Dram to Ton (UK) Converter

Convert drams to long tons with our free online weight converter.

Quick Answer

1 Dram = 0.00000174 long tons

Formula: Dram × conversion factor = Ton (UK)

Use the calculator below for instant, accurate conversions.

Our Accuracy Guarantee

All conversion formulas on UnitsConverter.io have been verified against NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) guidelines and international SI standards. Our calculations are accurate to 10 decimal places for standard conversions and use arbitrary precision arithmetic for astronomical units.

Last verified: December 2025Reviewed by: Sam Mathew, Software Engineer

Dram to Ton (UK) Calculator

How to Use the Dram to Ton (UK) Calculator:

  1. Enter the value you want to convert in the 'From' field (Dram).
  2. The converted value in Ton (UK) will appear automatically in the 'To' field.
  3. Use the dropdown menus to select different units within the Weight category.
  4. Click the swap button (⇌) to reverse the conversion direction.
Share:

How to Convert Dram to Ton (UK): Step-by-Step Guide

Converting Dram to Ton (UK) involves multiplying the value by a specific conversion factor, as shown in the formula below.

Formula:

1 Dram = 0.00000174386 long tons

Example Calculation:

Convert 5 drams: 5 × 0.00000174386 = 0.0000087193 long tons

Disclaimer: For Reference Only

These conversion results are provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees regarding the precision of these results, especially for conversions involving extremely large or small numbers which may be subject to the inherent limitations of standard computer floating-point arithmetic.

Not for professional use. Results should be verified before use in any critical application. View our Terms of Service for more information.

What is a Dram and a Ton (UK)?

Avoirdupois Dram (Commercial)

The avoirdupois dram is defined in the common weight system used for most goods:

Relationships:

  • 1 dram = 1/16 ounce (avoirdupois)
  • 1 dram = 1/256 pound (avoirdupois)
  • 1 dram = 27.34375 grains (exactly)
  • 1 dram ≈ 1.7718451953125 grams (exactly)

Symbol: dr, dr av, or dr avdp

Historical use: General commerce, precious materials, spices, ammunition powder charges.

Apothecary/Troy Dram (Pharmaceutical)

The apothecary dram (also called drachm) belongs to the apothecaries' weight system used historically in pharmacy:

Relationships:

  • 1 dram (ʒ) = 1/8 ounce (apothecary)
  • 1 dram = 3 scruples
  • 1 dram = 60 grains (exactly)
  • 1 dram ≈ 3.8879346 grams (exactly)

Symbol: ʒ (resembles the number 3, representing 3 scruples)

Historical use: Compounding medicines, pharmaceutical measurements, medical prescriptions.

The Critical Difference

Apothecary dram = 2.194 × Avoirdupois dram

This 2.2× ratio causes confusion. Historical recipes and medical texts must specify which system they use, or dosages could be dangerously incorrect.

Fluid Dram (Volume, Not Weight)

Adding to the confusion, the fluid dram is a unit of volume:

Fluid dram (imperial):

  • 1/8 fluid ounce (imperial)
  • ≈ 3.5516 mL

Fluid dram (US):

  • 1/8 fluid ounce (US)
  • ≈ 3.6967 mL

Symbol: fl dr, fl ʒ, or ℈

This is completely separate from weight drams, though historically related (1 fluid dram of water weighs approximately 1 avoirdupois dram).

The long ton (also called imperial ton or UK ton) is a unit of mass in the British Imperial system, officially defined as:

1 long ton = 2,240 pounds (lb) = 1,016.0469088 kilograms (kg)

Historical Definition

The long ton is based on the Imperial system's hundredweight (cwt):

1 long ton = 20 hundredweight (cwt)

  • 1 hundredweight (Imperial) = 112 pounds
  • 20 × 112 lb = 2,240 pounds

This contrasts with the US system:

  • US hundredweight = 100 pounds
  • US short ton = 20 US hundredweight = 2,000 pounds

The Three "Tons" Compared

| Ton Type | Weight in Pounds | Weight in Kilograms | Where Used | |----------|------------------|---------------------|------------| | Long Ton (UK/Imperial) | 2,240 lb | 1,016.047 kg | UK, Commonwealth (historic), naval displacement | | Short Ton (US) | 2,000 lb | 907.185 kg | United States, North America | | Metric Ton/Tonne | 2,204.62 lb | 1,000 kg (exactly) | International standard (SI-compatible) |

Difference Summary:

  • Long ton vs. short ton: 240 lbs (10.9% difference)
  • Long ton vs. metric tonne: ~16 kg (1.6% difference)
  • Short ton vs. metric tonne: ~93 kg (10.2% difference)

Why "Long" Ton?

The term "long ton" emerged in the early 20th century to distinguish the British imperial ton (2,240 lbs) from the American "short ton" (2,000 lbs). Before this, "ton" simply meant the local standard:

  • In Britain and the Empire: ton = 2,240 lbs (now called "long ton")
  • In the United States: ton = 2,000 lbs (now called "short ton")

International trade requiring clarity led to the qualifying adjectives "long" and "short."


