Stone to Slug Converter
Convert stones to slugs with our free online weight converter.
Quick Answer
1 Stone = 0.435133 slugs
Formula: Stone × conversion factor = Slug
Use the calculator below for instant, accurate conversions.
Our Accuracy Guarantee
All conversion formulas on UnitsConverter.io have been verified against NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) guidelines and international SI standards. Our calculations are accurate to 10 decimal places for standard conversions and use arbitrary precision arithmetic for astronomical units.
Stone to Slug Calculator
How to Use the Stone to Slug Calculator:
- Enter the value you want to convert in the 'From' field (Stone).
- The converted value in Slug will appear automatically in the 'To' field.
- Use the dropdown menus to select different units within the Weight category.
- Click the swap button (⇌) to reverse the conversion direction.
How to Convert Stone to Slug: Step-by-Step Guide
Converting Stone to Slug involves multiplying the value by a specific conversion factor, as shown in the formula below.
Formula:
1 Stone = 0.435133 slugsExample Calculation:
Convert 5 stones: 5 × 0.435133 = 2.17566 slugs
Disclaimer: For Reference Only
These conversion results are provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees regarding the precision of these results, especially for conversions involving extremely large or small numbers which may be subject to the inherent limitations of standard computer floating-point arithmetic.
Not for professional use. Results should be verified before use in any critical application. View our Terms of Service for more information.
Need to convert to other weight units?
View all Weight conversions →What is a Stone and a Slug?
1 stone = 14 avoirdupois pounds (lb) = 6.35029318 kilograms (kg) EXACT
The stone (symbol: st) is a unit of mass in the Imperial system, legally defined in terms of pounds, which are themselves defined in terms of kilograms. The exact conversion is:
1 pound = 0.45359237 kilograms (international definition, 1959)
1 stone = 14 × 0.45359237 kg = 6.35029318 kg
Stone and Pounds Notation
The stone is almost never used alone for body weight. Instead, it's combined with additional pounds:
Format: "X stone Y pounds" or "X st Y lb"
Examples:
- 10 st 0 lb = 10 stone exactly = 140 lb = 63.5 kg
- 10 st 7 lb = 10 stone + 7 pounds = 147 lb = 66.7 kg
- 12 st 3 lb = 12 stone + 3 pounds = 171 lb = 77.6 kg
Why this format? It provides precision without unwieldy decimal places. Saying "10.5 stone" is rare—people say "10 stone 7" instead (10 stone + 7 pounds = 10.5 stone).
Stone vs. Kilogram vs. Pound
Three systems for measuring body weight:
| System | Unit | Used In | Precision | |-----------|----------|-------------|---------------| | Imperial (UK) | Stone + Pounds | UK, Ireland | "11 st 7 lb" (161 lb) | | Imperial (US) | Pounds only | United States, Canada | "161 lb" | | Metric | Kilograms | Most of the world | "73 kg" |
Cultural difference:
- Americans say "I weigh 161 pounds"
- British say "I weigh 11 stone 7" (rarely "161 pounds")
- Europeans say "I weigh 73 kilograms"
Why 14 Pounds?
The number 14 has no scientific basis—it's purely historical. Medieval England used base-12 counting (duodecimal) for some systems:
- 12 inches = 1 foot
- 12 pence = 1 shilling (pre-1971)
- But 14 pounds = 1 stone (not 12!)
Theory: The 14-pound wool stone emerged from trade practices. A "sack of wool" weighed 364 pounds = 26 stones (26 × 14 = 364), a convenient round number for taxation and commerce.
What Is a Slug?
The slug (symbol: sl or slug) is a unit of mass in the Foot-Pound-Second (FPS) system of imperial units. It is defined through Newton's second law of motion (F = ma):
1 slug = 1 lbf / (1 ft/s²)
In words: one slug is the mass that accelerates at one foot per second squared when a force of one pound-force is applied to it.
Exact Value
1 slug = 32.17404855... pounds-mass (lbm) ≈ 32.174 lbm
1 slug = 14.593902937206... kilograms ≈ 14.5939 kg
These values derive from the standard acceleration due to gravity: g = 32.174 ft/s² = 9.80665 m/s².
The Pound Confusion
The imperial system has a fundamental ambiguity: the word "pound" means two different things:
Pound-mass (lbm):
- A unit of mass (quantity of matter)
- An object has the same pound-mass everywhere in the universe
- Symbol: lbm
Pound-force (lbf):
- A unit of force (weight)
- The force exerted by one pound-mass under standard Earth gravity
- Symbol: lbf
- 1 lbf = 1 lbm × 32.174 ft/s² (weight = mass × gravity)
This creates confusion because in everyday language, "pound" can mean either, depending on context. The slug eliminates this ambiguity by serving as an unambiguous mass unit compatible with pound-force.
Why the Slug Matters: Making F = ma Work
Newton's second law: F = ma (Force = mass × acceleration)
Problem with pounds-mass and pounds-force: If you use lbm for mass and lbf for force, Newton's law becomes: F = ma / g_c
where g_c = 32.174 lbm·ft/(lbf·s²) is a dimensional conversion constant—ugly and error-prone!
Solution with slugs: Using slugs for mass and lbf for force, Newton's law works cleanly: F = ma (no extra constants needed!)
