Rankine to Réaumur Converter

Convert degrees Rankine to degrees Réaumur with our free online temperature converter.

Quick Answer

1 Rankine = -218.075556 degrees Réaumur

Formula: Rankine × conversion factor = Réaumur

Use the calculator below for instant, accurate conversions.

Our Accuracy Guarantee

All conversion formulas on UnitsConverter.io have been verified against NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) guidelines and international SI standards. Our calculations are accurate to 10 decimal places for standard conversions and use arbitrary precision arithmetic for astronomical units.

Last verified: February 2026Reviewed by: Sam Mathew, Software Engineer

Rankine to Réaumur Calculator

How to Use the Rankine to Réaumur Calculator:

  1. Enter the value you want to convert in the 'From' field (Rankine).
  2. The converted value in Réaumur will appear automatically in the 'To' field.
  3. Use the dropdown menus to select different units within the Temperature category.
  4. Click the swap button (⇌) to reverse the conversion direction.
Share:

How to Convert Rankine to Réaumur: Step-by-Step Guide

Temperature conversions like Rankine to Réaumur use specific non-linear formulas.

Formula:

First convert °R to °C: °C = (°R - 491.67) × 5/9. Then convert °C to °Ré: °Ré = °C × 4/5

Example Calculation:

Convert 10°R:
1. °C = (10 - 491.67) × 5/9 = -267.59°C
2. °Ré = -267.59 × 4/5 = -214.08°Ré

Disclaimer: For Reference Only

These conversion results are provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees regarding the precision of these results, especially for conversions involving extremely large or small numbers which may be subject to the inherent limitations of standard computer floating-point arithmetic.

Not for professional use. Results should be verified before use in any critical application. View our Terms of Service for more information.

What is a Rankine and a Réaumur?

What Is the Rankine Scale?

The Rankine scale (symbol: °R or °Ra) is an absolute thermodynamic temperature scale where:

  • Zero point: Absolute zero (0 °R = −459.67 °F), the theoretical lowest possible temperature where all molecular kinetic energy ceases
  • Degree size: Equal to Fahrenheit degrees (1 °R increment = 1 °F increment)
  • Named after: William John Macquorn Rankine (1820-1872), Scottish engineer and physicist

Absolute Temperature Scales

An absolute temperature scale begins at absolute zero rather than an arbitrary freezing point:

Absolute scales (start at absolute zero):

  • Kelvin (K): Uses Celsius-sized degrees, 0 K = absolute zero, used worldwide in science
  • Rankine (°R): Uses Fahrenheit-sized degrees, 0 °R = absolute zero, used in some U.S. engineering

Relative scales (start at arbitrary points):

  • Celsius (°C): 0 °C = water's freezing point (at standard pressure)
  • Fahrenheit (°F): 0 °F = freezing point of brine solution, 32 °F = water's freezing point

Why Absolute Scales Matter

Many fundamental physics equations require absolute temperatures because ratios and products become meaningful only when zero truly means "no thermal energy":

Ideal gas law: PV = nRT (T must be absolute) Carnot efficiency: η = 1 - T_cold/T_hot (requires absolute temperatures) Stefan-Boltzmann law: Power radiated ∝ T⁴ (absolute temperature to fourth power) Entropy calculations: ΔS = Q/T (T must be absolute to avoid division by zero)

Using relative scales (Fahrenheit, Celsius) in these equations produces nonsensical results. Absolute scales (Rankine, Kelvin) make the mathematics work correctly.

Official Definition

1 degree Rankine = 1 degree Fahrenheit (in size)

Relationship to Fahrenheit: °R = °F + 459.67

Relationship to Kelvin: °R = K × 9/5 (or °R = K × 1.8)

Relationship to Celsius: °R = (°C + 273.15) × 9/5


The Réaumur scale (symbol: °Ré, °Re, or °R) is a temperature scale that divides the interval between the freezing point and boiling point of water into 80 equal divisions under standard atmospheric pressure (1 atmosphere).

Scale Calibration

Fixed Points:

  • Freezing point of water: 0 degrees Réaumur (0°Ré)
  • Boiling point of water: 80 degrees Réaumur (80°Ré)
  • Degree size: Each Réaumur degree = 1.25 Celsius degrees (or 5/4 °C)

Mathematical Relationships:

  • Réaumur to Celsius: °C = °Ré × 5/4 (or °Ré × 1.25)
  • Celsius to Réaumur: °Ré = °C × 4/5 (or °C × 0.8)
  • Réaumur to Fahrenheit: °F = (°Ré × 9/4) + 32 (or °Ré × 2.25 + 32)
  • Fahrenheit to Réaumur: °Ré = (°F - 32) × 4/9

Why 80 Degrees?

