolution eliminated these variations. Today, when anyone uses "point" in typography, they mean the 1/72-inch DTP point unless explicitly stated otherwise.

The Eighth of a Mile

The furlong is defined as exactly 1/8 of a statute mile.

Precise equivalents:

  • 220 yards (1/8 × 1,760 yards)
  • 660 feet (220 yards × 3 feet/yard)
  • 40 rods (traditional surveying unit; 1 rod = 16.5 feet)
  • 10 chains (1 chain = 66 feet = 4 rods)
  • 201.168 meters (exactly, using 1 yard = 0.9144 m)

Old English Etymology

"Furlang" = "furrow-long"

  • Furh (Old English) = furrow (a trench cut by a plow)
  • Lang (Old English) = long

Agricultural origin: In medieval open-field farming, peasants plowed long, narrow strips. The furlong represented the standard length of these strips—the distance a team of oxen could pull a heavy plow before needing to rest and turn around.

Why this specific distance?

  • Oxen stamina: Approximately 220 yards before fatigue
  • Practical turn-around: Long enough to be efficient, short enough to manage
  • Acre relationship: 1 furlong × 1 chain (66 ft) = 1 acre (historical definition)

The Chain-Furlong-Mile System

Edmund Gunter's surveyor's chain (1620):

  • 1 chain = 66 feet = 4 rods = 100 links
  • 10 chains = 1 furlong
  • 80 chains = 1 mile

Why 66 feet? Gunter designed the chain so that:

  • 10 square chains = 1 acre (exactly)
  • Easy conversion between area and distance
  • Practical length for field surveying (two surveyors could carry it)

This system dominated English-speaking land surveys for 300+ years.

Note: The Point (Typography) is part of the imperial/US customary system, primarily used in the US, UK, and Canada for everyday measurements. The Furlong belongs to the imperial/US customary system.

History of the Point (Typography) and Furlong

Early Typography: The Cicero and Finger-Width (1400s-1700s)

Early European printing used inconsistent measurements based on:

  • The cicero: A unit based on the line width of a specific typeface (Cicero type), varying by region
  • Local inches and feet: Each region had different inch definitions
  • Finger widths and eyeball estimates: Printers adjusted type spacing by hand

This inconsistency made it nearly impossible to share typeface designs or maintain consistency across print shops.

Pierre Simon Fournier: The First Point System (1737)

French typefounder Pierre Simon Fournier le Jeune published "Table des proportions" (1737), introducing the first systematic point system:

  • Based the point on the French royal inch (pouce du roi)
  • Divided the inch into 72 points (a number divisible by many factors: 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12)
  • Created 20 standardized font sizes
  • Named sizes after musical terms (e.g., "Petit-Canon," "Gros-Parangon")

Fournier's system brought mathematical precision to typography for the first time, allowing typefounders to create consistent, proportional type families.

François-Ambroise Didot: The Didot Point (1783)

François-Ambroise Didot, another French typefounder, refined Fournier's system by basing measurements on the pied du roi (royal foot):

  • 1 Didot point = 1/72 of 1/12 of the pied du roi ≈ 0.3759 mm
  • Larger than Fournier's point (about 7% bigger)
  • Created the cicero as 12 Didot points
  • Established type size naming still used today (e.g., corps 8, corps 12)

The Didot system became the standard across Continental Europe and remains influential in French and German typography traditions. Some European printing specifications still reference "Didot" even today when discussing historical typography.

American and British Variations (1800s)

The 19th century saw typography spread across the English-speaking world, but without international standards:

American Point System (established c. 1886):

  • Created by the United States Type Founders Association
  • Based on the pica: 1 pica = 0.166 inches
  • Therefore: 1 point = 0.166/12 ≈ 0.013837 inches
  • Result: approximately 72.27 points per inch

British Imperial Point:

  • Similar to American system but based on British imperial inch
  • Also approximately 72.27 points per inch
  • Created incompatibilities when Britain and US used different inch definitions before 1959

This proliferation of standards created international printing chaos. A "12 point" font in France was noticeably different from "12 point" in Britain or America.

Adobe PostScript: The Digital Revolution (1982-1985)

The desktop publishing revolution began when Adobe Systems developed PostScript, a page description language for laser printers:

John Warnock and Charles Geschke (Adobe founders) faced a choice: adopt historical point systems with fractional relationships to inches, or create a new, mathematically clean standard.

