Ton (UK) to Carat Converter

Convert long tons to carats with our free online weight converter.

Quick Answer

1 Ton (UK) = 5080234.544 carats

Formula: Ton (UK) × conversion factor = Carat

Use the calculator below for instant, accurate conversions.

Our Accuracy Guarantee

All conversion formulas on UnitsConverter.io have been verified against NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) guidelines and international SI standards. Our calculations are accurate to 10 decimal places for standard conversions and use arbitrary precision arithmetic for astronomical units.

Last verified: December 2025Reviewed by: Sam Mathew, Software Engineer

Ton (UK) to Carat Calculator

How to Use the Ton (UK) to Carat Calculator:

  1. Enter the value you want to convert in the 'From' field (Ton (UK)).
  2. The converted value in Carat will appear automatically in the 'To' field.
  3. Use the dropdown menus to select different units within the Weight category.
  4. Click the swap button (⇌) to reverse the conversion direction.
Share:

How to Convert Ton (UK) to Carat: Step-by-Step Guide

Converting Ton (UK) to Carat involves multiplying the value by a specific conversion factor, as shown in the formula below.

Formula:

1 Ton (UK) = 5080230 carats

Example Calculation:

Convert 5 long tons: 5 × 5080230 = 25401200 carats

Disclaimer: For Reference Only

These conversion results are provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees regarding the precision of these results, especially for conversions involving extremely large or small numbers which may be subject to the inherent limitations of standard computer floating-point arithmetic.

Not for professional use. Results should be verified before use in any critical application. View our Terms of Service for more information.

What is a Ton (UK) and a Carat?

The long ton (also called imperial ton or UK ton) is a unit of mass in the British Imperial system, officially defined as:

1 long ton = 2,240 pounds (lb) = 1,016.0469088 kilograms (kg)

Historical Definition

The long ton is based on the Imperial system's hundredweight (cwt):

1 long ton = 20 hundredweight (cwt)

  • 1 hundredweight (Imperial) = 112 pounds
  • 20 × 112 lb = 2,240 pounds

This contrasts with the US system:

  • US hundredweight = 100 pounds
  • US short ton = 20 US hundredweight = 2,000 pounds

The Three "Tons" Compared

| Ton Type | Weight in Pounds | Weight in Kilograms | Where Used | |----------|------------------|---------------------|------------| | Long Ton (UK/Imperial) | 2,240 lb | 1,016.047 kg | UK, Commonwealth (historic), naval displacement | | Short Ton (US) | 2,000 lb | 907.185 kg | United States, North America | | Metric Ton/Tonne | 2,204.62 lb | 1,000 kg (exactly) | International standard (SI-compatible) |

Difference Summary:

  • Long ton vs. short ton: 240 lbs (10.9% difference)
  • Long ton vs. metric tonne: ~16 kg (1.6% difference)
  • Short ton vs. metric tonne: ~93 kg (10.2% difference)

Why "Long" Ton?

The term "long ton" emerged in the early 20th century to distinguish the British imperial ton (2,240 lbs) from the American "short ton" (2,000 lbs). Before this, "ton" simply meant the local standard:

  • In Britain and the Empire: ton = 2,240 lbs (now called "long ton")
  • In the United States: ton = 2,000 lbs (now called "short ton")

International trade requiring clarity led to the qualifying adjectives "long" and "short."


A carat (symbol: ct) is a unit of mass used exclusively for measuring gemstones and pearls, defined as:

1 carat = 200 milligrams (mg) = 0.2 grams (g)

Carat vs. Karat: Critical Distinction

Carat (ct) = Gemstone weight

  • Measures mass of diamonds, rubies, sapphires, emeralds, pearls, etc.
  • 1 ct = 200 mg

Karat (K or kt) = Gold purity

  • Measures proportion of pure gold in an alloy
  • 24K = 100% pure gold
  • 18K = 75% gold (18/24)
  • 14K = 58.3% gold (14/24)

Spelling/Pronunciation:

  • United States: "Carat" (gemstones), "Karat" (gold) - different spellings
  • UK/Commonwealth: Often "carat" for both, distinguished by context (ct vs. K)
  • Pronunciation: Both pronounced identically ("CARE-ut")

Example: An 18-karat gold ring set with a 2-carat diamond contains gold that is 75% pure and a diamond weighing 400 mg.

Points: The Carat Subdivision

In the gem trade, carats are divided into 100 points:

  • 1 carat = 100 points
  • 0.01 carat = 1 point

Trade Terminology:

  • "50-pointer" = 0.50 carat (50 points)
  • "Three-quarter carat" = 0.75 ct (75 points)
  • "10-point diamond" = 0.10 ct

Points allow precise specification of smaller gemstones and enable pricing granularity.


Note: The Ton (UK) is part of the imperial/US customary system, primarily used in the US, UK, and Canada for everyday measurements. The Carat belongs to the imperial/US customary system.

History of the Ton (UK) and Carat

of the Long Ton

Medieval Origins: The Tun (c. 1200-1500)

The Wine Trade:

  • The word "ton" derives from "tun" (Old English tunne, Middle English tonne), meaning a large cask or barrel
  • A tun was a standard wine cask in medieval England holding approximately 252 wine gallons (~954 liters, 210 Imperial gallons)
  • When filled with wine, a tun weighed roughly 2,240 pounds, establishing the weight association

Early Standardization Attempts:

  • 13th-14th centuries: English merchants used "ton" for both volume (liquids) and weight (bulk goods)
  • Different commodities had varying ton definitions:
    • Wool ton: Weight needed to fill shipping space (variable)
    • Coal ton: Weight-based measurement
    • Freight ton: Volume-based (40 cubic feet)

The Problem of Multiple Tons:

  • Confusion in trade due to inconsistent ton definitions
  • Disputes over cargo weight vs. volume
  • Regional variations across England and continental Europe

Standardization: The Weights and Measures Act of 1824

Imperial System Codification:

  • 1824: British Parliament passed the Weights and Measures Act under King George IV
  • Unified and standardized British weights and measures across the Empire
  • Officially defined the imperial ton as 2,240 pounds
  • Based on existing practice: 20 hundredweight of 112 pounds each

Why 2,240 Pounds? The choice reflected established commercial practice:

  • 1 hundredweight (cwt) = 112 pounds (8 stones × 14 pounds)
  • 20 hundredweight = 2,240 pounds
  • This matched the traditional weight of a tun of wine
  • Integrated with existing Imperial units (stones, pounds, ounces)

