Troy Ounce to Ton (UK) Converter

Convert troy ounces to long tons with our free online weight converter.

Quick Answer

1 Troy Ounce = 0.0000306 long tons

Formula: Troy Ounce × conversion factor = Ton (UK)

Use the calculator below for instant, accurate conversions.

Our Accuracy Guarantee

All conversion formulas on UnitsConverter.io have been verified against NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) guidelines and international SI standards. Our calculations are accurate to 10 decimal places for standard conversions and use arbitrary precision arithmetic for astronomical units.

Last verified: December 2025Reviewed by: Sam Mathew, Software Engineer

Troy Ounce to Ton (UK) Calculator

How to Use the Troy Ounce to Ton (UK) Calculator:

  1. Enter the value you want to convert in the 'From' field (Troy Ounce).
  2. The converted value in Ton (UK) will appear automatically in the 'To' field.
  3. Use the dropdown menus to select different units within the Weight category.
  4. Click the swap button (⇌) to reverse the conversion direction.
Share:

How to Convert Troy Ounce to Ton (UK): Step-by-Step Guide

Converting Troy Ounce to Ton (UK) involves multiplying the value by a specific conversion factor, as shown in the formula below.

Formula:

1 Troy Ounce = 0.0000306122 long tons

Example Calculation:

Convert 5 troy ounces: 5 × 0.0000306122 = 0.000153061 long tons

Disclaimer: For Reference Only

These conversion results are provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees regarding the precision of these results, especially for conversions involving extremely large or small numbers which may be subject to the inherent limitations of standard computer floating-point arithmetic.

Not for professional use. Results should be verified before use in any critical application. View our Terms of Service for more information.

What is a Troy Ounce and a Ton (UK)?

1 troy ounce = 31.1034768 grams (g) = 480 grains

The troy ounce (abbreviated "oz t", "ozt", or "t oz") is a unit of mass in the troy weight system, used exclusively for precious metals and gemstones. It differs significantly from the avoirdupois ounce used in everyday measurements.

Troy vs. Avoirdupois: Critical Distinction

| Unit | Grams | Use Cases | |----------|-----------|---------------| | Troy ounce | 31.1034768 g | Precious metals (gold, silver, platinum), gemstones, pharmaceuticals (historic) | | Avoirdupois ounce | 28.349523125 g | Food, body weight, general commerce | | Difference | +2.754 g (9.7% heavier) | Troy ounce is HEAVIER |

Critical for buyers: If someone sells you "1 ounce of gold" using avoirdupois ounces instead of troy ounces, you're getting 9.7% less metal than you paid for!

The Troy Weight System

Unlike the avoirdupois system (16 ounces = 1 pound), the troy system uses different ratios:

  • 24 grains = 1 pennyweight (dwt)
  • 20 pennyweights = 1 troy ounce (oz t)
  • 12 troy ounces = 1 troy pound (lb t)

Paradox: The troy ounce is heavier than the avoirdupois ounce, BUT the troy pound (373.24 g) is lighter than the avoirdupois pound (453.59 g) because it contains only 12 ounces instead of 16!

Why Troy Ounces Persist

Despite global metrication, troy ounces remain dominant in precious metals for these reasons:

  1. Market convention: Centuries of gold/silver trading established price benchmarks in troy ounces
  2. Legal tender: U.S. Mint, Royal Canadian Mint, and others mint official coins in troy ounce denominations
  3. Futures contracts: COMEX gold contracts specify 100 troy ounces per contract
  4. LBMA standards: London Bullion Market Association requires troy ounce quotations
  5. Central banks: Gold reserves reported in troy ounces (e.g., Fort Knox holds 147.3 million oz t)

The long ton (also called imperial ton or UK ton) is a unit of mass in the British Imperial system, officially defined as:

1 long ton = 2,240 pounds (lb) = 1,016.0469088 kilograms (kg)

Historical Definition

The long ton is based on the Imperial system's hundredweight (cwt):

1 long ton = 20 hundredweight (cwt)

  • 1 hundredweight (Imperial) = 112 pounds
  • 20 × 112 lb = 2,240 pounds

This contrasts with the US system:

  • US hundredweight = 100 pounds
  • US short ton = 20 US hundredweight = 2,000 pounds

The Three "Tons" Compared

| Ton Type | Weight in Pounds | Weight in Kilograms | Where Used | |----------|------------------|---------------------|------------| | Long Ton (UK/Imperial) | 2,240 lb | 1,016.047 kg | UK, Commonwealth (historic), naval displacement | | Short Ton (US) | 2,000 lb | 907.185 kg | United States, North America | | Metric Ton/Tonne | 2,204.62 lb | 1,000 kg (exactly) | International standard (SI-compatible) |

Difference Summary:

  • Long ton vs. short ton: 240 lbs (10.9% difference)
  • Long ton vs. metric tonne: ~16 kg (1.6% difference)
  • Short ton vs. metric tonne: ~93 kg (10.2% difference)

Why "Long" Ton?

The term "long ton" emerged in the early 20th century to distinguish the British imperial ton (2,240 lbs) from the American "short ton" (2,000 lbs). Before this, "ton" simply meant the local standard:

  • In Britain and the Empire: ton = 2,240 lbs (now called "long ton")
  • In the United States: ton = 2,000 lbs (now called "short ton")

International trade requiring clarity led to the qualifying adjectives "long" and "short."


Note: The Troy Ounce is part of the imperial/US customary system, primarily used in the US, UK, and Canada for everyday measurements. The Ton (UK) belongs to the imperial/US customary system.

History of the Troy Ounce and Ton (UK)

Ancient and Medieval Origins (Pre-1500)

The word "ounce" derives from the Latin "uncia" (one-twelfth), reflecting the Roman system where 1 uncia = 1/12 of a libra (pound). The troy system's specific origins trace to Troyes, France, a major European trade city.

12th-15th centuries - Champagne Fairs: Troyes hosted international trade fairs where merchants from Italy, Flanders, England, and German states exchanged goods. Precious metals, spices, and textiles required standardized weights. The "Troyes weight" system emerged as a trusted standard for valuable commodities, particularly gold, silver, and gemstones.

