Rankine to Rømer Converter

Convert degrees Rankine to degrees Rømer with our free online temperature converter.

Quick Answer

1 Rankine = -135.612083 degrees Rømer

Formula: Rankine × conversion factor = Rømer

Use the calculator below for instant, accurate conversions.

Our Accuracy Guarantee

All conversion formulas on UnitsConverter.io have been verified against NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) guidelines and international SI standards. Our calculations are accurate to 10 decimal places for standard conversions and use arbitrary precision arithmetic for astronomical units.

Last verified: December 2025Reviewed by: Sam Mathew, Software Engineer

Rankine to Rømer Calculator

How to Use the Rankine to Rømer Calculator:

  1. Enter the value you want to convert in the 'From' field (Rankine).
  2. The converted value in Rømer will appear automatically in the 'To' field.
  3. Use the dropdown menus to select different units within the Temperature category.
  4. Click the swap button (⇌) to reverse the conversion direction.
Share:

How to Convert Rankine to Rømer: Step-by-Step Guide

Temperature conversions like Rankine to Rømer use specific non-linear formulas.

Formula:

First convert °R to °C: °C = (°R - 491.67) × 5/9. Then convert °C to °Rø: °Rø = °C × 21/40 + 7.5

Example Calculation:

Convert 10°R:
1. °C = (10 - 491.67) × 5/9 = -267.59°C
2. °Rø = (-267.59 × 21/40) + 7.5 = -132.99°Rø

Disclaimer: For Reference Only

These conversion results are provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees regarding the precision of these results, especially for conversions involving extremely large or small numbers which may be subject to the inherent limitations of standard computer floating-point arithmetic.

Not for professional use. Results should be verified before use in any critical application. View our Terms of Service for more information.

What is a Rankine and a Rømer?

What Is the Rankine Scale?

The Rankine scale (symbol: °R or °Ra) is an absolute thermodynamic temperature scale where:

  • Zero point: Absolute zero (0 °R = −459.67 °F), the theoretical lowest possible temperature where all molecular kinetic energy ceases
  • Degree size: Equal to Fahrenheit degrees (1 °R increment = 1 °F increment)
  • Named after: William John Macquorn Rankine (1820-1872), Scottish engineer and physicist

Absolute Temperature Scales

An absolute temperature scale begins at absolute zero rather than an arbitrary freezing point:

Absolute scales (start at absolute zero):

  • Kelvin (K): Uses Celsius-sized degrees, 0 K = absolute zero, used worldwide in science
  • Rankine (°R): Uses Fahrenheit-sized degrees, 0 °R = absolute zero, used in some U.S. engineering

Relative scales (start at arbitrary points):

  • Celsius (°C): 0 °C = water's freezing point (at standard pressure)
  • Fahrenheit (°F): 0 °F = freezing point of brine solution, 32 °F = water's freezing point

Why Absolute Scales Matter

Many fundamental physics equations require absolute temperatures because ratios and products become meaningful only when zero truly means "no thermal energy":

Ideal gas law: PV = nRT (T must be absolute) Carnot efficiency: η = 1 - T_cold/T_hot (requires absolute temperatures) Stefan-Boltzmann law: Power radiated ∝ T⁴ (absolute temperature to fourth power) Entropy calculations: ΔS = Q/T (T must be absolute to avoid division by zero)

Using relative scales (Fahrenheit, Celsius) in these equations produces nonsensical results. Absolute scales (Rankine, Kelvin) make the mathematics work correctly.

Official Definition

1 degree Rankine = 1 degree Fahrenheit (in size)

Relationship to Fahrenheit: °R = °F + 459.67

Relationship to Kelvin: °R = K × 9/5 (or °R = K × 1.8)

Relationship to Celsius: °R = (°C + 273.15) × 9/5


The Rømer scale (°Rø) is a historical temperature scale where the freezing point of water is set at 7.5 degrees and the boiling point at 60 degrees.

Note: The Rankine is part of the imperial/US customary system, primarily used in the US, UK, and Canada for everyday measurements. The Rømer belongs to the imperial/US customary system.

History of the Rankine and Rømer

William John Macquorn Rankine (1820-1872)

William Rankine was a Scottish engineer, physicist, and professor at the University of Glasgow who made foundational contributions to thermodynamics, civil engineering, and molecular physics.