Imperial Hundredweight System:

  • 1 stone = 14 pounds
  • 1 hundredweight = 8 stones = 112 pounds
  • 1 ton = 20 hundredweight = 160 stones = 2,240 pounds

British Empire and Global Commerce (1824-1945)

Dominance of British Shipping:

  • 19th century: Britain controlled ~60-70% of world merchant shipping tonnage
  • British shipping companies used long tons for:
    • Cargo capacity (deadweight tonnage)
    • Ship displacement (weight of water displaced)
    • Freight charges (cost per ton)

The Coal Trade:

  • British coal powered the Industrial Revolution
  • Coal universally measured in long tons
  • Newcastle coal trade: Millions of long tons exported annually
  • Coal exports to Europe, Americas, Asia all priced in long tons

Naval Architecture:

  • Displacement tonnage: Weight of water displaced by a floating ship, measured in long tons
  • Used to classify warship size: "10,000-ton cruiser," "50,000-ton battleship"
  • Standard in Royal Navy and Commonwealth navies
  • Example: HMS Dreadnought (1906): ~18,000 long tons displacement

Imperial Commodity Trade:

  • Iron and steel: British iron production measured in long tons
  • Grain: Commonwealth grain shipments (wheat, barley) in long tons
  • Rubber, cotton, wool: Plantation exports measured in long tons
  • Freight rates: Shipping costs typically £X per long ton

Global Adoption:

  • British commercial dominance spread long ton usage
  • Bills of lading (shipping documents) in long tons
  • Maritime insurance: Cargo value calculated per long ton
  • Port records: Cargo throughput recorded in long tons

American Divergence: The Short Ton

US Measurement Evolution:

  • Early America inherited British Imperial units
  • By mid-19th century, US customary system diverged
  • Americans adopted a 100-pound hundredweight (simpler decimal-friendly base)
  • US ton = 20 US hundredweight = 20 × 100 lb = 2,000 pounds (the "short ton")

Why the Difference?

  • Simplicity: 100-pound hundredweight easier for calculation
  • Independence: Post-colonial desire for distinct American standards
  • Internal trade: US domestic commerce didn't require British compatibility

Terminology:

  • Originally, both were simply called "ton" in their respective countries
  • Early 20th century: International trade necessitated distinction
    • British ton → "long ton"
    • American ton → "short ton"

The Rise of the Metric Tonne (1875-Present)

Metric System Development:

  • 1875: Metric Convention established international metric standards
  • Metric tonne (or ton) defined as 1,000 kilograms (exactly)
  • Decimal-based, simple, scientifically rational

Advantages Over Long/Short Tons:

  • Exact decimal definition: 1 tonne = 1,000 kg (no fractions)
  • Universal: Not tied to any national system
  • SI-compatible: Integrates with scientific units
  • Easier calculation: Decimal arithmetic vs. 2,240-pound conversions

Global Metrication Wave (1960s-1990s):

United Kingdom:

  • 1965: UK government announced metrication program
  • 1970s-1980s: Gradual transition in trade, industry, and commerce
  • 1995: Most commercial transactions legally required to use metric units
  • Long ton legacy: Persists in road signs (distances/heights) and some traditional contexts

Commonwealth Nations:

  • Australia: Metrication 1970s, completed by 1988
  • Canada: Metrication 1970s, officially adopted 1977-1980
  • New Zealand: Metrication 1969-1976
  • India: Adopted metric system post-independence (1947-1960s)
  • South Africa: Metrication 1970s

Shipping and Maritime:

  • International Maritime Organization (IMO): Encouraged metric units
  • Modern cargo manifests typically in metric tonnes
  • Shipping contracts, freight rates increasingly metric

Contemporary Usage (1990s-Present)

Where the Long Ton Survives:

1. Naval Displacement (UK and Commonwealth):

  • Royal Navy still reports warship displacement in long tons (alongside metric)
  • Royal Australian Navy, Royal Canadian Navy, Royal New Zealand Navy: Use long tons traditionally
  • Example: HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier: ~65,000 long tons full load displacement

2. Historical Records:

  • Pre-1990s British commercial records in long tons
  • Archival shipping manifests, trade statistics, industrial production data
  • Converting historical data requires long ton knowledge

3. Certain Industries:

  • Some maritime insurance policies reference long tons in older contracts
  • Vintage engineering specifications (bridges, railways built pre-metrication)
  • Mining records: Historical coal, iron ore output

4. United States Context:

  • When Americans refer to British/Commonwealth historical data, they may encounter long tons
  • Rare in modern US usage (Americans use short tons domestically)

Gradual Obsolescence:

  • Most modern international trade: metric tonnes
  • Younger generations in UK/Commonwealth unfamiliar with long tons
  • Likely to become purely historical unit within decades

of the Carat

Ancient Origins: Carob Seeds (c. 3000 BCE - 500 CE)

The Carob Tree:

  • Carob tree (Ceratonia siliqua): Native to Mediterranean region
  • Produces seed pods containing small, hard seeds
  • Ancient belief: Carob seeds had remarkably uniform weight (~200 mg)

Early Use as Weights:

  • Ancient Greece: Used carob seeds ("keration") as counterweights on balance scales
  • Roman Empire: Adopted Greek practice for weighing gems, gold, medicines
  • Middle East & India: Arab and Indian merchants used carob or similar seeds
  • Reason: Small, portable, abundant, believed to be consistent

Reality Check: Modern analysis shows carob seeds actually vary by 10-20% in weight (180-220 mg), so ancient measurements weren't as precise as believed. However, the average (~200 mg) remarkably matches the modern standard.