Why "troy" not "avoirdupois"? Two parallel weight systems developed:

  • Troy weights: For precious metals, spices, medicines (high-value, small quantities)
  • Avoirdupois weights: For bulk goods like wool, grain, iron (from French "avoir de pois" = goods of weight)

English Standardization (1500-1800)

1527 - King Henry VIII standardization: Henry VIII officially defined troy weights for the English realm, establishing:

  • 1 troy pound = 5,760 grains
  • 1 troy ounce = 480 grains
  • 1 grain = 64.79891 milligrams (based on barley grain weight)

1758 - British assay offices: The Goldsmiths' Company and assay offices in London, Birmingham, Sheffield, and Edinburgh used troy ounces exclusively for hallmarking gold and silver items. This reinforced troy ounces as the legal standard for precious metals in British commerce.

The Tower Pound obsolescence: England previously used the "Tower pound" for minting coins (5,400 grains), but troy weights (5,760 grains per pound) eventually replaced it in 1527, creating unified standards for bullion and coinage.

American Adoption (1776-1900)

1776-1792 - Early United States: American colonies inherited British troy standards. The early U.S. used Spanish silver dollars and British gold sovereigns, all measured in troy ounces.

1828 - U.S. Coinage Act: Congress officially adopted troy weights for all U.S. coinage. The Act specified:

  • Gold dollar = 25.8 grains (1.672 g) of 90% gold
  • Silver dollar = 412.5 grains (26.73 g) of 90% silver
  • All coins measured in troy grains

1849-1855 - California Gold Rush: The discovery of gold at Sutter's Mill created massive demand for standardized weights. Assay offices in San Francisco weighed gold dust and nuggets in troy ounces, establishing the unit in the American West.

1873 - Coinage Act ("Crime of 1873"): This act demonetized silver, ending bimetallism. However, troy ounces remained the standard for measuring both gold and silver bullion.

Global Standardization (1900-Present)

1900-1971 - The Gold Standard era: Most nations tied currencies to gold reserves, measured in troy ounces:

  • 1900: Gold Standard Act (U.S. fixed $20.67 per troy ounce)
  • 1933: FDR revalued gold to $35 per troy ounce
  • 1944: Bretton Woods Agreement ($35/oz t peg)
  • 1971: Nixon ended gold convertibility, but troy ounce pricing persisted

1919 - London Bullion Market Association (LBMA): Founded to standardize London gold market practices. LBMA established:

  • Good Delivery bars: 350-430 troy ounces (typically 400 oz t)
  • Minimum purity: 995 parts per 1,000 (99.5% pure gold)
  • Troy ounce quotations for spot prices

1974 - COMEX gold futures: The Commodity Exchange (COMEX) in New York launched gold futures contracts:

  • Contract size: 100 troy ounces
  • Delivery specifications: 1 kg bars (32.1507 oz t) or 100 oz bars
  • Global price discovery mechanism

1975 - Gold ownership legalization: U.S. citizens regained the right to own gold bullion (banned since 1933). Investment coins like the Krugerrand (1 oz t), Canadian Maple Leaf (1 oz t), and American Gold Eagle (1 oz t) popularized troy ounce denominations for retail investors.

2000s-Present - Digital age: Despite metrication, troy ounces dominate:

  • ETFs: SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) holds 900+ tons (28.9M oz t)
  • Central banks: Reserve holdings reported in troy ounces (U.S. 261.5M oz t, Germany 108.9M oz t)
  • Spot prices: Bloomberg, Reuters, Kitco quote gold/silver per troy ounce
  • Refineries: Swiss refiners (PAMP, Valcambi) produce bars in troy ounce sizes

Cultural Significance

The troy ounce represents continuity in global finance—a medieval trade standard that survived the industrial revolution, world wars, and digital transformation. While most historical units vanished with metrication, the troy ounce persists because precious metals markets value tradition, legal precedent, and universal standardization over decimal convenience.

of the Long Ton

Medieval Origins: The Tun (c. 1200-1500)

The Wine Trade:

  • The word "ton" derives from "tun" (Old English tunne, Middle English tonne), meaning a large cask or barrel
  • A tun was a standard wine cask in medieval England holding approximately 252 wine gallons (~954 liters, 210 Imperial gallons)
  • When filled with wine, a tun weighed roughly 2,240 pounds, establishing the weight association

Early Standardization Attempts:

  • 13th-14th centuries: English merchants used "ton" for both volume (liquids) and weight (bulk goods)
  • Different commodities had varying ton definitions:
    • Wool ton: Weight needed to fill shipping space (variable)
    • Coal ton: Weight-based measurement
    • Freight ton: Volume-based (40 cubic feet)

The Problem of Multiple Tons:

  • Confusion in trade due to inconsistent ton definitions
  • Disputes over cargo weight vs. volume
  • Regional variations across England and continental Europe

Standardization: The Weights and Measures Act of 1824

Imperial System Codification:

  • 1824: British Parliament passed the Weights and Measures Act under King George IV
  • Unified and standardized British weights and measures across the Empire
  • Officially defined the imperial ton as 2,240 pounds
  • Based on existing practice: 20 hundredweight of 112 pounds each

Why 2,240 Pounds? The choice reflected established commercial practice:

  • 1 hundredweight (cwt) = 112 pounds (8 stones × 14 pounds)
  • 20 hundredweight = 2,240 pounds
  • This matched the traditional weight of a tun of wine
  • Integrated with existing Imperial units (stones, pounds, ounces)

Imperial Hundredweight System:

  • 1 stone = 14 pounds
  • 1 hundredweight = 8 stones = 112 pounds
  • 1 ton = 20 hundredweight = 160 stones = 2,240 pounds

British Empire and Global Commerce (1824-1945)

Dominance of British Shipping:

  • 19th century: Britain controlled ~60-70% of world merchant shipping tonnage
  • British shipping companies used long tons for:
    • Cargo capacity (deadweight tonnage)
    • Ship displacement (weight of water displaced)
    • Freight charges (cost per ton)

The Coal Trade:

  • British coal powered the Industrial Revolution
  • Coal universally measured in long tons
  • Newcastle coal trade: Millions of long tons exported annually
  • Coal exports to Europe, Americas, Asia all priced in long tons

Naval Architecture:

  • Displacement tonnage: Weight of water displaced by a floating ship, measured in long tons
  • Used to classify warship size: "10,000-ton cruiser," "50,000-ton battleship"
  • Standard in Royal Navy and Commonwealth navies
  • Example: HMS Dreadnought (1906): ~18,000 long tons displacement

Imperial Commodity Trade:

  • Iron and steel: British iron production measured in long tons
  • Grain: Commonwealth grain shipments (wheat, barley) in long tons
  • Rubber, cotton, wool: Plantation exports measured in long tons
  • Freight rates: Shipping costs typically £X per long ton

Global Adoption:

  • British commercial dominance spread long ton usage
  • Bills of lading (shipping documents) in long tons
  • Maritime insurance: Cargo value calculated per long ton
  • Port records: Cargo throughput recorded in long tons

American Divergence: The Short Ton

US Measurement Evolution:

  • Early America inherited British Imperial units
  • By mid-19th century, US customary system diverged
  • Americans adopted a 100-pound hundredweight (simpler decimal-friendly base)
  • US ton = 20 US hundredweight = 20 × 100 lb = 2,000 pounds (the "short ton")

Why the Difference?

  • Simplicity: 100-pound hundredweight easier for calculation
  • Independence: Post-colonial desire for distinct American standards
  • Internal trade: US domestic commerce didn't require British compatibility

Terminology:

  • Originally, both were simply called "ton" in their respective countries
  • Early 20th century: International trade necessitated distinction
    • British ton → "long ton"
    • American ton → "short ton"

The Rise of the Metric Tonne (1875-Present)

Metric System Development:

  • 1875: Metric Convention established international metric standards
  • Metric tonne (or ton) defined as 1,000 kilograms (exactly)
  • Decimal-based, simple, scientifically rational

Advantages Over Long/Short Tons:

  • Exact decimal definition: 1 tonne = 1,000 kg (no fractions)
  • Universal: Not tied to any national system
  • SI-compatible: Integrates with scientific units
  • Easier calculation: Decimal arithmetic vs. 2,240-pound conversions

Global Metrication Wave (1960s-1990s):

United Kingdom:

  • 1965: UK government announced metrication program
  • 1970s-1980s: Gradual transition in trade, industry, and commerce
  • 1995: Most commercial transactions legally required to use metric units
  • Long ton legacy: Persists in road signs (distances/heights) and some traditional contexts

Commonwealth Nations:

  • Australia: Metrication 1970s, completed by 1988
  • Canada: Metrication 1970s, officially adopted 1977-1980
  • New Zealand: Metrication 1969-1976
  • India: Adopted metric system post-independence (1947-1960s)
  • South Africa: Metrication 1970s

Shipping and Maritime:

  • International Maritime Organization (IMO): Encouraged metric units
  • Modern cargo manifests typically in metric tonnes
  • Shipping contracts, freight rates increasingly metric

Contemporary Usage (1990s-Present)

Where the Long Ton Survives:

1. Naval Displacement (UK and Commonwealth):

  • Royal Navy still reports warship displacement in long tons (alongside metric)
  • Royal Australian Navy, Royal Canadian Navy, Royal New Zealand Navy: Use long tons traditionally
  • Example: HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier: ~65,000 long tons full load displacement

2. Historical Records:

  • Pre-1990s British commercial records in long tons
  • Archival shipping manifests, trade statistics, industrial production data
  • Converting historical data requires long ton knowledge

3. Certain Industries:

  • Some maritime insurance policies reference long tons in older contracts
  • Vintage engineering specifications (bridges, railways built pre-metrication)
  • Mining records: Historical coal, iron ore output

4. United States Context:

  • When Americans refer to British/Commonwealth historical data, they may encounter long tons
  • Rare in modern US usage (Americans use short tons domestically)

Gradual Obsolescence:

  • Most modern international trade: metric tonnes
  • Younger generations in UK/Commonwealth unfamiliar with long tons
  • Likely to become purely historical unit within decades

Common Uses and Applications: troy ounces vs long tons

Explore the typical applications for both Troy Ounce (imperial/US) and Ton (UK) (imperial/US) to understand their common contexts.

Common Uses for troy ounces

1. Precious Metals Trading

The troy ounce is the universal standard for global bullion markets:

Spot price quotations:

  • Gold: $1,800-2,100 per troy ounce (fluctuates with markets)
  • Silver: $20-30 per oz t
  • Platinum: $900-1,200 per oz t
  • Palladium: $1,000-1,600 per oz t
  • Rhodium: $3,000-15,000 per oz t (highest volatility)

Major markets:

  • London Bullion Market (LBMA): Sets gold/silver fix twice daily in troy ounces
  • COMEX (New York): Futures contracts (100 oz t gold, 5,000 oz t silver)
  • Shanghai Gold Exchange: Trades gold in grams but converts to oz t for international quotes
  • Dubai Gold Souk: Retail sales in grams, wholesale in troy ounces

Why troy ounces persist: Centuries of price history, legal contracts, and central bank reserves create network effects—changing to grams would require recalibrating trillions in financial instruments.

2. Investment Coins & Bars

Government minted coins (1 oz troy):

  • American Gold Eagle: Most popular U.S. bullion coin, 22K gold
  • Canadian Maple Leaf: 24K gold (.9999 fine), iconic design
  • South African Krugerrand: First modern bullion coin (1967)
  • Austrian Philharmonic: European alternative, euro-denominated
  • Chinese Gold Panda: Annual design changes, collector value

Fractional coins:

  • 1/2 oz, 1/4 oz, 1/10 oz troy ounce denominations
  • Higher premiums per ounce (manufacturing costs)
  • Easier to liquidate small amounts

Private mint bars:

  • 1 oz, 10 oz, 100 oz troy ounce sizes (silver)
  • 1 oz, 10 oz, 1 kg gold bars
  • Lower premiums than coins (no numismatic value)
  • Stackability for storage

3. Jewelry Manufacturing

Jewelers purchase gold in troy ounces but often work in grams or pennyweights (dwt):

Pricing structure:

  1. Spot price: Current troy ounce price (e.g., $2,000/oz)
  2. Karat adjustment: 14K = 58.3%, 18K = 75%, 22K = 91.67%
  3. Fabrication cost: Labor, design, gemstones
  4. Retail markup: 2-3× material cost

Example calculation (14K ring):

  • Weight: 5 grams = 0.16075 oz t
  • Pure gold: 0.16075 × 0.583 = 0.0938 oz t
  • Gold value: 0.0938 × $2,000 = $187.60
  • Retail price: $500-800 (includes labor, overhead, profit)

Scrap gold recycling: Jewelers sell scrap in troy ounces to refineries, receiving 90-95% of spot price (refining losses, processing fees).