Note: The Dram is part of the imperial/US customary system, primarily used in the US, UK, and Canada for everyday measurements. The Ton (UK) belongs to the imperial/US customary system.

History of the Dram and Ton (UK)

Ancient Greek Drachma (600 BCE - 300 CE)

The drachma coin: Greek city-states minted silver coins called drachmas, weighing approximately 4.3 grams (varying by region and period).

Origin of name: "Drachma" (δραχμή) derives from "drax" (handful) or "drassomai" (to grasp), possibly referring to a handful of six obol coins.

Weight standard: The Attic drachma (Athens) weighed about 4.3 g of silver, becoming a widespread weight and monetary standard.

Roman Adoption (300 BCE - 500 CE)

Drachma in Roman medicine: Roman physicians adopted Greek medical practices, including pharmaceutical measurements based on the drachma.

Galen's formulations: The physician Galen (129-216 CE) used drachmas extensively in medicinal recipes, establishing the unit in medical tradition.

Byzantine and Islamic Medicine (500-1200 CE)

Byzantine continuation: The Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantium) preserved Greek medical texts, maintaining the drachm as a pharmaceutical unit.

Islamic Golden Age: Arab physicians (Al-Razi, Avicenna) translated Greek medical works, incorporating drachms into Arabic pharmacy. The dirham (Arabic coin) shares the same etymological root.

Transmission to Europe: Through Islamic Spain and Sicily, Arabic medical knowledge returned to Western Europe (11th-13th centuries), bringing pharmaceutical drachm measurements.

Medieval European Apothecaries (1200-1600)

Apothecary guilds: European cities established apothecary guilds, standardizing medicinal weights based on the drachm.

The apothecary system:

  • 1 pound (lb ap) = 12 ounces
  • 1 ounce (℥) = 8 drams (ʒ)
  • 1 dram = 3 scruples (℈)
  • 1 scruple = 20 grains (gr)

Result: 1 apothecary dram = 60 grains

Symbol evolution: The symbol ʒ (scribal abbreviation for Latin "drachma") became standard for the dram.

British Standardization (1600-1800)

London Pharmacopoeia (1618): The first official British pharmacopoeia standardized apothecary weights, including the dram at 60 grains.

Avoirdupois emergence: Simultaneously, the avoirdupois system developed for general commerce, creating a different dram:

  • Avoirdupois dram = 1/16 ounce = 27.34375 grains

Coexistence: Two dram standards coexisted—apothecary for medicine, avoirdupois for trade.

American Adoption (1776-1900)

U.S. Pharmacopeia (1820): The first U.S. Pharmacopeia codified pharmaceutical measurements, adopting British apothecary standards including the dram.

Medical education: American medical schools taught apothecary measurements. Physicians wrote prescriptions using symbols like ʒ for drams.

Commercial use: Avoirdupois drams measured gunpowder, spices, precious materials, and other commodities.

Ammunition Application (1800s-Present)

Black powder charges: Early firearms used black powder measured in drams. A "3-dram load" meant 3 avoirdupois drams of powder.

Dram equivalent: With the transition to smokeless powder (1880s onward), manufacturers created "dram equivalent" ratings—the amount of smokeless powder producing the same velocity as a given dram measure of black powder.

Modern shotshells: Today's shotgun shells still reference "3 dram equivalent" or "3¼ dram equivalent" on the box, though actual powder weights are in grains or grams.

Metrication and Decline (1900-Present)

British pharmacy (1970): The UK officially abandoned apothecary weights, switching entirely to metric (grams, milligrams).

American pharmacy (1970s-1980s): U.S. pharmacy schools phased out apothecary measurements, adopting metric. By 1990, nearly all prescriptions used metric units.

Persistence:

  • Ammunition: Dram equivalent ratings continue
  • Historical recipes: Antique cookbooks and medical texts
  • Collectors: Antique apothecary scales and weights

of the Long Ton

Medieval Origins: The Tun (c. 1200-1500)

The Wine Trade:

  • The word "ton" derives from "tun" (Old English tunne, Middle English tonne), meaning a large cask or barrel
  • A tun was a standard wine cask in medieval England holding approximately 252 wine gallons (~954 liters, 210 Imperial gallons)
  • When filled with wine, a tun weighed roughly 2,240 pounds, establishing the weight association

Early Standardization Attempts:

  • 13th-14th centuries: English merchants used "ton" for both volume (liquids) and weight (bulk goods)
  • Different commodities had varying ton definitions:
    • Wool ton: Weight needed to fill shipping space (variable)
    • Coal ton: Weight-based measurement
    • Freight ton: Volume-based (40 cubic feet)

The Problem of Multiple Tons:

  • Confusion in trade due to inconsistent ton definitions
  • Disputes over cargo weight vs. volume
  • Regional variations across England and continental Europe

Standardization: The Weights and Measures Act of 1824

Imperial System Codification:

  • 1824: British Parliament passed the Weights and Measures Act under King George IV
  • Unified and standardized British weights and measures across the Empire
  • Officially defined the imperial ton as 2,240 pounds
  • Based on existing practice: 20 hundredweight of 112 pounds each

Why 2,240 Pounds? The choice reflected established commercial practice:

  • 1 hundredweight (cwt) = 112 pounds (8 stones × 14 pounds)
  • 20 hundredweight = 2,240 pounds
  • This matched the traditional weight of a tun of wine
  • Integrated with existing Imperial units (stones, pounds, ounces)

Imperial Hundredweight System:

  • 1 stone = 14 pounds
  • 1 hundredweight = 8 stones = 112 pounds
  • 1 ton = 20 hundredweight = 160 stones = 2,240 pounds

British Empire and Global Commerce (1824-1945)

Dominance of British Shipping:

  • 19th century: Britain controlled ~60-70% of world merchant shipping tonnage
  • British shipping companies used long tons for:
    • Cargo capacity (deadweight tonnage)
    • Ship displacement (weight of water displaced)
    • Freight charges (cost per ton)

The Coal Trade:

  • British coal powered the Industrial Revolution
  • Coal universally measured in long tons
  • Newcastle coal trade: Millions of long tons exported annually
  • Coal exports to Europe, Americas, Asia all priced in long tons

Naval Architecture:

  • Displacement tonnage: Weight of water displaced by a floating ship, measured in long tons
  • Used to classify warship size: "10,000-ton cruiser," "50,000-ton battleship"
  • Standard in Royal Navy and Commonwealth navies
  • Example: HMS Dreadnought (1906): ~18,000 long tons displacement

Imperial Commodity Trade:

  • Iron and steel: British iron production measured in long tons
  • Grain: Commonwealth grain shipments (wheat, barley) in long tons
  • Rubber, cotton, wool: Plantation exports measured in long tons
  • Freight rates: Shipping costs typically £X per long ton

Global Adoption:

  • British commercial dominance spread long ton usage
  • Bills of lading (shipping documents) in long tons
  • Maritime insurance: Cargo value calculated per long ton
  • Port records: Cargo throughput recorded in long tons

American Divergence: The Short Ton

US Measurement Evolution:

  • Early America inherited British Imperial units
  • By mid-19th century, US customary system diverged
  • Americans adopted a 100-pound hundredweight (simpler decimal-friendly base)
  • US ton = 20 US hundredweight = 20 × 100 lb = 2,000 pounds (the "short ton")

Why the Difference?

  • Simplicity: 100-pound hundredweight easier for calculation
  • Independence: Post-colonial desire for distinct American standards
  • Internal trade: US domestic commerce didn't require British compatibility

Terminology:

  • Originally, both were simply called "ton" in their respective countries
  • Early 20th century: International trade necessitated distinction
    • British ton → "long ton"
    • American ton → "short ton"

The Rise of the Metric Tonne (1875-Present)

Metric System Development:

  • 1875: Metric Convention established international metric standards
  • Metric tonne (or ton) defined as 1,000 kilograms (exactly)
  • Decimal-based, simple, scientifically rational

Advantages Over Long/Short Tons:

  • Exact decimal definition: 1 tonne = 1,000 kg (no fractions)
  • Universal: Not tied to any national system
  • SI-compatible: Integrates with scientific units
  • Easier calculation: Decimal arithmetic vs. 2,240-pound conversions

Global Metrication Wave (1960s-1990s):

United Kingdom:

  • 1965: UK government announced metrication program
  • 1970s-1980s: Gradual transition in trade, industry, and commerce
  • 1995: Most commercial transactions legally required to use metric units
  • Long ton legacy: Persists in road signs (distances/heights) and some traditional contexts

Commonwealth Nations:

  • Australia: Metrication 1970s, completed by 1988
  • Canada: Metrication 1970s, officially adopted 1977-1980
  • New Zealand: Metrication 1969-1976
  • India: Adopted metric system post-independence (1947-1960s)
  • South Africa: Metrication 1970s

Shipping and Maritime:

  • International Maritime Organization (IMO): Encouraged metric units
  • Modern cargo manifests typically in metric tonnes
  • Shipping contracts, freight rates increasingly metric

Contemporary Usage (1990s-Present)

Where the Long Ton Survives:

1. Naval Displacement (UK and Commonwealth):

  • Royal Navy still reports warship displacement in long tons (alongside metric)
  • Royal Australian Navy, Royal Canadian Navy, Royal New Zealand Navy: Use long tons traditionally
  • Example: HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier: ~65,000 long tons full load displacement

2. Historical Records:

  • Pre-1990s British commercial records in long tons
  • Archival shipping manifests, trade statistics, industrial production data
  • Converting historical data requires long ton knowledge

3. Certain Industries:

  • Some maritime insurance policies reference long tons in older contracts
  • Vintage engineering specifications (bridges, railways built pre-metrication)
  • Mining records: Historical coal, iron ore output

4. United States Context:

  • When Americans refer to British/Commonwealth historical data, they may encounter long tons
  • Rare in modern US usage (Americans use short tons domestically)

Gradual Obsolescence:

  • Most modern international trade: metric tonnes
  • Younger generations in UK/Commonwealth unfamiliar with long tons
  • Likely to become purely historical unit within decades

Common Uses and Applications: drams vs long tons

Explore the typical applications for both Dram (imperial/US) and Ton (UK) (imperial/US) to understand their common contexts.