They chose simplicity: 1 point = exactly 1/72 inch

This decision meant:

  • Easy calculation: multiply by 72 to convert inches to points
  • Clean pixel mapping on early displays (72 DPI screens made 1 point = 1 pixel)
  • No fractional arithmetic in computer calculations
  • Complete break from historical confusion

Apple LaserWriter and Macintosh (1985)

Apple Computer licensed Adobe PostScript for the Macintosh computer and LaserWriter printer (launched January 1985):

  • First affordable desktop publishing system
  • 72 DPI screen resolution matched PostScript's 72 points/inch
  • Onscreen "What You See Is What You Get" (WYSIWYG): Text appeared on screen at the exact size it would print
  • Revolutionary for designers: no more calculating conversions

The LaserWriter cost $7,000 (expensive but far cheaper than typesetting equipment costing $50,000+), making professional typography accessible to small businesses and independent designers.

Industry Standardization (1985-1995)

The DTP point rapidly became universal:

1987: Adobe releases Adobe Illustrator and Photoshop (1990), both using PostScript points 1987: PageMaker (Aldus, later Adobe) becomes industry-standard layout software 1990s: Microsoft adopts 72 points/inch in Word, PowerPoint, Publisher 1996: CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) defines the pt unit as 1/72 inch for web typography 2000s: All professional design software (InDesign, Quark, CorelDRAW) standardizes on DTP point

By 2000, the historical Didot and pica points had effectively vanished from active use. The DTP point achieved something remarkable: complete global standardization of a measurement unit in just 15 years.

Modern Digital Era (2000-Present)

Today's typography operates in a world of complete point standardization:

  • Print design: All software uses 72 pt/inch
  • Web design: CSS pt units defined as 1/72 inch (though px and em are more common online)
  • Mobile apps: iOS, Android use point-based typography systems
  • E-readers: Kindle, Apple Books use point-based font sizing
  • Office software: Word, Google Docs, Apple Pages all use identical point measurements

The point has become so universal that most designers under 40 have never encountered historical point systems. The DTP point is simply "the point."

Anglo-Saxon Origins (5th-11th Centuries)

Open-field strip farming: Medieval English villages practiced communal agriculture, with fields divided into long, narrow strips assigned to different families.

Strip dimensions:

  • Length: 1 furlong (~220 yards)
  • Width: 1 chain (~22 yards, later standardized to 1 chain = 66 feet / 4 rods)
  • Area: Approximately 1 acre

Plowing practice: Farmers plowed the length of the strip (1 furlong), then turned the ox team at the headland (the unplowed area at each end). The furlong emerged as the natural unit for this plowing distance.

Norman and Plantagenet Standardization (11th-14th Centuries)

Domesday Book (1086): William the Conqueror's land survey used furlongs and acres to catalog English landholdings, cementing these units in law.

Statute of 1305 (Edward I): Formalized the furlong as:

  • 40 rods (1 rod = 16.5 feet = 5.5 yards)
  • 1/8 mile
  • Standard for all land measurement in England

Acre definition: Legally defined as 1 furlong × 4 rods (1 furlong × 66 feet), creating the enduring acre-furlong relationship.

Edmund Gunter and the Surveyor's Chain (1620)

Revolutionary tool: English mathematician Edmund Gunter invented the surveyor's chain, a 66-foot measuring chain with 100 links.

Advantages:

  • Durability: Metal chain resisted wear better than ropes
  • Accuracy: Standardized links prevented stretching errors
  • Calculation ease: 100 links made decimal-like subdivision simple
  • Furlong integration: 10 chains = 1 furlong (exact)

Global spread: Gunter's chain became the standard surveying tool throughout the British Empire, spreading the furlong to:

  • North America (colonial land surveys)
  • Australia (1788 onwards)
  • India (British Raj)
  • Africa (colonial territories)

Horse Racing Adoption (18th Century)

The Jockey Club (founded 1750): British horse racing's governing body standardized race distances in furlongs and miles.