4. Pharmaceutical & Apothecary (Historic)

Before metrication, pharmacists used troy weights for compounding:

Apothecaries' system:

  • 20 grains = 1 scruple
  • 3 scruples = 1 dram
  • 8 drams = 1 troy ounce

Modern legacy:

  • Grain measurements persist (aspirin: 5 grains = 325 mg)
  • Troy ounces phased out in medicine by 1970s
  • Replaced by milligrams and grams for precision

5. Mining & Geology

Gold production and ore grades measured in troy ounces:

Reserve reporting:

  • Gold deposits: "10 million oz t at 2 g/t grade" (metric tons ore, troy ounces gold)
  • Production rates: "500,000 oz t per year" (annual mine output)

Ore grades:

  • High-grade: 10-20 g/t (0.32-0.64 oz t per metric ton ore)
  • Low-grade: 1-5 g/t (0.032-0.16 oz t/t)
  • Ultra-low-grade: 0.5 g/t (economical with modern extraction)

Example (Nevada Gold Mine):

  • Reserves: 50 million metric tons
  • Grade: 2 g/t (0.064 oz t/t)
  • Contained gold: 3.2 million troy ounces
  • Mine life: 15 years (213,000 oz t/year production)

6. Central Banking & Reserves

Countries hold gold reserves measured in troy ounces:

Reserve valuation: Most central banks value gold at historic cost ($42.22/oz t, a 1973 price), not market rates. However, market value uses current spot prices:

  • U.S. reserves: 261.5M oz t × $2,000 = $523 billion market value
  • Official books: 261.5M oz t × $42.22 = $11 billion (!)

Reserve diversification:

  • Gold as % of reserves: U.S. (70%), Germany (67%), Italy (64%)
  • Rationale: Inflation hedge, currency crisis protection, geopolitical insurance

7. Collectibles & Numismatics

Coin collectors distinguish between bullion value (troy ounces) and numismatic value (rarity, condition):

Example: 1933 Double Eagle

  • Gold content: 0.9675 oz t (~$1,935 melt value)
  • Auction price: $18.9 million (2021 Sotheby's)
  • Numismatic premium: 9,700× bullion value!

Modern bullion vs. collectible:

  • Bullion: Trades at spot + 3-10% premium (1 oz Gold Eagle)
  • Collectible: Rare dates, low mintages command 2-100× premiums

When to Use long tons

of the Long Ton in Modern Contexts

1. Naval and Maritime History

Researchers, naval historians, and museum curators working with historical ships and maritime records must understand long tons:

  • Ship specifications: Displacement, cargo capacity, fuel capacity
  • Archival documents: Shipping manifests, port records, naval reports
  • Comparative analysis: Comparing historical ships to modern vessels
  • Museum exhibits: HMS Victory, USS Constitution, RMS Titanic displays

Example: Understanding that HMS Hood's 42,000 long ton displacement = ~42,672 metric tonnes helps compare to modern carriers.

2. Royal Navy and Commonwealth Navies

British and Commonwealth naval forces still reference long tons:

  • Official displacement figures: Warships listed in long tons (with metric equivalent)
  • Naval doctrine: Historical continuity in naval architecture
  • Training: Naval officers learn both systems
  • Public relations: Press releases may include long ton figures for tradition

Modern Practice: Usually list both: "HMS Queen Elizabeth: 65,000 long tons (66,000 tonnes)"

3. Historical Research and Archives

Historians studying British Empire, Industrial Revolution, or maritime trade encounter long tons constantly:

  • Economic history: Production statistics (coal, iron, steel, ships)
  • Trade records: Import/export volumes
  • Infrastructure: Railway freight, canal cargo
  • Colonial economies: Plantation outputs (sugar, rubber, cotton)

Conversion Necessity: Comparing 19th-century British data (long tons) with modern data (metric tonnes) requires accurate conversion.

4. Vintage Engineering and Restoration

Engineers working with historic structures, machinery, or vehicles:

  • Bridge load ratings: Victorian bridges specified in long tons
  • Crane capacities: Historic cranes rated in long tons
  • Railway heritage: Steam locomotives, heritage railways use long tons
  • Industrial archaeology: Historic factories, mines with long ton specifications

Safety: Modern safety assessments must convert long ton ratings to metric.

5. Commodity Markets and Legal Documents

Occasionally, older contracts or legal documents reference long tons:

  • Mining leases: Historic coal, iron ore extraction rights
  • Shipping contracts: Old freight agreements still in force
  • Insurance policies: Maritime insurance with long ton clauses
  • Property deeds: Historical rights to extract/transport X long tons

Legal interpretation: Courts may need to convert long tons for enforcement.

6. Education and Reference

Students and general public encounter long tons in:

  • History textbooks: British industrial production, maritime trade
  • War histories: Shipping losses, munitions production
  • Biographies: Figures like Brunel (engineering), Nelson (naval)
  • Documentaries: Maritime history, industrial heritage

Confusion: Many confuse long ton, short ton, metric tonne without understanding differences.

7. International Trade (Rare, Legacy Contexts)

Very occasionally, long tons appear in:

  • UK-Commonwealth trade: Older business relationships honoring traditional units
  • Specific commodities: Niche markets with historical ties
  • Contracts: Long-standing agreements referencing long tons

Trend: Rapidly disappearing as metrication completes and older contracts expire.


Additional Unit Information

About Troy Ounce (oz t)

1. Is a troy ounce the same as a regular ounce?

No. The troy ounce (31.1035 g) is about 9.7% heavier than the avoirdupois ounce (28.3495 g) used for food and general items.

Visual comparison:

  • 1 troy ounce gold = Size of a large grape (but very dense)
  • 1 avoirdupois ounce flour = Same volume but less mass

When it matters: Precious metals (gold, silver, platinum) always use troy ounces. If someone offers you "1 ounce of gold" at a suspiciously low price, verify it's troy ounces—not avoirdupois!