Key contributions:

  • Formulated the Rankine cycle (1859), describing the ideal thermodynamic cycle for steam engines
  • Developed the Rankine temperature scale (1859) as an absolute scale compatible with Fahrenheit
  • Wrote influential textbooks on applied mechanics, steam engines, and civil engineering
  • Co-founded the science of thermodynamics alongside Carnot, Clausius, Kelvin, and Joule

Rankine was a contemporary and correspondent of William Thomson (Lord Kelvin), who proposed the Kelvin absolute scale in 1848. The two scientists worked on similar thermodynamic problems but approached them from different engineering traditions—Kelvin from metric/Celsius contexts, Rankine from British imperial/Fahrenheit contexts.

The Need for an Absolute Scale (1840s-1850s)

The mid-19th century saw rapid developments in thermodynamics driven by the Industrial Revolution's reliance on steam engines:

Carnot's theorem (1824): Sadi Carnot demonstrated that heat engine efficiency depends on the temperature ratio between hot and cold reservoirs, implicitly requiring an absolute temperature scale

Joule's mechanical equivalent of heat (1843-1850): James Prescott Joule established that heat and mechanical work are interconvertible, laying foundations for the first law of thermodynamics

Thomson's (Kelvin's) absolute scale (1848): William Thomson proposed an absolute scale based on Carnot's theorem, using Celsius degree increments, with zero at −273.15 °C

These developments made clear that thermodynamic calculations required absolute temperature measurements, but Thomson's Kelvin scale was impractical for British and American engineers who worked exclusively in Fahrenheit.

Rankine's Proposal (1859)

In 1859, Rankine published his absolute temperature scale in engineering papers, presenting it as the practical solution for engineers who needed absolute temperatures but worked in imperial units:

Rankine's logic:

  1. Thermodynamic calculations require absolute zero as the baseline
  2. British and American engineers measure temperature in Fahrenheit
  3. Constantly converting Fahrenheit ↔ Celsius ↔ Kelvin introduces errors and inefficiency
  4. An absolute scale with Fahrenheit-sized degrees solves the problem elegantly

The result: 0 °R = absolute zero (−459.67 °F), with degree increments matching Fahrenheit

This allowed engineers to use familiar Fahrenheit measurements while accessing the mathematical benefits of absolute temperature.

Adoption in Engineering (1860s-1960s)

The Rankine scale became standard in British and American engineering disciplines throughout the late 19th and first half of the 20th centuries:

Steam engineering: Rankine cycle analysis (for steam turbines, power plants) used Rankine temperatures for efficiency calculations

ASME standards: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers incorporated Rankine into standard tables for steam properties, refrigeration cycles, and combustion calculations

Aerospace engineering: Early rocket and jet engine development (1940s-1960s) used Rankine for combustion chamber and exhaust nozzle temperature calculations

Cryogenics: Liquefied gas industries (oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen) used Rankine when working with U.S. measurement systems

Thermodynamics textbooks: Engineering thermodynamics texts published in the U.S. and U.K. through the 1960s routinely presented equations in both Kelvin and Rankine

Decline and Modern Usage (1960s-Present)

Several factors led to Rankine's decline:

International metrication (1960s-1980s): Most countries adopted SI units (including Kelvin), making Rankine unnecessary outside the United States

Scientific standardization: The global scientific community standardized on Kelvin, making it the universal absolute scale for research and international collaboration

U.S. engineering education shift: Even American engineering programs increasingly taught Kelvin as the primary absolute scale, relegating Rankine to historical footnotes

Computing and automation: Modern engineering software typically works in SI units (Kelvin), reducing incentive to maintain Rankine compatibility

Where Rankine Survives Today

Despite its decline, Rankine persists in specific niches:

American aerospace engineering: NASA and aerospace contractors occasionally use Rankine in rocket propulsion calculations when working with U.S. customary units (pounds-force, BTU, etc.)

Cryogenic engineering: Liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities and industrial gas companies in the U.S. may use Rankine for process calculations

Legacy documentation: Older engineering manuals, equipment specifications, and technical standards still reference Rankine, requiring continued familiarity

Thermodynamics education: Some U.S. engineering thermodynamics courses teach Rankine alongside Kelvin to demonstrate absolute temperature concepts with Fahrenheit context

Historical research: Engineers and historians studying 19th-20th century technology encounter Rankine in original documents and must understand conversions


Invented by the Danish astronomer Ole Christensen Rømer in 1701. Rømer based his scale on two points: the freezing point of brine (0 °Rø) and the boiling point of water (60 °Rø). He later observed pure water froze at 7.5 °Rø. Daniel Fahrenheit visited Rømer and reportedly based his own scale on Rømer's work, multiplying the number of degrees by four.