Example:
- Force: 10 lbf
- Acceleration: 5 ft/s²
- Mass: F/a = 10 lbf / 5 ft/s² = 2 slugs
- (Or in lbm: mass = 2 slugs × 32.174 = 64.348 lbm)
FPS System
The slug is part of the Foot-Pound-Second (FPS) system, also called the British Gravitational System or English Engineering System:
- Length: foot (ft)
- Force: pound-force (lbf)
- Time: second (s)
- Mass: slug (sl)
- Acceleration: feet per second squared (ft/s²)
This contrasts with the SI system (meter, kilogram, second, newton) and the pound-mass system (foot, pound-mass, second, poundal).
Note: The Stone is part of the imperial/US customary system, primarily used in the US, UK, and Canada for everyday measurements. The Slug belongs to the imperial/US customary system.
History of the Stone and Slug
Ancient and Medieval Origins (Pre-1300)
The concept of standardized stones: Before precise metallic weights, communities used stones as trade counterweights. A merchant would keep a reference stone in the marketplace, verified by local authorities, against which goods were weighed.
Advantages:
- Durability: Stones don't corrode or wear like metal
- Availability: Every village had stones
- Tamper-resistance: Hard to secretly shave weight off a stone
Problem: Every region had different stones! The "stone of wool" in Yorkshire differed from the "stone of wool" in Kent.
Medieval Standardization Attempts (1300-1824)
Edward III's wool stone (1340): King Edward III standardized the wool stone at 14 pounds as part of regulating the lucrative wool trade (England's economic backbone in the Middle Ages). The "sack of wool" was defined as 364 pounds = 26 stones.
Commodity-specific stones: Different goods had different stone weights:
| Commodity | Stone Weight | Reasoning | |--------------|-----------------|---------------| | Wool | 14 lb (6.35 kg) | Trade standard | | Meat | 8 lb (3.63 kg) | Butcher's stone | | Glass | 5 lb (2.27 kg) | Fragile goods | | Cheese | 16 lb (7.26 kg) | Agricultural products | | Iron | Variable (8-15 lb) | Regional differences |
Why different weights? Practical reasons:
- Heavy commodities (iron, lead): Smaller stone weight made counting easier
- Light, valuable goods (wool, spices): Larger stone weight reduced fractions
- Tradition: Each guild jealously guarded its customary weights
The Weights and Measures Act 1824
The problem: By 1800, Britain had dozens of incompatible stone definitions, creating chaos in trade and taxation.
The solution: The 1824 Act standardized British weights and measures:
- 14 pounds = 1 stone (for general use, not tied to specific commodities)
- Stone officially defined in relation to the pound
- Commodity-specific stones discouraged (but not banned)
Imperial standardization: The Act also defined:
- 1 pound = 7,000 grains
- 16 ounces = 1 pound
- 14 pounds = 1 stone
- 8 stone = 1 hundredweight (112 pounds)
- 20 hundredweight = 1 ton (2,240 pounds)
Body weight adoption: The Victorian era (1837-1901) saw the stone become the standard for human weighing. Bathroom scales, medical records, and public health data used stones and pounds.
Metrication and Persistence (1965-Present)
The Weights and Measures Act 1965: The UK officially adopted the metric system, making kilograms the legal unit for trade. However, the Act exempted personal weighing—bathroom scales could continue showing stones.
Why the exemption?
- Cultural resistance: Brits refused to abandon stones for body weight
- Economic lobbying: Scale manufacturers didn't want to retool
- Medical inertia: NHS records already used stones; conversion would be costly
The result: 60+ years later, the stone persists:
- Bathroom scales: Default to stones in the UK (even modern digital ones)
- NHS medical records: Still record patient weight in stones/pounds
- Weight loss programs: Slimming World, Weight Watchers UK use stones
- Media: British newspapers report celebrity weight in stones
- Sports: Boxing, horse racing, rowing use stones for weight classes
Ireland's experience: Ireland officially adopted metric units in 2005, but the stone remains common for body weight, especially among older generations.
Generational divide:
- Older Brits (60+): Think exclusively in stones
- Middle-aged (30-60): Bilingual (stones and kilograms)
- Younger (<30): Increasingly use kilograms, but still understand stones
Cultural Tenacity
The stone is the most persistent Imperial unit in British daily life, outlasting:
- Fahrenheit: Replaced by Celsius (weather, ovens)
- Inches/feet for height: Partially replaced by metres (though feet still common)
- Pints: Milk sold in litres (though beer still sold in pints!)
- Miles: Road signs still use miles (the UK never fully switched)
Why the stone survives:
- Emotional connection: Body weight is personal; changing units feels invasive
- Convenient range: For adults, weight is 8-20 stones (easy to remember vs. 50-127 kg)
- Medical exemption: Doctors use stones, so patients use stones
- Social reinforcement: Everyone around you uses stones, so you do too
The Imperial Weight-Mass Problem (Pre-1900)
Before the slug was invented, the imperial system created confusion between weight (force due to gravity) and mass (quantity of matter):
Common usage: "Pound" meant weight (what a scale measures on Earth)
- "This weighs 10 pounds" meant 10 pounds-force (10 lbf)
Scientific usage: "Pound" could mean mass (quantity of matter)
- "This has 10 pounds of mass" meant 10 pounds-mass (10 lbm)
The problem: Newton's laws of motion require distinguishing force from mass. Using "pound" for both led to:
- Confusion in physics calculations
- Need for awkward gravitational conversion constants
- Errors in engineering (mixing lbf and lbm)
Arthur Mason Worthington (1852-1916)
Arthur Mason Worthington was a British physicist and professor at the Royal Naval College, Greenwich, known for his pioneering work in:
- High-speed photography of liquid drops and splashes
- Physics education and textbook writing
- Developing clearer terminology for imperial units
Around 1900, Worthington recognized that the imperial system needed a mass unit analogous to the kilogram—a unit that would make Newton's second law (F = ma) work without conversion factors.