Common race distances established:

  • 5 furlongs: Sprint races
  • 1 mile (8 furlongs): Classic middle distance
  • 1.5 miles (12 furlongs): St. Leger Stakes (established 1776)
  • 2.5 miles (20 furlongs): Royal Ascot Gold Cup

Why furlongs?

  • Traditional British measurement
  • Convenient divisions of the mile
  • Allowed precise race distance specifications
  • Established in racecourse infrastructure (distance poles)

American Horse Racing (19th Century)

Kentucky Derby (1875): Established at 1.5 miles (12 furlongs), later shortened to 1.25 miles (10 furlongs) in 1896. The furlong became America's standard racing measurement.

Belmont Stakes (1867): Originally 1.625 miles, standardized to 1.5 miles (12 furlongs)—the "Test of the Champion."

Preakness Stakes (1873): Run at 9.5 furlongs (1.1875 miles).

All three Triple Crown races use furlong-based distances.

Metrication and Decline (20th Century)

UK Weights and Measures Act (1985): Officially transitioned Britain to metric system for most purposes. The furlong became obsolete for:

  • Road distances (now kilometers)
  • Land surveying (now meters)
  • General measurement (meters standard)

Exception: Horse racing Racing authorities worldwide retained furlongs, grandfathered as a traditional sporting measure.

Modern Persistence (21st Century)

Countries still using furlongs in horse racing:

  • United Kingdom: All thoroughbred racing
  • Ireland: All thoroughbred racing
  • United States: All thoroughbred and quarter horse racing
  • Canada: Thoroughbred racing
  • Australia: Some racing uses furlongs alongside meters
  • Myanmar (Burma): Road signs and general distance measurement

Global standard: Despite metrication, international horse racing maintains furlong terminology for consistency with historical records and tradition.

Common Uses and Applications: points vs furlongs

Explore the typical applications for both Point (Typography) (imperial/US) and Furlong (imperial/US) to understand their common contexts.

Common Uses for points

1. Document Typography and Word Processing

Body Text Standards:

  • 10-12 pt: Standard body text for business documents, reports, letters
  • 11 pt: Often considered optimal for printed books (balance of readability and page economy)
  • 12 pt: Default in Microsoft Word, Google Docs; universally acceptable for any document
  • 14 pt: Large print books for readers with visual impairments

Heading Hierarchies: Professional documents typically use 3-5 heading levels with systematic point size progression:

  • H1 (Title): 18-24 pt, bold
  • H2 (Major sections): 16-18 pt, bold
  • H3 (Subsections): 14-16 pt, bold
  • H4 (Minor subsections): 12-14 pt, bold or italic
  • Body text: 10-12 pt, regular

This creates clear visual hierarchy while maintaining readability.

2. Professional Graphic Design and Layout

Adobe Creative Suite Standards:

  • InDesign: All text boxes, frames, and measurements in points
  • Illustrator: Artboard rulers can display points; all typography in points
  • Photoshop: Type tool uses points by default

Print Design Specifications:

  • Business cards: Names typically 14-18 pt, contact info 8-10 pt
  • Brochures: Headlines 24-36 pt, body text 9-11 pt
  • Posters: Titles 48-144+ pt depending on viewing distance
  • Magazine layouts: Body 9-10 pt (smaller for dense content), headlines 18-48 pt

Grid Systems: Many designers use point-based grids: 12 pt baseline grids ensure consistent vertical rhythm across pages.

3. Web Typography (CSS)

CSS supports points, though pixels and ems are more common for responsive design:

body {
  font-size: 12pt; /* Equivalent to 16px at 96 DPI */
}

h1 {
  font-size: 24pt; /* Prints at exactly 1/3 inch tall */
}

@media print {
  body { font-size: 11pt; } /* Optimize for printed output */
}

Print Stylesheets: Points are ideal for @media print CSS rules since they translate directly to physical printed size.

Fixed Layouts: PDF generators and print-to-web applications often use point-based layouts for predictable output.

4. Font Design and Development

Em Square Definition:

  • Font designers work within an em square measured in points
  • Traditionally 1000 or 2048 units per em square (OpenType fonts)
  • Defines the bounding box for all characters

Typeface Specifications:

  • X-height: Ratio of lowercase 'x' height to full em square (typically 0.5-0.6)
  • Cap height: Uppercase letter height (typically 0.65-0.75 of em square)
  • Ascenders/descenders: Extensions above/below baseline

All these proportions maintain their relationships regardless of point size, so a typeface designed with good proportions at 12 pt will remain readable at 8 pt or 72 pt.

