Ton (UK) to Pound Converter
Convert long tons to pounds with our free online weight converter.
Quick Answer
1 Ton (UK) = 2240 pounds
Formula: Ton (UK) × conversion factor = Pound
Use the calculator below for instant, accurate conversions.
Our Accuracy Guarantee
All conversion formulas on UnitsConverter.io have been verified against NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) guidelines and international SI standards. Our calculations are accurate to 10 decimal places for standard conversions and use arbitrary precision arithmetic for astronomical units.
Ton (UK) to Pound Calculator
How to Use the Ton (UK) to Pound Calculator:
- Enter the value you want to convert in the 'From' field (Ton (UK)).
- The converted value in Pound will appear automatically in the 'To' field.
- Use the dropdown menus to select different units within the Weight category.
- Click the swap button (⇌) to reverse the conversion direction.
How to Convert Ton (UK) to Pound: Step-by-Step Guide
Converting Ton (UK) to Pound involves multiplying the value by a specific conversion factor, as shown in the formula below.
Formula:
1 Ton (UK) = 2240 poundsExample Calculation:
Convert 5 long tons: 5 × 2240 = 11200 pounds
Disclaimer: For Reference Only
These conversion results are provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees regarding the precision of these results, especially for conversions involving extremely large or small numbers which may be subject to the inherent limitations of standard computer floating-point arithmetic.
Not for professional use. Results should be verified before use in any critical application. View our Terms of Service for more information.
Need to convert to other weight units?
View all Weight conversions →What is a Ton (UK) and a Pound?
The long ton (also called imperial ton or UK ton) is a unit of mass in the British Imperial system, officially defined as:
1 long ton = 2,240 pounds (lb) = 1,016.0469088 kilograms (kg)
Historical Definition
The long ton is based on the Imperial system's hundredweight (cwt):
1 long ton = 20 hundredweight (cwt)
- 1 hundredweight (Imperial) = 112 pounds
- 20 × 112 lb = 2,240 pounds
This contrasts with the US system:
- US hundredweight = 100 pounds
- US short ton = 20 US hundredweight = 2,000 pounds
The Three "Tons" Compared
| Ton Type | Weight in Pounds | Weight in Kilograms | Where Used | |----------|------------------|---------------------|------------| | Long Ton (UK/Imperial) | 2,240 lb | 1,016.047 kg | UK, Commonwealth (historic), naval displacement | | Short Ton (US) | 2,000 lb | 907.185 kg | United States, North America | | Metric Ton/Tonne | 2,204.62 lb | 1,000 kg (exactly) | International standard (SI-compatible) |
Difference Summary:
- Long ton vs. short ton: 240 lbs (10.9% difference)
- Long ton vs. metric tonne: ~16 kg (1.6% difference)
- Short ton vs. metric tonne: ~93 kg (10.2% difference)
Why "Long" Ton?
The term "long ton" emerged in the early 20th century to distinguish the British imperial ton (2,240 lbs) from the American "short ton" (2,000 lbs). Before this, "ton" simply meant the local standard:
- In Britain and the Empire: ton = 2,240 lbs (now called "long ton")
- In the United States: ton = 2,000 lbs (now called "short ton")
International trade requiring clarity led to the qualifying adjectives "long" and "short."
The pound is a unit of mass in the British imperial and United States customary systems of measurement. Since the international yard and pound agreement of 1959, one pound has been defined as exactly 0.45359237 kilograms. This makes the pound equal to precisely 16 ounces, 7,000 grains, or 453.59237 grams.
The pound is denoted by the symbol lb (from the Latin libra, meaning balance or scales) or sometimes lbs for plural, though technically "lb" serves both singular and plural. In commercial contexts, you'll see prices as "$/lb" (dollars per pound) or weights as "5 lb bag."
Unlike the metric system where weight relationships are decimal (1,000 grams = 1 kilogram), the pound uses the relationship of 16 ounces to 1 pound. This fractional system reflects historical divisions: 1 pound = 16 ounces = 256 drams = 7,000 grains, with each division serving practical purposes in trade and measurement.
Note: The Ton (UK) is part of the imperial/US customary system, primarily used in the US, UK, and Canada for everyday measurements. The Pound belongs to the imperial/US customary system.
History of the Ton (UK) and Pound
of the Long Ton
Medieval Origins: The Tun (c. 1200-1500)
The Wine Trade:
- The word "ton" derives from "tun" (Old English tunne, Middle English tonne), meaning a large cask or barrel
- A tun was a standard wine cask in medieval England holding approximately 252 wine gallons (~954 liters, 210 Imperial gallons)
- When filled with wine, a tun weighed roughly 2,240 pounds, establishing the weight association
Early Standardization Attempts:
- 13th-14th centuries: English merchants used "ton" for both volume (liquids) and weight (bulk goods)
- Different commodities had varying ton definitions:
- Wool ton: Weight needed to fill shipping space (variable)
- Coal ton: Weight-based measurement
- Freight ton: Volume-based (40 cubic feet)
The Problem of Multiple Tons:
- Confusion in trade due to inconsistent ton definitions
- Disputes over cargo weight vs. volume
- Regional variations across England and continental Europe
Standardization: The Weights and Measures Act of 1824
Imperial System Codification:
- 1824: British Parliament passed the Weights and Measures Act under King George IV
- Unified and standardized British weights and measures across the Empire
- Officially defined the imperial ton as 2,240 pounds
- Based on existing practice: 20 hundredweight of 112 pounds each
Why 2,240 Pounds? The choice reflected established commercial practice:
- 1 hundredweight (cwt) = 112 pounds (8 stones × 14 pounds)
- 20 hundredweight = 2,240 pounds
- This matched the traditional weight of a tun of wine
- Integrated with existing Imperial units (stones, pounds, ounces)
Imperial Hundredweight System:
- 1 stone = 14 pounds
- 1 hundredweight = 8 stones = 112 pounds
- 1 ton = 20 hundredweight = 160 stones = 2,240 pounds
British Empire and Global Commerce (1824-1945)
Dominance of British Shipping:
- 19th century: Britain controlled ~60-70% of world merchant shipping tonnage
- British shipping companies used long tons for:
- Cargo capacity (deadweight tonnage)
- Ship displacement (weight of water displaced)
- Freight charges (cost per ton)
The Coal Trade:
- British coal powered the Industrial Revolution
- Coal universally measured in long tons
- Newcastle coal trade: Millions of long tons exported annually
- Coal exports to Europe, Americas, Asia all priced in long tons
Naval Architecture:
- Displacement tonnage: Weight of water displaced by a floating ship, measured in long tons
- Used to classify warship size: "10,000-ton cruiser," "50,000-ton battleship"
- Standard in Royal Navy and Commonwealth navies
- Example: HMS Dreadnought (1906): ~18,000 long tons displacement
Imperial Commodity Trade:
- Iron and steel: British iron production measured in long tons
- Grain: Commonwealth grain shipments (wheat, barley) in long tons
- Rubber, cotton, wool: Plantation exports measured in long tons
- Freight rates: Shipping costs typically £X per long ton
Global Adoption:
- British commercial dominance spread long ton usage
- Bills of lading (shipping documents) in long tons
- Maritime insurance: Cargo value calculated per long ton
- Port records: Cargo throughput recorded in long tons
American Divergence: The Short Ton
US Measurement Evolution:
- Early America inherited British Imperial units
- By mid-19th century, US customary system diverged
- Americans adopted a 100-pound hundredweight (simpler decimal-friendly base)
- US ton = 20 US hundredweight = 20 × 100 lb = 2,000 pounds (the "short ton")
Why the Difference?