The Slug's Introduction (c. 1900-1920)
Worthington proposed the slug as a solution:
The name: "Slug" evokes sluggishness—the tendency of massive objects to resist acceleration (inertia). A more massive object is more "sluggish" in responding to forces.
The definition: 1 slug = mass that accelerates at 1 ft/s² under 1 lbf
The relationship: 1 slug = 32.174 lbm (approximately)
This ratio (32.174) is not arbitrary—it equals the standard acceleration due to gravity in ft/s² (g = 32.174 ft/s²). This means:
- On Earth's surface, a 1-slug mass weighs 32.174 lbf
- On Earth's surface, a 1-lbm mass weighs 1 lbf
Adoption in Engineering Education (1920s-1940s)
The slug gained acceptance in American and British engineering textbooks during the early 20th century:
Advantages recognized:
- Simplified dynamics calculations (F = ma without g_c)
- Clearer distinction between force and mass
- Consistency with scientific notation (separating weight from mass)
Textbook adoption: Engineering mechanics books by authors like Beer & Johnston, Meriam & Kraige, and Hibbeler introduced the slug to generations of engineering students
University courses: American aerospace and mechanical engineering programs taught dynamics using the FPS system with slugs
Aerospace Era Embrace (1940s-1970s)
The slug became essential in American aerospace during the mid-20th century:
NACA/NASA adoption (1940s-1970s):
- Aircraft performance calculations used slugs for mass
- Rocket dynamics required precise force-mass-acceleration relationships
- Apollo program documentation used slugs extensively
Military ballistics:
- Artillery trajectory calculations
- Rocket and missile design
- Aircraft carrier catapult systems
Engineering standards:
- ASME and SAE specifications sometimes used slugs
- Aerospace contractor documentation (Boeing, Lockheed, etc.)
Decline with Metrication (1960s-Present)
Despite its technical superiority, the slug declined for several reasons:
International metrication (1960s onward):
- Most countries adopted SI units (kilogram for mass, newton for force)
- International aerospace and scientific collaboration required metric
- Slug never gained traction outside English-speaking countries
Everyday unfamiliarity:
- People use pounds (lbm/lbf) in daily life, not slugs
- No one says "I weigh 5 slugs" (they say "160 pounds")
- Slug remained a technical unit, never entering popular vocabulary
Educational shifts:
- Even American universities increasingly teach SI units first
- Engineering courses present slugs as "alternative" or "legacy" units
Software standardization:
- Modern engineering software defaults to SI (kg, N, m)
- Maintaining slug support became maintenance burden
Where Slugs Survive Today
The slug persists in specific technical niches:
American aerospace engineering:
- Aircraft weight and balance calculations (sometimes)
- Rocket propulsion dynamics
- Legacy documentation from NASA programs
Mechanical engineering dynamics courses:
- Teaching Newton's laws in FPS units
- Demonstrating unit system consistency
Ballistics and defense:
- Military projectile calculations
- Explosive dynamics
Historical technical documentation:
- 20th-century engineering reports and specifications
- Understanding legacy systems and equipment
Common Uses and Applications: stones vs slugs
Explore the typical applications for both Stone (imperial/US) and Slug (imperial/US) to understand their common contexts.
Common Uses for stones
1. Body Weight Measurement
The stone is the unit for body weight in the UK and Ireland.
Bathroom scales:
- Display: "11 st 7 lb" (digital) or analog dial with stone markings
- Dual units: Many scales toggle between st/lb and kg
- Default: Stones for UK-sold scales, even from international brands
Weighing yourself:
- British: "I'm 12 stone 3"
- American: "I'm 171 pounds"
- European: "I'm 78 kilograms"
Weight goals:
- "I want to lose a stone" = 14-pound goal
- "I'm aiming for 10 stone" = target weight
- "I've gained half a stone" = 7-pound increase
2. Medical and Healthcare
NHS patient records: British hospitals and GPs record weight in stones/pounds (with kg conversion).
Medical forms:
- Pre-op questionnaires: "Weight: __ st __ lb"
- Prescription dosing: Sometimes based on weight (converted to kg for calculations)
- Anesthesia planning: Weight in stones converted to kg for drug dosages
Maternity care:
- Booking appointment: "What was your pre-pregnancy weight?" (stones)
- Pregnancy weight tracking: "You've gained 2 stone, which is healthy"
- Post-natal: "Most women lose 1-2 stone in the first weeks"
Mental health context: Eating disorder treatment tracks weight changes in stones (e.g., anorexia recovery: "gained 1 stone to 7 stone 10").
3. Weight Loss and Fitness
Slimming clubs:
- Slimming World, Weight Watchers UK: Weigh-ins in stones
- Awards: "Half-stone hero," "Stone club," "3-stone milestone"
- Targets: "Lose 10% of body weight" (e.g., 1.5 stone from 15 stone start)
Fitness apps (UK versions):
- MyFitnessPal UK: Input weight in stones
- Fitbit/Garmin: UK users set goals in stones
- Weight tracking graphs: Y-axis shows stones, not kg
Personal trainers: British trainers discuss client progress in stones: "You've dropped from 14 stone to 12 stone 8—fantastic!"