Common Uses and Applications: degrees Rankine vs degrees Rømer

Explore the typical applications for both Rankine (imperial/US) and Rømer (imperial/US) to understand their common contexts.

Common Uses for degrees Rankine

1. Thermodynamic Cycle Analysis

Engineers analyzing heat engines and refrigeration cycles use Rankine when working in U.S. customary units:

Carnot efficiency calculation: η = 1 - T_cold/T_hot

Example (using Rankine for compatibility with imperial units):

  • Hot reservoir: 1160 °R (700 °F, combustion chamber)
  • Cold reservoir: 540 °R (80 °F, ambient air)
  • Maximum efficiency: η = 1 - 540/1160 = 1 - 0.465 = 53.5%

If you incorrectly used Fahrenheit (relative scale) instead: η = 1 - 80/700 = 88.6% ← Wrong! (impossibly high)

Rankine (absolute scale) gives the correct physical result.

Ideal gas law (PV = nRT): Requires absolute temperature T in Rankine or Kelvin Refrigeration coefficient of performance: COP = T_cold/(T_hot - T_cold), requires absolute T Entropy change: ΔS = Q/T, requires absolute T

2. Aerospace and Rocket Propulsion

NASA and aerospace contractors sometimes use Rankine in rocket engine calculations when working entirely in imperial units:

Rocket nozzle expansion:

  • Combustion chamber temperature: 6000 °R (5540 °F, liquid hydrogen/oxygen combustion)
  • Nozzle exit temperature: 1500 °R (1040 °F, after expansion)
  • Temperature ratio used in thrust calculations: 1500/6000 = 0.25

Specific impulse calculations: Rocket performance metrics sometimes expressed in U.S. units (pounds-force, BTU, Rankine)

Reentry heating analysis: Atmospheric friction temperatures calculated in Rankine for Space Shuttle and Apollo programs

3. Cryogenic and Liquefied Gas Engineering

Engineers working with liquefied natural gas (LNG), liquid nitrogen, or liquid oxygen may use Rankine in American industrial contexts:

LNG storage:

  • Methane boiling point: 201.1 °R (−258.6 °F, 111.7 K)
  • Storage tank insulation must maintain temperatures below 210 °R

Nitrogen liquefaction: Process temperatures from ambient (528 °R) down to liquid nitrogen (140 °R)

Oxygen separation: Cryogenic air separation units cool air from 520 °R to 163 °R (oxygen boiling point)

4. Steam Power and HVAC Engineering

Historical and some modern steam system calculations use Rankine:

Steam turbine efficiency: Calculating ideal Rankine cycle efficiency for power plants Boiler performance: Heat transfer calculations involving steam temperatures in Rankine HVAC refrigeration cycles: Coefficient of performance calculations requiring absolute temperatures

5. Combustion and Internal Combustion Engines

Engine designers analyzing combustion processes may use Rankine when working in U.S. units:

Compression ratio effects: Calculating temperature rise during compression stroke Exhaust temperatures: Modeling exhaust gas temperatures for turbocharger design Flame temperatures: Analyzing combustion chamber temperatures in Rankine for compatibility with BTU energy units

6. Materials Science and Heat Treatment

Metallurgists and materials engineers working with U.S. specifications:

Heat treatment processes: Tempering, annealing, and hardening temperatures sometimes specified in Rankine in older American standards Thermal expansion: Calculating expansion coefficients with temperature in Rankine Phase transitions: Melting and solidification temperatures in absolute scale for thermodynamic calculations

7. Historical Engineering and Technical Documentation

Engineers working with legacy systems, historical restoration, or archival research:

Old ASME standards: Early 20th century steam tables and equipment specifications used Rankine Vintage aviation: WWII and early jet age aircraft engine documentation may use Rankine Technical history: Understanding historical engineering achievements requires Rankine fluency


When to Use degrees Rømer

  • Historical Significance: Primarily of historical interest as a precursor to the Fahrenheit scale.
  • Not used in modern scientific or general applications.