- Simplicity: 100-pound hundredweight easier for calculation
- Independence: Post-colonial desire for distinct American standards
- Internal trade: US domestic commerce didn't require British compatibility
Terminology:
- Originally, both were simply called "ton" in their respective countries
- Early 20th century: International trade necessitated distinction
- British ton → "long ton"
- American ton → "short ton"
The Rise of the Metric Tonne (1875-Present)
Metric System Development:
- 1875: Metric Convention established international metric standards
- Metric tonne (or ton) defined as 1,000 kilograms (exactly)
- Decimal-based, simple, scientifically rational
Advantages Over Long/Short Tons:
- Exact decimal definition: 1 tonne = 1,000 kg (no fractions)
- Universal: Not tied to any national system
- SI-compatible: Integrates with scientific units
- Easier calculation: Decimal arithmetic vs. 2,240-pound conversions
Global Metrication Wave (1960s-1990s):
United Kingdom:
- 1965: UK government announced metrication program
- 1970s-1980s: Gradual transition in trade, industry, and commerce
- 1995: Most commercial transactions legally required to use metric units
- Long ton legacy: Persists in road signs (distances/heights) and some traditional contexts
Commonwealth Nations:
- Australia: Metrication 1970s, completed by 1988
- Canada: Metrication 1970s, officially adopted 1977-1980
- New Zealand: Metrication 1969-1976
- India: Adopted metric system post-independence (1947-1960s)
- South Africa: Metrication 1970s
Shipping and Maritime:
- International Maritime Organization (IMO): Encouraged metric units
- Modern cargo manifests typically in metric tonnes
- Shipping contracts, freight rates increasingly metric
Contemporary Usage (1990s-Present)
Where the Long Ton Survives:
1. Naval Displacement (UK and Commonwealth):
- Royal Navy still reports warship displacement in long tons (alongside metric)
- Royal Australian Navy, Royal Canadian Navy, Royal New Zealand Navy: Use long tons traditionally
- Example: HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier: ~65,000 long tons full load displacement
2. Historical Records:
- Pre-1990s British commercial records in long tons
- Archival shipping manifests, trade statistics, industrial production data
- Converting historical data requires long ton knowledge
3. Certain Industries:
- Some maritime insurance policies reference long tons in older contracts
- Vintage engineering specifications (bridges, railways built pre-metrication)
- Mining records: Historical coal, iron ore output
4. United States Context:
- When Americans refer to British/Commonwealth historical data, they may encounter long tons
- Rare in modern US usage (Americans use short tons domestically)
Gradual Obsolescence:
- Most modern international trade: metric tonnes
- Younger generations in UK/Commonwealth unfamiliar with long tons
- Likely to become purely historical unit within decades
The pound represents one of the oldest weight measurements in continuous use, with lineage tracing back over two millennia.
Roman Origins: The word "pound" derives from the Latin pondus (weight), while the symbol "lb" comes from libra, the Roman unit of weight equal to approximately 329 grams. The Romans used a libra divided into 12 unciae (ounces), though this differs from the modern 16-ounce pound.
Medieval Development: Multiple "pounds" existed simultaneously in medieval Europe—the tower pound (5,400 grains), merchant's pound (6,750 grains), and troy pound (5,760 grains) for precious metals. This created confusion in commerce and necessitated standardization.
Avoirdupois System: In 13th-century England, the avoirdupois system (from Old French aver de peis, "goods of weight") emerged for general commerce. The avoirdupois pound standardized at 16 ounces, each containing 437.5 grains, totaling 7,000 grains per pound. This system proved so practical for trade that it displaced most other pound definitions.
British Standardization: The Weights and Measures Act of 1824 established the imperial pound throughout the British Empire, legally defining it through physical standards. The Imperial Standard Pound, a platinum cylinder, was kept at the Houses of Parliament as the official definition.
US Independence: After the American Revolution, the United States maintained the British pound definition from colonial times. The Mendenhall Order of 1893 tied US weights to metric standards: 1 pound = 0.4535924277 kilograms (based on 1 meter = 39.37 inches).
1959 International Agreement: The international yard and pound agreement unified English-speaking nations. The United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa agreed that 1 pound equals exactly 0.45359237 kilograms. This created perfect mathematical alignment between imperial and metric systems.
Troy vs. Avoirdupois: Two pound systems coexist today. The avoirdupois pound (16 oz, 453.6 g) is used for general commerce and everyday measurements. The troy pound (12 troy oz, 373.2 g) survives only for precious metals—gold, silver, platinum. When someone says "pound" without qualifier, they always mean avoirdupois pound.
Cultural Persistence: Despite metric conversion efforts worldwide, the pound persists in American daily life. The 1975 Metric Conversion Act made metric "preferred" but voluntary, allowing continued pound usage. Today, Americans buy meat in pounds, weigh themselves in pounds, and ship packages in pounds, maintaining a measurement tradition spanning centuries.
Common Uses and Applications: long tons vs pounds
Explore the typical applications for both Ton (UK) (imperial/US) and Pound (imperial/US) to understand their common contexts.