4. Sports Weight Classes
Boxing: British boxing traditionally used stones for weight classes (now officially kilograms, but stones still common in commentary).
Horse racing:
- Jockey weights: Includes jockey + saddle + lead weights to meet required "riding weight"
- Handicapping: Horses carry different weights (in stones) to equalize competition
- Penalties: "Carrying 9 stone 7" vs. "Carrying 10 stone" affects race outcomes
Rowing: Lightweight rowers must weigh under certain stone limits (now metric, but historically stones).
5. Everyday Conversation
The stone pervades British informal speech:
Common phrases:
- "I'm 11 stone, give or take" = approximate weight
- "She must be 10 stone soaking wet" = very light
- "He's put on a stone since Christmas" = seasonal weight gain
- "I haven't been 9 stone since I was 15!" = nostalgic reference
Social etiquette:
- It's impolite to ask someone's weight directly, but acceptable to discuss your own
- Women might say "I'm trying to get back to 9 stone" (goal weight)
6. Media and Entertainment
British TV shows:
- Reality TV: "Love Island" contestants' weights discussed in tabloids (stones)
- Medical shows: "Embarrassing Bodies" references patient weight in stones
- Game shows: "The Biggest Loser UK" tracked loss in stones
Newspapers and magazines:
- Celebrity weight speculation: "Has she lost 2 stone?"
- Health articles: "How to lose half a stone by summer"
- Success stories: "I lost 8 stone and transformed my life!"
7. Historical and Cultural References
Literature: Victorian novels reference weight in stones:
- Dickens, Austen rarely mention specific weights (impolite)
- 20th-century literature: "She was a strapping girl of 12 stone"
British humor: Comedians joke about weight in stones:
- "I'm not overweight, I'm just undertall for my 14 stone!"
Generational markers:
- Older Brits: "When I got married, I was 8 stone"
- Modern comparison: "That's only 112 pounds—too thin by today's standards!"
When to Use slugs
1. Aerospace Engineering and Aircraft Dynamics
Aerospace engineers use slugs when working in imperial units for aircraft and spacecraft calculations:
Aircraft weight and balance:
- Empty weight: 100,000 lbs = 3,108 slugs
- Loaded weight: 175,000 lbs = 5,440 slugs
- Center of gravity calculations using slugs for mass distribution
Rocket dynamics (Newton's F = ma):
- Thrust: 750,000 lbf
- Mass: 50,000 slugs (initial), decreasing as fuel burns
- Acceleration: F/m = 750,000 lbf / 50,000 slugs = 15 ft/s²
Orbital mechanics:
- Satellite mass in slugs
- Thrust-to-weight calculations
- Momentum and angular momentum in slug·ft/s units
2. Mechanical Engineering Dynamics
Engineering students and professionals analyze motion using slugs:
Newton's second law problems:
- Force: 50 lbf
- Acceleration: 10 ft/s²
- Mass: F/a = 50/10 = 5 slugs (no gravitational constant needed!)
Momentum calculations (p = mv):
- Car mass: 77.7 slugs (2,500 lbs)
- Velocity: 60 ft/s
- Momentum: p = 77.7 × 60 = 4,662 slug·ft/s
Rotational dynamics (moment of inertia):
- I = mr² (with mass in slugs, radius in feet)
- Flywheel: mass = 10 slugs, radius = 2 ft
- I = 10 × 2² = 40 slug·ft²
3. Ballistics and Projectile Motion
Military and firearms engineers use slugs for projectile calculations:
Artillery shell trajectory:
- Shell mass: 0.932 slugs (30 lbs)
- Muzzle force: 50,000 lbf
- Acceleration: a = F/m = 50,000/0.932 = 53,648 ft/s²
Bullet dynamics:
- Bullet mass: 0.000466 slug (150 grains = 0.0214 lbm)
- Chamber pressure force: 0.5 lbf (approximate average)
- Barrel acceleration calculation
Recoil analysis:
- Conservation of momentum (m_gun × v_gun = m_bullet × v_bullet)
- Gun mass: 6.22 slugs (200 lbs)
- Calculating recoil velocity in ft/s
4. Physics Education and Problem Sets
High school and college physics courses teaching imperial units:
Demonstrating unit consistency:
- Showing that F = ma works directly with slugs
- Contrasting with the g_c requirement when using lbm
Inclined plane problems:
- Block mass: 2 slugs
- Angle: 30°
- Friction force calculations in lbf
Atwood machine:
- Two masses in slugs
- Pulley system acceleration
- Tension forces in lbf
5. Automotive Engineering
Vehicle dynamics calculations using imperial units:
Braking force analysis:
- Car mass: 93.2 slugs (3,000 lbs)
- Deceleration: 20 ft/s² (emergency braking)
- Required braking force: F = ma = 93.2 × 20 = 1,864 lbf
Acceleration performance:
- Engine force (at wheels): 3,000 lbf
- Car mass: 77.7 slugs (2,500 lbs)
- Acceleration: a = F/m = 3,000/77.7 = 38.6 ft/s²
Suspension design:
- Spring force (F = kx) in lbf
- Sprung mass in slugs
- Natural frequency calculations
6. Structural Dynamics and Vibration
Engineers analyzing oscillating systems in imperial units:
Simple harmonic motion:
- F = -kx (Hooke's law, force in lbf)
- m = mass in slugs
- Natural frequency: ω = √(k/m) where m is in slugs
Seismic analysis:
- Building mass: distributed load in slugs per floor
- Earthquake force (F = ma) with acceleration in ft/s²
Mechanical vibrations:
- Damping force proportional to velocity
- Mass-spring-damper systems with m in slugs
7. Fluid Dynamics and Hydraulics
Flow and pressure calculations when using imperial units:
Momentum of flowing fluid:
- Mass flow rate: ṁ = ρAv (density in slug/ft³, area in ft², velocity in ft/s)
- Force on pipe bend: F = ṁΔv (in lbf)
Pipe flow:
- Water density: 1.938 slug/ft³ (at 68°F)
- Pressure drop calculations
- Pump power requirements
Aerodynamic forces:
- Drag force (lbf) = ½ ρ v² A C_D
- Air density: 0.00238 slug/ft³ (sea level, standard conditions)
Additional Unit Information
About Stone (st)