2. How many grams are in a troy ounce?

Exactly 31.1034768 grams.

This precise definition comes from the 1959 international agreement on units. It's the same globally—LBMA (London), COMEX (New York), and Shanghai Gold Exchange all use this exact conversion.

For practical purposes:

  • 1 troy oz ≈ 31.1 grams (rounded)
  • 10 troy oz ≈ 311 grams
  • 32.15 troy oz = 1 kilogram (exactly 1,000 g)

3. How many troy ounces are in a troy pound?

12 troy ounces = 1 troy pound (373.24 grams).

This differs from the avoirdupois system where 16 ounces = 1 pound. The troy system uses base-12 (duodecimal), a remnant of Roman and medieval counting systems.

Paradox explained:

  • Troy ounce (31.10 g) > Avoirdupois ounce (28.35 g)
  • BUT Troy pound (373.24 g) < Avoirdupois pound (453.59 g)

Why: 12 × 31.10 = 373.24, while 16 × 28.35 = 453.59.

4. Why do precious metals use troy ounces instead of grams?

Historical inertia and market convention.

Reasons troy ounces persist:

  1. Centuries of price data: Gold has been priced per troy ounce since the 1700s. Changing would break historical charts and analysis.

  2. Legal tender and contracts: U.S. Mint, Canadian Mint, and others legally define coins in troy ounces. Futures contracts, options, and derivatives are denominated in oz t.

  3. Central bank reserves: Fort Knox holds "147.3 million troy ounces," not "4,582.7 metric tons"—the legal records use troy ounces.

  4. Network effects: If London uses oz t, New York must too. Shanghai converts grams to oz t for international quotes.

  5. Cultural identity: "An ounce of gold" evokes tangibility. "31.1 grams of gold" lacks the same resonance.

Metrication attempts failed: France and other metric-first countries tried quoting gold in grams, but international traders kept converting back to oz t for comparison.

5. How much is 1 troy ounce of gold worth?

It fluctuates constantly. As of 2024, gold trades between $1,800 - $2,100 per troy ounce, depending on economic conditions.

Price drivers:

  • Inflation fears: Gold rises when currency value erodes
  • Interest rates: Low rates → gold attractive (no yield anyway)
  • Geopolitical crises: Wars, sanctions boost safe-haven demand
  • Central bank buying: China, Russia, Turkey accumulating reserves
  • Jewelry demand: India, China seasonal festivals

Historical context:

  • 1900: $20.67/oz (Gold Standard Act)
  • 1971: $35/oz (Nixon Shock, end of Bretton Woods)
  • 1980: $850/oz (Hunt Brothers silver crisis, inflation)
  • 2011: $1,900/oz (Financial crisis aftermath)
  • 2020: $2,067/oz (COVID-19 pandemic peak)

Real-time prices: Check Bloomberg, Reuters, Kitco, or bullion dealer sites.

6. What's the difference between "carat" and "karat"?

Completely different units—one measures weight, the other purity:

CARAT (ct) = Gemstone weight

  • 1 carat = 200 milligrams = 0.00643 troy ounces
  • Measures diamonds, rubies, sapphires, emeralds
  • "5-carat diamond" = 1 gram weight

KARAT (K or kt) = Gold purity

  • 24K = 100% pure gold
  • 18K = 75% gold (18/24)
  • 14K = 58.3% gold (14/24)
  • Measures alloy composition, not weight

Example: "18K gold ring weighing 0.2 troy ounces" means:

  • Karat: 75% pure (18/24)
  • Weight: 0.2 oz t = 6.22 g total
  • Pure gold: 0.15 oz t = 4.67 g (6.22 × 0.75)

7. Can I buy fractional troy ounces?

Yes! Governments and private mints produce fractional coins:

Common sizes:

  • 1/10 oz t (3.11 g) — Popular for small investors
  • 1/4 oz t (7.78 g)
  • 1/2 oz t (15.55 g)
  • 1 oz t (31.10 g) — Most popular size

Trade-offs:

  • Pros: Lower entry cost ($200 for 1/10 oz vs. $2,000 for 1 oz), easier to liquidate small amounts
  • Cons: Higher premiums per ounce (1/10 oz costs ~15% premium vs. 3-5% for 1 oz)

Example:

  • 1 oz Gold Eagle: $2,050 ($50 premium over $2,000 spot = 2.5%)
  • 1/10 oz Gold Eagle: $240 ($40 premium over $200 spot = 20%!)

Why higher premiums? Minting costs don't scale linearly. Striking a 1/10 oz coin costs almost as much as a 1 oz coin, so the percentage premium is higher.

8. What is a "Good Delivery" gold bar?

The international standard for large-scale gold bullion, set by the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA).

Specifications:

  • Weight: 350-430 troy ounces (typically 400 oz t = 12.4 kg)
  • Purity: Minimum 995 parts per 1,000 (99.5% pure gold)
  • Fineness stamp: Refinery mark, serial number, purity, year
  • Refiners: LBMA-approved list (~70 refineries: PAMP, Valcambi, Rand, Johnson Matthey)

Why "Good Delivery"? Before standardization, banks had to assay every bar (costly, time-consuming). LBMA Good Delivery certification means bars are universally accepted without re-assaying.

Where they're used:

  • Central bank reserves (Fort Knox, Bank of England vaults)
  • Commercial bank vaults (HSBC, JPMorgan)
  • ETF backing (SPDR Gold Shares stores Good Delivery bars)

Retail availability: Most investors never see Good Delivery bars—they're institutional. Retail investors buy 1 oz coins or small bars (1 oz, 10 oz, 100 oz).