Common Uses for drams

1. Ammunition and Reloading

Shotshell ratings: Manufacturers mark shotgun shells with "dram equivalent" to indicate approximate velocity/power level.

Why still used? Tradition and familiarity. Shooters understand "3 dram load" means standard power, while "3¾ dram" is heavy magnum.

Reloading manuals: Some reloading data references dram equivalents alongside modern grain measurements.

2. Historical Recipe Interpretation

19th-century cookbooks: Recipes may call for "1 dram of nutmeg" or "2 drams of ginger."

Conversion challenge: Must determine if the recipe uses avoirdupois or apothecary drams (usually avoirdupois for cooking).

Modern equivalent: 1 avoirdupois dram ≈ 1.77 grams ≈ 1/3 teaspoon (for dry spices)

3. Antique Apothecary Items

Collectible scales: Antique apothecary scales often have dram weights marked with ʒ.

Medicine bottles: Historical pharmacy bottles may indicate contents in drams.

Historical research: Understanding drams is essential for interpreting 18th-19th century medical texts.

4. Pharmaceutical History

Old pharmacopoeias: Historical pharmaceutical formulas use apothecary drams.

Example prescription (1850s): "℞ Quinine sulfate ʒij" = Take 2 drams of quinine sulfate

Modern interpretation: 2 apothecary drams = 7.78 grams

When to Use long tons

of the Long Ton in Modern Contexts

1. Naval and Maritime History

Researchers, naval historians, and museum curators working with historical ships and maritime records must understand long tons:

  • Ship specifications: Displacement, cargo capacity, fuel capacity
  • Archival documents: Shipping manifests, port records, naval reports
  • Comparative analysis: Comparing historical ships to modern vessels
  • Museum exhibits: HMS Victory, USS Constitution, RMS Titanic displays

Example: Understanding that HMS Hood's 42,000 long ton displacement = ~42,672 metric tonnes helps compare to modern carriers.

2. Royal Navy and Commonwealth Navies

British and Commonwealth naval forces still reference long tons:

  • Official displacement figures: Warships listed in long tons (with metric equivalent)
  • Naval doctrine: Historical continuity in naval architecture
  • Training: Naval officers learn both systems
  • Public relations: Press releases may include long ton figures for tradition

Modern Practice: Usually list both: "HMS Queen Elizabeth: 65,000 long tons (66,000 tonnes)"

3. Historical Research and Archives

Historians studying British Empire, Industrial Revolution, or maritime trade encounter long tons constantly:

  • Economic history: Production statistics (coal, iron, steel, ships)
  • Trade records: Import/export volumes
  • Infrastructure: Railway freight, canal cargo
  • Colonial economies: Plantation outputs (sugar, rubber, cotton)

Conversion Necessity: Comparing 19th-century British data (long tons) with modern data (metric tonnes) requires accurate conversion.

4. Vintage Engineering and Restoration

Engineers working with historic structures, machinery, or vehicles:

  • Bridge load ratings: Victorian bridges specified in long tons
  • Crane capacities: Historic cranes rated in long tons
  • Railway heritage: Steam locomotives, heritage railways use long tons
  • Industrial archaeology: Historic factories, mines with long ton specifications

Safety: Modern safety assessments must convert long ton ratings to metric.

5. Commodity Markets and Legal Documents

Occasionally, older contracts or legal documents reference long tons:

  • Mining leases: Historic coal, iron ore extraction rights
  • Shipping contracts: Old freight agreements still in force
  • Insurance policies: Maritime insurance with long ton clauses
  • Property deeds: Historical rights to extract/transport X long tons

Legal interpretation: Courts may need to convert long tons for enforcement.

6. Education and Reference

Students and general public encounter long tons in:

  • History textbooks: British industrial production, maritime trade
  • War histories: Shipping losses, munitions production
  • Biographies: Figures like Brunel (engineering), Nelson (naval)
  • Documentaries: Maritime history, industrial heritage

Confusion: Many confuse long ton, short ton, metric tonne without understanding differences.

7. International Trade (Rare, Legacy Contexts)

Very occasionally, long tons appear in:

  • UK-Commonwealth trade: Older business relationships honoring traditional units
  • Specific commodities: Niche markets with historical ties
  • Contracts: Long-standing agreements referencing long tons

Trend: Rapidly disappearing as metrication completes and older contracts expire.


Additional Unit Information

About Dram (dr)

How many drams are in an ounce (avoirdupois)?

Exactly 16 avoirdupois drams = 1 avoirdupois ounce.

This is the definition:

  • 1 oz av = 16 dr av
  • 1 dr av = 1/16 oz av = 0.0625 oz

How many grams are in a dram (avoirdupois)?