Common Uses for long tons
of the Long Ton in Modern Contexts
1. Naval and Maritime History
Researchers, naval historians, and museum curators working with historical ships and maritime records must understand long tons:
- Ship specifications: Displacement, cargo capacity, fuel capacity
- Archival documents: Shipping manifests, port records, naval reports
- Comparative analysis: Comparing historical ships to modern vessels
- Museum exhibits: HMS Victory, USS Constitution, RMS Titanic displays
Example: Understanding that HMS Hood's 42,000 long ton displacement = ~42,672 metric tonnes helps compare to modern carriers.
2. Royal Navy and Commonwealth Navies
British and Commonwealth naval forces still reference long tons:
- Official displacement figures: Warships listed in long tons (with metric equivalent)
- Naval doctrine: Historical continuity in naval architecture
- Training: Naval officers learn both systems
- Public relations: Press releases may include long ton figures for tradition
Modern Practice: Usually list both: "HMS Queen Elizabeth: 65,000 long tons (66,000 tonnes)"
3. Historical Research and Archives
Historians studying British Empire, Industrial Revolution, or maritime trade encounter long tons constantly:
- Economic history: Production statistics (coal, iron, steel, ships)
- Trade records: Import/export volumes
- Infrastructure: Railway freight, canal cargo
- Colonial economies: Plantation outputs (sugar, rubber, cotton)
Conversion Necessity: Comparing 19th-century British data (long tons) with modern data (metric tonnes) requires accurate conversion.
4. Vintage Engineering and Restoration
Engineers working with historic structures, machinery, or vehicles:
- Bridge load ratings: Victorian bridges specified in long tons
- Crane capacities: Historic cranes rated in long tons
- Railway heritage: Steam locomotives, heritage railways use long tons
- Industrial archaeology: Historic factories, mines with long ton specifications
Safety: Modern safety assessments must convert long ton ratings to metric.
5. Commodity Markets and Legal Documents
Occasionally, older contracts or legal documents reference long tons:
- Mining leases: Historic coal, iron ore extraction rights
- Shipping contracts: Old freight agreements still in force
- Insurance policies: Maritime insurance with long ton clauses
- Property deeds: Historical rights to extract/transport X long tons
Legal interpretation: Courts may need to convert long tons for enforcement.
6. Education and Reference
Students and general public encounter long tons in:
- History textbooks: British industrial production, maritime trade
- War histories: Shipping losses, munitions production
- Biographies: Figures like Brunel (engineering), Nelson (naval)
- Documentaries: Maritime history, industrial heritage
Confusion: Many confuse long ton, short ton, metric tonne without understanding differences.
7. International Trade (Rare, Legacy Contexts)
Very occasionally, long tons appear in:
- UK-Commonwealth trade: Older business relationships honoring traditional units
- Specific commodities: Niche markets with historical ties
- Contracts: Long-standing agreements referencing long tons
Trend: Rapidly disappearing as metrication completes and older contracts expire.
When to Use pounds
Medical and Healthcare Settings
Healthcare in the US primarily operates in pounds for patient weight, though hospitals increasingly record kilograms for medication dosing calculations. Patient charts typically show both: "185 lbs (84 kg)." However, all patient communication uses pounds—doctors say "You've gained 5 pounds" or "Try to lose 10-15 pounds," never kilograms.
Weight-based medication dosing creates complexity: drugs dose in mg/kg, requiring conversion. A 160-lb patient equals 72.6 kg, so a drug dosed at 5 mg/kg requires 363 mg. Medical staff use conversion charts or electronic calculators to prevent errors.
Anesthesiology requires precise weight for medication dosing. Operating room scales display both pounds and kilograms, with staff typically asking patients "What's your weight in pounds?" for verification against chart data.
Public health BMI calculations use pounds and inches in the US: BMI = (weight in pounds × 703) ÷ (height in inches)². A person 5'9" (69") weighing 170 lbs has BMI = (170 × 703) ÷ (69 × 69) = 25.1, just into the "overweight" category (BMI 25-29.9).
Weight Loss and Fitness Industry
Diet programs, weight loss apps, and fitness tracking exclusively use pounds in the US market. Weight Watchers, MyFitnessPal, Lose It!, and similar apps default to pounds, though users can switch to kilograms.
Fitness goals frame in pounds: "Lose 20 pounds by summer," "Gain 10 pounds of muscle," "Drop 5 pounds this month." Personal trainers track client progress in pounds, celebrating milestone losses: "You've lost 25 pounds—that's like losing two bowling balls!"
Scale psychology creates significance for specific numbers. Dropping below 200 lbs (reaching "onederland") represents a major milestone for many dieters. Breaking into the 100s (199 lbs) feels dramatically different from 200 lbs despite being only 1 pound difference.
Bodybuilding competitions divide by weight classes in pounds: lightweight (<154 lbs), middleweight (154-176 lbs), light-heavyweight (176-198 lbs), heavyweight (198-242 lbs), super-heavyweight (>242 lbs). Competitors cut weight aggressively, sometimes losing 10-20 lbs of water weight in final days before weigh-in.
Commercial Food Service and Restaurants
Restaurant kitchens order ingredients in pounds and bulk quantities:
- 50-lb bags of onions
- 40-lb cases of chicken breast
- 25-lb blocks of cheese
- 5-lb containers of mayonnaise
- 10-lb boxes of bacon
Recipe scaling in commercial kitchens calculates in pounds: a recipe serving 20 using 2 lbs ground beef scales to serve 100 by using 10 lbs. Kitchen scales measure in pounds and ounces, with precision to 0.1 oz for small quantities.
Food costs calculate per pound: if chicken costs $2.50/lb and a dish uses 6 oz (0.375 lbs), the protein cost is $0.94 per serving. Restaurant profitability depends on accurate food costing, requiring staff to think fluently in pounds and ounces.
Portion control uses ounces: 8-oz steak, 6-oz salmon fillet, 4-oz burger patty (quarter-pounder). Pre-portioned proteins simplify cooking and ensure consistency. A case of forty 4-oz burger patties weighs 10 lbs total.