Medieval to Early Modern Period (500-1800 CE)

Divergent Regional Standards: As gem trade expanded across Europe, Middle East, and Asia, different regions developed local carat standards:

European Carats:

  • Florence (Italy): ~197 mg
  • Amsterdam (Netherlands): ~205.3 mg
  • Paris (France): ~205 mg
  • London (UK): ~205.3 mg
  • Venice (Italy): ~207 mg

Ottoman Empire:

  • Constantinople carat: ~200-205 mg (varied over time)

India:

  • Mangelin (Madras): ~193 mg
  • Rati: Ancient Indian unit (~188 mg), still used traditionally for pearls

Problems:

  • International gem trade faced confusion: "Is this a Florence carat or Amsterdam carat?"
  • Disputes over weight and pricing
  • Fraudulent practices exploiting different standards

The Diamond Revolution (1800s)

South African Diamond Discoveries (1867-1870s):

  • Discovery of diamonds at Kimberley, South Africa
  • Massive increase in diamond supply
  • Rise of industrial diamond mining
  • Expansion of international diamond trade

De Beers Consolidation:

  • Cecil Rhodes founded De Beers Mining Company (1888)
  • Consolidated South African diamond production
  • Established control over global diamond supply
  • Created need for international weight standard

Growing Trade Complexity:

  • Diamonds moved from South Africa → London → Antwerp → New York → global markets
  • Multiple carat standards caused pricing inconsistencies
  • Insurers, traders, cutters demanded standardization

International Standardization (1907-1914)

Fourth General Conference on Weights and Measures (1907):

  • Convened in Paris to expand metric system
  • International gem trade representatives advocated for uniform carat
  • Proposal: Define carat as exactly 200 milligrams
  • Rationale: Close to existing averages, clean metric value

Advantages of 200 mg:

  • Simple metric conversion: 5 carats = 1 gram
  • Close to historical average: Most European carats were 197-207 mg
  • No major disruption: Minimal adjustment for major markets
  • Decimal-friendly: Easy calculation and subdivision

Global Adoption:

  • 1907: Metric carat adopted at CGPM Paris
  • 1913: United States codified 200 mg carat in federal law
  • 1914: Antwerp (Belgium), London (UK), New York officially adopted
  • 1920s-1930s: Remaining gem centers transitioned
  • By 1950s: Universal acceptance worldwide

The Modern Diamond Industry (1930s-Present)

The "Four Cs" Framework (1940s):

  • Gemological Institute of America (GIA) established 1931
  • Robert M. Shipley (GIA founder) popularized diamond grading
  • 1940s: GIA codified the "Four Cs" of diamond quality:
    1. Carat (weight)
    2. Cut (proportions, symmetry, polish)
    3. Color (D-to-Z scale, D = colorless)
    4. Clarity (internal inclusions, external blemishes)

Carat as Primary Value Driver:

  • Of the Four Cs, carat weight is most objective (precise scale measurement)
  • Cut, color, clarity require expert judgment
  • Carat directly determines size (larger diamonds rarer, more valuable)
  • Price per carat increases exponentially with weight

Diamond Certification:

  • GIA, International Gemological Institute (IGI), and others issue certificates
  • Certificates specify carat weight to 0.01 ct precision
  • Example: "1.27 carats" (127 points), measured to ±0.005 ct accuracy

Electronic Precision Scales:

  • Modern gem scales measure to 0.001 carat (0.2 mg precision)
  • Temperature-controlled environments ensure accuracy
  • Calibrated against reference standards traceable to SI kilogram

Contemporary Developments (1990s-Present)

Synthetic Diamonds:

  • Lab-grown diamonds (HPHT, CVD methods) entered market
  • Sold by carat, like natural diamonds
  • Price typically 30-70% less than natural for same carat weight

Online Diamond Trade:

  • Internet sellers (Blue Nile, James Allen, etc.) list specifications including exact carat weight
  • Photos, videos, 360° views help buyers assess size
  • Carat weight filtering standard on all sites

Famous Large Diamonds:

  • Modern discoveries and sales emphasize carat weight as headline figure
  • "Largest diamond found in 100 years: 1,109 carats!"

Common Uses and Applications: long tons vs carats

Explore the typical applications for both Ton (UK) (imperial/US) and Carat (imperial/US) to understand their common contexts.

Common Uses for long tons

of the Long Ton in Modern Contexts

1. Naval and Maritime History

Researchers, naval historians, and museum curators working with historical ships and maritime records must understand long tons:

  • Ship specifications: Displacement, cargo capacity, fuel capacity
  • Archival documents: Shipping manifests, port records, naval reports
  • Comparative analysis: Comparing historical ships to modern vessels
  • Museum exhibits: HMS Victory, USS Constitution, RMS Titanic displays

Example: Understanding that HMS Hood's 42,000 long ton displacement = ~42,672 metric tonnes helps compare to modern carriers.

2. Royal Navy and Commonwealth Navies

British and Commonwealth naval forces still reference long tons:

  • Official displacement figures: Warships listed in long tons (with metric equivalent)
  • Naval doctrine: Historical continuity in naval architecture
  • Training: Naval officers learn both systems
  • Public relations: Press releases may include long ton figures for tradition

Modern Practice: Usually list both: "HMS Queen Elizabeth: 65,000 long tons (66,000 tonnes)"

3. Historical Research and Archives

Historians studying British Empire, Industrial Revolution, or maritime trade encounter long tons constantly:

  • Economic history: Production statistics (coal, iron, steel, ships)
  • Trade records: Import/export volumes
  • Infrastructure: Railway freight, canal cargo
  • Colonial economies: Plantation outputs (sugar, rubber, cotton)

Conversion Necessity: Comparing 19th-century British data (long tons) with modern data (metric tonnes) requires accurate conversion.

4. Vintage Engineering and Restoration

Engineers working with historic structures, machinery, or vehicles:

  • Bridge load ratings: Victorian bridges specified in long tons
  • Crane capacities: Historic cranes rated in long tons
  • Railway heritage: Steam locomotives, heritage railways use long tons
  • Industrial archaeology: Historic factories, mines with long ton specifications

Safety: Modern safety assessments must convert long ton ratings to metric.

5. Commodity Markets and Legal Documents

Occasionally, older contracts or legal documents reference long tons:

  • Mining leases: Historic coal, iron ore extraction rights
  • Shipping contracts: Old freight agreements still in force
  • Insurance policies: Maritime insurance with long ton clauses
  • Property deeds: Historical rights to extract/transport X long tons

Legal interpretation: Courts may need to convert long tons for enforcement.

6. Education and Reference

Students and general public encounter long tons in:

  • History textbooks: British industrial production, maritime trade
  • War histories: Shipping losses, munitions production
  • Biographies: Figures like Brunel (engineering), Nelson (naval)
  • Documentaries: Maritime history, industrial heritage

Confusion: Many confuse long ton, short ton, metric tonne without understanding differences.

7. International Trade (Rare, Legacy Contexts)

Very occasionally, long tons appear in:

  • UK-Commonwealth trade: Older business relationships honoring traditional units
  • Specific commodities: Niche markets with historical ties
  • Contracts: Long-standing agreements referencing long tons

Trend: Rapidly disappearing as metrication completes and older contracts expire.