1 avoirdupois dram = 1.7718451953125 grams (exactly).

Practical approximation: 1 dr av ≈ 1.77 g

Derivation: 1 pound av = 453.59237 grams (exact) 1 pound = 256 drams 1 dram = 453.59237 ÷ 256 = 1.77185 g

Is a dram a unit of mass or volume?

Both exist, which causes significant confusion:

Mass (weight):

  • Avoirdupois dram (dr): 1.772 g
  • Apothecary dram (ʒ): 3.888 g

Volume:

  • Fluid dram (fl dr, US): 3.697 mL
  • Fluid dram (fl dr, imperial): 3.552 mL

Context matters:

  • Pharmacy/medicine historically: could be either (check symbols)
  • General commerce: usually weight
  • Modern usage: rare except ammunition (weight-related rating)

What's the difference between avoirdupois and apothecary drams?

Avoirdupois dram (commercial):

  • 1/16 ounce avoirdupois
  • 27.34375 grains
  • 1.772 grams
  • Used for general goods

Apothecary dram (pharmaceutical):

  • 1/8 ounce apothecary
  • 60 grains
  • 3.888 grams
  • Used for medicines

Key difference: Apothecary dram is 2.19× heavier than avoirdupois dram.

What does the symbol ʒ mean?

The symbol ʒ represents the apothecary dram.

Origin: Scribal abbreviation of Latin "drachma" or "dragma."

Appearance: Resembles a fancy number "3," which is appropriate since 1 dram = 3 scruples.

Usage: Historical pharmaceutical prescriptions: "℞ Morphine ʒi" = Take 1 dram of morphine

What is a dram equivalent in ammunition?

"Dram equivalent" is a velocity/power rating for shotgun shells, not actual powder weight.

Historical context: Black powder shotgun loads used actual drams of powder (e.g., "3 drams of black powder").

Modern meaning: A "3 dram equivalent" smokeless powder load produces approximately the same muzzle velocity as a historical 3-dram black powder load.

Actual powder weight: Modern "3 dram equivalent" loads typically contain 18-22 grains of smokeless powder (less than 1 actual dram by weight).

Rating scale:

  • 2¾ dram eq: Light/target
  • 3 dram eq: Standard
  • 3¼ dram eq: Magnum
  • 3¾ - 4 dram eq: Heavy magnum

Do doctors still use drams?

No, modern medicine uses metric units exclusively.

Historical use: 19th and early 20th century physicians wrote prescriptions using apothecary measurements including drams (ʒ).

Transition:

  • UK: Abandoned apothecary units in 1970
  • US: Phased out 1970s-1990s

Current practice: All modern prescriptions use milligrams (mg), grams (g), and milliliters (mL). Drams are historical artifacts.

How do I convert historical dram measurements?

Step 1: Identify the system

  • Pharmacy/medicine: Likely apothecary dram (3.888 g)
  • Cooking/commerce: Likely avoirdupois dram (1.772 g)

Step 2: Check for symbols

  • ʒ symbol: Definitely apothecary
  • "dr" or no symbol: Context-dependent (probably avoirdupois for cooking)

Step 3: Convert to grams

  • Avoirdupois: drams × 1.772
  • Apothecary: drams × 3.888

Step 4: Convert to modern measure

  • Grams to teaspoons (dry ingredients): ~5 g per tsp
  • Grams to milliliters (liquids): depends on density

Can I still buy dram weights?

Yes, as antique collectibles, but not for practical use.

Antique apothecary weights: Available from antique dealers, often brass or bronze, marked with ʒ symbol.

Modern equivalents: Not manufactured. Use gram scales instead.

Collectible value: Complete sets of 18th-19th century apothecary weights command $100-500+ depending on condition.

Why did pharmacy abandon drams?

Multiple reasons drove metrication:

1. International standardization: Metric system adopted globally for science and medicine.

2. Safety: Multiple dram systems (avoirdupois vs. apothecary) created dangerous confusion.

3. Ease of calculation: Decimal metric system simpler than fractional apothecary system.

4. Precision: Milligrams allow more precise dosing than grains/scruples/drams.

Result: By 1990, virtually all pharmacy worldwide used metric exclusively.

About Ton (UK) (long ton)

1. How many pounds are in a UK Ton (Long Ton)?

There are exactly 2,240 pounds in 1 UK long ton. This derives from the Imperial system's definition: 1 long ton = 20 hundredweight, and 1 Imperial hundredweight = 112 pounds, so 20 × 112 = 2,240 pounds. This standard was codified in the British Weights and Measures Act of 1824 and became the official weight unit across the British Empire for shipping, coal trade, and bulk commodities. The 2,240-pound long ton originated from the traditional weight of a "tun" (large wine cask) when filled, which medieval merchants found convenient for maritime commerce. Today, while largely replaced by metric tonnes in most contexts, the 2,240-pound definition remains unchanged in the few areas where long tons are still used, particularly Royal Navy ship displacement measurements.