5. Publishing and Book Design

Book Industry Standards:

  • Fiction novels: 10-12 pt body text, typically Garamond, Baskerville, or Caslon
  • Textbooks: 10-11 pt body, 8-9 pt captions/sidebars
  • Children's books: 14-18 pt for early readers, larger for picture books
  • Academic journals: 10-11 pt Times New Roman or similar serif fonts

Line Spacing (Leading): Traditionally measured in points: 10 pt text with 12 pt leading (written "10/12" and pronounced "ten on twelve") means 10 pt font with 2 pts of extra space between lines.

6. Screen Display and User Interface Design

Operating System Defaults:

  • Windows: 96 DPI screen resolution → 12 pt = 16 pixels
  • macOS (historical): 72 DPI → 12 pt = 12 pixels (now uses points independently of DPI)
  • Retina/HiDPI displays: Points now represent logical pixels rather than physical pixels

Mobile App Guidelines:

  • iOS: Uses point as device-independent unit; 1 pt = 1 logical pixel (2-3 physical pixels on Retina)
  • Android: Uses density-independent pixels (dp), roughly equivalent to points

Accessibility Standards:

  • WCAG 2.1: Recommends minimum 14 pt (18.67 px at 96 DPI) for body text
  • Large print: 18 pt or larger considered "large print" for accessibility

7. Technical Drawing and CAD (Limited Use)

While engineering drawings typically use millimeters or inches, annotation text in CAD software (AutoCAD, SolidWorks) is specified in points:

  • Drawing notes: 10-12 pt
  • Dimension labels: 8-10 pt
  • Title blocks: 14-24 pt

This ensures text remains readable when drawings are printed or exported to PDF.

When to Use furlongs

1. Thoroughbred Horse Racing

Race distance specification: Nearly all English-language racing nations specify race lengths in furlongs.

Examples:

  • "A 6-furlong sprint on turf"
  • "The colt won at distances from 8 to 12 furlongs"
  • "She specializes in 5-furlong races"

Racecourse markers: Distance poles along the track show remaining furlongs to the finish (e.g., "4F" pole = 4 furlongs to go).

2. Breeding and Training

Horse pedigrees: Thoroughbred bloodlines are analyzed by optimal racing distances measured in furlongs.

Example: "This stallion's progeny excel at 8-10 furlongs, inheriting his stamina."

Training distances: Trainers describe workout distances in furlongs: "We gave him a strong 6-furlong breeze this morning."

3. Myanmar (Burma)

Road distances: Myanmar road signs often show distances in furlongs and miles rather than kilometers.

Example: "Yangon 12 furlongs" (1.5 miles ahead)

Why? British colonial legacy; Myanmar has resisted full metrication.

4. Historical Documents

Land deeds: Property descriptions in English-speaking countries often reference furlongs:

"Beginning at the oak tree, thence north 3 furlongs, thence east 2 furlongs..."

Literary references: Classic literature mentions furlongs for travel distances.

Additional Unit Information

About Point (Typography) (pt)

How many points are in an inch?

Exactly 72 points (pt) = 1 inch (in) in the modern DTP point system used by all contemporary software. This creates simple conversions:

  • 36 pt = 0.5 inches (half inch)
  • 18 pt = 0.25 inches (quarter inch)
  • 144 pt = 2 inches

Historically, European Didot points (≈67.55 per inch) and American pica points (≈72.27 per inch) used slightly different ratios, but these are obsolete in modern typography.

What is the difference between a point and a pixel?

Points are physical length units (1/72 inch), used for print and when physical size matters. Pixels are device-dependent digital display units whose physical size varies by screen resolution:

  • On 96 DPI screens (Windows/web standard): 1 pt = 1.333 pixels
  • On 72 DPI screens (old Mac standard): 1 pt = 1 pixel
  • On Retina/HiDPI displays: 1 pt = 2-4 physical pixels (but still 1.333 "logical" pixels)

Use points for print design where physical dimensions matter. Use pixels or ems for responsive web design where consistency across devices matters more than absolute size.