When to Use carats

of the Carat in Modern Contexts

1. Jewelry Retail and E-Commerce

Every jewelry store and online retailer specifies carat weight:

  • Product listings: "1.5 ct Diamond Solitaire Ring"
  • Filters: Search by carat range (0.5-0.75 ct, 0.75-1.0 ct, etc.)
  • Pricing: Often listed as "price per carat"
  • Certification: GIA, IGI certificates state precise carat weight

Example Product Description:

"18K White Gold Engagement Ring featuring a 1.27 ct Round Brilliant Cut Diamond (G color, VS2 clarity, Excellent cut) with 0.25 ct total weight of side stones."

2. Gemological Laboratories

Institutions like GIA, IGI, AGS (American Gem Society) issue certificates:

  • Carat weight: Measured to 0.01 ct precision
  • Measurement: Length, width, depth in millimeters
  • Report number: Unique identifier
  • Laser inscription: Microscopic certificate number on diamond girdle

Certificate ensures:

  • Buyer knows exact weight
  • Seller can't misrepresent size
  • International trade transparency

3. Auction Houses and High-Value Sales

Christie's, Sotheby's, and other auction houses emphasize carat weight:

  • Lot descriptions: "Lot 345: 10.12 ct Fancy Vivid Blue Diamond Ring"
  • Estimates: "$2-3 million" (often $200,000-$500,000 per carat for rare colors)
  • Hammer prices: Record sales widely reported by carat

Recent Record Sales:

  • Pink Star (59.60 ct): $71.2 million (2017) = $1.195 million/ct
  • Oppenheimer Blue (14.62 ct): $57.5 million (2016) = $3.93 million/ct

4. Mining and Rough Diamond Trade

Diamond mines report production in carats:

  • Botswana (Debswana mines): ~23 million carats annually
  • Russia (Alrosa): ~28 million carats annually
  • Canada (Diavik, Ekati): ~6 million carats annually

Rough Diamond Pricing:

  • Sold by carat at rough diamond exchanges (Antwerp, Dubai, Mumbai)
  • Average rough prices: $50-$150 per carat (varies by quality)
  • High-quality rough: $300-$500+ per carat

5. Customs and Import/Export

International gem trade requires carat weight declarations:

  • Harmonized System (HS) codes: Classify gems by type and weight
  • Import duties: Often based on declared carat weight and value
  • Kimberley Process Certification: Anti-conflict diamond scheme specifies carat weight

Example: Importing 1,000 ct of rough diamonds into EU requires documentation with precise weight.

6. Insurance and Appraisals

Jewelry insurance policies specify carat weight:

  • Appraisal: "1.52 ct center stone, 0.40 ct total side stones"
  • Replacement value: Based on carat × price-per-carat for quality
  • Loss claims: Carat weight determines payout

Example Policy: "Insured item: Platinum ring with 2.03 ct diamond (H color, VS1). Replacement value: $18,000. Annual premium: $180 (1% of value)."

7. Consumer Education and Marketing

Jewelry retailers educate customers using the Four Cs:

  • In-store displays: Charts showing carat sizes
  • Online tools: Interactive "build your ring" showing carat options with price updates
  • Marketing: "50% larger diamond for only 30% more!" (e.g., 0.75 ct vs. 0.50 ct)

De Beers "A Diamond is Forever" Campaign:

  • Emphasized carat size as symbol of commitment
  • "Two months' salary" guideline (now ~one month average)

Additional Unit Information

About Ton (UK) (long ton)

1. How many pounds are in a UK Ton (Long Ton)?

There are exactly 2,240 pounds in 1 UK long ton. This derives from the Imperial system's definition: 1 long ton = 20 hundredweight, and 1 Imperial hundredweight = 112 pounds, so 20 × 112 = 2,240 pounds. This standard was codified in the British Weights and Measures Act of 1824 and became the official weight unit across the British Empire for shipping, coal trade, and bulk commodities. The 2,240-pound long ton originated from the traditional weight of a "tun" (large wine cask) when filled, which medieval merchants found convenient for maritime commerce. Today, while largely replaced by metric tonnes in most contexts, the 2,240-pound definition remains unchanged in the few areas where long tons are still used, particularly Royal Navy ship displacement measurements.

2. Is a UK Ton larger than a US Ton?

Yes, a UK long ton (2,240 lb / 1,016 kg) is 12% larger than a US short ton (2,000 lb / 907 kg)—specifically, 240 pounds heavier. This difference arose because the UK retained the traditional 112-pound Imperial hundredweight (20 cwt = 2,240 lb), while the US adopted a simplified 100-pound hundredweight (20 cwt = 2,000 lb) in the 19th century. The 12% difference is significant in large-scale commerce: 10,000 US short tons = 8,929 UK long tons (a shortfall of 1,071 long tons). This discrepancy caused confusion in transatlantic trade, requiring contracts to specify "long tons" or "short tons" explicitly. The metric tonne (1,000 kg) was partly adopted internationally to eliminate this Anglo-American ambiguity, being nearly equal to the long ton (1.6% lighter) but defined in the universal decimal system.

3. How does the UK Ton compare to the metric ton?

A UK long ton (1,016.047 kg) is 1.6% heavier than a metric tonne (1,000 kg)—specifically, ~16 kg or ~35 pounds heavier. This near-equivalence made conversion relatively straightforward during metrication: 1 long ton ≈ 1.016 tonnes, and 1 tonne ≈ 0.984 long tons. For rough estimates, many treated them as approximately equal, but precision trade required exact conversion (error of 1.6% matters for large shipments). Example: 100,000 long tons = 101,605 metric tonnes (1,605-tonne difference). The metric tonne's advantage: exact decimal definition (1,000 kg) integrates seamlessly with SI units, whereas the long ton (2,240 lbs, odd historical number) requires complex conversions. Despite metrication, some UK contexts preserve long tons: Royal Navy still reports ship displacement in long tons alongside metric figures, maintaining centuries of naval tradition.

4. Why did Britain use 2,240 pounds instead of a round number?

The 2,240-pound definition arose organically from medieval commerce, not rational design. It derives from the Imperial hundredweight system: 1 cwt = 8 stones = 8 × 14 lbs = 112 pounds. Twenty hundredweight = 20 × 112 = 2,240 pounds. This system was based on stones (14 lbs, traditional for weighing people and goods) rather than decimal convenience. Additionally, the "tun" (wine cask) traditionally weighed ~2,240 lbs when full, reinforcing this standard. When the Weights and Measures Act of 1824 standardized British units, lawmakers codified existing practice rather than inventing new decimal-friendly numbers. Result: An Imperial system built on 14s, 16s, 112s, and 2,240s—functional but mathematically awkward compared to the metric system's base-10 simplicity. This complexity was a major driver of global metrication in the 20th century, as decimal systems (1,000 kg tonne) are far easier for calculation and international trade.