1. How many pounds are in a stone?
Exactly 14 pounds.
This is a defined constant. There are no regional variations—1 stone always equals 14 pounds in any context.
Calculation examples:
- 5 stone = 5 × 14 = 70 pounds
- 12 stone = 12 × 14 = 168 pounds
- 0.5 stone = 0.5 × 14 = 7 pounds
2. Is the stone used outside the UK and Ireland?
Rarely. The stone is almost exclusive to the UK and Ireland.
Usage by country:
- UK: Dominant for body weight (even with official metrication)
- Ireland: Common, especially among older generations
- Canada, Australia, New Zealand: Not used (fully metric)
- United States: Not used (pounds only)
- Rest of world: Not used (metric)
Exception: British expats abroad sometimes use stones, and international weight loss forums may reference stones when discussing UK participants.
3. Why is it called a stone?
Historical practice: Actual stones were used as standardized weights in medieval markets.
How it worked:
- A community selected a reference stone of agreed weight
- The stone was kept in the marketplace (sometimes literally built into a wall)
- Merchants used the reference stone on balance scales to verify weights
- Different stones existed for different commodities (wool stone, meat stone, etc.)
Modern name: The unit name "stone" is a fossil of this practice, long after actual stones stopped being used.
4. How do you convert stone to kilograms?
Formula:
Kilograms = Stone × 6.35029318
Quick approximation:
Kilograms ≈ Stone × 6.35 (good to 3 decimal places)
Examples:
- 10 stone × 6.35 = 63.5 kg
- 12 stone × 6.35 = 76.2 kg
- 15 stone × 6.35 = 95.25 kg
Online tools: Most conversion sites and apps include stone ↔ kilogram calculators.
5. How do British people talk about their weight?
Typical format: "I'm X stone Y pounds" or "I'm X stone Y"
Examples:
- "I'm 11 stone 7" = 11 stone + 7 pounds = 161 lb = 73 kg
- "I'm just over 12 stone" = slightly more than 168 lb
- "I'm nearly 10 stone" = approaching 140 lb
Rarely said:
- "I'm 11.5 stone" (uncommon—people say "11 stone 7" instead)
- "I'm 161 pounds" (too American—Brits don't think in pounds alone)
- "I'm 73 kilograms" (used by younger generations, but less common)
Conversational weight: Discussing weight is somewhat taboo, so people often avoid specifics: "I need to lose a bit of weight" rather than "I need to drop from 13 to 11 stone."
6. Do British bathroom scales show kilograms?
Yes, most modern scales show both.
Typical features:
- Default: Stones and pounds (st/lb)
- Toggle button: Switch to kilograms
- Dual display: Some show both simultaneously
Older scales: Analog scales from before 2000 often show stones only.
Buying scales in the UK: Even international brands (Fitbit, Garmin) sell UK-specific versions that default to stones.
7. Will the UK ever stop using stones?
Unlikely in the near future.
Reasons for persistence:
- Cultural attachment: Body weight is personal; people resist change
- Legal exemption: Personal weighing scales exempt from trade regulations
- NHS inertia: Changing medical records costly
- Generational use: Older generations use stones exclusively
- No enforcement: No push to mandate kilograms for personal use
Trend: Younger Brits (under 30) increasingly use kilograms, especially those who travel or use fitness apps with international audiences. However, the stone will likely persist for decades among older populations.
Comparison: Similar to Fahrenheit in the US—officially discouraged but culturally entrenched.
8. What is a "half stone"?
Half stone = 7 pounds = 3.175 kg
Usage:
- Weight loss: "I've lost half a stone" = 7 lb loss
- Weight gain: "I've put on half a stone over Christmas" = 7 lb gain
- Milestones: "Half-stone club" in weight loss programs
Why significant? Half a stone is a noticeable weight change—enough to affect how clothes fit and how you feel, but achievable in 3-7 weeks of dieting (at 1-2 lb/week loss).
9. How do you write stone and pounds?
Common formats:
Formal:
- "11 stone 7 pounds"
- "11 st 7 lb"
Informal:
- "11 stone 7"
- "11st 7lb" (no spaces)
- "11-7" (very casual, context-dependent)
Avoid:
- "11.7 stone" (ambiguous—could mean 11 stone 7 lb or 11 stone 9.8 lb)
- "11/7 st" (confusing notation)
Medical records: NHS typically uses "st/lb" format: "Patient weight: 12 st 3 lb"
10. Why do Americans not use stone?
The United States never adopted the stone for body weight.