Postal and Freight Shipping
The entire US shipping industry operates in pounds. Postage rates tier by weight:
USPS First-Class Mail:
- Up to 3 oz: $0.63 (letter)
- Up to 13 oz: Incrementally increases
- Over 13 oz: Requires Priority Mail
Priority Mail tiers:
- Up to 1 lb: $8.50 flat rate (approximate regional)
- 1-2 lbs: $9.50
- 2-3 lbs: $11.00
- Continues in 1-lb increments to 70 lbs
Shipping costs increase dramatically with weight. A 15.5-lb package costs significantly more than a 15-lb package if it crosses a tier boundary. Online sellers optimize packaging to stay within weight tiers: use lighter boxes, remove unnecessary materials, choose compact packaging.
Freight shipping (over 150 lbs) charges by "hundredweight" (CWT): cost per 100 lbs. A 750-lb shipment traveling 500 miles at $45/CWT costs $337.50 (7.5 × $45).
Farming and Agriculture
Agricultural commerce operates entirely in pounds:
Crop yields per acre:
- Corn: 170-200 bushels/acre (56 lbs per bushel = 9,520-11,200 lbs/acre)
- Soybeans: 50-60 bushels/acre (60 lbs per bushel = 3,000-3,600 lbs/acre)
- Wheat: 50-70 bushels/acre (60 lbs per bushel = 3,000-4,200 lbs/acre)
Livestock weights:
- Market hogs: Sold at 250-280 lbs live weight
- Feeder cattle: Sold at 600-800 lbs, finished at 1,200-1,400 lbs
- Broiler chickens: Processed at 5-6 lbs
- Turkeys: Processed at 25-30 lbs
Feed calculations:
- Dairy cow eats 50-60 lbs of feed daily
- Beef cattle eat 25-30 lbs of feed daily during finishing
- Horse eats 15-25 lbs of hay daily
- Bag of horse feed: 50 lbs (common size)
Farmers sell crops and livestock by the pound or hundredweight (100 lbs). Commodity prices quote in cents per pound: corn at $0.055/lb, soybeans at $0.15/lb (converted from bushel prices).
Manufacturing and Industrial Production
Manufacturing specs, especially for non-precision work, use pounds:
Sheet metal weight:
- Steel sheet weight: pounds per square foot for given thickness
- Aluminum sheet: Lighter than steel at same thickness
- Copper sheet: Heavier than steel
Material handling:
- Pallet weight limits: 2,500 lbs typical
- Forklift capacity: 3,000-5,000 lbs common
- Hand truck/dolly: 500-800 lbs capacity
Product specifications:
- Appliances: Refrigerator 200-300 lbs, washing machine 150-200 lbs
- Furniture: Dining table 50-150 lbs, dresser 100-200 lbs
- Machinery: Small lathe 500-1,500 lbs, mill 2,000-5,000 lbs
Shipping and logistics calculate by weight and dimensions. Freight classifications assign classes based on weight density (pounds per cubic foot): class 50 (50+ lbs/cu ft, densest), class 500 (1 lb/cu ft, lightest).
Waste Management and Recycling
Waste services charge based on weight:
Dumpster weight limits:
- 10-yard dumpster: 2-3 tons (4,000-6,000 lbs) weight limit
- 20-yard dumpster: 3-4 tons (6,000-8,000 lbs)
- 40-yard dumpster: 5-6 tons (10,000-12,000 lbs)
Exceeding weight limits incurs fees: $50-100 per ton over limit. Construction debris (concrete, brick, dirt) quickly exceeds weight limits despite not filling volume.
Recycling programs:
- Aluminum cans: ~30 cans per pound, recyclers pay $0.30-0.50/lb
- Scrap steel: $0.05-0.15/lb
- Copper: $2-4/lb (valuable, often stolen)
- Cardboard: $0.02-0.10/lb
- Paper: $0.01-0.05/lb
Individuals recycling metals weigh loads at scrap yards on drive-over scales, receiving payment based on total pounds by category.
Pet Care and Veterinary Medicine
Pet food portion recommendations use pounds:
- Small dogs (<20 lbs): 1/2 to 1 cup food daily
- Medium dogs (20-50 lbs): 1 to 2 cups daily
- Large dogs (50-90 lbs): 2 to 3.5 cups daily
- Giant dogs (>90 lbs): 3.5 to 5+ cups daily
Medication dosing requires accurate pet weight. A 40-lb dog receiving medication at 1 mg/lb needs a 40 mg dose. Underdosing proves ineffective; overdosing risks toxicity.
Veterinarians track pet weight over time, flagging unhealthy gains or losses. "Fluffy has gained 3 pounds since last year—we need to reduce portions" or "Max has lost 5 pounds unexpectedly—let's run some tests."
Additional Unit Information
About Ton (UK) (long ton)
1. How many pounds are in a UK Ton (Long Ton)?
There are exactly 2,240 pounds in 1 UK long ton. This derives from the Imperial system's definition: 1 long ton = 20 hundredweight, and 1 Imperial hundredweight = 112 pounds, so 20 × 112 = 2,240 pounds. This standard was codified in the British Weights and Measures Act of 1824 and became the official weight unit across the British Empire for shipping, coal trade, and bulk commodities. The 2,240-pound long ton originated from the traditional weight of a "tun" (large wine cask) when filled, which medieval merchants found convenient for maritime commerce. Today, while largely replaced by metric tonnes in most contexts, the 2,240-pound definition remains unchanged in the few areas where long tons are still used, particularly Royal Navy ship displacement measurements.
2. Is a UK Ton larger than a US Ton?
Yes, a UK long ton (2,240 lb / 1,016 kg) is 12% larger than a US short ton (2,000 lb / 907 kg)—specifically, 240 pounds heavier. This difference arose because the UK retained the traditional 112-pound Imperial hundredweight (20 cwt = 2,240 lb), while the US adopted a simplified 100-pound hundredweight (20 cwt = 2,000 lb) in the 19th century. The 12% difference is significant in large-scale commerce: 10,000 US short tons = 8,929 UK long tons (a shortfall of 1,071 long tons). This discrepancy caused confusion in transatlantic trade, requiring contracts to specify "long tons" or "short tons" explicitly. The metric tonne (1,000 kg) was partly adopted internationally to eliminate this Anglo-American ambiguity, being nearly equal to the long ton (1.6% lighter) but defined in the universal decimal system.