5. Do modern British ships still use long tons?

Yes, but with caveats. The Royal Navy still officially reports warship displacement in long tons alongside metric tonnes, preserving centuries of naval tradition. Example: HMS Queen Elizabeth (2017) is listed as 65,000 long tons (~66,000 tonnes) displacement. However, merchant shipping has almost entirely switched to metric tonnes following international maritime conventions and UK metrication (1965-1990s). Modern cargo ships, tankers, and container vessels specify capacity in metric tonnes (deadweight tonnage, cargo capacity). Engineering calculations, fuel consumption, and port documentation now use metric. The Royal Navy's continued use of long tons is primarily ceremonial and historical—engineers work in metric internally, but public-facing documents honor tradition. Most Commonwealth navies (Australia, Canada, New Zealand) similarly list both units. Prediction: As older naval officers retire, long tons may eventually disappear even from Royal Navy specifications, becoming purely a historical footnote.

6. When did the UK stop using long tons officially?

The UK's transition was gradual, not instantaneous: 1965: Government announced metrication program. 1970s-1980s: Industries progressively adopted metric units. 1995: Metrication of trade largely complete; the Weights and Measures Act 1985 required most goods sold by weight to use metric. However, "official" cessation is complex: Some sectors retain long tons (e.g., Royal Navy). Road signs still use miles (not metric). Pubs serve pints (568 ml, not 500 ml metric). Thus, metrication was incomplete: "soft" metrication allowed dual units. By the late 1990s-2000s, most commerce, manufacturing, and shipping had switched to metric tonnes, making long tons rare outside specific legacy contexts. Practically, long tons ceased being the default standard around 1990-2000, but they never disappeared entirely. Older Britons still think in stones/pounds for body weight, and tonnes sometimes mentally convert to long tons. Full cultural shift may take another generation.

7. What's the difference between a long ton and a freight ton?

Long ton and freight ton (also called measurement ton) measure different things: Long ton: Unit of weight = 2,240 pounds (1,016 kg). Freight ton (measurement ton): Unit of volume = 40 cubic feet (~1.133 cubic meters). Shipping charges historically used whichever gave the higher value: weight or volume. Why? Some cargo is dense and heavy (iron ore, coal): charged by weight (long tons). Other cargo is bulky but light (cotton bales, furniture): charged by volume (freight tons). Example: 1,000 cubic feet of cotton = 25 freight tons (1,000 ÷ 40). If it weighs only 10,000 lbs = 4.46 long tons, ship charges for 25 freight tons (higher). Conversely, 1,000 cubic feet of lead = 25 freight tons. If it weighs 70,000 lbs = 31.25 long tons, ship charges for 31.25 long tons (higher). This "weight or measurement, whichever greater" rule persists in modern shipping (now using metric tonnes and cubic meters, but same principle).

8. How did metrication affect industries that relied on long tons?

Metrication required massive reengineering, retraining, and record conversion: Coal mining: Decades of production data in long tons had to be converted for comparisons. Miners trained to think in long tons had to learn metric. Modern equipment calibrated in tonnes. Shipping: Bills of lading, cargo manifests, freight rates all converted to metric tonnes. Crane capacities, ship specifications re-rated. Steel industry: Furnace capacities, production targets, quality standards converted. Historical production comparisons required conversion factors. Agriculture: Grain yields (tons per acre → tonnes per hectare), livestock weights, feed quantities. Challenges: Elderly workers unfamiliar with metric. "Rounding errors" in conversion causing disputes (1,000 long tons ≠ 1,000 tonnes). Cost of replacing scales, signage, documentation. Benefits: International trade simplified (no long ton/short ton confusion). Decimal calculations easier. Integration with scientific/engineering standards. Transition pain: 1970s-1990s saw dual labeling, calculation errors, generational confusion. By 2000s, mostly smooth, but legacy long ton data remains in archives requiring ongoing conversion skills.

9. Why do some sources say "ton" while others say "tonne"?

The spelling distinguishes metric from non-metric: "Ton" (t-o-n): Generic term, historically means long ton (UK), short ton (US), or any ton. "Tonne" (t-o-n-n-e): Specifically refers to metric ton (1,000 kg). Also written "metric ton." The extra "ne" distinguishes it. Usage: British English: Often use "tonne" for metric, "ton" for Imperial/US. American English: Usually "ton" for short ton (domestic), "metric ton" (not "tonne") for 1,000 kg. International standards: SI prefers "tonne" for 1,000 kg to avoid confusion. Pronunciation: Both pronounced identically in English (sounds like "tun"). In practice: Context usually clarifies, but precise technical writing specifies: "long ton," "short ton," "metric tonne" (or "metric ton"). Ambiguity persists: A British naval historian might write "50,000 tons" meaning long tons, while a modern cargo manifest "50,000 tonnes" means metric. Recommendation: Always specify unit explicitly in technical contexts to prevent costly errors.

10. Can I still buy things by the long ton in the UK?

Legally: No, almost impossible. The Weights and Measures Act 1985 and subsequent regulations require most goods sold by weight to use metric units (kilograms, grams, tonnes). Imperial units can be supplementary (dual labeling), but metric must be primary. Violations result in fines. Exceptions: Some traditional items (loose goods in markets) tolerated Imperial informally, but legally must be metric. Practically: No modern British shop, supplier, or merchant sells bulk commodities by the long ton. Everything is tonnes (metric): coal (if still sold for heating, rare), aggregates (gravel, sand), scrap metal, agricultural products. Why?: Suppliers, scales, invoices, and logistics all metric. Even older Britons who remember long tons accept metric in commercial contexts. Historical context: Pre-1970s, coal merchants delivered "1 ton of coal" (long ton) to homes. Now, heating oil sold in litres, firewood in cubic meters. Legacy: Long tons only appear in historical records, naval references, vintage engineering specs—not retail or commerce.