9. How do I convert troy ounces to kilograms?

Formula:

1 troy ounce = 0.0311034768 kilograms
OR
1 kilogram = 32.1507466 troy ounces

Quick method: Divide troy ounces by 32.15 to get kilograms:

400 oz t ÷ 32.15 ≈ 12.44 kg

Precise method: Multiply troy ounces by 0.0311034768:

400 oz t × 0.0311034768 = 12.44139072 kg (EXACT)

Common conversions:

  • 1 oz t = 0.0311 kg
  • 10 oz t = 0.311 kg
  • 100 oz t = 3.11 kg
  • 1,000 oz t = 31.1 kg
  • 32.15 oz t = 1 kg (exactly 1,000 g)

10. What's the smallest amount of gold I can buy?

Technically, you can buy any amount, but practical minimums exist:

Physical gold:

  • Smallest coins: 1/10 oz t (~$200-250)
  • Gold jewelry: Varies, but 14K chains start around $100-200 (contains ~0.05 oz t pure gold)
  • Gold leaf: Decorative, negligible weight (~0.001 oz t per sheet)

Paper gold (no physical delivery):

  • Gold ETFs (GLD, IAU): 1 share ≈ 0.1 oz t (~$200)
  • Fractional platforms (OneGold, Vaulted): Buy as little as $1 worth (0.0005 oz t)
  • Futures contracts: 100 oz t minimum (~$200,000—professional traders only)

Recommendation for beginners: Start with 1/4 oz or 1/2 oz coins (balance between affordability and premiums). Avoid tiny fractions (1/20 oz) due to extremely high premiums.

11. How do jewelers measure gold?

Three units, depending on context:

  1. Troy ounces (oz t): Buying gold from refineries, calculating melt value
  2. Pennyweights (dwt): Traditional unit (1 oz t = 20 dwt, 1 dwt = 1.555 g)
  3. Grams (g): Modern standard, easier math

Example (jeweler selling 14K scrap):

  • Weighs scrap: 25.5 grams
  • Converts to troy ounces: 25.5 ÷ 31.1 = 0.82 oz t
  • Calculates pure gold: 0.82 × 0.583 (14K) = 0.478 oz t
  • Refinery pays: 0.478 × $2,000 × 0.95 = $908 (95% of spot, 5% refining fee)

Pennyweight legacy: Older jewelers still use "dwt" for historic reasons. Most modern shops use grams for precision.

12. Why are central banks buying more gold?

Diversification away from the U.S. dollar and geopolitical hedging.

Key drivers:

  1. De-dollarization: Russia, China, Turkey reducing USD reserves after sanctions
  2. Inflation hedge: 2020-2024 inflation spikes drove safe-haven demand
  3. Currency debasement fears: Massive money printing (COVID stimulus) erodes fiat value
  4. Geopolitical tensions: Ukraine war, Taiwan tensions increase reserve gold holdings

Recent trends (2020-2024):

  • China: Added 300+ tons (9.6M oz t) in 2023 alone
  • Russia: Doubled reserves to 2,300 tons (74M oz t) before Ukraine war
  • Poland: Increased from 103 to 228 tons (7.3M oz t)
  • Singapore: Tripled reserves to 230 tons (7.4M oz t)

Why troy ounces matter: Central bank transactions are reported in troy ounces (IMF, World Gold Council standards), even though storage is often measured in metric tons.

About Ton (UK) (long ton)

1. How many pounds are in a UK Ton (Long Ton)?

There are exactly 2,240 pounds in 1 UK long ton. This derives from the Imperial system's definition: 1 long ton = 20 hundredweight, and 1 Imperial hundredweight = 112 pounds, so 20 × 112 = 2,240 pounds. This standard was codified in the British Weights and Measures Act of 1824 and became the official weight unit across the British Empire for shipping, coal trade, and bulk commodities. The 2,240-pound long ton originated from the traditional weight of a "tun" (large wine cask) when filled, which medieval merchants found convenient for maritime commerce. Today, while largely replaced by metric tonnes in most contexts, the 2,240-pound definition remains unchanged in the few areas where long tons are still used, particularly Royal Navy ship displacement measurements.

2. Is a UK Ton larger than a US Ton?

Yes, a UK long ton (2,240 lb / 1,016 kg) is 12% larger than a US short ton (2,000 lb / 907 kg)—specifically, 240 pounds heavier. This difference arose because the UK retained the traditional 112-pound Imperial hundredweight (20 cwt = 2,240 lb), while the US adopted a simplified 100-pound hundredweight (20 cwt = 2,000 lb) in the 19th century. The 12% difference is significant in large-scale commerce: 10,000 US short tons = 8,929 UK long tons (a shortfall of 1,071 long tons). This discrepancy caused confusion in transatlantic trade, requiring contracts to specify "long tons" or "short tons" explicitly. The metric tonne (1,000 kg) was partly adopted internationally to eliminate this Anglo-American ambiguity, being nearly equal to the long ton (1.6% lighter) but defined in the universal decimal system.

3. How does the UK Ton compare to the metric ton?

A UK long ton (1,016.047 kg) is 1.6% heavier than a metric tonne (1,000 kg)—specifically, ~16 kg or ~35 pounds heavier. This near-equivalence made conversion relatively straightforward during metrication: 1 long ton ≈ 1.016 tonnes, and 1 tonne ≈ 0.984 long tons. For rough estimates, many treated them as approximately equal, but precision trade required exact conversion (error of 1.6% matters for large shipments). Example: 100,000 long tons = 101,605 metric tonnes (1,605-tonne difference). The metric tonne's advantage: exact decimal definition (1,000 kg) integrates seamlessly with SI units, whereas the long ton (2,240 lbs, odd historical number) requires complex conversions. Despite metrication, some UK contexts preserve long tons: Royal Navy still reports ship displacement in long tons alongside metric figures, maintaining centuries of naval tradition.

4. Why did Britain use 2,240 pounds instead of a round number?

The 2,240-pound definition arose organically from medieval commerce, not rational design. It derives from the Imperial hundredweight system: 1 cwt = 8 stones = 8 × 14 lbs = 112 pounds. Twenty hundredweight = 20 × 112 = 2,240 pounds. This system was based on stones (14 lbs, traditional for weighing people and goods) rather than decimal convenience. Additionally, the "tun" (wine cask) traditionally weighed ~2,240 lbs when full, reinforcing this standard. When the Weights and Measures Act of 1824 standardized British units, lawmakers codified existing practice rather than inventing new decimal-friendly numbers. Result: An Imperial system built on 14s, 16s, 112s, and 2,240s—functional but mathematically awkward compared to the metric system's base-10 simplicity. This complexity was a major driver of global metrication in the 20th century, as decimal systems (1,000 kg tonne) are far easier for calculation and international trade.