3. How does the UK Ton compare to the metric ton?
A UK long ton (1,016.047 kg) is 1.6% heavier than a metric tonne (1,000 kg)—specifically, ~16 kg or ~35 pounds heavier. This near-equivalence made conversion relatively straightforward during metrication: 1 long ton ≈ 1.016 tonnes, and 1 tonne ≈ 0.984 long tons. For rough estimates, many treated them as approximately equal, but precision trade required exact conversion (error of 1.6% matters for large shipments). Example: 100,000 long tons = 101,605 metric tonnes (1,605-tonne difference). The metric tonne's advantage: exact decimal definition (1,000 kg) integrates seamlessly with SI units, whereas the long ton (2,240 lbs, odd historical number) requires complex conversions. Despite metrication, some UK contexts preserve long tons: Royal Navy still reports ship displacement in long tons alongside metric figures, maintaining centuries of naval tradition.
4. Why did Britain use 2,240 pounds instead of a round number?
The 2,240-pound definition arose organically from medieval commerce, not rational design. It derives from the Imperial hundredweight system: 1 cwt = 8 stones = 8 × 14 lbs = 112 pounds. Twenty hundredweight = 20 × 112 = 2,240 pounds. This system was based on stones (14 lbs, traditional for weighing people and goods) rather than decimal convenience. Additionally, the "tun" (wine cask) traditionally weighed ~2,240 lbs when full, reinforcing this standard. When the Weights and Measures Act of 1824 standardized British units, lawmakers codified existing practice rather than inventing new decimal-friendly numbers. Result: An Imperial system built on 14s, 16s, 112s, and 2,240s—functional but mathematically awkward compared to the metric system's base-10 simplicity. This complexity was a major driver of global metrication in the 20th century, as decimal systems (1,000 kg tonne) are far easier for calculation and international trade.
5. Do modern British ships still use long tons?
Yes, but with caveats. The Royal Navy still officially reports warship displacement in long tons alongside metric tonnes, preserving centuries of naval tradition. Example: HMS Queen Elizabeth (2017) is listed as 65,000 long tons (~66,000 tonnes) displacement. However, merchant shipping has almost entirely switched to metric tonnes following international maritime conventions and UK metrication (1965-1990s). Modern cargo ships, tankers, and container vessels specify capacity in metric tonnes (deadweight tonnage, cargo capacity). Engineering calculations, fuel consumption, and port documentation now use metric. The Royal Navy's continued use of long tons is primarily ceremonial and historical—engineers work in metric internally, but public-facing documents honor tradition. Most Commonwealth navies (Australia, Canada, New Zealand) similarly list both units. Prediction: As older naval officers retire, long tons may eventually disappear even from Royal Navy specifications, becoming purely a historical footnote.
6. When did the UK stop using long tons officially?
The UK's transition was gradual, not instantaneous: 1965: Government announced metrication program. 1970s-1980s: Industries progressively adopted metric units. 1995: Metrication of trade largely complete; the Weights and Measures Act 1985 required most goods sold by weight to use metric. However, "official" cessation is complex: Some sectors retain long tons (e.g., Royal Navy). Road signs still use miles (not metric). Pubs serve pints (568 ml, not 500 ml metric). Thus, metrication was incomplete: "soft" metrication allowed dual units. By the late 1990s-2000s, most commerce, manufacturing, and shipping had switched to metric tonnes, making long tons rare outside specific legacy contexts. Practically, long tons ceased being the default standard around 1990-2000, but they never disappeared entirely. Older Britons still think in stones/pounds for body weight, and tonnes sometimes mentally convert to long tons. Full cultural shift may take another generation.
7. What's the difference between a long ton and a freight ton?
Long ton and freight ton (also called measurement ton) measure different things: Long ton: Unit of weight = 2,240 pounds (1,016 kg). Freight ton (measurement ton): Unit of volume = 40 cubic feet (~1.133 cubic meters). Shipping charges historically used whichever gave the higher value: weight or volume. Why? Some cargo is dense and heavy (iron ore, coal): charged by weight (long tons). Other cargo is bulky but light (cotton bales, furniture): charged by volume (freight tons). Example: 1,000 cubic feet of cotton = 25 freight tons (1,000 ÷ 40). If it weighs only 10,000 lbs = 4.46 long tons, ship charges for 25 freight tons (higher). Conversely, 1,000 cubic feet of lead = 25 freight tons. If it weighs 70,000 lbs = 31.25 long tons, ship charges for 31.25 long tons (higher). This "weight or measurement, whichever greater" rule persists in modern shipping (now using metric tonnes and cubic meters, but same principle).
8. How did metrication affect industries that relied on long tons?
Metrication required massive reengineering, retraining, and record conversion: Coal mining: Decades of production data in long tons had to be converted for comparisons. Miners trained to think in long tons had to learn metric. Modern equipment calibrated in tonnes. Shipping: Bills of lading, cargo manifests, freight rates all converted to metric tonnes. Crane capacities, ship specifications re-rated. Steel industry: Furnace capacities, production targets, quality standards converted. Historical production comparisons required conversion factors. Agriculture: Grain yields (tons per acre → tonnes per hectare), livestock weights, feed quantities. Challenges: Elderly workers unfamiliar with metric. "Rounding errors" in conversion causing disputes (1,000 long tons ≠ 1,000 tonnes). Cost of replacing scales, signage, documentation. Benefits: International trade simplified (no long ton/short ton confusion). Decimal calculations easier. Integration with scientific/engineering standards. Transition pain: 1970s-1990s saw dual labeling, calculation errors, generational confusion. By 2000s, mostly smooth, but legacy long ton data remains in archives requiring ongoing conversion skills.
9. Why do some sources say "ton" while others say "tonne"?
The spelling distinguishes metric from non-metric: "Ton" (t-o-n): Generic term, historically means long ton (UK), short ton (US), or any ton. "Tonne" (t-o-n-n-e): Specifically refers to metric ton (1,000 kg). Also written "metric ton." The extra "ne" distinguishes it. Usage: British English: Often use "tonne" for metric, "ton" for Imperial/US. American English: Usually "ton" for short ton (domestic), "metric ton" (not "tonne") for 1,000 kg. International standards: SI prefers "tonne" for 1,000 kg to avoid confusion. Pronunciation: Both pronounced identically in English (sounds like "tun"). In practice: Context usually clarifies, but precise technical writing specifies: "long ton," "short ton," "metric tonne" (or "metric ton"). Ambiguity persists: A British naval historian might write "50,000 tons" meaning long tons, while a modern cargo manifest "50,000 tonnes" means metric. Recommendation: Always specify unit explicitly in technical contexts to prevent costly errors.