Réaumur's choice of 80 degrees between water's freezing and boiling points was not arbitrary:

  1. Base-8 arithmetic: 80 = 10 × 8, facilitating calculations in the duodecimal and base-8 systems common in 18th-century commerce
  2. Divisibility: 80 has many factors (1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 10, 16, 20, 40, 80), making fraction conversions easier
  3. Alcohol expansion: Réaumur's diluted ethanol expanded approximately 8% per 10 degrees, making 80 degrees a natural calibration
  4. Practical range: Most European weather falls between -20°Ré and +30°Ré, yielding manageable numbers

Thermometric Fluid

Unlike Fahrenheit's mercury thermometers, Réaumur used diluted ethanol (alcohol-water mixture) because:

  • Consistent expansion: 80 parts expansion per 1000 parts volume per 10°Ré
  • Visibility: Clear alcohol + dye was easier to read than mercury
  • Lower freezing point: Alcohol mixture remains liquid far below water's freezing point
  • Safety: Less toxic than mercury for household thermometers

Note: The Rankine is part of the imperial/US customary system, primarily used in the US, UK, and Canada for everyday measurements. The Réaumur belongs to the imperial/US customary system.

History of the Rankine and Réaumur

William John Macquorn Rankine (1820-1872)

William Rankine was a Scottish engineer, physicist, and professor at the University of Glasgow who made foundational contributions to thermodynamics, civil engineering, and molecular physics.

Key contributions:

  • Formulated the Rankine cycle (1859), describing the ideal thermodynamic cycle for steam engines
  • Developed the Rankine temperature scale (1859) as an absolute scale compatible with Fahrenheit
  • Wrote influential textbooks on applied mechanics, steam engines, and civil engineering
  • Co-founded the science of thermodynamics alongside Carnot, Clausius, Kelvin, and Joule

Rankine was a contemporary and correspondent of William Thomson (Lord Kelvin), who proposed the Kelvin absolute scale in 1848. The two scientists worked on similar thermodynamic problems but approached them from different engineering traditions—Kelvin from metric/Celsius contexts, Rankine from British imperial/Fahrenheit contexts.

The Need for an Absolute Scale (1840s-1850s)

The mid-19th century saw rapid developments in thermodynamics driven by the Industrial Revolution's reliance on steam engines:

Carnot's theorem (1824): Sadi Carnot demonstrated that heat engine efficiency depends on the temperature ratio between hot and cold reservoirs, implicitly requiring an absolute temperature scale

Joule's mechanical equivalent of heat (1843-1850): James Prescott Joule established that heat and mechanical work are interconvertible, laying foundations for the first law of thermodynamics

Thomson's (Kelvin's) absolute scale (1848): William Thomson proposed an absolute scale based on Carnot's theorem, using Celsius degree increments, with zero at −273.15 °C

These developments made clear that thermodynamic calculations required absolute temperature measurements, but Thomson's Kelvin scale was impractical for British and American engineers who worked exclusively in Fahrenheit.

Rankine's Proposal (1859)

In 1859, Rankine published his absolute temperature scale in engineering papers, presenting it as the practical solution for engineers who needed absolute temperatures but worked in imperial units:

Rankine's logic:

  1. Thermodynamic calculations require absolute zero as the baseline
  2. British and American engineers measure temperature in Fahrenheit
  3. Constantly converting Fahrenheit ↔ Celsius ↔ Kelvin introduces errors and inefficiency
  4. An absolute scale with Fahrenheit-sized degrees solves the problem elegantly

The result: 0 °R = absolute zero (−459.67 °F), with degree increments matching Fahrenheit

This allowed engineers to use familiar Fahrenheit measurements while accessing the mathematical benefits of absolute temperature.

Adoption in Engineering (1860s-1960s)

The Rankine scale became standard in British and American engineering disciplines throughout the late 19th and first half of the 20th centuries:

Steam engineering: Rankine cycle analysis (for steam turbines, power plants) used Rankine temperatures for efficiency calculations

ASME standards: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers incorporated Rankine into standard tables for steam properties, refrigeration cycles, and combustion calculations

Aerospace engineering: Early rocket and jet engine development (1940s-1960s) used Rankine for combustion chamber and exhaust nozzle temperature calculations

Cryogenics: Liquefied gas industries (oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen) used Rankine when working with U.S. measurement systems

Thermodynamics textbooks: Engineering thermodynamics texts published in the U.S. and U.K. through the 1960s routinely presented equations in both Kelvin and Rankine

Decline and Modern Usage (1960s-Present)

Several factors led to Rankine's decline:

International metrication (1960s-1980s): Most countries adopted SI units (including Kelvin), making Rankine unnecessary outside the United States

Scientific standardization: The global scientific community standardized on Kelvin, making it the universal absolute scale for research and international collaboration

U.S. engineering education shift: Even American engineering programs increasingly taught Kelvin as the primary absolute scale, relegating Rankine to historical footnotes

Computing and automation: Modern engineering software typically works in SI units (Kelvin), reducing incentive to maintain Rankine compatibility

Where Rankine Survives Today

Despite its decline, Rankine persists in specific niches:

American aerospace engineering: NASA and aerospace contractors occasionally use Rankine in rocket propulsion calculations when working with U.S. customary units (pounds-force, BTU, etc.)