What does 12 pt font mean?

12 pt font means the font's em square (the invisible bounding box containing the letters plus spacing) is 12 points (1/6 inch or 4.23 mm) tall. This includes:

  • Ascenders: Parts above the baseline (tops of 'h', 'b', 'd')
  • Descenders: Parts below the baseline (tails of 'g', 'y', 'p')
  • Built-in spacing: Extra vertical room above and below

The actual visible letter height (called x-height for lowercase or cap height for capitals) is typically 60-70% of the point size. So 12 pt text has capital letters around 8-9 points (0.11-0.125 inches) tall, with the remaining space used for descenders and line spacing.

Why are there exactly 72 points in an inch?

Adobe Systems chose 72 because it's highly divisible: 72 = 2³ × 3² = 8 × 9, with factors including 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36. This makes common fractions simple:

  • 1/2 inch = 36 pt
  • 1/3 inch = 24 pt
  • 1/4 inch = 18 pt
  • 1/6 inch = 12 pt (standard body text)
  • 1/8 inch = 9 pt

Additionally, early Macintosh screens used 72 DPI (dots per inch), making 1 point = 1 pixel—perfect for WYSIWYG ("what you see is what you get") design. Text appeared onscreen at its exact printed size.

Historically, Pierre Simon Fournier's 1737 system also used 72 points/inch for the same mathematical convenience, though his "inch" was the French royal inch, slightly different from today's international inch.

What's the difference between points and picas?

Points and picas are related typographic units:

  • 1 pica = 12 points
  • 6 picas = 72 points = 1 inch
  • 1 pica = 1/6 inch ≈ 4.233 mm

Points are used for font sizes and small measurements (12 pt text, 2 pt line thickness). Picas are used for larger layout dimensions (column widths, page margins, grid spacing).

Example: A newspaper column might be "12 picas wide" (2 inches / 144 points) with "9 pt body text" and "1 pica margins" (12 points / 1/6 inch).

Both units are part of the same measurement system and convert simply (multiply or divide by 12), making calculations easy while providing appropriately-scaled units for different design elements.

How do I convert points to millimeters?

Formula: millimeters = points × 0.352777... (exact value: 25.4 / 72)

Simplified: millimeters ≈ points × 0.353 (accurate within 0.01%)

Quick conversions:

  • 10 pt = 3.53 mm
  • 12 pt = 4.23 mm
  • 14 pt = 4.94 mm
  • 18 pt = 6.35 mm
  • 24 pt = 8.47 mm
  • 72 pt = 25.4 mm (exactly 1 inch)

Reverse conversion (millimeters to points): points = millimeters × 2.834645... ≈ millimeters × 2.835

Example: A European specification requires "4 mm text." You need: 4 mm × 2.835 ≈ 11.34 pt (round to 11 pt or 11.5 pt).

Is 12 pt the same size in Word and Photoshop?

Yes, exactly. All modern software—Microsoft Word, Adobe Photoshop, InDesign, Illustrator, Google Docs, Apple Pages—uses the same DTP point definition (1/72 inch). 12 pt text will measure exactly 1/6 inch (4.23 mm) when printed from any of these applications.

However, onscreen appearance may differ slightly due to:

  • Font rendering differences: Windows ClearType vs. Mac font smoothing displays the same physical size slightly differently
  • Screen zoom levels: If Word is zoomed to 150%, text appears larger on screen but still prints at correct physical size
  • Different default fonts: Word's default Calibri looks different from Photoshop's default Arial, even at the same point size

But when measured with a ruler on printed output, 12 pt is always exactly 1/6 inch across all applications.

Why doesn't my 12 pt text look 12 points tall on screen?

Your screen zoom level affects apparent size, but the text will still print at correct physical dimensions:

  • 100% zoom: 12 pt text appears at approximately true physical size (depending on monitor size and resolution)
  • 200% zoom: 12 pt text appears twice as large on screen but still prints at 1/6 inch (4.23 mm)
  • 50% zoom: Text appears half-size on screen but prints correctly

Most word processors and design software show the current zoom level in the bottom toolbar. Page view at 100% zoom usually displays content close to actual print size, though this depends on your monitor's physical dimensions and resolution.