10. Can I still buy things by the long ton in the UK?
Legally: No, almost impossible. The Weights and Measures Act 1985 and subsequent regulations require most goods sold by weight to use metric units (kilograms, grams, tonnes). Imperial units can be supplementary (dual labeling), but metric must be primary. Violations result in fines. Exceptions: Some traditional items (loose goods in markets) tolerated Imperial informally, but legally must be metric. Practically: No modern British shop, supplier, or merchant sells bulk commodities by the long ton. Everything is tonnes (metric): coal (if still sold for heating, rare), aggregates (gravel, sand), scrap metal, agricultural products. Why?: Suppliers, scales, invoices, and logistics all metric. Even older Britons who remember long tons accept metric in commercial contexts. Historical context: Pre-1970s, coal merchants delivered "1 ton of coal" (long ton) to homes. Now, heating oil sold in litres, firewood in cubic meters. Legacy: Long tons only appear in historical records, naval references, vintage engineering specs—not retail or commerce.
11. What industries were most resistant to abandoning the long ton?
Shipping and maritime industries were most resistant, for several reasons: 1. International standardization concerns: Shipping was already internationalized; changing units required global coordination. Royal Navy and Commonwealth navies valued continuity of displacement measurements across centuries for comparing ship classes. 2. Existing infrastructure: Shipyards, cranes, dry docks all rated in long tons. Re-rating everything expensive. 3. Cultural tradition: "Tonnage" terminology deeply embedded in maritime law, insurance, and practice. Changing felt like severing heritage. 4. Training: Mariners, naval architects, shipbuilders trained in long tons for entire careers. Coal industry also resisted: Miners, colliery managers, and coal merchants used long tons for generations. Production targets, wage calculations, and rail freight all based on long tons. However, resistance eventually failed: Economic necessity (international trade efficiency) and generational change (younger workers learned metric in school) gradually shifted all industries. By 2000s, even holdouts largely surrendered, with long tons surviving only in niche ceremonial contexts (Royal Navy traditions) and historical references.
12. How do I convert historical British data in long tons to modern metric?
Step-by-step conversion:
1. Identify that it's long tons: Historical British/Commonwealth data (pre-1990s) in "tons" almost certainly means long tons. Verify context (if US source, might be short tons).
2. Use precise conversion factor: 1 long ton = 1.01604691 metric tonnes (or 1,016.0469088 kg exactly).
3. Multiply: Long tons × 1.01604691 = metric tonnes. Example: 50 million long tons of coal (1913 UK production) × 1.01604691 = 50.802 million metric tonnes.
4. For large datasets: Use spreadsheet formula: =A1*1.01604691 where A1 is long tons.
5. Check reasonableness: Long ton is ~1.6% heavier than metric tonne, so metric number should be slightly larger. If wildly different, error likely.
6. Rounding: For historical approximation, 1 long ton ≈ 1 tonne (ignoring 1.6%) often acceptable. For trade/finance, use precise factor.
7. Document conversion: When publishing converted data, note: "Converted from long tons using factor 1.01604691."
Common pitfall: Don't use 2,240 lbs → kg conversion (introduces rounding error). Use exact long ton to metric tonne factor.
About Pound (lb)
How many ounces are in a pound?
There are exactly 16 ounces in 1 avoirdupois pound. This relationship is fundamental to the US customary weight system and has remained constant since the avoirdupois system was standardized in 13th-century England.
The 16-ounce division allows convenient fractional measurements: 1/2 pound = 8 oz, 1/4 pound = 4 oz (quarter-pounder burger), 1/8 pound = 2 oz. Food packaging commonly uses both: "1 lb (16 oz)" or "12 oz (3/4 lb)."
Converting pounds to ounces: Multiply pounds by 16
- 1 lb = 16 oz
- 2.5 lbs = 40 oz
- 0.75 lbs = 12 oz (three-quarters of a pound)
Converting ounces to pounds: Divide ounces by 16
- 32 oz = 2 lbs
- 24 oz = 1.5 lbs
- 10 oz = 0.625 lbs
Mixed notation: "5 lbs 10 oz" means 5 pounds + 10 ounces = (5 × 16) + 10 = 90 ounces total.
Important distinction: Fluid ounces (volume) and ounces (weight) are different measurements. "16 fluid ounces" of water weighs approximately 16 ounces, but 16 fluid ounces of honey weighs about 24 ounces. The context determines which "ounce" is meant.
How do I convert pounds to kilograms?
To convert pounds to kilograms, multiply by 0.45359237. This is the exact conversion factor established by the 1959 international agreement.
Formula: kilograms = pounds × 0.45359237
Examples:
- 1 lb = 0.454 kg
- 10 lbs = 4.536 kg
- 50 lbs = 22.680 kg
- 100 lbs = 45.359 kg
- 150 lbs = 68.039 kg
- 200 lbs = 90.718 kg
Quick approximation: For mental math, divide pounds by 2.2 (or multiply by 0.45):
- 100 lbs ÷ 2.2 ≈ 45.5 kg (actual: 45.36 kg)
- 150 lbs ÷ 2.2 ≈ 68.2 kg (actual: 68.04 kg)
Reverse conversion (kg to lbs): Multiply kilograms by 2.20462
- 10 kg = 22.046 lbs
- 50 kg = 110.231 lbs
- 75 kg = 165.347 lbs
For professional contexts (medical dosing, commercial trade, engineering), always use the exact conversion factor. For casual estimates ("How heavy is that in kilograms?"), dividing by 2.2 provides close enough results.
What measurement system uses pounds?
The pound (lb) is a key unit in the imperial and US customary measurement systems. While the UK officially adopted the metric system in 1965, pounds remain common for body weight, and road signs still show distances in miles. The United States uses pounds extensively across all aspects of daily life.
Where pounds are standard:
- United States: Primary weight unit for commerce, body weight, cooking, shipping
- United Kingdom: Still common for body weight (though officially metric)
- Canada: Used alongside metric, especially for body weight and produce
- Caribbean nations: Many former British colonies maintain some imperial usage
Where kilograms dominate:
- European Union countries (mandatory metric since 1960s-1990s)
- Asia (Japan, China, Korea, etc.)