Cryogenic engineering: Liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities and industrial gas companies in the U.S. may use Rankine for process calculations

Legacy documentation: Older engineering manuals, equipment specifications, and technical standards still reference Rankine, requiring continued familiarity

Thermodynamics education: Some U.S. engineering thermodynamics courses teach Rankine alongside Kelvin to demonstrate absolute temperature concepts with Fahrenheit context

Historical research: Engineers and historians studying 19th-20th century technology encounter Rankine in original documents and must understand conversions


The Réaumur scale's 300-year history mirrors the development of scientific measurement, European political changes, and the eventual triumph of the metric system.

René-Antoine Ferchault de Réaumur (1683-1757)

Born in La Rochelle, France, Réaumur was a polymath whose work spanned entomology, metallurgy, and experimental physics. Appointed to the French Academy of Sciences at age 25 (1708), he gained fame for inventing processes to produce opaque "Réaumur porcelain" glass and techniques for steel production.

1730: Creation of the Scale

Réaumur's thermometer research began as an investigation into improving scientific instruments. His 1730 paper to the French Academy, "Règles pour construire des thermomètres dont les degrés soient comparables" ("Rules for Constructing Thermometers Whose Degrees Are Comparable"), proposed:

  • Universal standard: All thermometers should use identical calibration points
  • Reproducibility: Freezing and boiling water provided reliable fixed points
  • Alcohol-based: Diluted ethanol expansion was more linear than wine spirit
  • 80-degree scale: Practical for calculation and measurement precision

Réaumur's thermometers quickly became standard in French scientific institutions, replacing inconsistent instruments calibrated to "blood heat" or "deepest winter cold."

European Adoption (1730-1800)

The Réaumur scale spread across continental Europe within decades:

France (1730-1794):

  • French Academy of Sciences adopted Réaumur as standard (1732)
  • Weather observations recorded in Réaumur at royal observatories
  • Public thermometers in Paris showed Réaumur readings
  • Pharmacies and hospitals used Réaumur for medication storage

German States (1740s-1871):

  • Prussia adopted Réaumur for meteorological observations (1740s)
  • German scientific journals published temperatures in Réaumur
  • Instrument makers in Nuremberg, Dresden, and Berlin standardized on Réaumur
  • Persisted in German-speaking regions until unification standardization

Imperial Russia (1740s-1917):

  • Russian Academy of Sciences adopted Réaumur (1740s)
  • St. Petersburg and Moscow weather stations used Réaumur exclusively
  • Remained official scale until Bolshevik Revolution (1917)
  • Russian literature and documents reference Réaumur (Tolstoy, Dostoevsky novels)

Holy Roman Empire/Austria-Hungary:

  • Vienna Observatory used Réaumur (1750s-1870s)
  • Austrian meteorological network standardized on Réaumur
  • Persisted in rural Austria and Hungary into the early 20th century

Competition with Other Scales (1742-1850)

The mid-18th century saw multiple temperature scales competing:

Fahrenheit (1714): Dominated Britain, Netherlands, and English-speaking world Celsius/Centigrade (1742): Proposed by Anders Celsius, initially inverted (100° freeze, 0° boil) Réaumur (1730): Dominant in France, Germany, Russia, Italy

Scientific preference gradually shifted toward Celsius due to:

  • Decimal logic: 100 degrees matched metric system's base-10 philosophy
  • International standardization: Celsius gained support from international scientific congresses
  • Simplicity: 0-100 was conceptually cleaner than 0-80

Decline and Official Abandonment (1794-1900)

France (1794):

  • French Revolution's metric system officially adopted Celsius (centigrade)
  • Réaumur declared obsolete by Revolutionary government
  • Rural France continued using Réaumur into the 1850s
  • Instrument makers produced dual-scale thermometers (Réaumur/Celsius) through 1870s

Germany (1871-1880s):

  • German unification prompted measurement standardization
  • Meteorological services switched to Celsius (1876)
  • Industrial and commercial sectors gradually converted (1880s-1900s)
  • Last German Réaumur thermometers manufactured circa 1920

Russia (1917-1920):

  • Bolshevik Revolution brought metric system adoption
  • Soviet government mandated Celsius for all official purposes (1918-1920)
  • Complete conversion by 1925

20th Century Survival (1900-Present)

Despite official abandonment, Réaumur persisted in niche applications:

Italian Dairy (1900s-present):

  • Parmigiano-Reggiano DOP (Protected Designation of Origin) regulations specify Réaumur
  • Traditional cheesemakers measure milk temperature in Réaumur for authenticity
  • Consortium rules reference specific Réaumur temperatures for curd formation

Historical Literature:

  • 18th-19th century scientific papers require Réaumur conversion
  • Historical meteorological data recorded in Réaumur
  • Antique thermometer collecting preserves knowledge

Symbolism and Tradition:

  • European heritage associations preserve Réaumur knowledge
  • Museum exhibits explaining pre-metric measurement systems
  • Educational demonstrations of historical scientific practice

Common Uses and Applications: degrees Rankine vs degrees Réaumur

Explore the typical applications for both Rankine (imperial/US) and Réaumur (imperial/US) to understand their common contexts.