Additional Unit Information

About Rankine (°R)

What is absolute zero on the Rankine scale?

Answer: 0 °R (exactly)

Absolute zero is the lowest possible temperature, where all classical molecular motion ceases and a system has minimal quantum mechanical zero-point energy. On the Rankine scale, this is defined as exactly 0 °R.

Absolute zero in other scales:

  • Rankine: 0 °R (by definition)
  • Fahrenheit: −459.67 °F
  • Kelvin: 0 K (by definition)
  • Celsius: −273.15 °C

The Rankine scale, like Kelvin, is an absolute scale, meaning its zero point represents true zero thermal energy (in the classical thermodynamic sense), not an arbitrary freezing point like Celsius or Fahrenheit.

How does Rankine relate to Fahrenheit?

Answer: °R = °F + 459.67 (Rankine is Fahrenheit shifted to start at absolute zero)

The Rankine and Fahrenheit scales use identical degree sizes—a change of 1 °R equals a change of 1 °F. The only difference is where zero is placed:

  • Fahrenheit: 0 °F is the freezing point of a brine solution (arbitrary choice from 1724)
  • Rankine: 0 °R is absolute zero, the lowest possible temperature

Key reference points:

  • Absolute zero: −459.67 °F = 0 °R
  • Water freezes: 32 °F = 491.67 °R
  • Water boils: 212 °F = 671.67 °R
  • Room temperature: 68 °F = 527.67 °R

Temperature changes: Because degree sizes are equal, a temperature rise of 50 °F is also a rise of 50 °R.

How does Rankine relate to Kelvin?

Answer: °R = K × 9/5 (or K = °R × 5/9)

Rankine and Kelvin are both absolute scales (zero at absolute zero), but they use different degree sizes:

  • Kelvin: Uses Celsius-sized degrees
  • Rankine: Uses Fahrenheit-sized degrees (which are 9/5 the size of Celsius degrees)

Conversion formula: °R = K × 9/5 (or K × 1.8)

Examples:

  • 0 K = 0 °R (absolute zero aligns)
  • 273.15 K (water freezes) = 491.67 °R
  • 373.15 K (water boils) = 671.67 °R
  • 300 K (room temp) = 540 °R

No offset needed: Unlike Fahrenheit-Celsius (which requires both multiplication AND addition), Rankine-Kelvin only requires multiplication because both start at absolute zero.

Why was the Rankine scale created?

Answer: To provide an absolute temperature scale compatible with Fahrenheit for British and American engineers

William Rankine created the scale in 1859 to solve a practical problem:

The problem:

  • Thermodynamic calculations (heat engines, gas laws, entropy) require absolute temperatures
  • Lord Kelvin had created an absolute scale in 1848, but it used Celsius degree intervals
  • British and American engineers worked in Fahrenheit, not Celsius
  • Constantly converting Fahrenheit → Celsius → Kelvin was error-prone and inefficient

Rankine's solution:

  • Create an absolute scale (zero at absolute zero) using Fahrenheit-sized degrees
  • Result: Engineers could use familiar Fahrenheit measurements with the benefits of an absolute scale

Historical context: In the 19th and early 20th centuries, this was essential for steam engine design, refrigeration engineering, and thermodynamic analysis in imperial-unit countries.

Is the Rankine scale still used today?

Answer: Rarely—primarily in specialized American engineering contexts and legacy documentation

Rankine has largely been replaced by Kelvin in modern engineering and science, but persists in specific niches:

Where Rankine is still used:

  • American aerospace engineering: Some NASA and contractor calculations when working in U.S. customary units
  • Cryogenic engineering: U.S. liquefied gas industries (LNG, liquid nitrogen/oxygen)
  • Legacy documentation: Older ASME standards, vintage equipment manuals, historical references
  • Thermodynamics education: Some U.S. engineering courses teach both Rankine and Kelvin

Why it declined:

  • Global metrication (1960s onward) made Kelvin the international standard
  • Scientific community exclusively uses Kelvin
  • Modern engineering software typically works in SI units
  • International collaboration requires Kelvin for compatibility

Current status: Rankine is a "legacy unit" maintained primarily for continuity with older American engineering systems, not for new designs.

What are the key temperatures on the Rankine scale?