To verify true size, print a test page and measure with a ruler: 12 pt text should measure exactly 0.167 inches or 4.23 mm from the top of the tallest letter to the bottom of descenders.

What's the best point size for body text?

10-12 pt is the standard range for printed body text, with specific recommendations depending on context:

Printed Documents:

  • 10 pt: Acceptable minimum; used for dense content (textbooks, references)
  • 11 pt: Comfortable reading size for most book typography
  • 12 pt: Default in Microsoft Word; universally acceptable for any document

Digital/Screen Display:

  • 12-16 pt (or 16-21 pixels at 96 DPI): More comfortable for extended screen reading due to backlit display eye strain
  • 14-18 pt: Recommended for accessibility and readers with vision impairments

Factors affecting choice:

  • Font design: Fonts with larger x-height (like Verdana) are readable at smaller sizes than fonts with small x-height (like Garamond)
  • Line length: Longer lines benefit from larger text (12+ pt)
  • Reader age: Older audiences benefit from 12-14 pt minimum
  • Reading distance: Presentations and signage require much larger text (18+ pt)

When in doubt, 12 pt is the safe, professional standard for nearly all applications.

Can I use points for web design?

Yes, but it's discouraged for screen-only designs. Here's why:

Points in CSS: CSS supports the pt unit (1/72 inch), but it's primarily useful for print stylesheets:

@media print {
  body { font-size: 11pt; } /* Predictable printed size */
  h1 { font-size: 18pt; }
}

Why not for screen:

  • Not responsive: Points are absolute units, don't scale with user preferences or viewport size
  • Accessibility issues: Users who increase browser font size won't affect point-sized text
  • Device variations: Different pixel densities make points appear inconsistent across devices

Better alternatives for screen:

  • Relative units (em, rem): Scale with user preferences
  • Pixels (px): Precise control with media queries
  • Viewport units (vw, vh): Scale with screen size

Best practice: Use pixels or rems for screen, points for print stylesheets.

What is leading and how does it relate to points?

Leading (pronounced "led-ing") is the vertical space between lines of text, measured in points from baseline to baseline. The term comes from traditional typesetting, where thin strips of lead metal were inserted between lines of type.

Standard leading conventions:

  • Solid leading: Leading = font size (10 pt text with 10 pt leading = "10/10")
    • Lines touch; rarely used except for display type
  • Normal leading: Leading = 120% of font size (10 pt text with 12 pt leading = "10/12")
    • Default in most word processors
    • Comfortable reading with adequate space
  • Loose leading: Leading = 140-160% of font size (10 pt text with 14-16 pt leading = "10/14" or "10/16")
    • Airy, easy to read
    • Used for accessibility, children's books

Example: 12 pt text with 14.4 pt leading means:

  • Font size: 12 points (1/6 inch)
  • Space from baseline to baseline: 14.4 points (0.2 inches)
  • Extra space between lines: 2.4 points (0.033 inches)

Too-tight leading makes text hard to read (lines blur together). Too-loose leading creates disconnected "rivers" of white space.

Do fonts actually differ in "12 pt" size?

Yes and no. All 12 pt fonts have the same em square (the bounding box), but they can look very different sizes due to:

X-height variation:

  • High x-height fonts (Verdana, Arial): Lowercase letters occupy 50-60% of em square → appear larger
  • Low x-height fonts (Garamond, Bodoni): Lowercase letters occupy 40-50% of em square → appear smaller

Example:

  • 12 pt Verdana: Lowercase 'x' is about 6-7 points tall (very readable)
  • 12 pt Garamond: Lowercase 'x' is about 5-6 points tall (more elegant but smaller)

Both fonts have the same 12 pt em square, but Verdana allocates more of that space to letter height and less to descenders/ascenders, making it appear larger.

Practical implication: When switching fonts in a document, you may need to adjust point size to maintain similar apparent size. Replacing 12 pt Garamond with 12 pt Verdana might look too large; 11 pt Verdana may better match the original appearance.

This is why typographers often specify fonts and sizes together: "11 pt Garamond" and "10 pt Verdana" can provide similar readability despite different nominal sizes.

About Furlong (fur)

How many furlongs are in a mile?

Exactly 8 furlongs = 1 statute mile.