Historical reasons:
- Colonial divergence: By the time the stone standardized in Britain (1824), the US had already established pounds as the body weight unit
- Decimal preference: Americans favored simpler base-10 systems where possible
- No cultural push: No equivalent to UK's Victorian-era adoption of stones for weighing people
Result: Americans think in pounds only:
- "I weigh 180 pounds" (no stones)
- Weight loss: "I lost 30 pounds" (not "2 stone 2 pounds")
Canadian note: Canada officially metricated in the 1970s and uses kilograms, not stones or pounds (though older Canadians may still think in pounds).
11. Is stone a legal unit?
Yes, in the UK and Ireland, but with restrictions.
Legal status:
- Personal use: Fully legal (bathroom scales, self-weighing)
- Trade: Must use metric (kilograms) for selling goods by weight
- Medical: Allowed in patient records (NHS uses stones)
Weights and Measures Act: Kilograms are the legal unit for commerce, but stones remain legal for "non-trade" purposes (personal weighing, medical records).
Comparison: Similar to miles on UK road signs—officially metric, but exceptions preserve traditional units in specific contexts.
12. How much is a stone in other historical weight units?
Stone in troy and apothecary systems:
Troy weight (precious metals):
- 1 stone (avoirdupois) = 14 pounds (avoirdupois)
- 1 pound (avoirdupois) = 7,000 grains
- 1 stone = 98,000 grains (troy)
- 1 troy pound = 5,760 grains
- 1 stone ≈ 17.01 troy pounds
Apothecaries' weight (pharmacy):
- Same grain as troy and avoirdupois (64.79891 mg)
- 1 stone = 98,000 grains (apothecaries')
Why this matters: Historically, pharmacists used apothecaries' weights, so understanding stone conversions was important for dosing medicines based on body weight.
About Slug (sl)
How is the slug defined?
Answer: 1 slug = 1 lbf / (1 ft/s²) — the mass that accelerates at 1 ft/s² under 1 lbf
The slug is defined through Newton's second law (F = ma):
Rearranging: m = F/a
Definition: If a force of 1 pound-force produces an acceleration of 1 foot per second squared, the mass is 1 slug.
In equation form: 1 slug = 1 lbf / (1 ft/s²)
This makes Newton's law work cleanly: F (lbf) = m (slugs) × a (ft/s²)
Alternative definition (equivalent): 1 slug = 32.174 pounds-mass (lbm)
This number (32.174) comes from standard Earth gravity: g = 32.174 ft/s²
How many pounds-mass are in a slug?
Answer: 1 slug = 32.174 pounds-mass (lbm) exactly
This relationship derives from the gravitational constant:
Standard gravity: g = 32.17405 ft/s² (exactly, by definition)
Weight-mass relationship: Weight (lbf) = Mass (lbm) × g / g_c
where g_c = 32.174 lbm·ft/(lbf·s²) (dimensional conversion constant)
On Earth: A mass of 1 lbm experiences a weight of 1 lbf Therefore: A mass of 32.174 lbm experiences a weight of 32.174 lbf
But also: A mass of 1 slug experiences a weight of 32.174 lbf (by definition)
Conclusion: 1 slug = 32.174 lbm
Example:
- Person: 160 lbm
- In slugs: 160 ÷ 32.174 = 4.97 slugs
Why is the slug unit used?
Answer: To simplify F = ma calculations in imperial units by eliminating the need for gravitational conversion constants
The problem without slugs:
Using pounds-mass (lbm) and pounds-force (lbf) in Newton's law requires:
F = ma / g_c
where g_c = 32.174 lbm·ft/(lbf·s²)
This is awkward and error-prone!
The solution with slugs:
Using slugs for mass and lbf for force, Newton's law is simple:
F = ma (no conversion constant!)
Example comparison:
Force: 100 lbf Acceleration: 5 ft/s² Mass = ?
Without slugs (using lbm): m = F × g_c / a = 100 × 32.174 / 5 = 643.48 lbm
With slugs: m = F / a = 100 / 5 = 20 slugs
Much simpler! (Though 20 slugs = 643.48 lbm, same physical mass.)
How do I convert between slugs and kilograms?
Answer: 1 slug = 14.5939 kg (multiply slugs by 14.5939 to get kg)
Slugs to kilograms: kg = slugs × 14.5939
Examples:
- 1 slug = 14.5939 kg
- 5 slugs = 5 × 14.5939 = 72.97 kg
- 10 slugs = 10 × 14.5939 = 145.94 kg
Kilograms to slugs: slugs = kg ÷ 14.5939 (or kg × 0.0685218)
Examples:
- 10 kg = 10 ÷ 14.5939 = 0.685 slugs
- 70 kg = 70 ÷ 14.5939 = 4.80 slugs
- 100 kg = 100 ÷ 14.5939 = 6.85 slugs
Quick approximation:
- 1 slug ≈ 14.6 kg
- 1 kg ≈ 0.069 slugs (roughly 1/15th slug)
Why don't people use slugs in everyday life?