11. What industries were most resistant to abandoning the long ton?

Shipping and maritime industries were most resistant, for several reasons: 1. International standardization concerns: Shipping was already internationalized; changing units required global coordination. Royal Navy and Commonwealth navies valued continuity of displacement measurements across centuries for comparing ship classes. 2. Existing infrastructure: Shipyards, cranes, dry docks all rated in long tons. Re-rating everything expensive. 3. Cultural tradition: "Tonnage" terminology deeply embedded in maritime law, insurance, and practice. Changing felt like severing heritage. 4. Training: Mariners, naval architects, shipbuilders trained in long tons for entire careers. Coal industry also resisted: Miners, colliery managers, and coal merchants used long tons for generations. Production targets, wage calculations, and rail freight all based on long tons. However, resistance eventually failed: Economic necessity (international trade efficiency) and generational change (younger workers learned metric in school) gradually shifted all industries. By 2000s, even holdouts largely surrendered, with long tons surviving only in niche ceremonial contexts (Royal Navy traditions) and historical references.

12. How do I convert historical British data in long tons to modern metric?

Step-by-step conversion:

1. Identify that it's long tons: Historical British/Commonwealth data (pre-1990s) in "tons" almost certainly means long tons. Verify context (if US source, might be short tons).

2. Use precise conversion factor: 1 long ton = 1.01604691 metric tonnes (or 1,016.0469088 kg exactly).

3. Multiply: Long tons × 1.01604691 = metric tonnes. Example: 50 million long tons of coal (1913 UK production) × 1.01604691 = 50.802 million metric tonnes.

4. For large datasets: Use spreadsheet formula: =A1*1.01604691 where A1 is long tons.

5. Check reasonableness: Long ton is ~1.6% heavier than metric tonne, so metric number should be slightly larger. If wildly different, error likely.

6. Rounding: For historical approximation, 1 long ton ≈ 1 tonne (ignoring 1.6%) often acceptable. For trade/finance, use precise factor.

7. Document conversion: When publishing converted data, note: "Converted from long tons using factor 1.01604691."

Common pitfall: Don't use 2,240 lbs → kg conversion (introduces rounding error). Use exact long ton to metric tonne factor.


About Carat (ct)

1. How many milligrams are in a carat?

There are exactly 200 milligrams (mg) in 1 carat (ct). This precise definition was adopted internationally in 1907 at the Fourth General Conference on Weights and Measures in Paris and has been the global standard ever since. The 200 mg figure was chosen because it was close to the average of various historical carat standards (which ranged from 188-215 mg across different regions) and because it creates a clean metric conversion: 5 carats = 1 gram. Modern gemological laboratories use precision electronic scales that can measure to 0.001 carat (0.2 mg) accuracy, ensuring consistent and transparent gem trade worldwide. For comparison, a US dollar bill weighs approximately 1 gram = 5 carats, and a paperclip weighs ~1 gram = 5 carats. The 200 mg standard is legally enforced by metrology institutes in all countries, making carat weight the most objective and reliable of the "Four Cs" of diamond grading.

2. How many grams are in a carat?

There are exactly 0.2 grams (g) in 1 carat (ct), or conversely, 5 carats = 1 gram. This makes conversion straightforward: multiply carats by 0.2 to get grams, or multiply grams by 5 to get carats. Example: A 2.5-carat diamond weighs 2.5 × 0.2 = 0.5 grams (500 mg). The famous Hope Diamond (45.52 carats) weighs 45.52 × 0.2 = 9.104 grams. This clean metric relationship (5:1 ratio) was one reason the 200 mg standard was adopted in 1907—it integrates seamlessly with the metric system used globally in science and commerce. For context, a single M&M candy weighs approximately 1 gram = 5 carats, and a US nickel (5-cent coin) weighs 5 grams = 25 carats. The simplicity of the 5:1 carat-to-gram ratio facilitates international gem trade calculations and customs declarations.

3. Is carat the same as karat?

No, carat (ct) and karat (K or kt) are completely different units: Carat (ct) measures gemstone weight—1 ct = 200 mg. Used for diamonds, rubies, sapphires, emeralds, pearls, etc. Karat (K) measures gold purity—24K = 100% pure gold, 18K = 75% gold, 14K = 58.3% gold, etc. The fraction of pure gold is: (karat value ÷ 24). Example: 18K gold = 18/24 = 0.75 = 75% gold, 25% other metals (copper, silver, zinc for strength/color). Etymology: Both derive from the same root—"keration" (Greek for carob seed)—but diverged in meaning. In the US, different spellings distinguish them (carat/karat). In UK/Commonwealth, "carat" is used for both, distinguished by context and symbol (ct vs. K). Common example: "18-karat white gold engagement ring with a 1.5-carat diamond" correctly uses both units. Mixing them up causes confusion: "18-carat gold" is meaningless (gold purity isn't measured in gemstone weight units).

4. Why do diamonds cost more per carat as size increases?

Diamond prices exhibit exponential scaling—larger diamonds are disproportionately rarer, so price per carat increases with size. This is called the "carat premium." Example pricing (excellent cut, G color, VS2 clarity): 0.50 ct: $2,000 total = $4,000/ct. 1.00 ct: $6,000 total = $6,000/ct (50% higher per-carat than 0.5 ct). 2.00 ct: $22,000 total = $11,000/ct (83% higher per-carat than 1 ct, 175% higher than 0.5 ct). Why? Rarity: Only ~1 in 1,000 rough diamonds yields a 1-carat polished diamond; only ~1 in 1 million yields 2+ carats. Mining yields mostly small stones. Psychological milestones: Whole carat sizes (1.0, 2.0, 3.0) are culturally significant, driving demand and premiums. Implication: A 2-ct diamond costs ~3-4× more than a 1-ct diamond of identical quality, not 2×. Conversely, buying slightly below milestones (0.90 ct instead of 1.0 ct) can save 15-20% with negligible visual difference.

5. What's the largest diamond ever found?

The largest gem-quality rough diamond ever discovered is the Cullinan Diamond, found on January 26, 1905, at the Premier Mine in Cullinan, South Africa. It weighed an astonishing 3,106.75 carats (621.35 grams, about 1.37 pounds)—roughly the size of a human fist. The diamond was presented to King Edward VII of the United Kingdom and was subsequently cut by Joseph Asscher & Co. in Amsterdam into 9 major gems and 96 smaller brilliants: Cullinan I ("Great Star of Africa"): 530.2 carats, the largest clear-cut diamond in the world, set in the British Royal Sceptre. Cullinan II ("Second Star of Africa"): 317.4 carats, set in the British Imperial State Crown. Both are part of the British Crown Jewels displayed in the Tower of London. Other large rough diamonds: Lesedi La Rona (2015, Botswana): 1,109 carats. Sewelô (2019, Botswana): 1,758 carats (second-largest ever). However, the largest cut and faceted diamond is the Golden Jubilee at 545.67 carats, owned by the Thai Royal Family.