Answer: Important reference temperatures in Rankine:

| Physical Point | Rankine | Fahrenheit | Description | |----------------|---------|------------|-------------| | Absolute zero | 0 °R | −459.67 °F | Theoretical minimum temperature | | Liquid helium boils | 7.6 °R | −451.9 °F | Coldest commonly used cryogenic liquid | | Liquid nitrogen boils | 139.3 °R | −320.4 °F | Common cryogenic refrigerant | | Dry ice sublimes | 389.0 °R | −109.3 °F | Solid CO₂ turns directly to gas | | Water freezes | 491.67 °R | 32 °F | Ice point at standard pressure (exact) | | Room temperature | 527.67 °R | 68 °F | Typical comfortable indoor temp | | Human body | 558.27 °R | 98.6 °F | Normal body temperature | | Water boils | 671.67 °R | 212 °F | Boiling point at standard pressure (exact) |

Exact values: Water's freezing and boiling points are defined exactly in Fahrenheit (32 °F and 212 °F), so they're also exact in Rankine (491.67 °R and 671.67 °R).

How do I convert Rankine to Celsius?

Answer: °C = (°R × 5/9) − 273.15

Step-by-step process:

  1. Convert Rankine to Kelvin: K = °R × 5/9
  2. Convert Kelvin to Celsius: °C = K − 273.15

Combined formula: °C = (°R × 5/9) − 273.15

Examples:

  • 491.67 °R (water freezes) = (491.67 × 5/9) − 273.15 = 273.15 − 273.15 = 0 °C
  • 671.67 °R (water boils) = (671.67 × 5/9) − 273.15 = 373.15 − 273.15 = 100 °C
  • 527.67 °R (room temp) = (527.67 × 5/9) − 273.15 = 293.15 − 273.15 = 20 °C

Alternative method: First convert to Fahrenheit, then to Celsius:

  1. °F = °R − 459.67
  2. °C = (°F − 32) × 5/9

Both methods give the same result.

Can I use negative numbers in Rankine?

Answer: No—negative temperatures don't exist on the Rankine scale (or Kelvin)

Because Rankine is an absolute scale starting at absolute zero (0 °R), there are no temperatures below zero. Negative Rankine temperatures would represent temperatures colder than absolute zero, which is physically impossible according to thermodynamics.

Comparison to other scales:

  • Rankine/Kelvin (absolute): Only positive values (0 and up)
  • Fahrenheit/Celsius (relative): Can have negative values (arbitrary zero points)

Lowest possible temperature: 0 °R (absolute zero) = −459.67 °F = −273.15 °C = 0 K

Note on exotic physics: In specialized quantum systems, "negative absolute temperatures" can exist in a technical sense (inverted population distributions), but this is a quantum statistical mechanics concept unrelated to everyday thermodynamics, and still doesn''t produce Rankine values below zero in the conventional thermal sense.

What''s the difference between °R and °Ra symbols?

Answer: Both °R and °Ra represent Rankine; °R is more common in American usage

Symbol variations:

  • °R: Most common symbol in American engineering contexts
  • °Ra: Sometimes used to avoid confusion with other units (electrical resistance in ohms: Ω or R)
  • R (without degree symbol): Occasionally seen in older texts but discouraged

Current standard: Most modern references use °R (with degree symbol), matching the pattern of °F, °C, and K (though Kelvin dropped its degree symbol in 1968).

Avoiding confusion:

  • Electrical resistance: ohm (Ω), not R
  • Gas constant: R (universal gas constant, context makes it clear)
  • Rankine temperature: °R or °Ra (degree symbol helps distinguish)

Recommendation: Use °R for Rankine temperatures in modern technical writing.

Why doesn''t Kelvin use a degree symbol but Rankine does?

Answer: In 1968, the kelvin was redefined as a base SI unit, dropping the degree symbol; Rankine wasn''t part of SI and retained its symbol

Historical evolution:

Before 1968: Both scales used degree symbols

  • Kelvin: °K (degrees Kelvin)
  • Rankine: °R or °Ra (degrees Rankine)

After 1968: The 13th General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) redefined the kelvin as a base SI unit (like meter, kilogram, second), removing the degree symbol:

  • Kelvin: K (kelvin, no degree symbol)
  • Rankine: °R (still degrees Rankine, not an SI unit)

Reasoning: Celsius (°C) retained its degree symbol because it's defined relative to kelvin (°C = K − 273.15). But kelvin itself, as a fundamental unit, doesn't use degrees—you say "300 kelvin" not "300 degrees kelvin."