Common Uses for degrees Rankine

1. Thermodynamic Cycle Analysis

Engineers analyzing heat engines and refrigeration cycles use Rankine when working in U.S. customary units:

Carnot efficiency calculation: η = 1 - T_cold/T_hot

Example (using Rankine for compatibility with imperial units):

  • Hot reservoir: 1160 °R (700 °F, combustion chamber)
  • Cold reservoir: 540 °R (80 °F, ambient air)
  • Maximum efficiency: η = 1 - 540/1160 = 1 - 0.465 = 53.5%

If you incorrectly used Fahrenheit (relative scale) instead: η = 1 - 80/700 = 88.6% ← Wrong! (impossibly high)

Rankine (absolute scale) gives the correct physical result.

Ideal gas law (PV = nRT): Requires absolute temperature T in Rankine or Kelvin Refrigeration coefficient of performance: COP = T_cold/(T_hot - T_cold), requires absolute T Entropy change: ΔS = Q/T, requires absolute T

2. Aerospace and Rocket Propulsion

NASA and aerospace contractors sometimes use Rankine in rocket engine calculations when working entirely in imperial units:

Rocket nozzle expansion:

  • Combustion chamber temperature: 6000 °R (5540 °F, liquid hydrogen/oxygen combustion)
  • Nozzle exit temperature: 1500 °R (1040 °F, after expansion)
  • Temperature ratio used in thrust calculations: 1500/6000 = 0.25

Specific impulse calculations: Rocket performance metrics sometimes expressed in U.S. units (pounds-force, BTU, Rankine)

Reentry heating analysis: Atmospheric friction temperatures calculated in Rankine for Space Shuttle and Apollo programs

3. Cryogenic and Liquefied Gas Engineering

Engineers working with liquefied natural gas (LNG), liquid nitrogen, or liquid oxygen may use Rankine in American industrial contexts:

LNG storage:

  • Methane boiling point: 201.1 °R (−258.6 °F, 111.7 K)
  • Storage tank insulation must maintain temperatures below 210 °R

Nitrogen liquefaction: Process temperatures from ambient (528 °R) down to liquid nitrogen (140 °R)

Oxygen separation: Cryogenic air separation units cool air from 520 °R to 163 °R (oxygen boiling point)

4. Steam Power and HVAC Engineering

Historical and some modern steam system calculations use Rankine:

Steam turbine efficiency: Calculating ideal Rankine cycle efficiency for power plants Boiler performance: Heat transfer calculations involving steam temperatures in Rankine HVAC refrigeration cycles: Coefficient of performance calculations requiring absolute temperatures

5. Combustion and Internal Combustion Engines

Engine designers analyzing combustion processes may use Rankine when working in U.S. units:

Compression ratio effects: Calculating temperature rise during compression stroke Exhaust temperatures: Modeling exhaust gas temperatures for turbocharger design Flame temperatures: Analyzing combustion chamber temperatures in Rankine for compatibility with BTU energy units

6. Materials Science and Heat Treatment

Metallurgists and materials engineers working with U.S. specifications:

Heat treatment processes: Tempering, annealing, and hardening temperatures sometimes specified in Rankine in older American standards Thermal expansion: Calculating expansion coefficients with temperature in Rankine Phase transitions: Melting and solidification temperatures in absolute scale for thermodynamic calculations

7. Historical Engineering and Technical Documentation

Engineers working with legacy systems, historical restoration, or archival research:

Old ASME standards: Early 20th century steam tables and equipment specifications used Rankine Vintage aviation: WWII and early jet age aircraft engine documentation may use Rankine Technical history: Understanding historical engineering achievements requires Rankine fluency


When to Use degrees Réaumur

Historical Scientific Literature

Researchers studying 18th-19th century European science must convert Réaumur temperatures:

Meteorological Records:

  • French, German, Russian weather observations (1730-1900)
  • Climate historians reconstructing historical weather patterns
  • Agricultural records linking crop yields to temperature data

Industrial Documentation:

  • Metallurgy research from German states
  • French textile dyeing process documentation
  • Russian glass manufacturing temperature logs

Italian Artisan Cheesemaking

The Parmigiano-Reggiano Consortium (Consorzio del Formaggio Parmigiano-Reggiano) maintains traditional Réaumur specifications:

DOP Regulations Referencing Réaumur:

  • Milk heating: Must reach 26.4-27.2°Ré (33-34°C) before rennet addition
  • Curd cutting: Performed at specific Réaumur temperatures
  • Whey separation: Temperature-critical step measured in Réaumur

Traditional cheesemakers use antique or reproduction Réaumur thermometers to maintain authenticity and comply with centuries-old recipes. Modern producers convert Celsius measurements but reference Réaumur in documentation.