This is the defining relationship:

  • 1 furlong = 1/8 mile = 0.125 miles
  • 1 mile = 8 furlongs = 1,760 yards = 5,280 feet

How many yards/feet/meters are in a furlong?

1 furlong equals:

  • 220 yards (exactly)
  • 660 feet (220 × 3)
  • 201.168 meters (exactly, using international yard definition)

Derivation: 1 mile = 1,760 yards 1/8 mile = 1,760 ÷ 8 = 220 yards

Where is the furlong used most often today?

Primary use: Horse racing

Countries:

  • United Kingdom: All thoroughbred flat and jump racing
  • Ireland: All racing
  • United States: Thoroughbred and quarter horse racing standard
  • Canada: Thoroughbred racing
  • Australia: Some racing (alongside meters)

Secondary use:

  • Myanmar (Burma): Road distances, general measurement

Historical references:

  • Land deeds and property surveys (historical documents)
  • Classic literature

Is the furlong an SI unit?

No, the furlong is not part of the International System of Units (SI).

It belongs to the imperial and U.S. customary measurement systems. The SI unit for length is the meter.

Legal status:

  • UK: Permitted for specific uses (horse racing, historical contexts)
  • US: Legal, but not commonly used outside racing
  • Myanmar: Customary unit

Why is it called a furlong?

Etymology: Old English "furlang" = "furrow-long"

Origin:

  • Furh = furrow (trench cut by plow)
  • Lang = long

Agricultural meaning: The distance a team of oxen could plow a furrow before needing to rest—approximately 220 yards.

Historical context: Medieval open-field strip farming created long, narrow fields. The furlong defined the standard strip length, while the chain (66 feet) defined the width, producing a 1-acre plot.

Why does horse racing still use furlongs?

Historical tradition: British horse racing standardized on furlongs in the 18th century (Jockey Club, 1750). Racing infrastructure, records, and terminology built around furlongs over 270+ years.

Practical advantages:

  • Convenient divisions: 1 mile divides evenly into 8 furlongs, creating simple race distances (5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12 furlongs)
  • Global consistency: Using furlongs allows comparison across centuries of racing records
  • Infrastructure: Historic racecourses designed with furlong markers and measurements

Resistance to change: Metrication efforts in the 1970s-1990s met strong resistance from racing traditionalists. The sport successfully lobbied to preserve furlongs as a cultural heritage measure.

How long is the Kentucky Derby in furlongs?

10 furlongs = 1.25 miles = 2,012 meters

History:

  • 1875-1895: 1.5 miles (12 furlongs)
  • 1896-present: 1.25 miles (10 furlongs)

The distance was shortened to 10 furlongs in 1896 and has remained unchanged since, becoming known as "The most exciting two minutes in sports" (approximate finishing time for winners).

What's the difference between a furlong and a chain?

Both are imperial length units, but different sizes:

Furlong:

  • 220 yards = 660 feet = 201.168 m
  • Used for longer distances (racing, field lengths)

Chain (Gunter's chain):

  • 66 feet = 22 yards = 20.1168 m
  • 1 furlong = 10 chains
  • Used for detailed land surveying

Historical relationship: Edmund Gunter designed the chain so that 10 chains = 1 furlong, creating an integrated surveying system.

Can I convert racecourse distances from furlongs to meters?

Yes, multiply by 201.168.

Common conversions:

  • 5 furlongs × 201.168 = 1,006 m (~1 km)
  • 6 furlongs × 201.168 = 1,207 m
  • 8 furlongs × 201.168 = 1,609 m (~1 mile)
  • 10 furlongs × 201.168 = 2,012 m
  • 12 furlongs × 201.168 = 2,414 m

Note: Many international racing jurisdictions use round meter distances (1200m, 1600m, 2000m) rather than exact furlong equivalents.

Is a furlong longer than a kilometer?

No, a furlong is shorter than a kilometer.

Comparison:

  • 1 furlong = 201.168 meters = 0.201 km
  • 1 kilometer = 1,000 meters ≈ 4.97 furlongs (~5 furlongs)

Memory aid: 5 furlongs ≈ 1 kilometer

Conversion Table: Point (Typography) to Furlong

Point (Typography) (pt)Furlong (fur)
0.50
10
1.50
20
50
100
250
500
1000
2500
5000.001
1,0000.002

People Also Ask

How do I convert Point (Typography) to Furlong?