- Australia and New Zealand (converted to metric 1970s)
- Latin America
- Africa (except Liberia)
Hybrid usage: Many countries officially metric still use pounds informally. UK residents often describe body weight in stones and pounds despite official metric policy. Canada labels food in both grams and ounces.
Where is the pound commonly used?
The pound is primarily used in the United States for everyday measurements. Americans use pounds for:
Personal:
- Body weight (bathroom scales, medical records)
- Baby weight ("7 pounds, 6 ounces")
- Pet weight (vet visits, food portions)
- Luggage weight (airline limits)
Commerce:
- Grocery pricing ($3.99/lb for meat, produce)
- Postal shipping (USPS rates by pound)
- Food packaging (5-lb bag of flour)
- Restaurant portions (8-oz steak, quarter-pound burger)
Industrial:
- Construction materials (80-lb bag of concrete)
- Agricultural commodities (livestock sold per pound)
- Manufacturing specifications (product weights)
- Freight shipping (charges per 100 lbs)
The United Kingdom and Canada also use pounds commonly, though officially metric. UK residents often state body weight in stones and pounds. Canadian grocery stores show prices in both $/lb and $/kg.
In aviation, pounds of thrust measure jet engine power worldwide, and pounds of fuel calculate aircraft loading, even in metric countries—similar to altitude measured in feet globally.
Why do we use "lb" for pound?
The symbol "lb" comes from the Latin word libra, meaning balance or scales, which was the Roman unit of weight. The word "pound" itself derives from Latin pondus (weight), while the abbreviation preserved the Roman unit name.
Historical explanation:
- Roman libra ≈ 329 grams (about 0.7 modern pounds)
- Medieval scholars used "lb" as the standard abbreviation
- When the avoirdupois pound (16 oz, 454g) became England's commercial standard, it retained the Roman abbreviation despite the different weight value
Modern usage:
- "lb" serves both singular and plural (1 lb, 5 lb, not "5 lbs" technically, though "lbs" is common)
- Pronounced "pound" or "pounds" despite the letters "l-b"
- Used internationally in trade: "100 lb net weight"
Related terms:
- PSI = Pounds per Square Inch (pressure)
- lb-ft = pound-feet (torque)
- lb-test = fishing line strength (pounds of force before breaking)
The disconnect between spelling (lb) and pronunciation (pound) confuses English learners, but it's deeply embedded in language. No serious proposals exist to change it—tradition preserves the Roman abbreviation despite its non-phonetic representation.
What's the difference between mass and weight in pounds?
In scientific terms, mass measures the amount of matter in an object (kilogram or pound-mass), while weight measures the gravitational force on that mass (Newton or pound-force). However, in everyday American usage, "pound" refers to both interchangeably without distinction.
Scientific definitions:
- Mass (lbm): Amount of matter, constant regardless of location
- Weight (lbf): Force due to gravity = mass × acceleration
On Earth's surface, an object with 1 pound-mass (lbm) experiences 1 pound-force (lbf) of weight. On the Moon (1/6 Earth's gravity), that 1 lbm object would weigh only 0.167 lbf—but bathroom scales there would still show "1 lb" because they're calibrated for Earth gravity.
Everyday reality: When Americans say "I weigh 150 pounds," they technically mean "I have a mass that creates 150 pounds-force on Earth." Scales measure force (weight) but display mass units (pounds) assuming Earth gravity.
Engineering context: Engineers distinguish lbm (pound-mass) from lbf (pound-force) in calculations involving acceleration, thrust, or different gravitational environments. Aerospace applications carefully track both since spacecraft experience varying gravitational forces.
Practical impact: For everyday purposes—buying meat, weighing luggage, measuring body weight—the distinction doesn't matter. All occur at Earth's surface where 1 lbm = 1 lbf. Only in scientific, aerospace, or physics contexts does the mass vs. weight distinction require precision.
How much is a stone in pounds?
One stone equals exactly 14 pounds. The stone is a British imperial unit of weight still commonly used in the UK and Ireland for human body weight, though officially replaced by kilograms in most contexts.
Common conversions:
- 1 stone = 14 lbs = 6.35 kg
- 10 stone = 140 lbs = 63.5 kg
- 12 stone = 168 lbs = 76.2 kg
- 15 stone = 210 lbs = 95.3 kg
UK usage: British people typically express body weight in stones and pounds together:
- "I weigh 11 stone 8" = 11 stone + 8 lbs = 154 + 8 = 162 lbs total
- "I've lost half a stone" = lost 7 lbs
- "I need to lose 2 stone" = need to lose 28 lbs
Historical context: The stone was standardized in 1835 at 14 pounds for weighing people. Different stone weights existed historically for various commodities: wool stone (14 lbs), meat stone (8 lbs), cheese stone (16 lbs). The 14-pound definition survived for body weight.
Modern decline: Official UK government documents and medical records now use kilograms following metrication. However, bathroom scales in UK homes often still display stones and pounds, and older generations particularly think in stones when discussing weight.
US usage: Americans rarely use stones. When British media mentions someone weighing "12 stone," American audiences need conversion to understand this means 168 lbs.
Can you mix pounds and ounces in calculations?
Yes, but you must handle them carefully to avoid errors. Pounds and ounces can be added, subtracted, multiplied, and divided, but excess ounces must convert to pounds (since 16 oz = 1 lb).
Addition/Subtraction: Add or subtract pounds and ounces separately, then convert excess ounces:
- 5 lbs 10 oz + 3 lbs 8 oz = 8 lbs 18 oz = 9 lbs 2 oz (convert 18 oz = 1 lb 2 oz)
- 7 lbs 4 oz − 2 lbs 10 oz: borrow 1 lb = 16 oz, so 7 lbs 4 oz = 6 lbs 20 oz, then 6 lbs 20 oz − 2 lbs 10 oz = 4 lbs 10 oz
Multiplication/Division: Convert entirely to ounces or decimal pounds:
- Double 3 lbs 6 oz: Convert to 54 oz, double = 108 oz = 6 lbs 12 oz
- Half of 5 lbs 10 oz: Convert to 90 oz, half = 45 oz = 2 lbs 13 oz
- Or use decimal: 5 lbs 10 oz = 5.625 lbs, half = 2.8125 lbs = 2 lbs 13 oz
Decimal conversion:
- Pounds to decimal: 5 lbs 10 oz = 5 + (10÷16) = 5.625 lbs
- Decimal to pounds-ounces: 3.75 lbs = 3 lbs + 0.75 lbs = 3 lbs + 12 oz = 3 lbs 12 oz
Kitchen scales: Many digital scales switch between decimal pounds (5.63 lbs) and pounds-ounces (5 lbs 10 oz). Use decimal for recipe scaling and math, pounds-ounces for traditional recipes and portions.