2. Is a UK Ton larger than a US Ton?

Yes, a UK long ton (2,240 lb / 1,016 kg) is 12% larger than a US short ton (2,000 lb / 907 kg)—specifically, 240 pounds heavier. This difference arose because the UK retained the traditional 112-pound Imperial hundredweight (20 cwt = 2,240 lb), while the US adopted a simplified 100-pound hundredweight (20 cwt = 2,000 lb) in the 19th century. The 12% difference is significant in large-scale commerce: 10,000 US short tons = 8,929 UK long tons (a shortfall of 1,071 long tons). This discrepancy caused confusion in transatlantic trade, requiring contracts to specify "long tons" or "short tons" explicitly. The metric tonne (1,000 kg) was partly adopted internationally to eliminate this Anglo-American ambiguity, being nearly equal to the long ton (1.6% lighter) but defined in the universal decimal system.

3. How does the UK Ton compare to the metric ton?

A UK long ton (1,016.047 kg) is 1.6% heavier than a metric tonne (1,000 kg)—specifically, ~16 kg or ~35 pounds heavier. This near-equivalence made conversion relatively straightforward during metrication: 1 long ton ≈ 1.016 tonnes, and 1 tonne ≈ 0.984 long tons. For rough estimates, many treated them as approximately equal, but precision trade required exact conversion (error of 1.6% matters for large shipments). Example: 100,000 long tons = 101,605 metric tonnes (1,605-tonne difference). The metric tonne's advantage: exact decimal definition (1,000 kg) integrates seamlessly with SI units, whereas the long ton (2,240 lbs, odd historical number) requires complex conversions. Despite metrication, some UK contexts preserve long tons: Royal Navy still reports ship displacement in long tons alongside metric figures, maintaining centuries of naval tradition.

4. Why did Britain use 2,240 pounds instead of a round number?

The 2,240-pound definition arose organically from medieval commerce, not rational design. It derives from the Imperial hundredweight system: 1 cwt = 8 stones = 8 × 14 lbs = 112 pounds. Twenty hundredweight = 20 × 112 = 2,240 pounds. This system was based on stones (14 lbs, traditional for weighing people and goods) rather than decimal convenience. Additionally, the "tun" (wine cask) traditionally weighed ~2,240 lbs when full, reinforcing this standard. When the Weights and Measures Act of 1824 standardized British units, lawmakers codified existing practice rather than inventing new decimal-friendly numbers. Result: An Imperial system built on 14s, 16s, 112s, and 2,240s—functional but mathematically awkward compared to the metric system's base-10 simplicity. This complexity was a major driver of global metrication in the 20th century, as decimal systems (1,000 kg tonne) are far easier for calculation and international trade.

5. Do modern British ships still use long tons?

Yes, but with caveats. The Royal Navy still officially reports warship displacement in long tons alongside metric tonnes, preserving centuries of naval tradition. Example: HMS Queen Elizabeth (2017) is listed as 65,000 long tons (~66,000 tonnes) displacement. However, merchant shipping has almost entirely switched to metric tonnes following international maritime conventions and UK metrication (1965-1990s). Modern cargo ships, tankers, and container vessels specify capacity in metric tonnes (deadweight tonnage, cargo capacity). Engineering calculations, fuel consumption, and port documentation now use metric. The Royal Navy's continued use of long tons is primarily ceremonial and historical—engineers work in metric internally, but public-facing documents honor tradition. Most Commonwealth navies (Australia, Canada, New Zealand) similarly list both units. Prediction: As older naval officers retire, long tons may eventually disappear even from Royal Navy specifications, becoming purely a historical footnote.

6. When did the UK stop using long tons officially?

The UK's transition was gradual, not instantaneous: 1965: Government announced metrication program. 1970s-1980s: Industries progressively adopted metric units. 1995: Metrication of trade largely complete; the Weights and Measures Act 1985 required most goods sold by weight to use metric. However, "official" cessation is complex: Some sectors retain long tons (e.g., Royal Navy). Road signs still use miles (not metric). Pubs serve pints (568 ml, not 500 ml metric). Thus, metrication was incomplete: "soft" metrication allowed dual units. By the late 1990s-2000s, most commerce, manufacturing, and shipping had switched to metric tonnes, making long tons rare outside specific legacy contexts. Practically, long tons ceased being the default standard around 1990-2000, but they never disappeared entirely. Older Britons still think in stones/pounds for body weight, and tonnes sometimes mentally convert to long tons. Full cultural shift may take another generation.

7. What's the difference between a long ton and a freight ton?

Long ton and freight ton (also called measurement ton) measure different things: Long ton: Unit of weight = 2,240 pounds (1,016 kg). Freight ton (measurement ton): Unit of volume = 40 cubic feet (~1.133 cubic meters). Shipping charges historically used whichever gave the higher value: weight or volume. Why? Some cargo is dense and heavy (iron ore, coal): charged by weight (long tons). Other cargo is bulky but light (cotton bales, furniture): charged by volume (freight tons). Example: 1,000 cubic feet of cotton = 25 freight tons (1,000 ÷ 40). If it weighs only 10,000 lbs = 4.46 long tons, ship charges for 25 freight tons (higher). Conversely, 1,000 cubic feet of lead = 25 freight tons. If it weighs 70,000 lbs = 31.25 long tons, ship charges for 31.25 long tons (higher). This "weight or measurement, whichever greater" rule persists in modern shipping (now using metric tonnes and cubic meters, but same principle).