6. Do all gemstones of the same carat weight look the same size?

No! Carat is weight, not size, and different gemstones have different densities (specific gravity), so the same carat weight yields different sizes: 1-carat diamond (SG 3.52): ~6.5 mm diameter (round brilliant). 1-carat ruby/sapphire (SG ~4.0, denser than diamond): ~6.0 mm diameter—looks smaller than diamond. 1-carat emerald (SG ~2.71, less dense than diamond): ~6.9 mm diameter—looks larger than diamond. 1-carat opal (SG ~2.15, much less dense): ~7.5 mm diameter—looks much larger. Implication for buyers: If you want a larger-looking stone for the same budget, emeralds, aquamarines, or opals provide more "visual carat" than diamonds. However, diamonds are harder (Mohs 10) and more durable for daily wear. Cut also matters: A shallow-cut diamond may "spread" to look larger but sacrifices brilliance. A deep-cut diamond looks smaller but may have better light performance. Conclusion: Carat weight alone doesn't determine visual size—gemstone density and cut proportions both matter.

7. Are lab-grown diamonds measured in carats?

Yes, lab-grown (synthetic) diamonds are measured in carats identically to natural diamonds. They are chemically, physically, and optically identical to natural diamonds—pure crystalline carbon (C) with the same hardness (Mohs 10), refractive index (2.42), and density (3.52 g/cm³). Gemological laboratories (GIA, IGI) grade lab-grown diamonds using the same Four Cs (carat, cut, color, clarity) and issue certificates specifying exact carat weight. Key differences: Origin: Lab-grown created in controlled environments (HPHT or CVD methods) in weeks; natural formed over billions of years deep in Earth's mantle. Price: Lab-grown cost 30-70% less than natural diamonds of equivalent quality (e.g., 1 ct lab-grown ~$1,500-$3,000; natural ~$5,000-$8,000). Disclosure: Sellers must disclose lab-grown status; GIA certificates clearly state "laboratory-grown." Market: Growing acceptance, especially among younger, budget-conscious, or environmentally-minded buyers. Some prefer natural for rarity/tradition; others prefer lab-grown for value/ethics. Carat weight identical: 1 carat lab-grown = 200 mg, same as natural.

8. How accurate are carat weight measurements?

Modern carat weight measurements are extremely accurate, thanks to precision electronic scales: Precision: Gemological laboratories use scales calibrated to ±0.001 carat (±0.2 mg), often better. For reference, that's ~1/5th the weight of a single grain of table salt. Calibration: Scales are regularly calibrated against traceable reference standards linked to the SI kilogram (maintained by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures). Environmental control: Measurements performed in temperature-controlled rooms (~20-25°C) to prevent thermal expansion affecting readings. Cleaning: Gemstones cleaned before weighing (dirt, oils, or dust add weight). Repeatability: Multiple measurements averaged to ensure consistency. Certification: GIA, IGI, AGS certificates report carat weight to 0.01 ct (1 point) for consistency: e.g., "1.27 carats," measured to ±0.005 ct. Legal enforcement: Selling gemstones with misrepresented carat weight is fraud in most jurisdictions, punishable by fines and criminal penalties. Result: Carat weight is the most objective, precise, and reproducible of the Four Cs—far more consistent than subjective cut, color, or clarity grading.

9. What does "points" mean in diamond terminology?

In gem trade, 1 carat = 100 points, so 1 point = 0.01 carat = 2 milligrams. "Points" terminology allows precise description of smaller gemstones and fractional carats: Common examples: "50-pointer" = 0.50 carat (50 points). "75-point diamond" = 0.75 carat. "10-point melee" = 0.10 carat (small accent stones). "One-pointer" = 0.01 carat (tiny chip diamonds used in pavé settings). Why use points? Easier for small stones: Saying "ten-pointer" is quicker than "zero-point-one-carat." Pricing precision: Allows price-per-point calculations for wholesale. Trade jargon: Professional jewelers, cutters, and traders use points routinely. Historical: Predates electronic scales; points allowed finer distinctions than early balance scales. Example in retail: "This ring features a 75-point center diamond surrounded by 20 points total weight of accent stones" = 0.75 ct + 0.20 ct = 0.95 ct total carat weight (TCW). Note: While points are common in trade, consumer-facing marketing usually uses decimals: "0.50 ct" rather than "50 points."

10. Why did ancient people use carob seeds to weigh gems?

Ancient Mediterranean merchants used carob seeds (Ceratonia siliqua) as counterweights on balance scales because they believed these seeds had remarkably uniform weight—approximately 200 milligrams each, close to today's carat standard. Practical advantages: Abundance: Carob trees grew widely across Mediterranean (Greece, Italy, Middle East), making seeds readily available. Portability: Small, lightweight seeds easy to carry in pouches for trade. Durability: Dried carob seeds don't decay quickly; can be stored for years. Size: Perfect for weighing small, valuable items (gems, gold, spices, medicines). Ancient trade: Greek, Roman, Arab, and Persian merchants traveled long distances with balance scales and carob seeds, facilitating gem trade across continents. The belief in uniformity: Ancient texts suggest carob seeds were thought to have nearly identical weights, making them natural standard units. Reality: Modern analysis shows carob seeds actually vary by 10-20% (180-220 mg), so ancient weights weren't as precise as believed. However, the average (~200 mg) happens to closely match the modern carat, suggesting ancient merchants intuitively converged on a practical standard that persists today.

11. Can you haggle over carat weight when buying diamonds?

No, carat weight is objectively measurable and non-negotiable—a 1.00 ct diamond weighs exactly 200 mg, confirmed by precision scales. You cannot "haggle" to get 1.10 ct weight for the price of 1.00 ct. What you CAN negotiate: Price per carat: Total cost for the specific diamond (negotiating discount on asking price). Quality trade-offs: Choosing lower color (G vs. D), lower clarity (VS2 vs. VVS1), or different cut to stay within budget while maximizing carat. Just-below milestones: Purchasing 0.90 ct instead of 1.00 ct saves 15-20% with negligible visual difference—smart buying strategy, not haggling on weight. Total jewelry piece: Negotiating on the setting, band material, or package deal (ring + earrings). Trade-in: Bringing old jewelry to trade toward purchase. Timing: Shopping during sales (Black Friday, Valentine's Day) or at end of month/quarter when sellers have targets. What sellers CANNOT do: Misrepresent carat weight. Gemological certificates from GIA/IGI specify exact weight. If a seller claims a 1.00 ct diamond weighs more/less than 200 mg, it's either fraud or an error. Pro tip: Focus negotiations on price-per-carat reduction or value-adds (free resizing, upgraded setting), not on changing the actual diamond weight.