Antique Thermometer Collecting

Réaumur thermometers are prized collectibles:

Value Factors:

  • Age: 18th-century Réaumur thermometers: $500-5,000+
  • Maker: Instruments by famous makers (Fahrenheit, Dollond): $2,000-20,000
  • Condition: Working alcohol column increases value significantly
  • Provenance: Scientific institution provenance adds premium

Collectors seek:

  • Wall-mounted wooden-case thermometers (1750-1850)
  • Brass-framed scientific instruments
  • Dual-scale Réaumur/Celsius transition models (1850-1900)
  • Russian Imperial thermometers with Cyrillic markings

Historical Reenactment and Museums

Living history sites and science museums demonstrate Réaumur thermometers:

  • Colonial Williamsburg-style European village recreations
  • Science museum historical instrument exhibits
  • University physics department antique collections
  • Historical society educational programs

Literary and Historical Research

Translators and historians must understand Réaumur references in:

Literature:

  • Tolstoy's War and Peace: Russian temperatures in Réaumur
  • Goethe's scientific writings: Réaumur measurements
  • 19th-century French novels: Weather and fever descriptions

Historical Documents:

  • Napoleon's Russian campaign weather logs (1812): -30°Ré cold
  • French Revolution period documents
  • Industrial Revolution factory records

Traditional European Confectionery

Some traditional European candy makers reference Réaumur in heritage recipes:

  • Dutch sugar boiling techniques
  • French confectionery historical recipes
  • German marzipan production documentation (pre-1900)

Modern practitioners convert to Celsius but may cite Réaumur for historical authenticity.

Additional Unit Information

About Rankine (°R)

What is absolute zero on the Rankine scale?

Answer: 0 °R (exactly)

Absolute zero is the lowest possible temperature, where all classical molecular motion ceases and a system has minimal quantum mechanical zero-point energy. On the Rankine scale, this is defined as exactly 0 °R.

Absolute zero in other scales:

  • Rankine: 0 °R (by definition)
  • Fahrenheit: −459.67 °F
  • Kelvin: 0 K (by definition)
  • Celsius: −273.15 °C

The Rankine scale, like Kelvin, is an absolute scale, meaning its zero point represents true zero thermal energy (in the classical thermodynamic sense), not an arbitrary freezing point like Celsius or Fahrenheit.

How does Rankine relate to Fahrenheit?

Answer: °R = °F + 459.67 (Rankine is Fahrenheit shifted to start at absolute zero)

The Rankine and Fahrenheit scales use identical degree sizes—a change of 1 °R equals a change of 1 °F. The only difference is where zero is placed:

  • Fahrenheit: 0 °F is the freezing point of a brine solution (arbitrary choice from 1724)
  • Rankine: 0 °R is absolute zero, the lowest possible temperature

Key reference points:

  • Absolute zero: −459.67 °F = 0 °R
  • Water freezes: 32 °F = 491.67 °R
  • Water boils: 212 °F = 671.67 °R
  • Room temperature: 68 °F = 527.67 °R

Temperature changes: Because degree sizes are equal, a temperature rise of 50 °F is also a rise of 50 °R.

How does Rankine relate to Kelvin?

Answer: °R = K × 9/5 (or K = °R × 5/9)

Rankine and Kelvin are both absolute scales (zero at absolute zero), but they use different degree sizes:

  • Kelvin: Uses Celsius-sized degrees
  • Rankine: Uses Fahrenheit-sized degrees (which are 9/5 the size of Celsius degrees)

Conversion formula: °R = K × 9/5 (or K × 1.8)

Examples:

  • 0 K = 0 °R (absolute zero aligns)
  • 273.15 K (water freezes) = 491.67 °R
  • 373.15 K (water boils) = 671.67 °R
  • 300 K (room temp) = 540 °R

No offset needed: Unlike Fahrenheit-Celsius (which requires both multiplication AND addition), Rankine-Kelvin only requires multiplication because both start at absolute zero.

Why was the Rankine scale created?

Answer: To provide an absolute temperature scale compatible with Fahrenheit for British and American engineers

William Rankine created the scale in 1859 to solve a practical problem:

The problem:

  • Thermodynamic calculations (heat engines, gas laws, entropy) require absolute temperatures
  • Lord Kelvin had created an absolute scale in 1848, but it used Celsius degree intervals
  • British and American engineers worked in Fahrenheit, not Celsius
  • Constantly converting Fahrenheit → Celsius → Kelvin was error-prone and inefficient

Rankine's solution:

  • Create an absolute scale (zero at absolute zero) using Fahrenheit-sized degrees
  • Result: Engineers could use familiar Fahrenheit measurements with the benefits of an absolute scale

Historical context: In the 19th and early 20th centuries, this was essential for steam engine design, refrigeration engineering, and thermodynamic analysis in imperial-unit countries.

Is the Rankine scale still used today?

Answer: Rarely—primarily in specialized American engineering contexts and legacy documentation

Rankine has largely been replaced by Kelvin in modern engineering and science, but persists in specific niches:

Where Rankine is still used:

  • American aerospace engineering: Some NASA and contractor calculations when working in U.S. customary units
  • Cryogenic engineering: U.S. liquefied gas industries (LNG, liquid nitrogen/oxygen)
  • Legacy documentation: Older ASME standards, vintage equipment manuals, historical references
  • Thermodynamics education: Some U.S. engineering courses teach both Rankine and Kelvin

Why it declined:

  • Global metrication (1960s onward) made Kelvin the international standard
  • Scientific community exclusively uses Kelvin
  • Modern engineering software typically works in SI units
  • International collaboration requires Kelvin for compatibility

Current status: Rankine is a "legacy unit" maintained primarily for continuity with older American engineering systems, not for new designs.