Answer: Slugs are awkward for everyday masses and unfamiliar to the general public
Practical reasons:
1. Unfamiliar numbers: Converting common weights to slugs produces strange values
- "I weigh 5.6 slugs" sounds odd compared to "180 pounds"
- A gallon of milk is "0.26 slugs" vs. "8.6 pounds"
2. No tradition: Unlike pounds (used for centuries in commerce), slugs were invented for technical calculations only
3. Pounds work fine for daily life: The lbf/lbm ambiguity doesn't matter when you're just measuring weight on a scale
4. Imperial persistence: Americans use pounds because of cultural tradition, not technical correctness
Technical fields use slugs precisely because they eliminate ambiguity in force-mass calculations, but this advantage is irrelevant for grocery shopping or body weight.
Cultural reality: People will continue saying "pounds" for everyday masses, while engineers quietly use slugs behind the scenes.
What's the difference between a slug and a pound?
Answer: Slug measures mass; pound can mean either mass (lbm) or force/weight (lbf)
Slug:
- Always a unit of mass
- 1 slug = 32.174 lbm = 14.5939 kg
- Measures quantity of matter (inertia)
- Used in F = ma calculations
Pound-mass (lbm):
- Unit of mass
- 1 lbm = 1/32.174 slug = 0.453592 kg
- Quantity of matter
Pound-force (lbf):
- Unit of force (weight)
- Force exerted by 1 lbm under standard Earth gravity
- 1 lbf = force needed to accelerate 1 slug at 1 ft/s²
Relationship on Earth:
- 1 slug has a mass of 32.174 lbm
- 1 slug weighs (exerts a force of) 32.174 lbf on Earth
- 1 lbm weighs 1 lbf on Earth
Key insight: The numerical coincidence (1 lbm weighs 1 lbf on Earth) obscures the fact that mass and force are different physical quantities. Slugs eliminate this confusion.
Is the slug still used in engineering?
Answer: Yes, but rarely—mainly in American aerospace and dynamics courses
Where slugs are still used:
1. Aerospace engineering:
- NASA and aerospace contractors for some calculations
- Aircraft dynamics and performance
- Rocket propulsion when working in imperial units
2. Engineering education:
- Mechanical engineering dynamics courses
- Teaching Newton's laws with imperial units
- Demonstrating unit consistency
3. Defense/ballistics:
- Military projectile calculations
- Weapons systems analysis
4. Legacy documentation:
- Understanding 20th-century engineering reports
- Maintaining older systems specified in FPS units
Where slugs are NOT used:
- International engineering (uses kilograms)
- Daily life (people use pounds)
- Most modern engineering software (defaults to SI units)
- Scientific research (exclusively metric)
Current status: Declining but not extinct; maintained for continuity with older American engineering systems
Can I weigh myself in slugs?
Answer: Technically yes, but practically no—scales measure force (weight), not mass
The technical issue:
Bathroom scales measure weight (force in lbf or kg-force), not mass:
- They use a spring that compresses under gravitational force
- The readout is calibrated to show "pounds" or "kilograms"
Converting scale reading to slugs:
If your scale says "160 pounds" (meaning 160 lbf weight):
- Your mass = 160 lbm / 32.174 = 4.97 slugs
Or if metric scale says "70 kg" (meaning 70 kg-force weight):
- Your mass = 70 kg / 14.5939 = 4.80 slugs
Why people don't do this:
- Unfamiliar: "I weigh 5 slugs" sounds strange
- Extra math: Requires division by 32.174
- No benefit: Pounds work fine for personal weight tracking
Correct statement: "My mass is 4.97 slugs" (not "I weigh 4.97 slugs"—weight is measured in lbf!)
How does the slug relate to Newton's second law?
Answer: The slug is defined to make F = ma work directly with pounds-force and ft/s²
Newton's second law: Force = mass × acceleration
In slug system (FPS units):
- Force in pound-force (lbf)
- Mass in slugs (sl)
- Acceleration in feet per second squared (ft/s²)
Result: F (lbf) = m (slugs) × a (ft/s²)
Example:
- Mass: 2 slugs
- Acceleration: 15 ft/s²
- Force: F = 2 × 15 = 30 lbf
Why this works: The slug is defined such that 1 lbf accelerates 1 slug at 1 ft/s²
Contrast with lbm system (more complicated): F (lbf) = m (lbm) × a (ft/s²) / g_c
where g_c = 32.174 lbm·ft/(lbf·s²)
Same example using lbm:
- Mass: 2 slugs = 64.348 lbm
- Acceleration: 15 ft/s²
- Force: F = 64.348 × 15 / 32.174 = 30 lbf (same result, more complex calculation)
The slug's purpose: Eliminate the g_c conversion factor!
What does "slug" mean and where does the name come from?
Answer: "Slug" evokes sluggishness or inertia—the resistance of mass to acceleration
Etymology:
The term was coined by British physicist Arthur Mason Worthington around 1900.
The metaphor:
- Sluggish = slow to respond, resistant to movement
- Inertia = the tendency of massive objects to resist acceleration
- A more massive object is more "sluggish"
The connection to physics:
Inertial mass is the property of matter that resists acceleration:
- Larger mass → greater "sluggishness" → harder to accelerate
- Smaller mass → less "sluggish" → easier to accelerate
Example:
- Push a shopping cart (low mass) → accelerates easily (not very sluggish)
- Push a truck (high mass in slugs) → accelerates slowly (very sluggish!)