12. How has the carat system changed with modern technology?

The carat definition (200 mg) remains unchanged since 1907, but technology has revolutionized measurement, cutting, and trade: Precision scales: Modern electronic scales measure to ±0.001 ct (±0.2 mg) vs. early 20th-century balance scales (±0.05-0.10 ct). Ensures consistent global trade. Laser cutting: Computer-controlled lasers cut diamonds with micron-level precision, optimizing yield from rough and maximizing brilliance for a given carat weight. Can achieve ideal proportions consistently. 3D scanning: Machines scan rough diamonds in seconds, calculating optimal cut to maximize carat weight retention while achieving excellent proportions. Before: Cutters relied on experience; now: Algorithms optimize. Synthetic diamonds: Lab-grown diamonds (HPHT, CVD) can be produced to target carat weights, unlike mining where sizes are random. Enables consistent supply of specific sizes. Online retail: Internet sellers (Blue Nile, James Allen) list thousands of diamonds with exact carat weights, photos, 360° videos. Buyers filter by precise carat ranges (1.00-1.25 ct). Blockchain tracking: Some companies use blockchain to track diamonds from mine to retail, recording carat weight at each stage, enhancing transparency. AI grading: Emerging AI systems assist gemologists in assessing cut quality and predicting optimal finished carat weight from rough. Result: The carat unit is stable, but technology makes measurement, cutting, and trading far more precise, efficient, and transparent than ever before.


Conversion Table: Ton (UK) to Carat

Ton (UK) (long ton)Carat (ct)
0.52,540,117.272
15,080,234.544
1.57,620,351.816
210,160,469.088
525,401,172.72
1050,802,345.44
25127,005,863.6
50254,011,727.2
100508,023,454.4
2501,270,058,636
5002,540,117,272
1,0005,080,234,544

People Also Ask

How do I convert Ton (UK) to Carat?

To convert Ton (UK) to Carat, enter the value in Ton (UK) in the calculator above. The conversion will happen automatically. Use our free online converter for instant and accurate results. You can also visit our weight converter page to convert between other units in this category.

Learn more →

What is the conversion factor from Ton (UK) to Carat?

The conversion factor depends on the specific relationship between Ton (UK) and Carat. You can find the exact conversion formula and factor on this page. Our calculator handles all calculations automatically. See the conversion table above for common values.

Can I convert Carat back to Ton (UK)?

Yes! You can easily convert Carat back to Ton (UK) by using the swap button (⇌) in the calculator above, or by visiting our Carat to Ton (UK) converter page. You can also explore other weight conversions on our category page.

Learn more →

What are common uses for Ton (UK) and Carat?

Ton (UK) and Carat are both standard units used in weight measurements. They are commonly used in various applications including engineering, construction, cooking, and scientific research. Browse our weight converter for more conversion options.

For more weight conversion questions, visit our FAQ page or explore our conversion guides.

All Weight Conversions

Kilogram to GramKilogram to MilligramKilogram to PoundKilogram to OunceKilogram to StoneKilogram to Ton (metric)Kilogram to Ton (US)Kilogram to Ton (UK)Kilogram to MicrogramKilogram to CaratKilogram to SlugKilogram to Troy OunceKilogram to PennyweightKilogram to GrainKilogram to DramKilogram to QuintalKilogram to Atomic Mass UnitKilogram to Pavan (India)Kilogram to Kati (India)Kilogram to Masha (India)Kilogram to Dina (India)Kilogram to Pras (India)Kilogram to Lota (India)Gram to KilogramGram to MilligramGram to PoundGram to OunceGram to StoneGram to Ton (metric)Gram to Ton (US)Gram to Ton (UK)Gram to MicrogramGram to CaratGram to SlugGram to Troy OunceGram to PennyweightGram to GrainGram to DramGram to QuintalGram to Atomic Mass UnitGram to Pavan (India)Gram to Kati (India)Gram to Masha (India)Gram to Dina (India)Gram to Pras (India)Gram to Lota (India)Milligram to KilogramMilligram to GramMilligram to PoundMilligram to OunceMilligram to StoneMilligram to Ton (metric)Milligram to Ton (US)Milligram to Ton (UK)Milligram to MicrogramMilligram to CaratMilligram to SlugMilligram to Troy OunceMilligram to PennyweightMilligram to GrainMilligram to DramMilligram to QuintalMilligram to Atomic Mass UnitMilligram to Pavan (India)Milligram to Kati (India)Milligram to Masha (India)Milligram to Dina (India)Milligram to Pras (India)Milligram to Lota (India)Pound to KilogramPound to GramPound to MilligramPound to OuncePound to StonePound to Ton (metric)Pound to Ton (US)Pound to Ton (UK)Pound to MicrogramPound to CaratPound to SlugPound to Troy OuncePound to PennyweightPound to GrainPound to DramPound to QuintalPound to Atomic Mass UnitPound to Pavan (India)Pound to Kati (India)Pound to Masha (India)Pound to Dina (India)Pound to Pras (India)Pound to Lota (India)Ounce to KilogramOunce to GramOunce to MilligramOunce to PoundOunce to StoneOunce to Ton (metric)Ounce to Ton (US)Ounce to Ton (UK)Ounce to MicrogramOunce to CaratOunce to SlugOunce to Troy OunceOunce to PennyweightOunce to GrainOunce to DramOunce to QuintalOunce to Atomic Mass UnitOunce to Pavan (India)Ounce to Kati (India)Ounce to Masha (India)Ounce to Dina (India)Ounce to Pras (India)Ounce to Lota (India)Stone to KilogramStone to GramStone to MilligramStone to PoundStone to Ounce

Verified Against Authority Standards

All conversion formulas have been verified against international standards and authoritative sources to ensure maximum accuracy and reliability.

NIST Mass and Force Standards

National Institute of Standards and TechnologyUS standards for weight and mass measurements

ISO 80000-4

International Organization for StandardizationInternational standard for mechanics quantities

Last verified: December 3, 2025