To convert Point (Typography) to Furlong, enter the value in Point (Typography) in the calculator above. The conversion will happen automatically. Use our free online converter for instant and accurate results. You can also visit our length converter page to convert between other units in this category.

Learn more →

What is the conversion factor from Point (Typography) to Furlong?

The conversion factor depends on the specific relationship between Point (Typography) and Furlong. You can find the exact conversion formula and factor on this page. Our calculator handles all calculations automatically. See the conversion table above for common values.

Can I convert Furlong back to Point (Typography)?

Yes! You can easily convert Furlong back to Point (Typography) by using the swap button (⇌) in the calculator above, or by visiting our Furlong to Point (Typography) converter page. You can also explore other length conversions on our category page.

Learn more →

What are common uses for Point (Typography) and Furlong?

Point (Typography) and Furlong are both standard units used in length measurements. They are commonly used in various applications including engineering, construction, cooking, and scientific research. Browse our length converter for more conversion options.

For more length conversion questions, visit our FAQ page or explore our conversion guides.

All Length Conversions

Meter to KilometerMeter to HectometerMeter to DecimeterMeter to CentimeterMeter to MillimeterMeter to InchMeter to FootMeter to YardMeter to MileMeter to Nautical MileMeter to MicrometerMeter to NanometerMeter to Light YearMeter to Astronomical UnitMeter to ParsecMeter to AngstromMeter to Point (Typography)Meter to Mil/ThouMeter to FathomMeter to FurlongMeter to Link (Gunter's)Meter to PaceMeter to SpanMeter to DigitMeter to Cable LengthMeter to EllMeter to FingerMeter to Roman MileMeter to StadionMeter to Chi (Chinese)Meter to Shaku (Japanese)Meter to Li (Chinese)Meter to ToiseMeter to BoltMeter to RopeMeter to SmootMeter to SajeneMeter to KenMeter to WaMeter to VaraMeter to AlnMeter to Cubit (Royal/Egyptian)Meter to VerstaMeter to ArpentMeter to Ri (Japanese)Meter to KlafterMeter to YojanaMeter to SkeinKilometer to MeterKilometer to HectometerKilometer to DecimeterKilometer to CentimeterKilometer to MillimeterKilometer to InchKilometer to FootKilometer to YardKilometer to MileKilometer to Nautical MileKilometer to MicrometerKilometer to NanometerKilometer to Light YearKilometer to Astronomical UnitKilometer to ParsecKilometer to AngstromKilometer to Point (Typography)Kilometer to Mil/ThouKilometer to FathomKilometer to FurlongKilometer to Link (Gunter's)Kilometer to PaceKilometer to SpanKilometer to DigitKilometer to Cable LengthKilometer to EllKilometer to FingerKilometer to Roman MileKilometer to StadionKilometer to Chi (Chinese)Kilometer to Shaku (Japanese)Kilometer to Li (Chinese)Kilometer to ToiseKilometer to BoltKilometer to RopeKilometer to SmootKilometer to SajeneKilometer to KenKilometer to WaKilometer to VaraKilometer to AlnKilometer to Cubit (Royal/Egyptian)Kilometer to VerstaKilometer to ArpentKilometer to Ri (Japanese)Kilometer to KlafterKilometer to YojanaKilometer to SkeinHectometer to MeterHectometer to KilometerHectometer to DecimeterHectometer to CentimeterHectometer to MillimeterHectometer to InchHectometer to FootHectometer to YardHectometer to MileHectometer to Nautical MileHectometer to MicrometerHectometer to NanometerHectometer to Light YearHectometer to Astronomical UnitHectometer to ParsecHectometer to AngstromHectometer to Point (Typography)Hectometer to Mil/ThouHectometer to FathomHectometer to FurlongHectometer to Link (Gunter's)Hectometer to PaceHectometer to SpanHectometer to Digit

Verified Against Authority Standards

All conversion formulas have been verified against international standards and authoritative sources to ensure maximum accuracy and reliability.

NIST Guide for the Use of SI

National Institute of Standards and TechnologyOfficial US standards for length measurements

SI Brochure

Bureau International des Poids et MesuresInternational System of Units official documentation

Last verified: February 19, 2026