5. Do modern British ships still use long tons?

Yes, but with caveats. The Royal Navy still officially reports warship displacement in long tons alongside metric tonnes, preserving centuries of naval tradition. Example: HMS Queen Elizabeth (2017) is listed as 65,000 long tons (~66,000 tonnes) displacement. However, merchant shipping has almost entirely switched to metric tonnes following international maritime conventions and UK metrication (1965-1990s). Modern cargo ships, tankers, and container vessels specify capacity in metric tonnes (deadweight tonnage, cargo capacity). Engineering calculations, fuel consumption, and port documentation now use metric. The Royal Navy's continued use of long tons is primarily ceremonial and historical—engineers work in metric internally, but public-facing documents honor tradition. Most Commonwealth navies (Australia, Canada, New Zealand) similarly list both units. Prediction: As older naval officers retire, long tons may eventually disappear even from Royal Navy specifications, becoming purely a historical footnote.

6. When did the UK stop using long tons officially?

The UK's transition was gradual, not instantaneous: 1965: Government announced metrication program. 1970s-1980s: Industries progressively adopted metric units. 1995: Metrication of trade largely complete; the Weights and Measures Act 1985 required most goods sold by weight to use metric. However, "official" cessation is complex: Some sectors retain long tons (e.g., Royal Navy). Road signs still use miles (not metric). Pubs serve pints (568 ml, not 500 ml metric). Thus, metrication was incomplete: "soft" metrication allowed dual units. By the late 1990s-2000s, most commerce, manufacturing, and shipping had switched to metric tonnes, making long tons rare outside specific legacy contexts. Practically, long tons ceased being the default standard around 1990-2000, but they never disappeared entirely. Older Britons still think in stones/pounds for body weight, and tonnes sometimes mentally convert to long tons. Full cultural shift may take another generation.

7. What's the difference between a long ton and a freight ton?

Long ton and freight ton (also called measurement ton) measure different things: Long ton: Unit of weight = 2,240 pounds (1,016 kg). Freight ton (measurement ton): Unit of volume = 40 cubic feet (~1.133 cubic meters). Shipping charges historically used whichever gave the higher value: weight or volume. Why? Some cargo is dense and heavy (iron ore, coal): charged by weight (long tons). Other cargo is bulky but light (cotton bales, furniture): charged by volume (freight tons). Example: 1,000 cubic feet of cotton = 25 freight tons (1,000 ÷ 40). If it weighs only 10,000 lbs = 4.46 long tons, ship charges for 25 freight tons (higher). Conversely, 1,000 cubic feet of lead = 25 freight tons. If it weighs 70,000 lbs = 31.25 long tons, ship charges for 31.25 long tons (higher). This "weight or measurement, whichever greater" rule persists in modern shipping (now using metric tonnes and cubic meters, but same principle).

8. How did metrication affect industries that relied on long tons?

Metrication required massive reengineering, retraining, and record conversion: Coal mining: Decades of production data in long tons had to be converted for comparisons. Miners trained to think in long tons had to learn metric. Modern equipment calibrated in tonnes. Shipping: Bills of lading, cargo manifests, freight rates all converted to metric tonnes. Crane capacities, ship specifications re-rated. Steel industry: Furnace capacities, production targets, quality standards converted. Historical production comparisons required conversion factors. Agriculture: Grain yields (tons per acre → tonnes per hectare), livestock weights, feed quantities. Challenges: Elderly workers unfamiliar with metric. "Rounding errors" in conversion causing disputes (1,000 long tons ≠ 1,000 tonnes). Cost of replacing scales, signage, documentation. Benefits: International trade simplified (no long ton/short ton confusion). Decimal calculations easier. Integration with scientific/engineering standards. Transition pain: 1970s-1990s saw dual labeling, calculation errors, generational confusion. By 2000s, mostly smooth, but legacy long ton data remains in archives requiring ongoing conversion skills.

9. Why do some sources say "ton" while others say "tonne"?

The spelling distinguishes metric from non-metric: "Ton" (t-o-n): Generic term, historically means long ton (UK), short ton (US), or any ton. "Tonne" (t-o-n-n-e): Specifically refers to metric ton (1,000 kg). Also written "metric ton." The extra "ne" distinguishes it. Usage: British English: Often use "tonne" for metric, "ton" for Imperial/US. American English: Usually "ton" for short ton (domestic), "metric ton" (not "tonne") for 1,000 kg. International standards: SI prefers "tonne" for 1,000 kg to avoid confusion. Pronunciation: Both pronounced identically in English (sounds like "tun"). In practice: Context usually clarifies, but precise technical writing specifies: "long ton," "short ton," "metric tonne" (or "metric ton"). Ambiguity persists: A British naval historian might write "50,000 tons" meaning long tons, while a modern cargo manifest "50,000 tonnes" means metric. Recommendation: Always specify unit explicitly in technical contexts to prevent costly errors.

10. Can I still buy things by the long ton in the UK?

Legally: No, almost impossible. The Weights and Measures Act 1985 and subsequent regulations require most goods sold by weight to use metric units (kilograms, grams, tonnes). Imperial units can be supplementary (dual labeling), but metric must be primary. Violations result in fines. Exceptions: Some traditional items (loose goods in markets) tolerated Imperial informally, but legally must be metric. Practically: No modern British shop, supplier, or merchant sells bulk commodities by the long ton. Everything is tonnes (metric): coal (if still sold for heating, rare), aggregates (gravel, sand), scrap metal, agricultural products. Why?: Suppliers, scales, invoices, and logistics all metric. Even older Britons who remember long tons accept metric in commercial contexts. Historical context: Pre-1970s, coal merchants delivered "1 ton of coal" (long ton) to homes. Now, heating oil sold in litres, firewood in cubic meters. Legacy: Long tons only appear in historical records, naval references, vintage engineering specs—not retail or commerce.