What are the key temperatures on the Rankine scale?

Answer: Important reference temperatures in Rankine:

| Physical Point | Rankine | Fahrenheit | Description | |----------------|---------|------------|-------------| | Absolute zero | 0 °R | −459.67 °F | Theoretical minimum temperature | | Liquid helium boils | 7.6 °R | −451.9 °F | Coldest commonly used cryogenic liquid | | Liquid nitrogen boils | 139.3 °R | −320.4 °F | Common cryogenic refrigerant | | Dry ice sublimes | 389.0 °R | −109.3 °F | Solid CO₂ turns directly to gas | | Water freezes | 491.67 °R | 32 °F | Ice point at standard pressure (exact) | | Room temperature | 527.67 °R | 68 °F | Typical comfortable indoor temp | | Human body | 558.27 °R | 98.6 °F | Normal body temperature | | Water boils | 671.67 °R | 212 °F | Boiling point at standard pressure (exact) |

Exact values: Water's freezing and boiling points are defined exactly in Fahrenheit (32 °F and 212 °F), so they're also exact in Rankine (491.67 °R and 671.67 °R).

How do I convert Rankine to Celsius?

Answer: °C = (°R × 5/9) − 273.15

Step-by-step process:

  1. Convert Rankine to Kelvin: K = °R × 5/9
  2. Convert Kelvin to Celsius: °C = K − 273.15

Combined formula: °C = (°R × 5/9) − 273.15

Examples:

  • 491.67 °R (water freezes) = (491.67 × 5/9) − 273.15 = 273.15 − 273.15 = 0 °C
  • 671.67 °R (water boils) = (671.67 × 5/9) − 273.15 = 373.15 − 273.15 = 100 °C
  • 527.67 °R (room temp) = (527.67 × 5/9) − 273.15 = 293.15 − 273.15 = 20 °C

Alternative method: First convert to Fahrenheit, then to Celsius:

  1. °F = °R − 459.67
  2. °C = (°F − 32) × 5/9

Both methods give the same result.

Can I use negative numbers in Rankine?

Answer: No—negative temperatures don't exist on the Rankine scale (or Kelvin)

Because Rankine is an absolute scale starting at absolute zero (0 °R), there are no temperatures below zero. Negative Rankine temperatures would represent temperatures colder than absolute zero, which is physically impossible according to thermodynamics.

Comparison to other scales:

  • Rankine/Kelvin (absolute): Only positive values (0 and up)
  • Fahrenheit/Celsius (relative): Can have negative values (arbitrary zero points)

Lowest possible temperature: 0 °R (absolute zero) = −459.67 °F = −273.15 °C = 0 K

Note on exotic physics: In specialized quantum systems, "negative absolute temperatures" can exist in a technical sense (inverted population distributions), but this is a quantum statistical mechanics concept unrelated to everyday thermodynamics, and still doesn''t produce Rankine values below zero in the conventional thermal sense.

What''s the difference between °R and °Ra symbols?

Answer: Both °R and °Ra represent Rankine; °R is more common in American usage

Symbol variations:

  • °R: Most common symbol in American engineering contexts
  • °Ra: Sometimes used to avoid confusion with other units (electrical resistance in ohms: Ω or R)
  • R (without degree symbol): Occasionally seen in older texts but discouraged

Current standard: Most modern references use °R (with degree symbol), matching the pattern of °F, °C, and K (though Kelvin dropped its degree symbol in 1968).

Avoiding confusion:

  • Electrical resistance: ohm (Ω), not R
  • Gas constant: R (universal gas constant, context makes it clear)
  • Rankine temperature: °R or °Ra (degree symbol helps distinguish)

Recommendation: Use °R for Rankine temperatures in modern technical writing.

Why doesn''t Kelvin use a degree symbol but Rankine does?

Answer: In 1968, the kelvin was redefined as a base SI unit, dropping the degree symbol; Rankine wasn''t part of SI and retained its symbol

Historical evolution:

Before 1968: Both scales used degree symbols

  • Kelvin: °K (degrees Kelvin)
  • Rankine: °R or °Ra (degrees Rankine)

After 1968: The 13th General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) redefined the kelvin as a base SI unit (like meter, kilogram, second), removing the degree symbol:

  • Kelvin: K (kelvin, no degree symbol)
  • Rankine: °R (still degrees Rankine, not an SI unit)

Reasoning: Celsius (°C) retained its degree symbol because it's defined relative to kelvin (°C = K − 273.15). But kelvin itself, as a fundamental unit, doesn't use degrees—you say "300 kelvin" not "300 degrees kelvin."

Rankine status: Since Rankine isn't part of the International System of Units (SI), it never underwent this redefinition and still uses the degree symbol: °R.

Is Rankine more accurate than Fahrenheit for engineering?