8. How did metrication affect industries that relied on long tons?

Metrication required massive reengineering, retraining, and record conversion: Coal mining: Decades of production data in long tons had to be converted for comparisons. Miners trained to think in long tons had to learn metric. Modern equipment calibrated in tonnes. Shipping: Bills of lading, cargo manifests, freight rates all converted to metric tonnes. Crane capacities, ship specifications re-rated. Steel industry: Furnace capacities, production targets, quality standards converted. Historical production comparisons required conversion factors. Agriculture: Grain yields (tons per acre → tonnes per hectare), livestock weights, feed quantities. Challenges: Elderly workers unfamiliar with metric. "Rounding errors" in conversion causing disputes (1,000 long tons ≠ 1,000 tonnes). Cost of replacing scales, signage, documentation. Benefits: International trade simplified (no long ton/short ton confusion). Decimal calculations easier. Integration with scientific/engineering standards. Transition pain: 1970s-1990s saw dual labeling, calculation errors, generational confusion. By 2000s, mostly smooth, but legacy long ton data remains in archives requiring ongoing conversion skills.

9. Why do some sources say "ton" while others say "tonne"?

The spelling distinguishes metric from non-metric: "Ton" (t-o-n): Generic term, historically means long ton (UK), short ton (US), or any ton. "Tonne" (t-o-n-n-e): Specifically refers to metric ton (1,000 kg). Also written "metric ton." The extra "ne" distinguishes it. Usage: British English: Often use "tonne" for metric, "ton" for Imperial/US. American English: Usually "ton" for short ton (domestic), "metric ton" (not "tonne") for 1,000 kg. International standards: SI prefers "tonne" for 1,000 kg to avoid confusion. Pronunciation: Both pronounced identically in English (sounds like "tun"). In practice: Context usually clarifies, but precise technical writing specifies: "long ton," "short ton," "metric tonne" (or "metric ton"). Ambiguity persists: A British naval historian might write "50,000 tons" meaning long tons, while a modern cargo manifest "50,000 tonnes" means metric. Recommendation: Always specify unit explicitly in technical contexts to prevent costly errors.

10. Can I still buy things by the long ton in the UK?

Legally: No, almost impossible. The Weights and Measures Act 1985 and subsequent regulations require most goods sold by weight to use metric units (kilograms, grams, tonnes). Imperial units can be supplementary (dual labeling), but metric must be primary. Violations result in fines. Exceptions: Some traditional items (loose goods in markets) tolerated Imperial informally, but legally must be metric. Practically: No modern British shop, supplier, or merchant sells bulk commodities by the long ton. Everything is tonnes (metric): coal (if still sold for heating, rare), aggregates (gravel, sand), scrap metal, agricultural products. Why?: Suppliers, scales, invoices, and logistics all metric. Even older Britons who remember long tons accept metric in commercial contexts. Historical context: Pre-1970s, coal merchants delivered "1 ton of coal" (long ton) to homes. Now, heating oil sold in litres, firewood in cubic meters. Legacy: Long tons only appear in historical records, naval references, vintage engineering specs—not retail or commerce.

11. What industries were most resistant to abandoning the long ton?

Shipping and maritime industries were most resistant, for several reasons: 1. International standardization concerns: Shipping was already internationalized; changing units required global coordination. Royal Navy and Commonwealth navies valued continuity of displacement measurements across centuries for comparing ship classes. 2. Existing infrastructure: Shipyards, cranes, dry docks all rated in long tons. Re-rating everything expensive. 3. Cultural tradition: "Tonnage" terminology deeply embedded in maritime law, insurance, and practice. Changing felt like severing heritage. 4. Training: Mariners, naval architects, shipbuilders trained in long tons for entire careers. Coal industry also resisted: Miners, colliery managers, and coal merchants used long tons for generations. Production targets, wage calculations, and rail freight all based on long tons. However, resistance eventually failed: Economic necessity (international trade efficiency) and generational change (younger workers learned metric in school) gradually shifted all industries. By 2000s, even holdouts largely surrendered, with long tons surviving only in niche ceremonial contexts (Royal Navy traditions) and historical references.

12. How do I convert historical British data in long tons to modern metric?

Step-by-step conversion:

1. Identify that it's long tons: Historical British/Commonwealth data (pre-1990s) in "tons" almost certainly means long tons. Verify context (if US source, might be short tons).

2. Use precise conversion factor: 1 long ton = 1.01604691 metric tonnes (or 1,016.0469088 kg exactly).

3. Multiply: Long tons × 1.01604691 = metric tonnes. Example: 50 million long tons of coal (1913 UK production) × 1.01604691 = 50.802 million metric tonnes.