11. What industries were most resistant to abandoning the long ton?

Shipping and maritime industries were most resistant, for several reasons: 1. International standardization concerns: Shipping was already internationalized; changing units required global coordination. Royal Navy and Commonwealth navies valued continuity of displacement measurements across centuries for comparing ship classes. 2. Existing infrastructure: Shipyards, cranes, dry docks all rated in long tons. Re-rating everything expensive. 3. Cultural tradition: "Tonnage" terminology deeply embedded in maritime law, insurance, and practice. Changing felt like severing heritage. 4. Training: Mariners, naval architects, shipbuilders trained in long tons for entire careers. Coal industry also resisted: Miners, colliery managers, and coal merchants used long tons for generations. Production targets, wage calculations, and rail freight all based on long tons. However, resistance eventually failed: Economic necessity (international trade efficiency) and generational change (younger workers learned metric in school) gradually shifted all industries. By 2000s, even holdouts largely surrendered, with long tons surviving only in niche ceremonial contexts (Royal Navy traditions) and historical references.

12. How do I convert historical British data in long tons to modern metric?

Step-by-step conversion:

1. Identify that it's long tons: Historical British/Commonwealth data (pre-1990s) in "tons" almost certainly means long tons. Verify context (if US source, might be short tons).

2. Use precise conversion factor: 1 long ton = 1.01604691 metric tonnes (or 1,016.0469088 kg exactly).

3. Multiply: Long tons × 1.01604691 = metric tonnes. Example: 50 million long tons of coal (1913 UK production) × 1.01604691 = 50.802 million metric tonnes.

4. For large datasets: Use spreadsheet formula: =A1*1.01604691 where A1 is long tons.

5. Check reasonableness: Long ton is ~1.6% heavier than metric tonne, so metric number should be slightly larger. If wildly different, error likely.

6. Rounding: For historical approximation, 1 long ton ≈ 1 tonne (ignoring 1.6%) often acceptable. For trade/finance, use precise factor.

7. Document conversion: When publishing converted data, note: "Converted from long tons using factor 1.01604691."

Common pitfall: Don't use 2,240 lbs → kg conversion (introduces rounding error). Use exact long ton to metric tonne factor.


Conversion Table: Troy Ounce to Ton (UK)

Troy Ounce (oz t)Ton (UK) (long ton)
0.50
10
1.50
20
50
100
250.001
500.002
1000.003
2500.008
5000.015
1,0000.031

People Also Ask

How do I convert Troy Ounce to Ton (UK)?

To convert Troy Ounce to Ton (UK), enter the value in Troy Ounce in the calculator above. The conversion will happen automatically. Use our free online converter for instant and accurate results. You can also visit our weight converter page to convert between other units in this category.

Learn more →

What is the conversion factor from Troy Ounce to Ton (UK)?

The conversion factor depends on the specific relationship between Troy Ounce and Ton (UK). You can find the exact conversion formula and factor on this page. Our calculator handles all calculations automatically. See the conversion table above for common values.

Can I convert Ton (UK) back to Troy Ounce?

Yes! You can easily convert Ton (UK) back to Troy Ounce by using the swap button (⇌) in the calculator above, or by visiting our Ton (UK) to Troy Ounce converter page. You can also explore other weight conversions on our category page.

Learn more →

What are common uses for Troy Ounce and Ton (UK)?

Troy Ounce and Ton (UK) are both standard units used in weight measurements. They are commonly used in various applications including engineering, construction, cooking, and scientific research. Browse our weight converter for more conversion options.

For more weight conversion questions, visit our FAQ page or explore our conversion guides.

All Weight Conversions

Kilogram to GramKilogram to MilligramKilogram to PoundKilogram to OunceKilogram to StoneKilogram to Ton (metric)Kilogram to Ton (US)Kilogram to Ton (UK)Kilogram to MicrogramKilogram to CaratKilogram to SlugKilogram to Troy OunceKilogram to PennyweightKilogram to GrainKilogram to DramKilogram to QuintalKilogram to Atomic Mass UnitKilogram to Pavan (India)Kilogram to Kati (India)Kilogram to Masha (India)Kilogram to Dina (India)Kilogram to Pras (India)Kilogram to Lota (India)Gram to KilogramGram to MilligramGram to PoundGram to OunceGram to StoneGram to Ton (metric)Gram to Ton (US)Gram to Ton (UK)Gram to MicrogramGram to CaratGram to SlugGram to Troy OunceGram to PennyweightGram to GrainGram to DramGram to QuintalGram to Atomic Mass UnitGram to Pavan (India)Gram to Kati (India)Gram to Masha (India)Gram to Dina (India)Gram to Pras (India)Gram to Lota (India)Milligram to KilogramMilligram to GramMilligram to PoundMilligram to OunceMilligram to StoneMilligram to Ton (metric)Milligram to Ton (US)Milligram to Ton (UK)Milligram to MicrogramMilligram to CaratMilligram to SlugMilligram to Troy OunceMilligram to PennyweightMilligram to GrainMilligram to DramMilligram to QuintalMilligram to Atomic Mass UnitMilligram to Pavan (India)Milligram to Kati (India)Milligram to Masha (India)Milligram to Dina (India)Milligram to Pras (India)Milligram to Lota (India)Pound to KilogramPound to GramPound to MilligramPound to OuncePound to StonePound to Ton (metric)Pound to Ton (US)Pound to Ton (UK)Pound to MicrogramPound to CaratPound to SlugPound to Troy OuncePound to PennyweightPound to GrainPound to DramPound to QuintalPound to Atomic Mass UnitPound to Pavan (India)Pound to Kati (India)Pound to Masha (India)Pound to Dina (India)Pound to Pras (India)Pound to Lota (India)Ounce to KilogramOunce to GramOunce to MilligramOunce to PoundOunce to StoneOunce to Ton (metric)Ounce to Ton (US)Ounce to Ton (UK)Ounce to MicrogramOunce to CaratOunce to SlugOunce to Troy OunceOunce to PennyweightOunce to GrainOunce to DramOunce to QuintalOunce to Atomic Mass UnitOunce to Pavan (India)Ounce to Kati (India)Ounce to Masha (India)Ounce to Dina (India)Ounce to Pras (India)Ounce to Lota (India)Stone to KilogramStone to GramStone to MilligramStone to PoundStone to Ounce

Verified Against Authority Standards

All conversion formulas have been verified against international standards and authoritative sources to ensure maximum accuracy and reliability.

NIST Mass and Force Standards

National Institute of Standards and TechnologyUS standards for weight and mass measurements

ISO 80000-4

International Organization for StandardizationInternational standard for mechanics quantities

Last verified: December 3, 2025