Answer: Neither is more "accurate"—Rankine is better for thermodynamic calculations because it''s an absolute scale

Accuracy vs. suitability:

  • Both Rankine and Fahrenheit can be measured to arbitrary precision (accuracy)
  • The difference is mathematical correctness for thermodynamic equations

Why Rankine is better for thermodynamics:

  • Equations like PV = nRT, η = 1 - T_cold/T_hot, and ΔS = Q/T require absolute temperature
  • Using Fahrenheit (or Celsius) produces physically meaningless results (negative efficiency, division by zero, etc.)
  • Using Rankine (or Kelvin) produces correct physical results

Example (ideal gas law: PV = nRT):

  • At 0 °F (459.67 °R), pressure P is proportional to 459.67
  • If you incorrectly used 0 °F in the equation, you'd get P = 0 (no pressure), which is wrong!
  • Using 459.67 °R gives the correct pressure

Conclusion: For everyday temperature measurement, Fahrenheit is fine. For thermodynamic calculations, you must use Rankine (or Kelvin).

Will Rankine ever become obsolete?

Answer: Likely yes—it''s already obsolete in most contexts and will fade as U.S. engineering fully metrifies

Current trajectory:

  • 1960s-1990s: Rapid decline as global metrication occurred
  • 2000s-present: Niche survival in specific American engineering contexts
  • Future: Continued decline as remaining U.S. industries standardize on SI units (Kelvin)

Factors driving obsolescence:

  • International collaboration: Global engineering requires common units (Kelvin)
  • Software standardization: Modern CAD/simulation tools default to SI units
  • Educational shift: Engineering schools increasingly teach only Kelvin
  • Generational change: Engineers trained primarily in Rankine are retiring

Where it might persist longest:

  • Historical preservation (understanding old documents)
  • Legacy systems (maintaining equipment with Rankine specifications)
  • Specialized American aerospace/cryogenics (slow to change due to established procedures)

Likely outcome: Rankine will become a "historical unit" known primarily to engineering historians, similar to how the "degree Réaumur" (°Ré) is now obsolete despite 18th-19th century prominence.


About Réaumur (°Ré)

What are the freezing and boiling points of water in Réaumur?

Water freezes at 0°Ré and boils at 80°Ré under standard atmospheric pressure (1 atm at sea level). This 80-degree span is the defining feature of the Réaumur scale, compared to Celsius's 100-degree span.

How does Réaumur relate to Celsius?

1 degree Réaumur = 1.25 degrees Celsius (or 5/4 °C)

Conversion formulas:

  • °C = °Ré × 5/4 (or °Ré × 1.25)
  • °Ré = °C × 4/5 (or °C × 0.8)

Both scales set water's freezing point at 0°, making conversions straightforward multiplication without offset terms.

Is the Réaumur scale still commonly used?

No, it is rarely used today, having been superseded by Celsius throughout Europe during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. However, Réaumur survives in:

  • Traditional Italian cheesemaking (Parmigiano-Reggiano DOP specifications)
  • Historical document interpretation (18th-19th century literature and science)
  • Antique thermometer collecting
  • Some traditional European confectionery practices

Modern usage is essentially limited to historical and artisan contexts.

Why did Réaumur choose 80 degrees instead of 100?

Réaumur's 80-degree scale reflected 18th-century practical considerations:

  1. Alcohol expansion rate: His diluted ethanol expanded approximately 80 units per 1,000 between water's freezing and boiling
  2. Mathematical divisibility: 80 has many factors (2, 4, 5, 8, 10, 16, 20, 40), simplifying fractional calculations
  3. Base-8 arithmetic: 80 = 10 × 8, fitting duodecimal and octal systems used in commerce
  4. Practical precision: 80 divisions provided sufficient resolution without excessive graduations on thermometer tubes

The choice was empirically driven by his instrument's physical properties rather than abstract decimal preference.

Which countries historically used the Réaumur scale?

Primary Réaumur users (1730-1900):

  • France: 1730-1794 officially; lingered until 1850s-1870s in practice
  • German states/Germany: 1740s-1871 officially; transition through 1900s
  • Imperial Russia: 1740s-1917
  • Austria-Hungary: 1750s-1870s officially; rural use into early 1900s
  • Parts of Italy: Particularly northern regions; survives in traditional dairy
  • Switzerland: German-speaking cantons used Réaumur until late 1800s

Countries that NEVER adopted Réaumur:

  • Britain (used Fahrenheit)
  • United States (Fahrenheit)
  • Spain (used regional scales, then Celsius)
  • Netherlands (Fahrenheit preference)

How do you convert a Réaumur temperature to Fahrenheit?

Two-step method:

  1. Convert Réaumur to Celsius: °C = °Ré × 1.25
  2. Convert Celsius to Fahrenheit: °F = (°C × 9/5) + 32

Direct formula: °F = (°Ré × 9/4) + 32 (or °Ré × 2.25 + 32)

Example: 20°Ré to Fahrenheit

  • 20°Ré × 2.25 = 45
  • 45 + 32 = 77°F

Why does Italian Parmigiano-Reggiano still use Réaumur?

Tradition and legal protection:

Parmigiano-Reggiano is a DOP (Protected Designation of Origin) product, meaning production methods are legally codified to preserve historical authenticity. Original recipes and techniques from the 18th-19th centuries specified Réaumur temperatures, and DOP regulations maintain these specifications.