What's a "hundredweight" and how does it relate to pounds?
A hundredweight (abbreviated cwt) is a unit equal to 100 pounds in the US customary system. It's primarily used in freight shipping, agriculture, and commodity trading for pricing and calculating large quantities.
US hundredweight (short hundredweight): 100 pounds exactly
- Used in United States and Canada
- Freight rates often quote as $/cwt (dollars per hundred pounds)
- Commodity prices: livestock, grains sometimes price per cwt
UK hundredweight (long hundredweight): 112 pounds (8 stone)
- Used historically in British imperial system
- Now largely obsolete in favor of metric
- Equal to 1/20 of a UK long ton (2,240 lbs)
Practical examples:
- Freight charges: "$25/cwt" means $25 per 100 lbs
- A 500-lb shipment at $25/cwt costs 5 × $25 = $125
- Cattle pricing: "$180/cwt" means $1.80/lb; 1,200-lb steer = $2,160
Ton relationships:
- US short ton = 2,000 lbs = 20 cwt
- UK long ton = 2,240 lbs = 20 (UK) cwt
- Metric tonne = 2,204.6 lbs ≈ 22 cwt
Why it persists: Hundredweight provides convenient round numbers for commodity trading and freight pricing. Saying "$45 per hundredweight" sounds simpler than "$0.45 per pound," and multiplying weight by hundredweight rate requires fewer decimal places.
How accurate do bathroom scales measure pounds?
Typical consumer bathroom scales measure weight accurate to ±0.2-1 pound (±90-450 grams), depending on quality and calibration. This means a scale showing "150 lbs" indicates your actual weight is likely between 149-151 lbs.
Scale types and accuracy:
- Spring/mechanical scales: ±1 lb typical accuracy, can drift over time
- Basic digital scales: ±0.5 lb typical accuracy
- High-quality digital scales: ±0.2 lb accuracy (±90 grams)
- Medical-grade scales: ±0.1 lb accuracy (±50 grams)
- Laboratory balances: ±0.01 lb accuracy (±5 grams)
Factors affecting accuracy:
- Surface: Scales must sit on hard, flat, level floors; carpet adds error
- Calibration: Scales drift over time and need periodic calibration
- Battery: Low battery affects digital scale accuracy
- Temperature: Extreme temperatures alter spring tension or sensor readings
- Weight distribution: Leaning or shifting weight creates false readings
Consistency vs. accuracy: For weight tracking, consistency matters more than absolute accuracy. If your scale consistently reads 2 lbs heavy, you can still track changes accurately. Weigh yourself same time daily (morning after bathroom, before eating), same scale, same conditions.
Verification: To check scale accuracy, weigh a known weight (10-lb dumbbell, 5-lb bag of flour). If the scale shows 10.2 lbs for a 10-lb dumbbell, it's within reasonable tolerance. Differences over 0.5 lbs suggest recalibration needed.
Conversion Table: Ton (UK) to Pound
| Ton (UK) (long ton) | Pound (lb) |
|---|---|
| 0.5 | 1,120 |
| 1 | 2,240 |
| 1.5 | 3,360 |
| 2 | 4,480 |
| 5 | 11,200 |
| 10 | 22,400 |
| 25 | 56,000 |
| 50 | 112,000 |
| 100 | 224,000 |
| 250 | 560,000 |
| 500 | 1,120,000 |
| 1,000 | 2,240,000 |
People Also Ask
How do I convert Ton (UK) to Pound?
To convert Ton (UK) to Pound, enter the value in Ton (UK) in the calculator above. The conversion will happen automatically. Use our free online converter for instant and accurate results. You can also visit our weight converter page to convert between other units in this category.
Learn more →What is the conversion factor from Ton (UK) to Pound?
The conversion factor depends on the specific relationship between Ton (UK) and Pound. You can find the exact conversion formula and factor on this page. Our calculator handles all calculations automatically. See the conversion table above for common values.
Can I convert Pound back to Ton (UK)?
Yes! You can easily convert Pound back to Ton (UK) by using the swap button (⇌) in the calculator above, or by visiting our Pound to Ton (UK) converter page. You can also explore other weight conversions on our category page.
Learn more →What are common uses for Ton (UK) and Pound?
Ton (UK) and Pound are both standard units used in weight measurements. They are commonly used in various applications including engineering, construction, cooking, and scientific research. Browse our weight converter for more conversion options.
For more weight conversion questions, visit our FAQ page or explore our conversion guides.
Helpful Conversion Guides
Learn more about unit conversion with our comprehensive guides:
📚 How to Convert Units
Step-by-step guide to unit conversion with practical examples.
🔢 Conversion Formulas
Essential formulas for weight and other conversions.
⚖️ Metric vs Imperial
Understand the differences between measurement systems.
⚠️ Common Mistakes
Learn about frequent errors and how to avoid them.
All Weight Conversions
Other Weight Units and Conversions
Explore other weight units and their conversion options:
- Kilogram (kg) • Ton (UK) to Kilogram
- Gram (g) • Ton (UK) to Gram
- Milligram (mg) • Ton (UK) to Milligram
- Ounce (oz) • Ton (UK) to Ounce
- Stone (st) • Ton (UK) to Stone
- Ton (metric) (t) • Ton (UK) to Ton (metric)
- Ton (US) (ton) • Ton (UK) to Ton (US)
- Microgram (µg) • Ton (UK) to Microgram
- Carat (ct) • Ton (UK) to Carat
- Slug (sl) • Ton (UK) to Slug
Verified Against Authority Standards
All conversion formulas have been verified against international standards and authoritative sources to ensure maximum accuracy and reliability.
National Institute of Standards and Technology — US standards for weight and mass measurements
International Organization for Standardization — International standard for mechanics quantities
Last verified: December 3, 2025