Word choice reasoning: Worthington wanted a vivid, memorable term that conveyed the physical concept of inertia while fitting the imperial system of units (slug, pound, foot).
Alternative names considered: The unit could have been called "inertia pound" or "force-pound," but "slug" was catchier and emphasized the conceptual link to resistance to motion.
Why is 1 slug equal to 32.174 pounds-mass specifically?
Answer: Because 32.174 ft/s² is the standard acceleration due to Earth's gravity (g)
The relationship derives from weight-force:
Weight (lbf) = mass (lbm) × gravity (ft/s²) / g_c
where g_c = 32.174 lbm·ft/(lbf·s²) is the dimensional conversion constant
On Earth (g = 32.174 ft/s²):
- 1 lbm weighs: 1 lbm × 32.174 / 32.174 = 1 lbf
Also by definition:
- 1 slug weighs: 1 slug × 32.174 ft/s² = 32.174 lbf (from F = ma)
Combining these:
- If 1 lbm weighs 1 lbf, and 1 slug weighs 32.174 lbf...
- Then 1 slug must equal 32.174 lbm!
The number 32.174 is Earth's standard gravitational acceleration: g = 32.17405 ft/s² ≈ 32.174 ft/s²
Consequence: The slug naturally relates to pounds-mass through Earth's gravity, even though the slug is a mass unit (not dependent on gravity).
On other planets:
- Mass is still measured in slugs (unchanged)
- Weight changes (different g value)
- Example: 1 slug on Moon weighs only 5.32 lbf (not 32.174 lbf)
Will the slug eventually disappear?
Answer: Likely yes—it's declining rapidly as engineering shifts to SI units globally
Factors driving obsolescence:
1. International standardization:
- Global engineering collaborations require common units (SI/metric)
- Slug is unknown outside U.S./British contexts
2. Educational shifts:
- Even American universities teach SI units first
- Slugs relegated to "alternative units" or historical notes
3. Software migration:
- Modern CAD/simulation software defaults to metric (kg, N, m)
- Maintaining slug support is extra development cost
4. Generational change:
- Engineers trained in FPS/slug units are retiring
- New graduates work primarily in metric
5. Daily life disconnect:
- Slug never entered common vocabulary (unlike "pound")
- No cultural attachment to preserve it
Where it might persist longest:
- Legacy aerospace systems (maintaining old aircraft/rockets)
- Specialized defense applications
- Historical engineering documentation
- Educational examples showing unit system consistency
Likely outcome: Slug will become a "historical unit" known primarily to:
- Engineering historians
- Those maintaining 20th-century equipment
- Educators explaining evolution of unit systems
Similar to how poundals (another imperial force unit) are now essentially extinct despite once being scientifically "correct."
Conversion Table: Stone to Slug
| Stone (st) | Slug (sl) |
|---|---|
| 0.5 | 0.218 |
| 1 | 0.435 |
| 1.5 | 0.653 |
| 2 | 0.87 |
| 5 | 2.176 |
| 10 | 4.351 |
| 25 | 10.878 |
| 50 | 21.757 |
| 100 | 43.513 |
| 250 | 108.783 |
| 500 | 217.567 |
| 1,000 | 435.133 |
People Also Ask
How do I convert Stone to Slug?
To convert Stone to Slug, enter the value in Stone in the calculator above. The conversion will happen automatically. Use our free online converter for instant and accurate results. You can also visit our weight converter page to convert between other units in this category.
Learn more →What is the conversion factor from Stone to Slug?
The conversion factor depends on the specific relationship between Stone and Slug. You can find the exact conversion formula and factor on this page. Our calculator handles all calculations automatically. See the conversion table above for common values.
Can I convert Slug back to Stone?
Yes! You can easily convert Slug back to Stone by using the swap button (⇌) in the calculator above, or by visiting our Slug to Stone converter page. You can also explore other weight conversions on our category page.
Learn more →What are common uses for Stone and Slug?
Stone and Slug are both standard units used in weight measurements. They are commonly used in various applications including engineering, construction, cooking, and scientific research. Browse our weight converter for more conversion options.
For more weight conversion questions, visit our FAQ page or explore our conversion guides.
Helpful Conversion Guides
Learn more about unit conversion with our comprehensive guides:
📚 How to Convert Units
Step-by-step guide to unit conversion with practical examples.
🔢 Conversion Formulas
Essential formulas for weight and other conversions.
⚖️ Metric vs Imperial
Understand the differences between measurement systems.
⚠️ Common Mistakes
Learn about frequent errors and how to avoid them.
All Weight Conversions
Other Weight Units and Conversions
Explore other weight units and their conversion options:
- Kilogram (kg) • Stone to Kilogram
- Gram (g) • Stone to Gram
- Milligram (mg) • Stone to Milligram
- Pound (lb) • Stone to Pound
- Ounce (oz) • Stone to Ounce
- Ton (metric) (t) • Stone to Ton (metric)
- Ton (US) (ton) • Stone to Ton (US)
- Ton (UK) (long ton) • Stone to Ton (UK)
- Microgram (µg) • Stone to Microgram
- Carat (ct) • Stone to Carat
Verified Against Authority Standards
All conversion formulas have been verified against international standards and authoritative sources to ensure maximum accuracy and reliability.
National Institute of Standards and Technology — US standards for weight and mass measurements
International Organization for Standardization — International standard for mechanics quantities
Last verified: December 3, 2025