Reasons for retention:

  • Historical authenticity: Preserves traditional cheesemaking heritage
  • Legal documentation: Original consortium rules cited Réaumur
  • Artisan identity: Reinforces traditional, non-industrial methods
  • Practical continuity: Changing regulations requires bureaucratic process

Modern cheesemakers use Celsius thermometers but convert and reference Réaumur in documentation for DOP compliance.

What does "°R" mean on an antique thermometer?

On European antique thermometers (pre-1900): °R = Réaumur

Check for confirmation:

  • Freezing point marked 0°R
  • Boiling point marked 80°R (not 100 or 212)
  • European origin (French, German, Russian, Italian)
  • Pre-1900 manufacture date

On American engineering documents (post-1900): °R = Rankine

  • Absolute temperature scale (°R = °F + 459.67)
  • Used in US thermodynamics and engineering

Context, origin, and scale markings determine which "°R" is meant.

How do you read historical weather data recorded in Réaumur?

Step-by-step conversion:

  1. Identify the temperature in Réaumur (e.g., -25°Ré during Napoleon's 1812 Russian campaign)
  2. Convert to Celsius: °C = °Ré × 1.25
    • -25°Ré × 1.25 = -31.25°C
  3. Convert to Fahrenheit if desired: °F = (°C × 9/5) + 32
    • (-31.25°C × 1.8) + 32 = -24.25°F

Example: Paris summer 1783 recorded as 28°Ré

  • 28°Ré × 1.25 = 35°C = 95°F (significant heat wave)

Can you still buy Réaumur thermometers?

Original antiques: Available from antique dealers, auction houses, and specialty collectors

  • Prices: $200-$5,000+ depending on age, condition, maker
  • Functionality: Many have degraded alcohol columns (display only)

Modern reproductions: Some specialty scientific instrument makers produce Réaumur thermometers for:

  • Museum exhibits and educational purposes
  • Traditional cheesemaking (small-scale production for Parmigiano-Reggiano artisans)
  • Historical reenactment groups

Dual-scale thermometers: Réaumur/Celsius transition thermometers (1850-1900) are collector favorites, showing both scales side-by-side.

What is the relationship between Réaumur and Kelvin?

Kelvin (absolute thermodynamic scale):

  • K = °C + 273.15 (absolute zero at 0 K)

Réaumur to Kelvin:

  1. Convert Réaumur to Celsius: °C = °Ré × 1.25
  2. Add 273.15: K = (°Ré × 1.25) + 273.15

Direct formula: K = (°Ré × 5/4) + 273.15

Example: 0°Ré (water freezing)

  • (0 × 1.25) + 273.15 = 273.15 K

Example: 80°Ré (water boiling)

  • (80 × 1.25) + 273.15 = 100 + 273.15 = 373.15 K

Why did Réaumur use alcohol instead of mercury?

Réaumur chose diluted ethanol (alcohol-water mixture) over mercury for several reasons:

Technical advantages:

  • Consistent expansion: Alcohol's thermal expansion was more linear than wine spirits
  • Visibility: Clear liquid + dye was easier to read than opaque mercury
  • Larger expansion coefficient: Alcohol expanded more per degree, improving readability
  • Lower freezing point: Alcohol mixture remained liquid well below 0°C

Practical considerations:

  • Safety: Less toxic than mercury for household use
  • Cost: Cheaper to produce than mercury thermometers
  • Availability: Alcohol was readily available in 18th-century France

Limitations:

  • Boiling point: Alcohol limited upper temperature range (compared to mercury's 357°C boiling point)
  • Evaporation: Over decades, alcohol could slowly evaporate through glass, affecting calibration

People Also Ask

How do I convert Rankine to Réaumur?

To convert Rankine to Réaumur, enter the value in Rankine in the calculator above. The conversion will happen automatically. Use our free online converter for instant and accurate results. You can also visit our temperature converter page to convert between other units in this category.

Learn more →

What is the conversion factor from Rankine to Réaumur?

The conversion factor depends on the specific relationship between Rankine and Réaumur. You can find the exact conversion formula and factor on this page. Our calculator handles all calculations automatically. See the conversion table above for common values.

Can I convert Réaumur back to Rankine?

Yes! You can easily convert Réaumur back to Rankine by using the swap button (⇌) in the calculator above, or by visiting our Réaumur to Rankine converter page. You can also explore other temperature conversions on our category page.

Learn more →

What are common uses for Rankine and Réaumur?

Rankine and Réaumur are both standard units used in temperature measurements. They are commonly used in various applications including engineering, construction, cooking, and scientific research. Browse our temperature converter for more conversion options.

For more temperature conversion questions, visit our FAQ page or explore our conversion guides.

Other Temperature Units and Conversions

Explore other temperature units and their conversion options:

Verified Against Authority Standards

All conversion formulas have been verified against international standards and authoritative sources to ensure maximum accuracy and reliability.

NIST ITS-90 Temperature Scale

National Institute of Standards and TechnologyInternational Temperature Scale standards

BIPM Temperature Unit

Bureau International des Poids et MesuresDefinition of the kelvin and temperature scales

Last verified: February 19, 2026