4. For large datasets: Use spreadsheet formula: =A1*1.01604691 where A1 is long tons.

5. Check reasonableness: Long ton is ~1.6% heavier than metric tonne, so metric number should be slightly larger. If wildly different, error likely.

6. Rounding: For historical approximation, 1 long ton ≈ 1 tonne (ignoring 1.6%) often acceptable. For trade/finance, use precise factor.

7. Document conversion: When publishing converted data, note: "Converted from long tons using factor 1.01604691."

Common pitfall: Don't use 2,240 lbs → kg conversion (introduces rounding error). Use exact long ton to metric tonne factor.


Conversion Table: Dram to Ton (UK)

Dram (dr)Ton (UK) (long ton)
0.50
10
1.50
20
50
100
250
500
1000
2500
5000.001
1,0000.002

People Also Ask

How do I convert Dram to Ton (UK)?

To convert Dram to Ton (UK), enter the value in Dram in the calculator above. The conversion will happen automatically. Use our free online converter for instant and accurate results. You can also visit our weight converter page to convert between other units in this category.

Learn more →

What is the conversion factor from Dram to Ton (UK)?

The conversion factor depends on the specific relationship between Dram and Ton (UK). You can find the exact conversion formula and factor on this page. Our calculator handles all calculations automatically. See the conversion table above for common values.

Can I convert Ton (UK) back to Dram?

Yes! You can easily convert Ton (UK) back to Dram by using the swap button (⇌) in the calculator above, or by visiting our Ton (UK) to Dram converter page. You can also explore other weight conversions on our category page.

Learn more →

What are common uses for Dram and Ton (UK)?

Dram and Ton (UK) are both standard units used in weight measurements. They are commonly used in various applications including engineering, construction, cooking, and scientific research. Browse our weight converter for more conversion options.

For more weight conversion questions, visit our FAQ page or explore our conversion guides.

All Weight Conversions

Kilogram to GramKilogram to MilligramKilogram to PoundKilogram to OunceKilogram to StoneKilogram to Ton (metric)Kilogram to Ton (US)Kilogram to Ton (UK)Kilogram to MicrogramKilogram to CaratKilogram to SlugKilogram to Troy OunceKilogram to PennyweightKilogram to GrainKilogram to DramKilogram to QuintalKilogram to Atomic Mass UnitKilogram to Pavan (India)Kilogram to Kati (India)Kilogram to Masha (India)Kilogram to Dina (India)Kilogram to Pras (India)Kilogram to Lota (India)Gram to KilogramGram to MilligramGram to PoundGram to OunceGram to StoneGram to Ton (metric)Gram to Ton (US)Gram to Ton (UK)Gram to MicrogramGram to CaratGram to SlugGram to Troy OunceGram to PennyweightGram to GrainGram to DramGram to QuintalGram to Atomic Mass UnitGram to Pavan (India)Gram to Kati (India)Gram to Masha (India)Gram to Dina (India)Gram to Pras (India)Gram to Lota (India)Milligram to KilogramMilligram to GramMilligram to PoundMilligram to OunceMilligram to StoneMilligram to Ton (metric)Milligram to Ton (US)Milligram to Ton (UK)Milligram to MicrogramMilligram to CaratMilligram to SlugMilligram to Troy OunceMilligram to PennyweightMilligram to GrainMilligram to DramMilligram to QuintalMilligram to Atomic Mass UnitMilligram to Pavan (India)Milligram to Kati (India)Milligram to Masha (India)Milligram to Dina (India)Milligram to Pras (India)Milligram to Lota (India)Pound to KilogramPound to GramPound to MilligramPound to OuncePound to StonePound to Ton (metric)Pound to Ton (US)Pound to Ton (UK)Pound to MicrogramPound to CaratPound to SlugPound to Troy OuncePound to PennyweightPound to GrainPound to DramPound to QuintalPound to Atomic Mass UnitPound to Pavan (India)Pound to Kati (India)Pound to Masha (India)Pound to Dina (India)Pound to Pras (India)Pound to Lota (India)Ounce to KilogramOunce to GramOunce to MilligramOunce to PoundOunce to StoneOunce to Ton (metric)Ounce to Ton (US)Ounce to Ton (UK)Ounce to MicrogramOunce to CaratOunce to SlugOunce to Troy OunceOunce to PennyweightOunce to GrainOunce to DramOunce to QuintalOunce to Atomic Mass UnitOunce to Pavan (India)Ounce to Kati (India)Ounce to Masha (India)Ounce to Dina (India)Ounce to Pras (India)Ounce to Lota (India)Stone to KilogramStone to GramStone to MilligramStone to PoundStone to Ounce

Verified Against Authority Standards

All conversion formulas have been verified against international standards and authoritative sources to ensure maximum accuracy and reliability.

NIST Mass and Force Standards

National Institute of Standards and TechnologyUS standards for weight and mass measurements

ISO 80000-4

International Organization for StandardizationInternational standard for mechanics quantities

Last verified: December 3, 2025