Rankine status: Since Rankine isn't part of the International System of Units (SI), it never underwent this redefinition and still uses the degree symbol: °R.

Is Rankine more accurate than Fahrenheit for engineering?

Answer: Neither is more "accurate"—Rankine is better for thermodynamic calculations because it''s an absolute scale

Accuracy vs. suitability:

  • Both Rankine and Fahrenheit can be measured to arbitrary precision (accuracy)
  • The difference is mathematical correctness for thermodynamic equations

Why Rankine is better for thermodynamics:

  • Equations like PV = nRT, η = 1 - T_cold/T_hot, and ΔS = Q/T require absolute temperature
  • Using Fahrenheit (or Celsius) produces physically meaningless results (negative efficiency, division by zero, etc.)
  • Using Rankine (or Kelvin) produces correct physical results

Example (ideal gas law: PV = nRT):

  • At 0 °F (459.67 °R), pressure P is proportional to 459.67
  • If you incorrectly used 0 °F in the equation, you'd get P = 0 (no pressure), which is wrong!
  • Using 459.67 °R gives the correct pressure

Conclusion: For everyday temperature measurement, Fahrenheit is fine. For thermodynamic calculations, you must use Rankine (or Kelvin).

Will Rankine ever become obsolete?

Answer: Likely yes—it''s already obsolete in most contexts and will fade as U.S. engineering fully metrifies

Current trajectory:

  • 1960s-1990s: Rapid decline as global metrication occurred
  • 2000s-present: Niche survival in specific American engineering contexts
  • Future: Continued decline as remaining U.S. industries standardize on SI units (Kelvin)

Factors driving obsolescence:

  • International collaboration: Global engineering requires common units (Kelvin)
  • Software standardization: Modern CAD/simulation tools default to SI units
  • Educational shift: Engineering schools increasingly teach only Kelvin
  • Generational change: Engineers trained primarily in Rankine are retiring

Where it might persist longest:

  • Historical preservation (understanding old documents)
  • Legacy systems (maintaining equipment with Rankine specifications)
  • Specialized American aerospace/cryogenics (slow to change due to established procedures)

Likely outcome: Rankine will become a "historical unit" known primarily to engineering historians, similar to how the "degree Réaumur" (°Ré) is now obsolete despite 18th-19th century prominence.


About Rømer (°Rø)

What are the freezing and boiling points of water in Rømer?

Water freezes at 7.5 °Rø and boils at 60 °Rø.

How did Rømer influence Fahrenheit?

Fahrenheit adopted Rømer's use of two reference points and expanded the scale, likely multiplying Rømer's degrees by 4 to avoid fractions and negative numbers for everyday temperatures.

How does Rømer relate to Celsius?

The relationship is °Rø = °C × 21/40 + 7.5.

People Also Ask

How do I convert Rankine to Rømer?

To convert Rankine to Rømer, enter the value in Rankine in the calculator above. The conversion will happen automatically. Use our free online converter for instant and accurate results. You can also visit our temperature converter page to convert between other units in this category.

Learn more →

What is the conversion factor from Rankine to Rømer?

The conversion factor depends on the specific relationship between Rankine and Rømer. You can find the exact conversion formula and factor on this page. Our calculator handles all calculations automatically. See the conversion table above for common values.

Can I convert Rømer back to Rankine?

Yes! You can easily convert Rømer back to Rankine by using the swap button (⇌) in the calculator above, or by visiting our Rømer to Rankine converter page. You can also explore other temperature conversions on our category page.

Learn more →

What are common uses for Rankine and Rømer?

Rankine and Rømer are both standard units used in temperature measurements. They are commonly used in various applications including engineering, construction, cooking, and scientific research. Browse our temperature converter for more conversion options.

For more temperature conversion questions, visit our FAQ page or explore our conversion guides.

Other Temperature Units and Conversions

Explore other temperature units and their conversion options:

Verified Against Authority Standards

All conversion formulas have been verified against international standards and authoritative sources to ensure maximum accuracy and reliability.

NIST ITS-90 Temperature Scale

National Institute of Standards and TechnologyInternational Temperature Scale standards

BIPM Temperature Unit

Bureau International des Poids et MesuresDefinition of the kelvin and temperature scales

Last verified: December 3, 2025